The Paganization Of Christianity

Related image

BACKGROUND SOURCE 1 .

BACKGROUND SOURCE 2 .

BACKGROUND SOURCE 3 .

BACKGROUND SOURCE 4 .

People in hell are not there because God didn’t want them, they are there because they didn’t want God! Or they tried to add to, take away from, or otherwise alter THE ONLY WAY To God and Heaven.

KEY WORDS ARE UNDERLINED FOR EMPHASIS.

John 8:31-32 King James Version (KJV)

31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

John 10:1 King James Version (KJV)

10 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

John 14:6 King James Version (KJV)

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Acts 4:10-12 King James Version (KJV)

10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.

11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.

12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

Matthew 7:13-23 King James Version (KJV)

13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

============================

THE THREE REASONS I WROTE THIS ARTICLE

  1. I have family, friends, and folk here on FB who are NOT saved/NOT Biblical Christians, they see, read, and hear what some who claim to be Christian say/post and it is NO different from what an UNSAVED, NON-CHRISTIAN would say/post. I do NOT want to be confused with these HYPOCRITES. So I am making it CLEAR what IS right, what IS wrong, what IS Christian, and what is NOT Christian for all the unsaved and/or backslid. 
  2. There are family and friends, and celebrities [keep reading] claiming to be Christian who regularly, and casually post profanity, and talk about drinking (booze), engage in immoral sexual acts, and smoking. THAT is NOT Christian. That is NOT Christianity. I am NOTHING like that. I am 100% AGAINST THAT. 
  3. Certain members of my family posted a meme with this message, I cleaned it up BECAUSE CHRISTIANS DO NOT CURSE, NOR USE PROFANITY: Civilian friends are friendly to your face- talk [profane word for poop] behind your back. Military friends talk [profane word for poop] to your face- and have your back. I politely addressed this bald-faced lie saying: I know many HONORABLE Civilians who are honest. And I know many DISHONORABLE Military personnel who are drunks, dopers, liars, cheats, and immoral. One of my own family then posted lying smack and said, ORDERING me: “Step down cuz. You obviously have never been a part of a team…” This was from a FAMILY MEMBER who had NOT even seen me since 1977, and has only heard snippets about me here on FB. I replied politely, yet straightforwardly That when he is wrong, he IS wrong. And Boy, are you WRONG.

So……

I wrote and posted this article in response to between 5-7 different people. Some are family, some are friends, some I just know from FB.

The theme may not apply to everyone on every point, but what does…please PRAYERFULLY consider it in the Light of God’s Word, The Holy Bible.

Some things to consider are, first, these Scriptures:
MATTHEW 7:6, 13-21
JOHN 7:24
JOHN 8:31, 32, 36-44
ROMANS 1:16-32
ROMANS 3:10-18, 23
GALATIANS 1:6-9
GALATIANS 5:16-25
II CORINTHIANS 5:17, 21
II CORINTHIANS 6:14-7:1
MATTHEW 5:6
MATTHEW 6:21, 33

Questions:
Is it CHRIST-LIKE to profess Christianity and to regularly, casually, daily swear, curse, use profanity?

Is it CHRIST-LIKE to make false statements about someone? Especially someone you haven’t seen at all, and heard LITTLE from since 1977?

Is it CHRIST-LIKE to say we love Jesus Christ with ALL our heart, soul, mind, and strength and then live in complacent disobedience or open rebellion against HIS Holy Word & HIS Holy Spirit?

Is someone even CHRIST-LIKE who in their very everyday character, behaviour, and life is NOT CHRIST-LIKE?

BTW, Christ-like=CHRISTIAN.

I used the term Christ-Like for 2 reasons:
1. To drive the point home.
2. A lot of folk PROFESSING to be Christian who do NOT POSSESS Christianity at all.

Pray.
Think.

Some may be questioning what is this all about.
Others are already mad/offended.
Some may be blocking me on FB even now.

Pray.
Think.

JOHN 13:15, 17
JOHN 14:6, 15, 21, 23, 24
JOHN 15:14

=============

FIRST, ESTABLISH THE DEFINITION OF THE TERMS USED.

pa·gan
/ˈpāɡən/Submit
noun
1.
a person holding religious beliefs other than Biblical Judaism and Biblical Christianity, [MY NOTE:which we will see are one and the same thing.]
synonyms: heathen, infidel, idolater, idolatress
“pagans worshiped the sun”
adjective
1.
relating to pagans.
“a pagan god”
synonyms: heathen, ungodly, irreligious, infidel, idolatrous
“the pagan festival”

======================

NEXT, IS CHRISTIANITY BECOMING MORE PAGAN?

Yes.

Back in 1960 and before every mainline Protestant, Evangelical, Pentecostal, and Fundamental Christian church preached, taught, counselled, and thundered against:

ROCK-N-ROLL/CONTEMPORARY MUSIC: SECULAR OR THE PHONY “CHRISTIAN”

HALLOWEEN: IT STILL IS SATAN’S “BIRTHDAY”; WITCHES, GOBLINS, SORCERERS, DEMONS, SEANCES, FORTUNE TELLING, DIVINATION, WIZARDSALL STRAITLY FORBIDDEN REPEATEDLY IN SCRIPTURE

DANCING: THE SENSUAL MOVEMENT AND CONTACT MIXED WITH NON-CHRISTIAN MUSIC THAT STIRS UP LUST

GAMBLING: THE BEING A FOOLISH AND UNFAITHFUL STEWARD OF WHAT GOD BLESSED US WITH

TATTOOS/BODY-PIERCING: THE MAKING OF MARKS, WORDS, PICTURES AND SYMBOLS, AND THE PLACEMENT OF RINGS, CHAINS, AND GAUGES IN ONE’S BODY, AN ACT THAT ORIGINATED IN PAGANISM AND SLAVERY

IMMODEST DRESS: THE SENSUAL ATTIRE THAT ORIGINATED IN HARLOTRY, FORNICATION, AND ADULTERY

CURSING/PROFANITY: WAS EXTREMELY RARE, TO POINT THAT IT DID NOT EXIST IN THE CHRISTIAN’S LIFE AT ALL, NOW THERE THOSE WHO REGULARLY, CASUALLY, AND DAILY CURSE AND CLAIM TO BE CHRISTIAN…NOT KNOWING THAT SUCH A THING IS IMPOSSIBLE

In today’s “church” I have personally seen and heard ALL this taking place IN Christian’s lives, homes, and even IN The House of God, The Church!

Jesus was, AND IS, CLEAR:

Matthew 12:30 King James Version (KJV)

30 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

=======================

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE ACTUALLY, REALLY SAY ABOUT JUDGING?

I will post entire Scripture passages to show what GOD really says. BUT…

Can we all agree that in The Bible there is NO higher authority than God/Jesus/The Holy Spirit?

IF YOU agree on that then let’s begin here:

John 7:24 King James Version (KJV)

24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

This is The Lord Jesus Christ talking. HE speaks of TWO types of judging here. Superficial, hypocritical, and “righteous judging”.

The superficial/hypocritical Christ straitly forbids.

The Righteous judging HE commands.

Deuteronomy 1:12-18 King James Version (KJV)

12 How can I myself alone bear your cumbrance, and your burden, and your strife?

13 Take you wise men, and understanding, and known among your tribes, and I will make them rulers over you.

14 And ye answered me, and said, The thing which thou hast spoken is good for us to do.

15 So I took the chief of your tribes, wise men, and known, and made them heads over you, captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, and captains over fifties, and captains over tens, and officers among your tribes.

16 And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him.

17 Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God’s: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it.

18 And I commanded you at that time all the things which ye should do.

Here God commands, sets in order, and details the way to judge, judge ONLY according to God’s Word/Law.

Exodus 18:13-23 King James Version (KJV)

13 And it came to pass on the morrow, that Moses sat to judge the people: and the people stood by Moses from the morning unto the evening.

14 And when Moses’ father in law saw all that he did to the people, he said, What is this thing that thou doest to the people? why sittest thou thyself alone, and all the people stand by thee from morning unto even?

15 And Moses said unto his father in law, Because the people come unto me to enquire of God:

16 When they have a matter, they come unto me; and I judge between one and another, and I do make them know the statutes of God, and his laws.

17 And Moses’ father in law said unto him, The thing that thou doest is not good.

18 Thou wilt surely wear away, both thou, and this people that is with thee: for this thing is too heavy for thee; thou art not able to perform it thyself alone.

19 Hearken now unto my voice, I will give thee counsel, and God shall be with thee: Be thou for the people to God-ward, that thou mayest bring the causes unto God:

20 And thou shalt teach them ordinances and laws, and shalt shew them the way wherein they must walk, and the work that they must do.

21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear Godmen of truthhating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens:

22 And let them judge the people at all seasons: and it shall be, that every great matter they shall bring unto thee, but every small matter they shall judge: so shall it be easier for thyself, and they shall bear the burden with thee.

23 If thou shalt do this thing, and God command thee so, then thou shalt be able to endure, and all this people shall also go to their place in peace.

Psalm 149:6-9 King James Version (KJV)

Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two-edged sword in their hand;

To execute vengeance upon the heathen, and punishments upon the people;

To bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron;

To execute upon them the judgment written: this honour have all his saints. Praise ye the Lord.

Malachi 3:16-18 King James Version (KJV)

16 Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another: and the Lord hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord, and that thought upon his name.

17 And they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him.

18 Then shall ye return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, betweenhim that serveth God and him that serveth him not.

[NOTE: In the original Hebrew of the O.T. and Greek of the N.T. discern means: to judge correctly. THIS is very important later on as we’ll see.]

1 Corinthians 5 King James Version (KJV)

It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.

And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.

For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed,

In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ,

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

6 Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?

Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:

10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.

11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortionerwith such an one no not to eat.

12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?

13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

[NOTE: God’s Word says Paul passed this judgment though NOT physically present. God’s Word IS Truth, IS Right, no matter the distance or location.]

1 Corinthians 6:1-10 King James Version (KJV)

Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?

Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?

Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this lifeset them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.

I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?

But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers.

Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded?

Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren.

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be notdeceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, norabusers of themselves with mankind,

10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

1 Corinthians 12:7-11 King James Version (KJV)

But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.

For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;

To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;

10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:

11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.

[NOTE: Here is the word DISCERN again, as 1st seen in Malachi 3:16-18. One of the GIFTS of The Spirit is “discerning of/judging of spirits”. THIS will be seen as very vital later.]

1 Timothy 5:20 King James Version (KJV)

20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

2 Timothy 4:1-6 King James Version (KJV)

I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;

Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;

And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.

Titus 1:8-16 King James Version (KJV)

But a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate;

Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.

10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:

11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake.

12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.

13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;

14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

1 John 4:1-6 King James Version (KJV)

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.

We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth notus. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

[NOTE: From Malachi 3 to I Corinthians 12, now here in I John 4 we see the NEED of DISCERNING OF/judging of spirits, doctrine, truth, error, and right and wrong according TO God’s Word.]

Matthew 18:15-17 King James Version (KJV)

15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.

16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.

17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

[NOTE: This is Jesus talking again, the HIGHEST authority there is, and HE says HOW to execute judgment among the brethren in the church.]

Lastly, THE MOST MISUNDERSTOOD, MISUSED SCRIPTURE PASSAGE IN THE ENTIRE BIBLE, by saint and sinner alike.

Matthew 7:1-23 King James Version (KJV)

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

Thou hypocritefirst cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Give not that which is holy unto the dogsneither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you…

…13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and fewthere be that find it.

15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

===

Many stop at verse one like that is all that The Lord Jesus Christ said.

BUT place that INTO the proper CONTEXT of the rest of the chapter, and indeed, The WHOLE BIBLE, and you see Jesus Christ says in more detail in Matthew chpt. 7 what HE says in John 7:24. Jesus does NOT give a blanket prohibition of judging, BUT of superficial, hypocritical judging.

The Conclusion of the Whole Matter:

  1. STUDY GOD’S WORD- ALL OF IT.
  2. LEARN GOD’S WORD- ALL OF IT.
  3. BELIEVE GOD’S WORD- ALL OF IT.
  4. LIVE BY GOD’S WORD- AGAIN, ALL OF IT.
  5. And when God’s Word says something is right IT IS RIGHT regardless of who says otherwise.
  6. When God’s Word says something is wrong IT IS WRONG regardless of who says otherwise.
  7. Do NOT be shallow.
  8. Do NOT be hypocritical.
  9. Do NOT be hateful, hate-filled, NOR in anyway operate in hate.
  10. If you see a moral or doctrinal error PRAY FIRST. And ALWAYS respond IN and WITH LOVE, [Ephesians 4:15].

If you’re happy that someone failed so you can be the “Bible Cop”…then YOUR heart is not right. Pray. Repent. Get forgiveness. Get restoration.

Two things about Godly judgment:

MUST BE SQUARELY ROOTED IN GOD’S WORD- NO OPINION.

MUST BE COMPLETELY IN AND BY GOD’S LOVE- PERIOD.

You may be asking, “Why do you think this is so important, Rev. Larry?”

My answer…. think of the countless churches, homes, marriages, families, and lives that have been RUINED, some that went to Hell…because no one spoke God’s Word, The Truth, to them in love.

I hope this has been thorough enough. If the response demands it I will follow up….Scout’s Honor.

 

Image result for Those who say judge not lest ye be judged judges I say twist not scripture lest ye be like satan

================================

NOW, FOR SOME SOUL SEARCHING QUESTIONS.

  1. Are we actually Christian if we regularly disobey and transgress God and His Word?
  2. Do we really love Jesus if we don’t obey Him/His Word?
  3. Is The Lord Jesus Christ TRULY our Lord and Saviour if/when we daily live lives that are contrary to and in conflict with His Holy Word?
  4. How does a person claiming to be Christian affect all the lives and souls of the unsaved who ARE watching and listening to THEM curse, swear, get all tatted up, drink, smoke, and are as immoral as the sinner is????
  5. When a person who claims to be a Christian but daily, and casually engages in and lives in sin stands before The Lord Jesus Christ on Judgment Day, what will The Lord Jesus Christ say to them?

=============================

COMMON EXCUSES.

  1.  NO ONE IS PERFECT. False excuse. Of course no one is perfect. ONLY Jesus/God IS perfect. I am NOT perfect- BUT that is NO excuse to be casual about sin, that GOD from Genesis to Revelation forbids and condemns! What IS the Christian response to this then? We are not perfect. BUT by God’s grace, the love of Jesus, and the power and working of The Holy Spirit we CAN live lives overcoming sin, and that ARE Holy.
  2. Christians aren’t better than sinners- just better off. Outright LIE. If Christians are NOT better than sinners than WHAT REAL DIFFERENCE DID JESUS MAKE THEN?!! No. In and of ourselves we are wretched. BUT a person who is solely in and of themselves is NOT saved. A Christian is NOT in and of themselves– we ARE bought with a price, new creatures IN Christ Jesus, victorious NOW over Satan, sin, and the flesh, and by God’s grace we ARE better than sinners.

===========================

CLOSING SALVO.

The false/bogus accusation levied at me that “I obviously had never been part of team” is an outright lie. Spoken in ignorance. But still an outright lie. In was also the hypocritical judging of person they had NOT even seen in 41 years, and has ONLY heard small, brief tidbits here on FB. They know NOTHING about me at all. Yet they did not hesitate to pass false, hypocritical judgment (Remember: there IS good, Biblical judging/judgment), and to outright lie about and to me.

The truth?

I’ve been a part of team…a LONG time. Several teams actually.

  1. I was a street preacher for 12 years. We (15 to sometimes 67 of us) met at church. Prayed for at least one hour. Then on Friday and Saturday nights went in groups of 2-3 to the WORST parts of the K.C. metro area- unarmed- and shared the Gospel of The Lord Jesus Christ. There were times we saw people get on their knees on the sidewalk outside of the bar/nudey joint they just came out of, weeping, and give their hearts to Jesus. Over the 12 year period we had over 3,000 get saved one on one. BUT other times the 2-3 of us were surrounded by as many as 30, angry, violent people, who were arguing and threatening us. We guns pulled on us, knives pulled on us, threw beer bottles at us…remember, we were UNARMED. BUT GOD protected all of us. NOT one was ever hurt. A TEAM of prayer warriors at church. A team of evangelists on the streets, no more than 3 of us against sometimes 15-30 angry, violent people, one time it was against a group of 30 in the motorcycle gang The Black Vultures. We were threatened- NEVER hurt. We were a TEAM. Jesus IS THE Head, The Captain of our salvation. A Team. We had training. We had organization. We had discipline. We had on the spot instructions. We were UNARMED. WE WERE A TEAM.
  2. At Church, at least the one I go to [for almost 19 years] has order, structure, discipline, doctrine, training, teaching, on the spot counselling, a chain of command. WE’RE A TEAM.
  3. The Body of Christ. We love, listen, counsel, advise, learn, and pray for each other. We have each other’s back. WE’RE A TEAM.

If this is NEWS to you…you could have and should have ASKED about it first BEFORE making cockimamey judgments. Also…maybe it’s time to find another church if this is NEWS to you.

Now those who KNOW who this is about have CHOICES:

  1. Prayerfully seek The Lord and draw near to HIM.
  2. OR get mad and do “whatever”.

Those, in reality, are your ONLY two choices.

I can tell you to your face, up front, if ANYONE lies to me, lies about me, and/or makes bogus, false judgments again they are BLOCKED on FB. I love you. Will pray for you. But I aint hanging with ANYONE who is a liar. Period.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

Advertisements

COLON KRAPERNICK

PICTURE ABOVE OF A LIBERAL JACKASS, I KNOW, REDUNDANT.

 

PROLOGUE.

Due to moving A LOT, BEING A PREACHER’S KID, growing up tall fast, having a long/funny last name, having crew cuts in the late ’60’s-’70’s when my friends were going hippie…here is my personal experience at “oppression and bigotry” :

  1. was “the new kid”, an outsider, much of my life,
  2. was called names due my long, German/”funny” last name,
  3. was mocked for being a PK,
  4. because I was tall, but scrawny, bullies targeted me,
  5. because I was growing tall fast (was 6 ft. tall in 6th grade) I was constantly out-growing my jeans/pants, hence was mocked for wearing “high waters”, and getting ready for the flood,
  6. was daily called stupid, dummy, idiot, dork, nerd, jerk, loser…and those are the non-profanity laced names I was called,
  7. got beat up almost daily,
  8. had my belongings, bike, and possessions vandalised,
  9. had as many as 8-10 sports jocks meet me at my locker to take turns insulting and hitting me,
  10. was NEVER included in any parties, events, anything,
  11. was always blamed for whatever went wrong, even if it was not possible for me to be the blame…

So, there you have it. I was “oppressed”.

Now a closer look at Colon Krapernick, aka Colin Kaepernick.

Kaepernick was born in 1987 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to Heidi Russo, who was white.[6][7] His birth father, who was African-American, separated from Russo before Kaepernick was born.[8][9][10] Russo placed Kaepernick for adoption with a white couple named Rick and Teresa Kaepernick. The couple who had two older children, son Kyle and daughter Devon. The Kaepernicks decided to adopt a boy after losing two other sons to heart defects.[8][11][12]

Kaepernick lived in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin until age four when his family moved to California.[13][14] When he was eight years old, Kaepernick began playing youth football as a defensive end and punter. At age nine, he was the starting quarterback on his youth team, and he completed his first pass for a long touchdown.[13] A 4.0 GPA student[15] at John H. Pitman High School in Turlock, California, Kaepernick played football, basketball and baseball and was nominated for All-State selection in all three sports his senior year. He was the Most Valuable Player (MVP) of the Central California Conference in football, leading his school to its first-ever playoff victory. In basketball, he was a first-team all CCC selection at forward and led his 16th-ranked team to a near upset of #1 ranked Oak Ridge High School in the opening round of playoffs. In that game, Kaepernick scored 34 points but future NBA player Ryan Anderson of Oak Ridge scored 50 points to lead his team to a victory.[16]

Kaepernick started his college career at Nevada playing in 11 of the team’s 13 games. He finished the season with nineteen passing touchdowns, three interceptions, and 2,175 passing yards with a 53.8% completion percentage.[17] Kaepernick also added 593 rushing yards and six rushing touchdowns as the Nevada Wolf Pack finished 6-7.[18]

Kaepernick played college football for the University of Nevada where he was named the Western Athletic Conference (WAC) Offensive Player of the Year twice and became the only player in NCAA Division I FBS history to amass 10,000 passing yards and 4,000 rushing yards in a career. After graduating, he was selected by the San Francisco 49ers in the second round of the 2011 NFL Draft. Kaepernick began his professional football career as a backup quarterback to Alex Smith, and became the 49ers’ starter in the middle of the 2012 season after Smith suffered a concussion. He then remained the team’s starting quarterback for the rest of the season, leading the team to their first Super Bowl appearance since 1994. During the 2013 season, his first full season as a starter, Kaepernick helped the 49ers reach the NFC Championship Game. Over the next three seasons, Kaepernick lost and won back his starting job, with the 49ers missing the playoffs for three years consecutively.

Kaepernick was baptized Methodistconfirmed Lutheran, and attended a Baptist church during his college years.[104] Kaepernick spoke about his faith saying, “I think God guides me through every day and helps me take the right steps and has helped me to get to where I’m at.”[105] Kaepernick has multiple tattoos about his faith. His right arm features a scroll with the Bible verse Psalm 18:39 written on it. Tattooed under the scroll are praying hands with the phrase “To God The Glory” written on them. To the left of both the scroll and praying hands is the word “Faith” written vertically. His left arm features a Christian cross with the words “Heaven Sent” on it referring to Jesus Christ. Written above and below the cross is the phrase “God Will Guide Me”. Written to the left and right of the cross is the Bible verse Psalm 27:3.[106][107][108]

Kaepernick reportedly started dating radio personality and television host Nessa Diab in July 2015,[109] and officially went public about their relationship in February 2016.[110]

[NOTE: Nessa Diad is a Black Muslim, and leader in the Liberal, Militant “Black Lives Matter” group that implements socialism, America-hatred, racism, and violence as part of the S.O.P. Shortly after Colon began dating Muslim woman, Nessa Diad, he began his Anti-American bullying tactics and spreading the Liberal LIES of “oppression”…AND became a vegan, see below.]

Kaepernick began following a vegan diet in late 2015.[111]

ALSO, IMMEDIATELY AFTER hooking up with the Muslim, Black Lives Matter, Socialist Activist, Colon began his idiotic jihad:
In the 49ers third preseason game of the 2016 season, Kaepernick was noticed sitting down during the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” as opposed to the tradition of standing. During a post-game interview, he explained his position stating, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder”, referencing a series of African-American deaths caused by law enforcement that led to the Black Lives Matter movement and adding that he would continue to protest until he feels like “[the American flag] represents what it’s supposed to represent”.[72][73][74]

In July 2019, Nike, Inc. released a shoe featuring the Betsy Ross flag called the Air Max 1 Quick Strike Fourth of July trainers. The trainers were designed to celebrate Independence Day. The model was subsequently withdrawn after Colin Kaepernick told the brand he and others found the flag offensive because they associated it with slavery.[86][87][88] J

TIME FOR FACTS AND REAL HISTORY.

  1. THERE HAS BEEN NO SLAVERY IN THE U.S. SINCE 1865, WHITE PEOPLE FOUGHT A WAR TO FREE THE SLAVES.
  2. THE BETSY ROSS FLAG WAS, AND IS, RIGHTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, A WAR FOR LIBERTY.
  3. COLON WAS NEVER OPPRESSED IN HIS LIFETIME ANYMORE THAN I WAS, SEE PROLOGUE.
  4. COLON WAS, AND  IS, RATHER RICH AND PRIVILEGED…AND WRONG AND STUPID.
  5. COLON WAS NEVER A SLAVE. NO BLACKS, NO “PEOPLE OF COLOR”, HAVE BEEN SLAVES IN AMERICA SINCE 1865.
  6. THERE ARE NO SLAVE OWNERS ALIVE…ANYWHERE IN AMERICA.
  7. THIS IS NOTHING OTHER THAN MARXISM, DELUSION, LIES, AND FRAUD…AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND I’M BEING REDUNDANT.

SO there it is.
Colon Krapernick’s entire life as he  knows and lives it is a LIE. Yes, I called him names throughout…but that is NOT “oppression”, that is TRUTH IN LABELING.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Eh, How bad Can It get?

No photo description available.

BUGS BUNNY, A VAST IMPROVEMENT OVER THE JACKASS-N-CHIEF WE HAVE NOW…JUST SAYIN’…

SERIOUSLY though, this article is 99.99% the work of Twitter Patriot, Legal expert, Thorough researcher, and Genuine investigative reporter, SETH ABRAMS…let’s commence, shall we?

GOING TO POST THE ENTIRE THREAD FROM TWITTER PATRIOT EXTRAORDINAIRE, SETH ABRAMS.

SOURCE .

(THREAD) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS (CNN): Convicted Kremlin agent Maria Butina’s longtime boyfriend confirms that Don Jr. met secretly with Kremlin agents for an hour during the 2015 NRA Conference in Knoxville; Don Jr. therefore lied to Congress about collusion. Please RT and read on.

Image

1/ This story is still developing—and confusing enough that only those who’ve researched the Trump-Russia case for years understood its import when it first broke; many others are currently misreporting it, [MY NOTES: LIKE FOX]. I’m going to do my best to get this 100% right for you—as it’s huge news.

2/ SUMMARY: All agree Butina was a Kremlin agent working for a Kremlin official—Torshin; all agree she used sex to access targets; all agree she infiltrated the NRA and aimed to infiltrate Team Trump; all agree her job was to end sanctions. We *didn’t* know Jr. met with her team.

3/ BACKGROUND (all taken from PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, the Mueller Report, and major-media sources): in early 2015, the future top Trump adviser on Russia, Dmitri Simes, met with Putin; thereafter, he helped Alexander Torshin and Butina gain access to top federal banking officials.

 

4/ Torshin and Butina wanted access to banking officials as part of what is now confirmed as a Russian intelligence operation aimed at—among other things—gaining confidential data about the Ziff Brothers, whose Clinton donations the Kremlin thought could be used against Hillary.

5/ During the period Simes—the former top Trump adviser on Russia who now makes $500,000/year working for the Kremlin’s TV network, RT—was aiding Torshin/Butina, he was trying to Torshin’s aid for the top funder of his pro-Kremlin think tank, the Center for the National Interest.

6/ Filings in the Butina case confirm that—in early 2015—Butina/Torshin aimed to infiltrate the NRA and, if possible, Trump’s campaign. Butina’s ex-boyfriend, Patrick Byrne, has now confirmed Butina *spoke* of infiltrating four campaigns, but in fact only focused on one: Trump’s.

7/ We don’t know exactly who puts the FBI onto Russia’s activities—though to be clear both the hacking and propaganda operations run by the Kremlin in 2016 had *already begun* by Spring 2015. We also know the FBI was investigating George Papadopoulos as a possible Israeli agent.

8/ Given that it later prosecuted Butina, made Torshin an unindicted co-conspirator, got warrants on Papadopoulos, and turned Simes into the shocking “star” of Volume 1 of the Mueller Report, there’s a reasonable chance—but we don’t know—that the FBI was long tracking all four.

 

9/ The upshot to this part of the story is this: FBI agent Peter Strzok was running an FBI probe in early 2015 that believed—it turns out, 100% correctly—that Kremlin agents under Putin’s control sought to infiltrate Trump’s 2016 campaign. Tonight we got *major* new news on this.

10/ Butina’s ex-boyfriend—businessman Patrick Byrne—tonight *confirmed* to CNN that Butina said she had “close ties” to “four of the top seven oligarchs in Russia” and that she was in a position to orchestrate him (Byrne) meeting *one-on-one with Putin himself*. This is 100% new.

11/ Byrne further *confirms* to CNN that Butina said she was working for Torshin, a Kremlin official, and that she’d been tasked with infiltrating Trump’s campaign. She said the purpose was “peace”—which is the term the Kremlin uses (systematically) to refer to sanctions relief.

12/ We’ve long known that at the spring 2015 NRA Conference in Knoxville, Donald Trump Jr. made contact with Torshin; both men claimed that they randomly found themselves near one another and spoke only briefly of inconsequential things—and that’s what Don Jr. told Congress, too.

13/ We don’t know Torshin’s full story—as he fled to Russia. Likewise, we don’t know Simes’s full story—as he took a job for the Kremlin in Moscow. But in my 2018 book PROOF OF COLLUSION, I wrote of a major-media story that hinted Don Jr. *might* have been lying about Knoxville.

14/ CORRECTION: I mean Nashville, Tennessee, not Knoxville, Tennessee. My sister went to University of Tennessee in Knoxville, so it’s more on my brain than it is with most people. Wherever I wrote Knoxville above, I’m speaking of Nashville. OK, to continue with this major story:

15/ PROOF OF COLLUSION offered major-media reporting that a) Torshin’s meeting with Don Jr. wasn’t accidental; b) they discussed more than pleasantries; c) Torshin had been tasked to get Don Jr. to come with him to a second location for a secret meeting. That’s what I had *then*.

16/ According to Byrne, Butina told him that—at a time when she was connected to “four of the top seven oligarchs in Russia” and could orchestrate *face-to-face meetings with Putin*—she and Torshin successfully got Don Jr. to go to a second location for a one-hour secret meeting.

17/ This secret meeting in Nashville took place in April 2015, per Butina, just 60 days before Trump announced his presidential run. At *any* meeting between Torshin, Butina, Trump Jr., and other Kremlin agents, the topic Torshin and Butina were assigned to discuss was sanctions.

18/ By 30 days after Trump announced his run in June 2015, he *still* had not made a major official declaration of his policy on Russia sanctions. Then he went to FreedomFest in Las Vegas in July 2015. Butina was there and Byrne was there. Butina was posing as a young journalist.

19/ The event was televised, so any statement by Trump was certain to be seen by Putin and other leaders. Butina, posing as a journalist, asked Trump to state his position on sanctions. Trump—whose son had apparently secretly met with Butina and her boss—said he wanted them gone.

20/ It was at the 2015 Las Vegas event that Butina first approached Byrne; at the time she was in a relationship with GOP operative Paul Erickson, who’s since been indicted on multiple charges. Butina, the Kremlin agent, seduced Byrne, and they soon began a romantic relationship.

21/ Byrne is unclear on whether he contacted the FBI about Butina before or after their romantic relationship began. In any case, Byrne is clear he *wasn’t* acting as an FBI CI in Las Vegas; he was there as a *speaker*, but had worked with the FBI previously on unrelated matters.

22/ In any case, Butina’s conduct in trying to recruit Byrne is so suspicious that he alerts the FBI because he has prior—unrelated—contacts in the organization. The FBI, which has already—it turns out, 100% correctly—begun investigating Butina, asks Byrne to continue to see her.

23/ Byrne now says federal officials have told him that the order for him to keep seeing Butina came from Peter Strzok, James Comey and one other person—which would make sense, given that these are the men who were heading up the Russian election-interference probe at that point.

24/ In the months after Butina—following a meeting with Trump Jr.gets Trump to oppose sanctions on TV, Butina so infiltrates the NRA that she’s able to arrange a trip by the NRA’s top brass to Moscow to meet Putin at the same time Trump adviser Flynn is in Moscow to meet Putin.

 

25/ Just over a year after meeting with Putin—who has called Simes a “friend”—and during a period he’s still in contact with Torshin and Butina, Simes manages to insinuate himself into the Trump Camp during a March ’16 Center for the National Interest event that Jared Kushner attends.

6/ Thereafter, Simes becomes the “Russia whisperer” of the Trump campaign—involving himself in every major Russia-related foreign policy event and policy paper Trump’s campaign constructs between March and November 2016. Shortly after Butina is arrested, Simes *flees to Moscow*.

27/ Don Jr. testifies to Congress that he had no significant contacts with Torshin. But media reports suggest that not only—if Butina’s claims are true—did Don Jr. meet with Torshin, but *so did Trump himself*. Torshin ultimately tweets out that he met Trump at an NRA conference.

28/ Live television, folks. Going to correct one or two things that don’t change the story but more properly align events and dates.

29/ In late 2015, Alexander Torshin claimed on Twitter that he knew Trump from the NRA and could speak to his character. Torshin and Trump both attended the April 2015 NRA Conference in Nashville, so the assumption has been that they met at that time.

Russian politician claims he knows Trump through NRA connections: report

SOURCE .

30/ The secret Torshin/Trump Jr. meeting occurred, per Butina’s statements to Byrne, at *either* the Nashville NRA Conference in spring 2015 *or* the Louisville NRA Conference in spring 2016 *or* both. Byrne, in speaking to CNN, was not clear on this. But Byrne has corroboration.

31/ We already know that prosecutors investigating Torshin abroad have intimated that Trump Jr. is lying about his contacts with Torshin, which (as I wrote in PROOF OF COLLUSION) is further suggested by Trump Jr.’s lies about the meeting and Torshin’s plans for an off-site event.

2/ Here’s the 2018 YAHOO NEWS article (from Michael Isikoff, the author—with David Corn—of the New York Times bestseller RUSSIAN ROULETTE) about wiretaps that apparently incriminate Trump Jr. with respect to him lying to Congress about Alexander Torshin:

‘Trump’s Son Should Be Concerned’: FBI Obtained Wiretaps Of Putin Ally Who Met With Trump Jr.

The wiretaps feature conversations between Alexander Torshin and Alexander Romanov, a convicted Russian money launderer.

SOURCE .

33/ Earlier in the thread, I indicated that we *knew* Patrick Byrne was saying the Trump Jr.-Butina-Torshin meeting happened in 2015; reviewing his interview, it’s more accurate to say that he indicates the meeting could have occurred in 2015 in Nashville *or* 2016 in Louisville.

34/ By the way, between those two events Torshin tweeted this:

Image

35/ It’s *marginally* more likely the secret Trump Jr.-Butina-Torshin meeting happened in 2016 in Louisville, as we *know* the two men interacted at that event. But that said, it seems Torshin and Trump Sr. interacted in 2015 in Nashville—and *we know Trump Jr. was in Nashville*.

36/ We know Trump Jr. was in Nashville in 2015 because his father said so during his speech:

 

The Making of Donald Trump and the NRA’s Marriage of Convenience

How a potent odd couple came together, in 14 steps.

SOURCE .

37/ NOTE: I’m going to say something now that I can’t believe I’m going to say… but the next tweet is really one that *everyone* needs to read *carefully* and understand because it could point toward the most important revelation in the entire Trump-Russia investigation so far.

8/ 1) Trump and Don Jr. were both in Nashville and both in Louisville.

2) Torshin—by 7 months after Nashville—says he knows Trump via the NRA.

3) Butina says Don Jr. attended a secret meeting with Torshin in either Nashville or Louisville.

4) Why wouldn’t *Trump* have gone too?

39/ 5) SCENARIO #1: If Kremlin agent Torshin met Trump in Nashville in 2015 as he implies—and if the secret meeting was in Nashville—why would Don Jr. have gone in his father’s place, and how would Torshin be able to say he met *Trump* if *Trump* didn’t also attend that meeting?

40/ 6) SCENARIO #2: If Butina is saying the secret Torshin-Don Jr. meeting was in *Louisville*, that’s months *after* Torshin says he already knows Trump—and media reports say Torshin wanted to see Trump in Louisville. So why wouldn’t Trump have attended *that* secret meeting?

41/ In any case, what we have now is Don Jr. meeting secretly with Kremlin agent Torshin in—most likely—Louisville in spring ’16, and later lying about it to Congress. Torshin is—at the time—apparently connected to an op looking to get dirt on Clinton involving the Ziff Brothers.

 

42/ When Jr. gets contacted a few weeks later—in early June—and learns the Kremlin has dirt on Clinton it wants to give him, guess what the dirt is about? As confirmed by US media’s publication of the Kremlin talking points for that meeting, the info involves…the Ziff Brothers.

43/ Trump and Don Jr. thereafter lie about the meeting in which Jr. learned of the HRC “dirt” Torshin had been connecting to uncovering. And they *also* lie about the *other* topic of that June 2016 meeting: the “peace” Butina was working for, that is to say… sanctions relief.

 

44/ SUMMARY: So there’s now a clear throughline establishing a Kremlin operation involving Putin, his top four oligarchs, Butina, Torshin and Simes—one that involves infiltrating the Trump campaign through the NRA and specifically Don Jr. Both Don and his dad then lied about it.

45/ To me, the craziest part of all this is that when it hit media this evening, those who picked it up didn’t know enough about the Trump-Russia timeline to know what they were hearing. So they fell into a trap laid by the far-right “journalist” who spoke to Byrne—Sara Carter.

46/ Carter falsely claims the *real* story here is… the FBI asking Byrne to keep seeing Butina. I’ve no idea why that’d be a story, or why it’d be a story if—as Byrne says—Strzok and Comey issued that order. They were…*investigating Russia*. Of *course* they issued the order.

47/ The three Russian election-interference campaigns—hacking, propaganda, and infiltration—began in 2014 and 2015. It was always my assumption—it should’ve been everyone’s—that the best intelligence agencies in the world (ours) were on to the Russians’ activities not long after.

48/ That’s why, when the story came out that Mueller was looking into Papadopoulos’ overseas activities *before* he approached the Trump campaign the first time—in summer *2015*—it made sense: because the multinational collusion(s) PROOF OF CONSPIRACY details had started by then.

49/ I won’t rehash the whole Red Sea Conspiracy here—as that’s what PROOF OF CONSPIRACY will do when it’s published September 3. Suffice to say that activities in Israel, Russia, and the UAE in *2014* communicated to U.S. intelligence that a strange new alliance was being formed.

50/ The FBI, when it’s investigating a major national security issue—an attack by a hostile foreign power on our infrastructure, which was being investigated beginning in summer ’15 at the *latest*—*absolutely* is going to use a new resource like Byrne if he drops into their lap.
51/ Byrne maintains that the FBI agents he spoke to were honorable, were apologetic about asking him to falsely keep up a Butina relationship, and represented that they were pursuing key law enforcement duties. It’s the *last* portion of Byrne’s interview that’s sowing confusion.
52/ Byrne—citing no evidence at all—now says that he feels he was used to conduct “political espionage.” And even odder, he says that espionage was being conducted against *both* the Trump *and* Clinton campaigns. But his view on this seems to all stem from a single name: Strzok.
53/ That is, people like Sara Carter have convinced a certain brand of conspiracy theorist that just because Strzok didn’t like Trumpjust like *150 million Americans don’t*—it *automatically* means he was willing to throw away his FBI career to try to frame him and stage a coup.
54/ Mind you, Mueller did a thorough review of Strzok’s work and found *no* fault with it. Strzok got in trouble due to private texts—not his professional responsibilities. But because Byrne has become convinced—without evidence—that Strzok framed Trump, he feels Strzok used him.

55/ The result of all this is media is reporting the biggest breakthrough in the Trump-Russia investigation so far as though it confirms some sort of “deep-state” conspiracy—rather than just that Byrne isn’t happy about what he was asked to do now that he knows Strzok ordered it.

56/ As we’ve seen, Byrne’s revelations in fact have nothing to do with Strzok; rather, they’re about: (1) Donald Trump Jr.’s secret meetings and lies to Congress, (2) Maria Butina’s much-higher-than-known level of access to Putin and his oligarchs, and (3) the Trump-Torshin link.

57/ Here’s what absolutely has to happen now:

(1) Byrne has to be called before Congress.

(2) Donald Trump Jr. has to be called back before Congress.

(3) Trump has to be asked about every meeting he ever had with Alex Torshin, Maria Butina, or any agents of either Kremlin agent.

 

58/ And: (4) Media must clean up its reporting from tonight. Byrne is offering *no evidence* he was used for “political espionage”; he’s merely angry at Strzok—and therefore upset that Strzok apparently urged him to keep seeing Butina. His story is important for *other* reasons.

59/ But I also want underscore that Patrick Byrne’s story isn’t *legible* to anyone who hasn’t been researching the Trump-Russia case for years. I’ve been doing that—and have written two books on the subject—and even *I* had to listen hard to understand what Byrne was revealing.

60/ I don’t say that to be self-aggrandizing; I believe that *anyone* who fully understands the timeline and players in the Trump-Russia case would see and can confirm all I’ve said—so I’m not special for having “figured something out.” I’m just explaining why US media missed it.

61/ As for Carter, I don’t know why she misrepresented this. There’s an obvious potential reason—a political agenda—and a less-obvious reason: that some on the right are trying to “launder” bad information for Trump by reframing it falsely. But I don’t know if that happened here.

62/ It must be underscored that Byrne is a problematic witness—just not in a way that would necessarily undercut *this* story [i.e., in the way it’s important]. He clearly still has feelings for Butina; he deeply admires her; he even thinks that she should be President of Russia.

63/ Byrne’s story is significant exclusively because of statements his girlfriend made to him at a time those statements were either (1) against her interest, or (2) corroborated subsequently by other means. Let me explain what I mean by that, as it’s important.

64/ Federal filings confirm that Torshin and Butina were running an intelligence op to infiltrate the NRA and Trump’s campaign.

65/ It would have been *entirely detrimental to that intelligence op* for either of the two Kremlin agents to falsely claim to have had contact with anyone in the Trump family.

 

66/ Doing so would risk arousing the ire of their marks and diminishing their credibility and therefore potentially compromising their entire operation. So there are indicia of reliability in what Butina said to Byrne about Trump Jr. It’s also consistent with major media reports.

67/ Those news reports place the relevant parties at the relevant locations and with the stated intent to establish communications. We even had prior reporting that Torshin wanted an off-site meeting with Trump Jr. and that wiretaps would prove Trump Jr. lied about what happened.

68/ It’s clear Byrne believed his story was helping Butina *and moreover* it is clear from Carter’s reporting and Byrne’s CNN interview that Butina’s *U.S. lawyers* also thought so. So there’s no sense *anyone* here realized this would actually sink Butina, or wanted that result.

69/ One would have to be an idiot to hear or see the interview Patrick Byrne gave with CNN and *not* wonder about his reliability. The problem is that media reports also say that the FBI believed his story and, again, the relevant parts aren’t really touched by Byrne’s weirdness.

70/ And of course I’m leaving out entire swaths of corroboration for the sake of brevity. For instance, we already know that Donald Trump Jr. has lied under oath about these *very matters* (and others), and that Torshin and Simes both fled the country *when Butina was arrested*.

71/ The boasts Butina made about her extraordinarily well-placed Kremlin contacts were *confirmed* when she invited to Moscow, and then hosted in Moscow, top NRA brass, who were then ushered into meetings with top Kremlin officials. So she wasn’t lying to Byrne about any of that.

72/ I could go on (for instance regarding the telling synchronicity of Flynn being in Moscow while Butina was hosting the NRA brass, as we know what Flynn was in Moscow to do and who he was there to meet with) but the broader point is that weird people *aren’t* necessarily liars.

73/ I can readily understand, given the foregoing, why DOJ (presumably attorneys with the IG) believed Byrne. The question is whether they *only* looked at the Strzok angle, because that’s the only thing *they* are tasked with looking at right now. Mueller is [prematurely] gone.

74/ When Bob Mueller, to the shock of everyone except (oddly) the husband of Trump’s communications director, closed up shop almost immediately after Trump’s handpicked AG, Bill Barr, was confirmed, I was one of those saying, “What happens if new info comes out? Who handles it?”

75/ The one thing Carter may have gotten *right*, albeit inadvertently, is that at present the entirely silly and unimportant Strzok angle *is* the only one being looked at, because Byrne chose to go to DOJ, and therefore the IG looking at *just* that narrow (GOP-invented) issue.

 

76/ That Peter Strzok’s work was reviewed and found professional doesn’t matter to the conspiracy theorists obsessed with him. And when he *chose* to sue the FBI, thereby *opening himself up to questioning under oath*, even *then* they didn’t say, “Huh! Maybe this guy is clean?”

77/ But none of that solves the current problem: with Mueller having prematurely wrapped up his work (for whatever reason), there’s no one to publicly interview and publicly report on an interview with Byrne unless Congress does it or we see the FBI’s counterintelligence reports.

78/ As to the question asked—see below in the feed—by Maya Wiley about how Byrne could’ve had counterintelligence information about Butina that didn’t make it into Mueller’s report, that’s precisely the evidence Mueller said he left out (leaving out Butina/Torshin particularly).

79/ Just so, the probe Mueller did isn’t synonymous with the probe *Strzok* did—as Strzok and Comey were investigating Russian election interference well over a *year* before Mueller was appointed and chose to employ the former of the two (with good reason, given his prior role).

80/ Ever since the Mueller Report dropped and we learned—on p. 10 of Volume 1—that *all counterintelligence evidence* had been removed from the report with few if any exceptions, I’ve been saying that (as it turns out) on *collusion* we still haven’t seen the report that matters.

81/ You’ll never hear me say that about Vol. 2 of the Report; that’s as comprehensive as we’re going to get—accepting that (a) Mueller said he didn’t relay *every* relevant instance of potential obstruction but just 10 selected ones, and (b) more obstruction happened post-Report.

 

82/ But on “collusion”—meaning, every federal crime that has as a constituent part what a layperson would call collusive activity—Mueller only considered if Trump was part of a before-the-fact conspiracy with two entities: the GRU or IRA. That’s not what we’re talking about here.

83/ Indeed while much of the evidence—proof pointing toward a single conclusion, whether or not sufficient for conviction—I compiled in PROOF OF COLLUSION overlapped with what appeared in the Mueller Report 5 months later, even PROOF OF COLLUSION didn’t look at *that* conspiracy.

84/ Nor does my upcoming book—PROOF OF CONSPIRACY—consider any before-the-fact GRU or IRA conspiracy. Indeed, it doesn’t even focus on a quid pro quo, but rather “aiding and abetting” an existing conspiracy that was entered into overseas by the leaders of several foreign nations.

85/ So Byrne’s evidence a) is actually new, b) has indicia of reliability, (c) implicates Trump’s family in collusion, (d) must now be the subject of new House hearings, and e) isn’t evidence we would’ve expected to hear earlier—as it’s in an intelligence report we’ve never seen.

 

CONCLUSION/ I wrote such a long thread because this is *confusing* stuffnot because it’s fictional, but for the opposite reason: real crimes (at this level and implicating these particular statutes) are messy, confusing, and have many moving parts. It’s hard to summarize things.

NOTE/ I’ll stay on top of all this; I’m not pretending it’s fully unfolded. We must hear more from Byrne—though we’ve already heard enough for Congress to hold hearings at which Don Jr. and Byrne are asked about a secret 1-hour meeting with Kremlin agents in Nashville/Louisville.

NOTE2/ But I’ll also return to the most harrowing part of this thread: the possibility—as there’s evidence pointing this way—*Trump himself* attended, knew about in advance, or knew of after the fact a meeting between his son and Kremlin agents at an NRA conference in 2015/2016.

NOTE3/ Apologies again for the Knoxville/Nashville typo—addressed in Tweet 14—plaguing tweets 0, 12, and 13 due to my affinity for/ties to Knoxville (see Tweet 14). Note also the clarification that the NRA conference could’ve been either 2015’s or 2016’s. It’s damning either way.

NOTE4/ PROOF OF COLLUSION (Nov. ’18) and PROOF OF CONSPIRACY (Sept. ’19) both have literally thousands of citations, so please understand that this thread doesn’t even graze the surface of the news items we have on these topics. They even get this obscure:

Nashville lawyer who introduced Russian operative to the NRA has ties to Blackburn

SOURCE .

NOTE5/ I think most reading this know this, but in the event you don’t, the CNN report referred to in the first tweet in this thread is the interview that

conducted with Patrick Byrne on the former’s hour-long CNN program tonight. Byrne also (previously) spoke to FNC.

VIDEO/ Feel free to watch Byrne’s odd interview with FNC, in which he reveals the third person his orders came from—per his undisclosed sources—was McCabe. You’ll also see that he’s framing his story in a way that has nothing to do with why it’s important.

VIDEO .

VIDEO2/ Here’s the CNN interview referenced in my first tweet. It’s odd—again—but remember everyone agrees he had a relationship with Butina, the DOJ does believe he did work with the FBI involving Butina, and there’s significant other media corroboration.

VIDEO3/ The FNC video is *must-watch TV* for reasons no one at FNC seems to realize: Byrne says—quite clearly—that the moment the intel he was feeding the FBI indicated Butina was going to infiltrate *Trump’s* campaign rather than *Clinton’s*, “their interest went to zero.” WTF?

VIDEO4/ If Byrne’s FNC story is accurate—and his CNN interview echoes it on this point—he’s saying Strzok, McCabe, and Comey were investigating *Hillary’s emails* when he first came to them, and only *later* agreed to work with him because by then they were investigating Russia.

VIDEO5/ In other words, Byrne’s saying the FBI was *so focused on Clinton* and so focused on *doing their jobs* they almost let his shocking intel about the Trump family slip through their fingers. It was only *new* intel they got that made them want to work with Byrne on Russia.

 

SUMMARY/ Byrne is hard to follow, but put his FNC/CNN interviews together and what he’s saying is…
he’s the reason the Russia probe began. The FBI was working the Clinton case; he told them a Kremlin agent aimed to infiltrate Trump’s team; they began using him to follow up.
SUMMARY 2/ I don’t know what to say: Byrne’s FNC interview is the most incredible interview I’ve seen in three years. In *that* interview he says it was *Trump*—not his son—Butina’s team was going to “take out the back door” to a secret conference off-site from the NRA conference.
SUMMARY 3/ He seems to be describing the very beginning of the very first Russia probe, and doing so in a way that dramatically exculpates—frees from responsibility for wrongdoing—Strzok, McCabe and Comey, as they won’t listen to him about Trump because they’re focused on Clinton.
SUMMARY 4/ When—per Byrne—he’s able to convince Strzok, McCabe, and Comey to finally pay attention to what he’s telling them about the NRA and the Trump campaign being infiltrated, the three men do absolutely nothing wrong: per Byrne, all they do is tell him to keep seeing Butina.
SUMMARY 5/ I guess what I’m saying is—and I can’t believe I’m writing such words—that *if his story is accurate*, Patrick Byrne, future federal witness, represents the END of the conspiracy theory about anti-Trump sentiment at the FBI and the KEY to proving Trump-Russia collusion.
MORE/ There’s no way for me to summarize on Twitter the innumerable ways these facts dovetail with the intelligence evidence everyone will be seeing in PROOF OF CONSPIRACY on September 3, so at this point I’ll bring this to close and just point you there:

ADDITIONAL PATRICK BYRNE INTERVIEW/ Below I’ve done a brief thread (just 10 tweets!) on the interview Seth Hettena (

) did with Patrick Byrne on August 18. There’s still much to process from that interview, but I’ve at least made a start, here:

In this interview with Seth Hettena, who acknowledges Byrne’s oddness as I do, Byrne confirms that he told the FBI about Butina in July of 2015; they ignored him because they were working on the Clinton case; and in July *2016* they began paying attention.

 

The CEO of Overstock Has More to Say about Maria Butina, the FBI … and Don Jr

1/ Strzok, Comey and McCabe greenlighting having agents ask Byrne to re-engage with Butina in July ’16 is consistent with them receiving in spring 2016—from at least 7 allied intel agencies—reports of unusual Trump-Russia activity. Byrne had previously volunteered to assist them.
2/ It’s striking that Byrne says he was trying to feed the FBI intel a long time—but they were ignoring it. Given the Louisville NRA conference was in May 2016, and Butina told Byrne of Torshin meeting Trump/Don Jr. there, Byrne is saying even *that* intel was ignored until July.
3/ If true, this conclusively establishes that the FBI had no interest in *any* information suggesting foreign infiltration of Trump’s campaign until July 2016—by which time they’d received so much intel from trusted intel agencies that they went back and reviewed prior call-ins.
4/ It *also* means that when they reviewed that prior intelligence from Byrne, they found it credible enough to want to use him as an asset (as they had, with success, twice before on wholly unrelated matters). That intelligence would *include* a secret Kremlin-Trump Jr. meeting.
5/ It also means that this information—about Trump Jr. (or possibly Trump) meeting off-site with Torshin at an NRA conference in 2015 or 2016 and then lying about it to Congress (Jr.) or allowing Jr. to lie to Congress (Trump)—was among the intel passed off by Mueller to the FBI.
6/ Mueller clearly put Butina/Torshin in a separate intelligence-evidence bin, hence their absence from his Report. That’d also explain him farming out Butina’s case and giving no indication to anyone outside the FBI Counterintelligence Division that he had intel on Byrne-Butina.
7/ Do I think Buffet convinced Byrne to come forward? I don’t know. It’s bizarre that Byrne went to far-right activist Carter first; it makes me wonder if a Trump ally steered him there. But I don’t pretend to know. It’s just troubling, *especially* as his story was first framed.
8/ Byrne told FNC that Attorney General William Barr has all the evidence he (Byrne) has, which is odd—why wouldn’t Byrne’s evidence go to IG Horowitz? Why would Barr have access to it? Why would FNC be Byrne’s first TV interview? I think someone misread Byrne’s evidence *badly*.
9/ I think what we have here is someone on the right, who knows who—whether tied to Trump or not—wrongly thinking Byrne’s story inculpated Strzok, Comey and McCabe, when in fact it *exculpates* them. But this backfire is even worse—as Byrne’s story *incriminates* Donald Trump Jr.
10/ Just wait until tomorrow or the next day—you’ll see. As has happened each time the far-right tries to push its Strzok conspiracy theory, it’s backfired—with the “new” evidence *exculpating* the FBI and *inculpating* Trump pals. And this is the worst example of that ever. /end
PS/ Another mystery—from his FNC interview now—that Byrne is going to have to unravel is, who was the “bigtime Republican attorney” who he told his tale to in 2018, who in response told him to “go home and shut up”? My money is on Joe DiGenova, but to be clear, we don’t know yet.
PS2/ As an attorney, I feel compelled to add that Byrne tells Hettena he deliberately lied to federal agents he knew were in the midst of a criminal investigation—and that’s a crime. So Byrne—by all rights—should face federal charges here. If Barr does nothing, it tells us a lot.
Image

ADDITIONAL THREAD/ I’ve now done a sort of “after-action report” following up on the events of yesterday (Thursday, August 22), specifically by trying to separate fact from fiction in the fallout to Byrne’s explosive claims. You can find that thread below:

(THREAD) It’s time to separate fact from fiction in the case of Patrick Byrne, Maria Butina, Trump Jr. and a cadre of FBI agents and leaders. This is a still-developing story—but problematic reporting and Byrne’s bad framing are muddling events. I hope you’ll read on and retweet.

Image

 

CLAIM1/ Byrne was “directed” to sleep with Butina by the FBI (CNN).

False. The FBI not only had no authority to “direct” Byrne, but Byrne himself says that he was clearly told that he didn’t have to do anything. The FBI asked if he was willing to do something and he said he was.

CLAIM2/ Byrne’s activities were coordinated by Strzok, McCabe, and Comey (Byrne). Unclear. Byrne keeps changing his story—at one point saying “federal authorities” told him this was so, at another point saying he figured it out from TV, at another point implying he/Strzok spoke.

CLAIM3/ Byrne isn’t credible (many folks).

Unclear. We know he/Butina had a relationship; we know he’d worked with the FBI before; we know—if true—FBI records will confirm his story; we know DOJ found some of his story credible. It’s his odd demeanor convincing people otherwise.

 

CLAIM4/ There was no “second meeting” between Don Jr. and Kremlin agents Butina/Torshin; Don and Torshin had only a chance May 2016 encounter in Louisville. False—apparently. In other words, it *does* appear there was such a meeting. This one will take a few tweets to unwrap.

CLAIM 4-2/ According to Don Jr. and Torshin, all that happened is that they—by chance—were sitting near each other at an NRA dinner and they briefly exchanged inconsequential pleasantries. This bears no relationship/similarity to any meeting Butina has ever told any person about.

CLAIM 4-3/ What Butina told Byrne is that at 2PM on one of the days of the May 2016 Louisville NRA Conference, Butina and her team planned to take Trump Jr. out the back door of his hotel and bring him to her—Butina’s—hotel for a 1-hour meeting. The meeting was to be clandestine.

CLAIM 4-4/ Moreover, unlike the story Torshin and Trump Jr. later told—Torshin, who subsequently fled the country; Trump Jr., who subsequently lied to Congress on this and other mattersButina was, per Butina, slated to be *present* at the meeting between Torshin and Trump’s son.

CLAIM 4-5/ Byrne is *unwavering* in saying Butina told him this was her plan, and *unwavering* in saying it was his understanding the meeting *did* happen (leading to his *anger* that the FBI had “let it happen”). When Butina *told* him the meeting had occurred is still in doubt.

 

CLAIM 4-6/ Byrne says he stopped seeing Butina in April 2016, so they weren’t together (or in communication) at the time the planned May 2016 meeting would’ve occurred. But he reconnected with her after July 2016, and now says the meeting occurred, so she must have told him then.

CLAIM 4-7/ Butina’s attorneys are now saying there was no second meeting; as ever, statements made by paid advocates for a Kremlin agent who knows it would be an international scandal if it was revealed that she and others secretly met with Trump Jr. can be and must be *ignored*.

CLAIM 4-8/ Much more reliable are statements made against her own interest—because she was revealing sensitive operational details of a Kremlin operation—Butina made to Byrne in the context of a) a romantic relationship, b) trying to establish a trusting relationship with a mark.

CLAIM 4-9/ Of course, far more reliable than *that* is corroborating evidence: Don Jr., Butina, and Torshin were in the place Butina says they were on the date in question; Don Jr. and Torshin admit to contact; we know from other reporting that Torshin wanted a “second meeting.”

CLAIM 4-10/ We know Torshin is under criminal investigation in multiple jurisdictions and was Butina’s handler in a course of conduct in which Butina was a covert agent of influence; we know he’s fled; we know he took numerous actions to secretly liaison with Trump team members.

 

CLAIM 5/ Byrne’s story is “crazy” (Jim Comey).

First, we *have* to note that the *whole Trump-Russia story* as we now know it—while 100% true, per Mueller—sounds crazy when you first hear it. But Comey isn’t actually, making a *blanket* denial of Byrne’s highly unusual claims.

CLAIM 5-1/ It appears what Comey is denying is that *he* oversaw FBI agents’ contacts with Byrne—or that *he* in any way directed Byrne to have a relationship with Butina. It’s entirely possible for both Comey and Byrne to be right—as Byrne seems to be guessing about some things.

CLAIM 5-2/ Not only did Byrne *only* have contact with field agents—it *doesn’t* appear he had contact with FBI leadership—when you actually listen to the facts of his story, rather than his own misguided framing, it’s not clear… well… what the field agents *asked* him to do.

CLAIM 5-3/ From July ’15 to July ’16, Byrne was voluntarily in a relationship with Butina that he voluntarily reported on to FBI field agents. He says when he asked the agents to greenlight the relationship they did—but they were just declining to force him to end a relationship.

CLAIM 5-4/ It *would’ve* been a scandal if agents *had* told Byrne to end the relationship in late 2015—as it would suggest they saw Butina as dangerous *but* weren’t willing to investigate her further. *And* they’d be interceding in Byrne’s situation in a way they’d have to own.

CLAIM 5-5/ So the supposed “greenlight” appears to be FBI agents saying, yeah, you can keep us informed if you like, in the event anything untoward happens, but we’re not going to stand in the way of your romantic relationship. That appears to be all that happened at that point.

CLAIM 5-6/ What Byrne is *angry* about is that he then kept feeding the FBI agents information—which presumably they memorializedbut that they didn’t take any action, which frankly is *exactly* the same reaction Christopher Steele encountered, and actually looks bad for *Trump*.

CLAIM 5-7/ Trump and his allies’ conspiracy theory is that there was a massive FBI conspiracy to destroy him—but only if he won the presidency, which they took no action to prevent; follow *that* logic—but Byrne/Steele both suggest the FBI *ignored* evidence of Trump-Russia ties.

CLAIM 5-8/ Coupled with the FBI *lying to the New York Times* in the days before the election about what they knew of Trump-Russia ties, what we’re seeing is a *consistent* pattern of the FBI *hiding* what it knows about Trump and Russia rather than weaponizing it in any fashion.

 

CLAIM 5-9/ Even so, nothing in Byrne’s story is even arguably “crazy”—to go back to Comey’s claim—until July 2016, when the FBI, inspired by other evidence of Trump-Russia ties, asks Byrne if he’s *willing* to not just continue his relationship but continue having it be romantic.

CLAIM 5-10/ But here’s the thing: Byrne was already in the relationshipwhich is confirmed. It’d previously been romantic—which is confirmed. So in what way was the FBI even asking Byrne to do something he wasn’t already doing? It’s unclear. I think there’s an easier explanation:

CLAIM 5-11/ The easier explanation is that in July 2016 the agents communicating with Byrne told him that—in fact—Butina *was* potentially a danger to the US, at which point—presumably—Byrne would’ve wanted to break things off. The FBI simply asked him to consider not doing that.

CLAIM 5-12/ And that is, I think, the sum total of the far-less-interesting “Strzok-McCabe-Comey” part of the story—Byrne is offended that the FBI even *asked* him to continue seeing Maria Butina after the FBI informed him it was, in fact, worried that she was a foreign agent.

CLAIM 5-13/ But the fact is, the FBI request for Byrne to consider continuing to see Butina came in *July 2016* if it came at all: at a time when—as Byrne says the FBI told him—they were dealing with an extraordinary national security situation. It was *not* some concocted plot.

CLAIM 5-14/ I think, therefore, that Comey can be *correct* that Byrne’s framing of events is “crazy” even as his response doesn’t do anything to contradict the core facts: the Byrne-Butina relationship; Byrne-FBI contact; Butina’s claims—to Byrne—that she and Torshin met Don Jr.

 

CLAIM 6/ AG Barr intercepted Byrne’s evidence, even though it should have gone to the DOJ’s IG—Horowitz—and Barr should’ve had nothing to do with it.

Unclear. Byrne says that Barr knows the entirety of his (Byrne’s) story, but it’s not clear if he’s presuming that or knows that.

CLAIM 7/ Byrne “set up” persons “X, Y, and Z”—who he appears to now identify, respectively, as McCabe, Strzok, and Comey—for federal “felony charges.”
False. There’s zero evidence any of these men did anything wrong or were even involved in the field agents’ contacts with Byrne.
CLAIM 8/ Byrne himself committed federal felonies.
True—apparently. Byrne confessed, to journalist Seth Hettena, that he deliberately and repeatedly lied to federal investigators on the subject of a federal criminal investigation that he knew was ongoing. That’s a federal crime.
CLAIM 9/ Byrne was somehow coaxed into telling this story by Trump allies.
Unclear. Byrne says Warren Buffet—a mentor—is the person who finally convinced him to talk, though he also spoke to a “bigtime Republican attorney” who told him *not* to. But that’s where things get odd.
CLAIM 9-1/ Byrne also is cagey about who told him (almost certainly falsely) Strzok, McCabe, and Comey were overseeing his situation. These three men happen to be Trump’s three biggest enemies—in Trump’s view. Byrne also implies that *watching Trump allies on TV* got him to talk.
CLAIM 9-2/ It’s also unclear why Barr—who’s been acting as Trump’s lawyer, not the Attorney General—had access to info that should’ve been immediately referred to the IG. And it’s not clear why, if Byrne confessed to federal felonies in April, he hasn’t—it’s August—been arrested.
CLAIM 9-3/ It’s also unclear why Byrne’s first interview was with far-right “journalist” Sara Carterwho’s pushed the “Spygate” hoax Trump allies are desperately hoping will eclipse his crimesand why his second and third interviews went to Trump-allied Fox News and Fox Business.
CLAIM 9-4/ It’s also unclear why Byrne has had so much contact with the lawyers for a Kremlin agent (Butina) that his story now seems aimed at advancing a false narrative—aided by Byrne’s own bad framingthat would be exculpatory for Butina and, more importantly, for the Kremlin.
CLAIM 9-5/ Byrne also talks like someone who was seduced byand is still dazzled by—Butina. He offers glowing praise of her character and abilities, even saying she should be Russia’s president. So all this feels off—like the broader agenda that pushed Byrne forward is political.
SUMMARY1/ It’s possible that, due to Byrne’s bad framing—which seems wrapped up in others’ political agenda(s)—Byrne is telling the truth about the core facts of his story, many of which dovetail with other evidence, but simply drawing bad conclusions about what those facts mean.
SUMMARY2/ The facts Byrne offers about Butina’s Kremlin connections and carried-out plans to secretly collude with the Trump family are what’s earth-shattering here; the rest is just noise, confusion, and bad framing. Congress now needs to follow up on *only* the facts here. /end

IF ALL THIS WAS NOT ENOUGH TO CONVINCE YOU OF:

  1. THE DANGER AMERICA IS IN
  2. THE DANGER THE WORLD IS IN
  3. THAT THERE IS NO POLITICAL ANSWER…

THEN MAYBE THIS WILL HELP:

THERE ARE OTHER INVESTIGATIONS GOING ON.

AND ANOTHER POLITICIAN/PERSON IS NOT THE ANSWER.

THE ANSWER????

TURN TO

TRUST IN

FOLLOW COMPLETELY

THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. PERIOD.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

The Answer?

Though the above is meant to be funny (Author’s note: If it weren’t so scary it would be funny), it does not signal the true start of America’s descent into Liberalism, which goes back to the Liberalization of America’s universities, colleges, and so-called elite academia in the 1870’s. For brevity we will concern ourselves with what marked America’s first shift(s) as a nation toward Liberalism in 1913 and bring it forward to today via a timeline.

1913- President Woodrow Wilson (a racist, globalist, and Socialist) is the “father” of the IRS, INCOME TAX, The Federal Reserve bank, and The League of Nations, which would then give way to The United Nations. Wilson’s tax and economic policies led in part to The Great Depression.

1923-1929- CALVIN COOLIDGE. A small, Constitutionally restricted government, and tax CUTTER. Truly a Constitutional-Conservative and a silent version of the later Ronald Reagan. Greatly slowed the march toward Marxism/Liberalism.

1929- Herbert Hoover, another Liberal, Big Government President, exacerbated Wilson’s taxing with his Big Government spending. Hoover began the “alphabet soup” government bureaus that plague us to. This spending REQUIRED MORE $$$, hence taxes went UP…the logical application of Liberalism is ruin.

1933- FDR. What Wilson and Hoover began FDR put on steroids and applied even more vehemently. More bureaus, more government spending, to “Liberal Logic” necessitated MORE taxation. Truman continued this during his term.

1953- Eisenhower slowed the march down, BUT his “Super Highway” program, AND his continuing of ALL “New Deal” programs, AND expanding them did keep America’s march into Liberal ruin going. Eisenhower described himself as a “Progressive Moderate”.

1961-1969- JFK and LBJ sped the Marxist march back up…A LOT. Especially Johnson with his “Great Society”, which was a warmed over FDR “New Deal”. In short: Liberal answer is ALWAYS MORE GOVERNMENT…ALWAYS.

1969-1976- NIXON FORD…Minimum Wage, The 3 Phases of Wage and Price FREEZES, established the EPA…more and more BIG GOVERNMENT MEDDLING.

1977-1981- CARTER. A BIG pusher of Affirmative Action, aka Race & Gender based quotas; Carter also instituted the Cabinet level positions of the Depts. of Energy and Education, more reasons to spend $$$, hence to RAISE taxes. Carter’s energy policy included government price control a’la Nixon’s wage and price freezes…all of which are, of course, Liberal, and FAILED.

1981-1989- REAGAN. Even more than Eisenhower greatly slowed the march towards more Marxism, more akin to Coolidge. Reagan’s tax CUTS help bolster the economy, create jobs, and bring in an economic boom. Reagan had to fight with a wholly Liberal/Democrat Congress, but was still able to slow the march down.

1989-2000- GEORGE H.W. BUSH AND CLINTON. Bush sr. broke a major campaign promise of “No New Taxes” and raised taxes a LOT. Clinton raised taxes, weakened our National Security, and tried to push through Nationalised Health Care, aka Marxism. Oh, and Lewinski.

2001-2008 GEORGE W. BUSH. I believe a sincere man, meant well, BUT was economically worse than his dad with bail outs/T.A.R.P, NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND; the Democrat created Dot.com collapse and housing collapse made things economically worse. And when Liberal ideas fail, as they can ONLY do, the answer? MORE LIBERALISM. Ugh!

2008-2016- OBAMA. Obama-Care. The SINGLE BIGGEST Marxist, BIG Government grab EVER. And Obama’s CONSTANTLY apologizing to America’s enemies, and cold-shouldering our Allies. Obama though more polite, civil, educated, and refined than Trump was actually the predecessor of what was to come.

2016-present- TRUMP. Wow! Take ALL the racism of Wilson and LBJ, ALL the Big Government “solutions” of FDR, LBJ, and BHO, add ALL the lying and corruption of Nixon and Clinton, throw in a short attention span, heinously bad temper,and the IQ of a clump of dirt, and you have Trump. For more detail on Trump that is deeply and thoroughly documented see HERE .

FOR MORE ON HOW BAD IT IS NOW SEE:

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE and

HERE . This last one I wrote originally in 2015…NOT ONE PERSON HAS EVEN TRIED TO REFUTE IT, ANSWER IT, OR DENY IT. NOT. ONE.

All this has been well and deeply documented.
WHY ISN’T ANYTHING BEING DONE???

 

And….

MY QUESTION:

WHY, AND HOW, DOES ANYONE STILL DEFEND AND SUPPORT TRUMP???

Donald Trump Has Made More Than 12,000 False or Misleading Claims Since Becoming President

=======

These are the Trump associates who’ve pleaded guilty in the Mueller probe

The report is complete, but it’s possible more guilty pleas could come after further investigations.

========

A list of the alleged and admitted crimes undertaken by people associated with the Trump campaign

=======

TRUMP’S WORLD STILL FACES 16 KNOWN CRIMINAL PROBES

=======

It’s no coincidence that Trump is surrounded by criminals

========

Trump and Republicans and their pals who are Pedophiles and Sexual Abusers

PREDATORS TRUMP DEFENDED

• Rob Porter
• Steve Wynn
• Roy Moore
• Steve Bannon
• Bill O’Reilly
• Corey Lewandowski
• Roger Ailes
• Andrew Puzder
• Mike Tyson
• Donald Trump

“Trust me I will only hire the best people. BELIEVE ME! They will be great.”

=======

HOW can any sane person, Conservative or Liberal, ESPECIALLY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE A CHRISTIAN, defend and support THIS??!!!!

I’m going to speak to Conservatives now, primarily those who claim to be Christian.
HOW do YOU defend THIS?!!

Trump: ‘I Am the Chosen One’

Trump has snubbed an ally over some whacked-out fantasy to buy Greenland, told Jews who vote for Democrats that they’re disloyal, and referred to himself as the Chosen One. I eagerly await GOP loyalists saying with a straight face they think this is a stable, normal person.

-Tom Nichols, Twitter Patriot.

Skeptical? Don’t believe me?

Here, this is from Trump’s own Twitter account:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

“Thank you to Wayne Allyn Root for the very nice words. “President Trump is the greatest President for Jews and for Israel in the history of the world, not just America, he is the best President for Israel in the history of the world...and the Jewish people in Israel love him…. ….like he’s the King of Israel. They love him like he is the second coming of God…But American Jews don’t know him or like him. They don’t even know what they’re doing or saying anymore. It makes no sense! But that’s OK, if he keeps doing what he’s doing, he’s good for….. ..all Jews, Blacks, Gays, everyone. And importantly, he’s good for everyone in America who wants a job.” Wow!

================

The bizarre-even-by-Trump-standards past 72 hours, explained

From an ill-fated attempt to purchase Greenland to God comparisons, the past three days have been a lot.

By 

President Donald Trump speaking with his hand held up in the sign for “okay.”

President Donald Trump repeatedly threatened to release ISIS fighters in Europe as a form of punishment for countries like Germany and France; said he’s strongly considering trying to change the Constitution by executive order (it doesn’t work that way); indicated he hasn’t ruled out trying to illegally serve more than two terms; rewrote history during comments about Russia’s expulsion from the G8 that framed the situation in the most pro-Kremlin manner possible; and, despite five draft deferments, joked about giving himself the Medal of Honor.

That was Wednesday. And that’s an incomplete list of all the outlandish stuff Trump said on that day alone.

 

Any of the aforementioned statements would’ve generated major scandals coming from the mouth of any other president. But given the week Trump has been having, they arguably didn’t even make the cut of the five most WTF things he’s said since his New Jersey vacation ended on Monday.

Even in the context of a presidency that has regularly veered into surreal territory, the 72-hour period from Monday through Wednesday stood out. From a silly, ill-fated attempt to purchase Greenland that turned into a diplomatic row to amplifying a conspiracy theorist who compared him with God, Trump seems to be out there more than ever before.

Here’s a chronological rundown of just some of the lowlights.

Trump gets mad when the Danish PM accurately describes his effort to buy Greenland as “absurd”

The president’s desire to purchase Greenland from Denmark — even though it isn’t for sale — started off humorously enough. Trump even managed to poke some fun at himself over the whole thing on Twitter on Monday.

View image on Twitter

 

But shortly after Trump posted that tweet, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen dismissed the idea of selling the resource-rich island to America as “absurd.” That seemed to wound Trump’s robust sense of pride, causing him to lash out.

Out of nowhere, Trump on Tuesday escalated things by announcing that in light of Frederiksen’s comments, he decided to cancel his planned state visit to Denmark — one he reportedly invited himself to in the first place

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) noted that the chain of events was worthy of a Simpsons episode.

Little known fact: the current CNN breaking news headline “President Trump Postpones Denmark Trip After Prime Minster Refuses to Sell Greenland to United States”, was, word for word, in a 1995 episode of The Simpsons.

And yet there was more to come. Trump took things to another level on Wednesday, calling Frederiksen’s comments “nasty.”

“She shouldn’t treat the United States that way, by saying, ‘absurd.’ That’s not the right word to use, ‘absurd,’” Trump said, adding that he thinks he knows Denmark “well” because “I have many people from Denmark who live in the United States.”

[NOTE: Trump said “I have many…” I?? The U.S. is NOT Trump’s property!!!!]

Before Wednesday was over, Trump was attacking NATO in general and Denmark in particular for not spending as much as he wants them to on defense. What started as farce had turned into a diplomatic debacle.

Trump says he’s “the chosen one” and compares himself to the king of Israel. No, really.

In recent weeks, Trump has tried to score political points off Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib’s (D-MI) criticisms of Israel in an extremely misleading manner by saying things like they “hate Israel and all Jewish people.”

Trump seems to think that in light of Omar and Tlaib, no American Jew should vote for a Democrat. And on Tuesday, he said so in a way that invoked the very “dual loyalties” trope Republicans spent so much time criticizing Omar over earlier this year.

“I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat — I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty,” he said.

The president’s accusation that the majority of American Jews are either dumb or traitorous did not go over well. But on Wednesday morning, he made it even worse by quoting commentary from far-right conspiracy theorist Wayne Allyn Root in which Root asserted that Jews in Israel regard Trump as something akin to “the King of Israel” or “the second coming of God.” (Jews do not in fact believe in the second coming of God. [NOTE: Jews await the coming of Messiah, to them it is the first coming])

During his Wednesday afternoon media availability, Trump indicated that he’s taking Root’s comparison of him to divine figures more seriously than you might think. At one point he paused, looked toward the heavens, and said, “I am the chosen one.”

SOURCE .

======

LET ME ASK THIS AGAIN IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:

HOW can any sane person, Conservative or Liberal, ESPECIALLY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE A CHRISTIAN, defend and support THIS??!!!!

IF ALL THIS WAS NOT ENOUGH TO CONVINCE YOU OF:

  1. THE DANGER AMERICA IS IN
  2. THE DANGER THE WORLD IS IN
  3. THAT THERE IS NO POLITICAL ANSWER…

THEN MAYBE THIS WILL HELP:

THERE ARE OTHER INVESTIGATIONS GOING ON.

AND ANOTHER POLITICIAN/PERSON IS NOT THE ANSWER.

THE ANSWER????

TURN TO

TRUST IN

FOLLOW COMPLETELY

THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. PERIOD.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Polishing A Turd

Related image

Intro.

I have a lot of well-meaning friends (and some busy-body snoops) who want to know what I think of the Democrat field? what about the Democrat debates? which Democrat looks “good” to me?

Apparently they don’t know very well.

So, in the spirit of full disclosure let me explain:

Since 1962, when America banned God, America has been careening OFF the road, through dense woods, and since Obama, headed FOR the cliff…and with Trump have SPED UP AND WENT FLYING OFF THE CLIFF!

Let me be clear: there is NO Liberal cure. There is NO Liberal answer. Liberalism is what got us here.

So, to ask “Which Democrat is the best choice to replace Trump?”

The answer is: NONE OF THEM.

Trump IS a NY Liberal. NO “other kind” of Liberal will solve the problem. It will only make it worse…because LIBERALISM IS THE PROBLEM/POISON.

Some candidates may offer Liberalism in “smaller doses over longer periods of time”.

BUT, again, let me be crystal clear: LIBERALISM IS THE PROBLEM/POISON…no “small dose” application will, nor can be the cure. 

To use a hillbilly way to address it, it is akin to polishing a TURD. Whether horse, cow, goat, pig, or human…polishing a TURD is still just POLISHING A TURD.

WHAT IS THE ANSWER?

  1. AMERICA, YOU, ME, ALL OF US- HUMBLE OURSELVES BEFORE THE ALMIGHTY, THRICE HOLY GOD OF HEAVEN AND EARTH.
  2. SEEK GOD’S FACE, HIS WAYS, HIS WILL, HIS GLORY- NOT OUR OWN.
  3. PRAY. PRAY AS NEVER BEFORE. PRAY FERVENTLY. PRAY SINCERELY. PRAY EARNESTLY. PRAY.
  4. TURN FROM OUR WICKED WAYS. REPENT. TURN FROM SIN AND WICKEDNESS. TURN FROM UNBELIEF AND SKEPTICISM. TURN FROM PRIDE AND LUST. TURN TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST.

Most know how II Chronicles 7:14 ends…BUT we may be so close to the end of time as we know it (Matthew 24; Romans 1:16-32; I Timothy 4:1-3; II Timothy 3:1-8, 12, 13; Galatians 5:16-25, II Thessalonians 2:2-12, and the entire Book of Revelation)?

All evidence points to The Last Days. 

Meaning it may be too late.

It may be too late for a universal, nation-changing, world-shaking revival…BUT the church of The Living God CAN STILL HAVE VICTORY!

HOW?

LOOK TO JESUS. TRUST JESUS. FOLLOW JESUS. LEAN ON JESUS. LOVE JESUS.

The SAME WAY we had VICTORY under Roman rule and persecution. It hasn’t ever changed. Wont change. Can’t change. AND DOESN’T NEED TO CHANGE.

LOOK TO JESUS.

TRUST JESUS.

FOLLOW JESUS.

LEAN ON JESUS.

LOVE JESUS.

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

TrumPutin: Headlines and Memes

MUTT AND MUTTIER

“Trump isn’t known to have gone on any trips with Epstein, which would have been out of character. “I don’t think Trump would go to someone else’s property or someone else’s island or villa,” Nunberg said. “He doesn’t even play golf at anyone else’s clubs.” But Trump did host Epstein as a guest at Mar-a-Lago, where he appears in photos in 1997 and 2000. Epstein’s personal little black book, which was leaked by an employee in 2009, contained 14 phone numbers for Trump, his wife, Melania, and several people who worked for him.”

FROM:

“HE SAID NOT TO TELL ANYONE”: HOW TRUMP KEPT TABS ON JEFFREY EPSTEIN

SOURCE .

==================

JUST “HIM AND EPSTEIN” AND “28 GIRLS”: FLORIDA MAN DROPS A DIME ON TRUMP

Florida businessman George Houraney told the New York Times that the president’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein involved at least one “calendar girl” party at Mar-a-Lago.

 

Donald Trump now says he’s “not a fan” of Jeffrey Epstein, a convenient way to feel about the disgraced financier in the aftermath of his 2008 conviction on soliciting underage girls for prostitution and his indictment Monday on charges of sex trafficking minors. (Epstein has pleaded not guilty.) But that wasn’t always the case. There was a time when Trump could be counted among Epstein’s rich, well-connected friends. And, according to a report in the New York Times on Tuesday, the relationship may have been a good deal closer than the president has let on.

Per the Times, Trump in 1992 directed Florida businessman George Houraney—who would later accuse Trump of sexually harassing his former girlfriend and business partner, Jill Harth—to organize a members’ only “calendar girl” competition at Mar-a-Lago. After Houraney “arranged to have some contestants fly in,” he told the Times in an interview Monday, he discovered that there would be only two attendees. “At the very first party, I said, ‘Who’s coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming.’ It was him and Epstein,” Houraney recalled. “I said, ‘Donald, this is supposed to be a party with V.I.P.s. You’re telling me it’s you and Epstein?’” The anecdote underscores the friendship between the pair, and suggests that their relationship proceeded in spite of warnings about Epstein’s behavior. Houraney “pretty much had to ban Jeff from my events,” he said. “Trump didn’t care about that.”

[NOTE: It wasn’t Trump banning Epstein, it was HOURNANEY!!]

 

 

NOTICE THE YEAR TRAMP SAID THIS!!!

Quote from Christopher B. Monday:
I keep seeing posts about impeachment of the President which I find sort of ridiculous and here’s why. The Democrats secretly like him because he is a liberal and Republicans admire him because he does whatever he wants and because they too are liberal, they are covert about it.

TRUMP SUPPORTERS:

THE “GOSPEL” ACCORDING TO TRUMP & CO. :

BELOW IS WHY TO JOIN THE CONSTITUTION PARTY:

 

GLADLY PAY^^^

YO, TRUMPERS, YA LISTENING??

 

There you have it.

“I don’t know if I agree with all of this.”

GOOGLE IS OUR FRIEND. CHECK IT OUT. READ. BE INFORMED. QUIT BEING DELIBERATELY BLIND, DEAF, AND DUMB.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

CELEBRATING ALL THAT IS (THE REAL) TRUMPUTIN.

IN TRUMP-LAND, FORMERLY KNOW AS AMERICA, TRUMPUTIN SEEMS TO FEEL THAT INDEPENDENCE DAY/THE 4TH OF JULY IS ALL ABOUT HIM…UGH.

So, if we are to truly celebrate all that TrumPutin truly is then, well, let’s present THE TRUTH… let us start shall we.

THE REAL TRUMPUTIN

All False statements involving Donald Trump

 

AND

REPORT: TRUMP HAS TOLD MORE THAN 10,000 LIES SINCE BEING INAUGURATED

The noise from wind turbines causes cancer. The wall is already being built. Mothers, in consultation with their doctors, execute their children. These are some of the boldest, most deranged lies Donald Trump has told since becoming the 45th president of the United States. But, as anyone with access to the Internet or TV knows, he’s also told hundreds of smaller lies about everything from not calling Tim Cook“Tim Apple” to the number of people at a Beto O’Rourke rally. And when we say the leader of the free world has told “hundreds” of lies, we actually mean closer to 10,000.

In a truly superhuman feat, The Washington Post has tallied all the “falsehoods” that have spewed from Trump’s mouth and fingers since January 20, 2017, to April 27, 2019. Per the Post, that’s a whopping 10,111 in 828 days. And the situation vis-à-vis the president being a pathological liar is getting markedly worse. After telling a mere 5,000 false and misleading statements during his first 601 days in office, the pace and frequency of the lies has accelerated such that he doubled his bullsh*t in just a third of the time, telling almost 23 lies a day in the seven-month period beginning in late October, during midterm elections.

AND,

Trump is a known liar. Cover-ups are exactly what he does

After storming out of a meeting with members of Congress on Wednesday, President Trump held a press conference where he began with the phrase “I don’t do cover-ups.” The truth is Trump’s campaign and presidency have been filled with lies and cover-ups. Two of the most egregious examples are:

► Just days before the election in 2016, it was Trump who instructed his fixer Michael Cohen to funnel $130,000 in hush money to adult film star actress Stormy Daniels — money he reimbursed after taking office — in violation of campaign finance laws.

► When the news media first reported that senior members of the Trump’s team — including Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner — secretly met with Russian operatives promising dirt on Hillary Clinton in Trump Tower during the campaign, also in violation of campaign finance laws, Trump reportedly dictated the misleading statement by Trump Jr. claiming the meeting was about adoption policy.

The president’s strained relationship with the truth is well-documented. The Washington Post has identified more than 10,000 false or misleading statements that Trump made since assuming office.

The lies did not begin with his swearing in. For years, Trump built a personal brand of being a successful businessman, but he has since refused to release his taxes or any financial information during his campaign and presidency. The financial information the public has seen shows that he and his business have lost millions of dollars each year due to bad deals and investments.

===========================

BUT TRUMPUTIN ALSO IS…

SEXUAL PREDATOR.

Two women say E Jean Carroll told them about Trump alleged sexual assault

AND,

The 24 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

AND,

The one weird court case linking Trump, Clinton, and a billionaire pedophile

A woman suing in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s underage sex ring claims she was first approached while working as a towel girl at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort.

The woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her at age 13 has droppedher civil suit against the GOP presidential nominee. The suit alleged that the victim, known only as Jane Doe, was raped at a party thrown by sex offender billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. The suit also alleged that Epstein raped her. Earlier this week, Trump’s accuser was scheduled to give a press conference alongside attorney Lisa Bloom, but canceled the event at the last minute. Bloom says the woman was fearful for her life.

In a statement to The Daily Beast’s Brandy Zadrozny, Trump attorney Alan Garten responded to the news saying, “We are disturbed by the behavior of the attorneys involved and are evaluating our options.”

AND,

A Timeline of Donald Trump’s Inappropriate History With Women

Donald Trump’s infamous “grab her by the pussy” comment is just the tip of the iceberg: The president has a long history of sexual assault accusations and predatory remarks about women.

 

On October 7, 2016, the direction of Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign took a major turn when a 2005 video surfaced of the businessman turned presidential candidate boasting about how his celebrity privilege has allowed him to grope women and kiss them whether they want it or not. “I just start kissing them,” he told former Access Hollywood host Billy Bush. “It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy.”…

1992: A 10-year-old girl
Another damaging Trump video that emerged during the 2016 election cycle is a 1992 segment for Entertainment Tonight in which Trump made sexually suggestive remarks about a 10-year-old girl. Yes, really. While spotting the girl in front of an escalator, Trump quipped, “I’m going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?” To add even more disturbing perspective to this event, his daughter Ivanka Trump was also 10 years old at the time. He’s since joked that he would be dating her too, if she weren’t his daughter…

1992: Two 14-year-old girls
The same year, Trump made similar remarks to two 14-year-old girls, as the Chicago Tribune reported, linking to an archived story in its entertainment and gossip column. The wire report stated the incident occurred when Trump visited a youth choir outside of the Plaza Hotel. “He asked two of the girls how old they were,” it reads. “After they replied they were 14, Trump said, ‘Wow! Just think—in a couple of years I’ll be dating you.'”

1994: A 13-year-old girl
Trump has been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl in the apartment of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The case, which was recently filed for the third time in New York City, where the alleged rape occurred, consists of two affidavits filed by “Joan Doe” and “Tiffany Doe” which corroborate the victim’s story, as BuzzFeed reported. “Joan” says she was told about the assault after it happened, while “Tiffany,” who was apparently hired as a “recruiter” to bring young girls to Epstein’s apartment, alleges Trump and Epstein raped the victim more than once. Trump’s attorney has denied these accusations.

Late 1990s: Cathy Heller
Heller says she was at a Mother’s Day brunch at Mar-a-Lago with her family when her mother-in-law introduced her to Donald Trump. When she went to shake his hand, she says he pulled her toward him, and she tried to pull away. “He said, ‘Oh, come on,’ and he was angry,” she said. “He really grabbed me, and he was holding me very tight to kiss me on the mouth. He was strong.” She says she turned her head slightly so he couldn’t kiss her fully on the mouth, but she was still shaken and upset that he’d had the nerve to grab her in such a public manner—and in front of her family. Heller came forward with her story after Trump denied that he ever kissed women without their permission. “It drove me crazy,” she said. “It’s not just locker room talk. That’s who he is. He is a guy who grabs women.” A relative who says she was behind Heller when it happened supports her allegation, as does Heller’s husband, who was also present. The Trump campaign refuted the account.

SOURCE .

======

LASTLY, TO GET THE FULL SENSE OF WHO TRUMPUTIN REALLY IS…

TRUMP’S LOVE FOR TYRANNY

Nine Notorious Dictators, Nine Shout-Outs From Donald Trump

 

 

The Chinese Communist Party’s attempt to allow President Xi Jinping to rule indefinitely set off harsh criticism in China, as well as international opprobrium. But the power grab appears to have at least one fan: Donald Trump.

“He’s now president for life. President for life. No, he’s great,” Trump said of Xi at a lunch and fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago estate, according to CNN, which obtained a recording of the remarks. “And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot some day.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin

What Trump said about him: “If he says great things about me, I’m going to say great things about him. I’ve already said, he is really very much of a leader. I mean, you can say, ‘Oh, isn’t that a terrible thing’—the man has very strong control over a country. Now, it’s a very different system, and I don’t happen to like the system. But certainly, in that system, he’s been a leader, far more than our president has been a leader.”

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte

What Trump said about him: “I just wanted to congratulate you because I am hearing of the unbelievable job on the drug problem.”

When: April 2017

Context: The Philippines president has boasted about killing suspected drug dealers when he was a local mayor. Extrajudicial killings of drugs suspects have risen since Duterte became president in June 2016. Trump reportedly favors the death penalty for drug dealers—presumably ones who have been convicted.  The U.S. State Department noted last year that “police and unknown vigilantes have killed more than 6,000 suspected drug dealers and users as the government pursued a policy aimed at eliminating illegal drug activity in the country by the end of the year.” Human Rights Watch said“Duterte has plunged the Philippines into its worst human rights crisis since the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos in the 1970s and 1980s.” It added that Duterte’s most prominent critic was detained on “politically motivated drug charges.”

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

What Trump said about him: “Frankly, he’s getting very high marks. He’s also been working with the United States. We have a great friendship and the countries—I think we’re right now as close as we’ve ever been … a lot of that has to do with a personal relationship.”

When: September 2017

Context: The president’s remarks came shortly after Erdogan cracked down on Turkish civil society, the media, and his opponents. Erdogan accused members of democratic institutions of being part of a failed coup attempt against him the previous year. Trump even congratulated Erdogan after last year’s referendum that gave him—and subsequent presidents—more power.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi

What Trump said about him: “We agree on so many things. I just want to let everybody know in case there was any doubt that we are very much behind President el-Sisi. He’s done a fantastic job in a very difficult situation. We are very much behind Egypt and the people of Egypt. The United States has, believe me, backing, and we have strong backing.”

When: April 2017

Context: Sisi, who seized power in a coup, has cracked down in Egypt, where a brief flirtation with democracy during the Arab Spring resulted in a Muslim Brotherhood-dominated government (which Sisi ousted). The U.S. State Department says the most serious human-rights problems there involve “excessive use of force by security forces, deficiencies in due process, and the suppression of civil liberties.” Human Rights Watch says Sisi’s government “maintained its zero-tolerance policy towards dissent… and [continued] near-absolute impunity for abuses by security forces under the pretext of fighting ‘terrorism.’”

Trump’s fondness for authoritarians may have more to do with how power is wielded than those who exercise it. It just so happens that Western governments have, for the past seven decades, mostly adhered to a system of the rule of law, which empowers institutions rather than individuals. Trump’s apparent preference is for a system in which one individual, presumably him, wields that power.

Just how much does Trump love dictators? He can tell you in his own words.

SOURCE .

TWITTER PATRIOT, GLENN KIRSCHNER-

Who would have thought we see the day when we could take the word of Russian television over the word of our president and his Republican enablers in Congress.

QUOTES JULIA DAVIS-

‘s state TV host Evgeny Popov says that at the , “Putin completely captivated Trump, we can now say with complete certainty that Trump is ours.” Co-host Olga Skabeeva adds: “He wants the U.S. to be just like Russia… and himself to be just like Putin.” ©️

 

LET ME CLOSE AS I BEGAN:

 

 

SO, AS YOU GRILL, GATHER FAMILY AND FRIENDS, AND SET OFF FIRE-WORKS…REMEMBER TO GIVE TRUMPUTIN HIS DUE.

 

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

HOW TO DEFEAT LIBERAL “REASONING” EVERY TIME, ALL THE TIME, EASILY.

If after reading the article’s title you said, “This I gotta see.” Then, buddy, this is the place for you.

99.99% of this article will be simply using three things:

  1. COMMON-SENSE
  2. LOGIC.
  3. REALITY.

There WILL be links to facts. evidence, and science….but for the most part all that is needed to defeat Liberalism and Liberals is a functioning mind and sticking to the facts.

So, are you ready…

FIRST AT BAT:

TAXATION, SPENDING, THE ECONOMY, AND THE NATIONAL DEBT.

Liderals: we need to RAISE taxes on everyone, especially “tHe eViL rIcH”.

Conservative response:

Let’s use McDonalds as an example.

McDonalds in 1987 made 5.8125 BILLION DOLLARS.

So, according to Liberals, McDonalds quit opening stores, quit hiring people, quit giving raises, quit giving bonuses…that’s what happened, right? Because, in Liberal “reasoning” there is NO trickle down benefits, NO investing, NO growth, NO profit SHARING….

EXCEPT in The real World NONE of that happened. NOT. ONE. BIT.

McDonalds KEPT OPENING STORES.

McDonalds KEPT HIRING PEOPLE.

McDonalds KEPT GIVING RAISES.

McDonalds KEPT GIVING BONUSES.

McDonalds grew. And with it the economy FOR EVERYONE. Jobs were CREATED.

JOBS, LIKE, surveyors, architects, construction companies, construction workers, managers, assistant managers, supervisors, EMPLOYEES….

By “tHe eViL rIcH” being able to MAKE money, lots of money, they then INVESTED IT IN JOBS, HIRING, BUILDING, AND GROWING.

To which we Conservatives say:

“DUH!”

Of course that’s what happened! It’s HOW businesses actually operate in the REAL world.

Liberal Counter: “Yeah, but the managers, presidents and CEOs make a LOT more money than the fry cook!”

To which we Conservatives say:

Yes. You do NOT start at the TOP. You start at the bottom and work your way up.

Liberal Counter: “Work?!! As in EARN it?!!”

To which we Conservatives say:

Yes.

REALITY MATH:

20% of $100,000 IS LESS THAN 10% of $1,000,000.

 

GLOBAL COOLING, GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE CHANGE.

FIRST OF ALL:

CLIMATE IS: the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period; a region with particular prevailing weather conditions.

-Source: Google Online Dictionary.

OK.

Climate is DIRECTLY TIED TO AND DEFINED BY…WEATHER.

Having established THE OBVIOUS let us proceed.

In the late ’60’s and early ’70’s the Liberals were warning of “Global Cooling! The Next Ice-Age! All caused by man!” The ACTUAL data never supported that, but, nonetheless Time, Newsweek, The NYT’s et al ran with it. Hence it most assuredly was “truth”. **CUE EYE ROLL**

NO. I t was NOT true.

I was alive then. We had hot, sticky, humid summers in the midwest.

We had hot, arid, blistering summers in the southwest.

NO WHERE did weather conditions ever exist to support the “GLOBAL Cooling” hoax.

NO WHERE.

THENNNNN….

In the ’80’s through the early 2000’s the Left/Liberals warned us of “Global Warming”.

Except….there was NO “Global Warming”.

IT WAS ALL A COLOSSAL HOAX.

Soooo, when that rewording of “Global Crisis” didn’t work the Left/Liberals went to this, using “expert” John Kerry to help carry the water: 

“GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE”

The first two Leftist/Liberal alarms were flat out lies, hoaxes, so they went for something so ambiguous that ANY “data” could appear ro support it: “Global Climate-Change”. ANY change in the weather anywhere was “evidence” of the “Boogie-Man” of the eViL GlObAl cLiMaTe ChANgE. 

It’s raining in SPRING TIME? “Global Climate-Change”.

Hot during Summer? “Global Climate-Change”.

Tornadoes in Kansas, Texas, Missouri, and Oklahoma? “Global Climate-Change”.

Water is wet? Fire is hot? “Global Climate-Change”.

Ugh.

You’re asking by now, “Why are the Libs so bent on warning and scaring people with obvious lies?”

It has NEVER been about HELP.

IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT: CONTROL.

Leftists/Liberals are always and ONLY about: CONTROL.

They think we are too stupid or lazy to take care of ourselves.

We “NEED” their CONTROL.

In short: The Climate Alarmists are the Commie RED wrapped in thinly veiled Enviro-Wacko GREEN.

 

Speaking of Control, our next topic is…

GUN CONTROL.

Liberal “Logic”: ban guns crime will go down.

REALITY:

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

Before becoming a Christian IN 1976 I was a criminal. I committed:

  1. THEFT
  2. BREAKING AND ENTERING
  3. VANDALISM
  4. BOOTLEGGING ILLEGAL FIREWORKS
  5. ARSON

AFTER becoming a Christian, and studying The Bible at 3 Bible colleges, I was an Assistant Supervisor of Security (Guard) for 6 years.

I also worked a Street Ministry for 12 years.

MY experience, my training, shows that:

  1. IF AND WHEN I KNOW a house, apt., car, office, store, or church is protected by alarms, cameras, and/OR ESPECIALLY A PERSON WITH A GUN– choose a “safer/easier” target,
  2. NEVER go against a gun without a gun. Knife? lose. Club? lose. (Unless you have the element of surprise and first strike…even then, NO guarantee of a win).
  3. DEAD PEOPLE do NOT commit crimes.
  4. ALWAYS meet a threat with OVERWHELMING FORCE ON YOUR SIDE.

This is simple COMMON-SENSE.

NO crook PLANS to commit a crime with the end result being they get shot and killed!

AND LASTLY,

LIBERALISM IS LIBERALISM REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT’S FOUND, WHICH PARTY’S NAME THE PERSON TOUTS, OR WHO IT IS. PERIOD.

I am soooo beyond fed up with folks TELLING me:
“IF you don’t support R.I.N.O. ‘X’ then you must be a Liberal/Democrat!”

LET ME JUST SAY THIS:

BULL CRAP!

I HAVE ALWAYS SUPPORTED AND VOTED FOR THE MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE POSSIBLE…ALWAYS…CONSERVATIVE.

1980- REAGAN.

1984- REAGAN [BOTH TIMES NO REGRETS.]

1988- G.H.W. BUSH [BETTER THAN DUKAKIS; STILL HAD REGRETS.]

1992- G.H.W. BUSH [WAAAAAY BETTER THAN CLINTON]

1996- BOB DOLE [HAD A 100% RATING WITH THE CONSERVATIVE UNION.]

2000-G.W. BUSH [WAAAY BETTER THAN ALGORE; STILL HAD REGRETS.]

2004- G.W. BUSH [WAAAY BETTER THAN JOHN KERRY; HAD EVEN MORE REGRETS.]

2008- McCain [BEFORE WE FOUND OUT WHAT A FLAKE PALIN WAS SHE SEEMED TO MAKE THIS OK.]

2012- ROMNEY [MUCH BETTER THAN MADE TO SEEM BY MEDIA, DEMS, AND TRAITORS ON THE CONSERVATIVE SIDE; NOT THE PERFECT CONSERVATIVE, BUT TRULY WAS A CONSERVATIVE.]

2016- McMullin [A TRUE AND SOUND CONSERVATIVE; BETTER THAN BOTH HILLARY, AND HILLARY’S BIGGEST DONOR AND BFF, TRUMP.]

2020- WILL LIKELY VOTE 3RD PARTY AGAIN, MOST LIKELY JUSTIN AMASH. WILL NEVER VOTE FOR TRUMP OR ANY DEMOCRAT- EVER!!! NO LIBERALS MEANS NO LIBERALS.

 

FOR ALL WHO STILL THINK TRUMP’S A CONSERVATIVE, THIS.

HAVE NEVER HAD ANYONE IN 4 YEARS EVEN REPLY TO, LET ALONE REFUTE THIS.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

WHY Have “WE The People” Allowed THIS To Happen In And To America?!!

PREFACE.

To be brutally honest, YES, Obama and Michelle were Marxist too. So were Bill and Hillary, Al Gore, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon, LBJ, FDR…in short, ALL Democrats and EVERY R.I.N.O. is Marxist to some degree or another.

They were all in their own way corrupt and subversive of Our Constitution. So the IDIOTIC “What-Aboutism” crap can STOP NOW.

The stark difference between ALL of them and the flaming, NY Liberal, Big Government, Marxist NUT-JOB we have now is that THEY were at least, as people, much more polite, civil, normal, sane, and many actually thought that they were doing what is Right and Good.

Trump is a flat-out lying, conniving, backstabbing, egotistical, maniacal, fraud and con man. Trump commits OPEN treason, conspires with Putin-Russia, N. Korea, China, Saudi Arabia…Trump commits OPEN obstruction of justice with every breath he takes, he is rude, vile. Trump insults and wages trade wars with our allies, mocks and ridicules our allies, threatens to pull out of NATO, ALL WHILE appeasing and placating Russia, N. Korea, China, Saudi Arabia.

Trump OPENLY BRAGS about sexually assaulting MANY women, mocks the handicapped, scorns OUR military and IC, and takes the sole word of dictators like Putin and Kim Jung Un as Gospel Truth over the word of accumulated evidence from 17 of OUR Military and Intel agencies! 

And Trump lies. Trump lies about EVERYTHING EVERYDAY! Trump then lies about his lies. He then tells more lies to “explain” his previous lies, while telling more lies.

And UNLIKE every other corrupt politician named or unnamed Trump does care ONE BIT about if it’s Right or Good. Trump doesn’t care if it’s Constitutional. Trump does NOT care one bit if it WEAKENS America…or even RUINS America!

THE ONLY THING TRUMP CARES ABOUT IS:

TRUMP

====

Well, I saw this coming way back in the ’80’s when Trump attacked, smeared, and mocked Reagan. I saw it again in the ’90’s when Trump said Billy-Bob Clinton was the best President we’ve ever had (was sating that as recent as 2012!).

Through the early 2000’s saw it again when Trump mocked George W. Bush. And then thought Obama was great, even voted FOR Obama both times.

Trump has ALWAYS been a BIG Government, what’s-in-it-for-me Liberal. ALWAYS.

The grossly irritating part is that Trump is such a rude, vile, vulgar, festering, jackass that other Liberals hate him. And is so blatantly dishonest, corrupt, and Liberal that (TRUE) Conservatives can’t stand him!

The ONLY ones that like Trump are from the following groups:

THE STUPID

THOSE IGNORANT OF REAL AMERICAN HISTORY

THOSE IGNORANT OF THE CONSTITUTION

THOSE WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND WHERE LIBERTY COMES FROM AND HOW TO KEEP IT

THOSE WHO ARE IGNORANT OF CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVE ECONOMICS

THOSE IGNORANT OF CAPITALISM, FREE-MARKETS, PRIVATE BUSINESS/PROPERTY

THE GREEDY

THE CORRUPT

THE BLACKMAILED

THE BULLIED

THE BRIBED.

=========

Did you catch that?

Only those in one way or another are stupid/ignorant OR corrupt/bought off support Trump.

 

Don’t believe me? Then name ONE person who KNOWS America’s true History, origins, heritage, Laws, Constitution/Bill Of Rights, Liberty, and Freedom AND who is moral and uncompromised that supports Trump.

I’ll wait right here…

 

Let me save you some time. There are NONE. NO ONE who KNOWS American history, heritage, law, Constitution/Bill Of Rights, Liberty and Freedom, AND IS moral and uncompromised supports Trump.

 

NOT ONE.

BUT….you want evidence? proof?

HERE IT IS:

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

===

CAN THE CHATTER. DO SOMETHING ALREADY!

===

Either Trump Goes Or America IS OVER

===

Once Again…Just WHOSE Side Is Trump On??

===

“Only The BEST…EXTREME Vetting…” Part 3.

AND LASTLY,

Trump: The Politics of Distraction

===================

I know many of you Trumpers are mad. You are thinking, “Rev. Larry supports Obama, Hillary, Pelosi…Rev. Larry is a Liberal. Rev. Larry is a NUT…Rev. Larry hates Trump…”

  1. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY LIBERAL.
  2. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY LIBERALISM.
  3. I HAVE ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE EVER. PERIOD.
  4. I DO NOT HATE TRUMP OR ANYONE. I PRAY FOR HIS SOUL TO FIND (REAL) FORGIVENESS AND FOR TRUMP TO (TRULY) REPENT. BUT…….
  5. I LOVE JESUS, TRUTH, LIBERTY, AMERICA, OUR CONSTITUTION AND WHAT IS RIGHT MUCH MORE.

And BECAUSE I AM a Biblical-Christian and a Constitutional-Conservative I am bound by God’s Word to warn against ALL evil…and Trump IS evil.

 

 

 

You who continue to support Trump may be angry with me, you may even hate me…but I’ve given you facts, evidence, Scripture, Truth…AND the bottom line is:

YOUR OPINION WONT CHANGE THE FACTS.

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

GETTING BY WITH HELP FROM MY FRIENDS: TWITTER PATRIOTS, ASSEMBLE!

Related image

TO BEGIN LET ME LINK TO HE CALL FOR TRUMPUTIN’S IMPEACHMENT…FROM TRUMPUTIN HIMSELF:

Trump just invited Congress to begin impeachment proceedings

SOURCE .

[EXCERPTS.]

June 12 at 5:01 PM

George T. Conway III is a lawyer in New York. Neal Katyal, a law professor at Georgetown University, previously served as the acting solicitor general of the United States.

Much ink has been spilled about whether President Trump committed a criminal and impeachable offense by obstructing justice. That question deserves extensive debate, but another critical question — the ultimate question, really — is not whether he committed a crime, but whether he is even fit for office in the first place. And that question — the heart of an impeachment inquiry — turns upon whether the president abuses his power and demonstrates an unfitness to serve under the defining principles of our Constitution.

On Tuesday, Trump gave us direct evidence of his contempt toward the most foundational precept of our democracy — that no person, not even the president, is above the law. He filed a brief in the nation’s second-most-important court that takes the position that Congress cannot investigate the president, except possibly in impeachment proceedings. It’s a spectacularly anti-constitutional brief, and anyone who harbors such attitudes toward our Constitution’s architecture is not fit for office. Trump’s brief is nothing if not an invitation to commencing impeachment proceedings that, for reasons set out in the Mueller report, should have already commenced.

=============

THAT IS TODAY (JUNE 12, 2019). BUT LEADING UP TO THIS HAS BEEN THE GROUND WORK OF A PARTICULAR TRIO OF PATRIOTS I FOLLOW CLOSELY ON TWITTER. WE SHALL LOOK AT THEM PRESENTLY, BEFORE WE DO LET ME LINK TO OTHER ARTICLES WITH MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE, QUOTES, EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNTS, AND EXPERT TESTIMONY THAT WILL HELP BUILD AND HOLD THE FOUNDATION TOGETHER.

REMARKABLE TREASON

THE DARK SECRETS OF THE TRUMP-PUTIN TIES

“Where-the-Rubber-Meets-the-Road” Truth About DT’s ties to Putin and Russian Mob

K.S.N./V.N.D. :More Fun And Treason With Trump And Putin

AND ONE MORE,

NUNESBURGER: The Tale of Nothing to See Here

 

NOW MY THREE FAVORITE PATRIOTS FROM TWITTER, FIRST UP JENNIFER TAUB REPORTING ON THE MUELLER REPORT HEARING:

SOURCE .

Here we go. The Mueller Report hearing begins. Chairman Nadler gaveling in a bit late. 2:12 p.m. 1/

Nadler begins with opening statement. Said we now know the Russian government was engaging activities including hacking and influence campaign to benefit the Trump campaign and harm the Clinton campaign. Direct attack on our democratic process 2/

Although not enough evidence to charge Trump or campaign with conspiracy, did find meetings and links. Wants to call Robert Mueller to testify. Ten separate incidents Mueller identified where the president attempted to interfere with the investigation. 3/

We must follow the fact where they lead. Now identifying the four panelists who will testify today. Mentions House Rules that prevent making “inappropriate personal” comments about the president. But shouldn’t prevent discussing “serious misconduct.” 4/

Said former White House counsel Don McGahn will testify before the committee before long. We were attacked. Trump’s campaign took full advantage of the attack. The obstruction go to the heart of our legal system. 5/

Ranking member Collins. “If we were attacked. Then the priority should be to go to the battlefield of the attack.” What’s to know “how can we firm up our elections?” Complaining that this is really about the election of Trump. 6/

Collins said he doesn’t think he should hear from people who appear on television who are not part of the Mueller investigation. Also complaining about John Dean. “The 70s star of obstruction.” 7/

Collins now calls Dean “the Godfather.” Suggests Comey et al are like Dean was when he worked for Nixon 8/

Collins claims that the committee does not want to hear from Mueller. “I believe the priorities are wrong.” 9/

John Dean begins: Last time he was there was July 1974. Not here as a fact witness, but providing some perspectives. Likens Mueller Report to the Watergate Roadmap. 10/

Dean will focus on one parallel. Laid out six examples in his written statement which he called illustrative, not exhaustive. He will speak to the 6th. 11/

Dean is discussing whether the president dangled pardons before witnesses including Manafort, Cohen, and Stone. Was he seeking to keep their silence. 12/

Dean said Richard Nixon who used the pardon power in a similar way recognized that it was improper to do so. 13/

Dean recanted convos with Nixon concerning granting pardons. Nixon knew it was wrong. Nixon told him “in a very peculiar manner” in a “stage whisper.” Said “I made a mistake talking to Colson about clemency for Hunt, didn’t I?” And Dean replied, yes that was obstruction 14/

Joyce Vance is speaking now. Said she will cut to the chase. Prosecutors will only recommend indictment on obstruction if the can prove three elements: (1) obstructive act; (2) nexus with an official proceeding; (3) corrupt intent. 15/

THIS : “The facts contained in that report would be sufficient to . . .charge multiple counts of obstruction.” Not a close call. “I would have confidence that the evidence would be sufficient to obtain a guilty verdict” and stand up on appeal. 16/

Now Vance is presenting the details. EVERYONE should go back and watch her statement. It is clear and powerful. 17/

“If anyone other than the president of the United States had committed this conduct he would be under indictment for obstruction of justice.” 18/

Vance: It doesn’t take a law degree to know that in this country, no one is above the law. If you or I had committed this same conduct we would be indicted. 19/

John Malcolm is speaking. Like his written testimony, he criticizes Mueller and also claims Trump was cooperative. 20/

Malcolm says Trump was not acting corruptly because either “naked self-interest” and to protect office of the presidency. Here Malcolm suggests obstruction prohibition does not apply to President 21/

Note that Mueller wrote that law did apply to President but that the DOJ policy and Constitution prevents prosecution while in office 22/

Now is testifying. Multiple crimes of obstruction of justice.” It threatened our national security. 23/

McQuade lists specific examples. Then she focuses on Trump’s repeated pressure to get Sessions to unrecuse and to focus the interference investigation on future elections 24/

McQuade reminds us that evidence was destroyed. Also says if he’d been successful in curtailing investigation to future elections the indictments would not have been issued and our national security at risk 25/

Now questions begin. Starting with Nadler asking McQuade. Do you agree Congress has independent duty. McQuade said she would not call it a “do-over” but a separate inquiry 26/

Nadler read to language from the first page of Volume II (the obstruction part). She explains that Mueller recognized he was restricted by DOJ policy but contemplated future prosecutors etc could use this report. 27/

President is required to faithfully execute the law said McQuade 28/

Collins asked McQuade whether she and Rachel Maddow has evidence of collusion. She tried to politely remind him that Mueller (on page 1 of Volume I) said explicitly that he looked at crime of conspiracy not the broader non-legal term collusion 29/

Congresswoman from California is focused on McGahn. He told President to speak to his personal lawyer and not him about his complaints about supposed Mueller conflicts 30/

McQuade said Trump felt threatened by Mueller early in investigation because didn’t know Mueller would ultimately conclude insufficient evidence to charge conspiracy 31/

Congresswoman Lee recounts that Mueller report describes the President twice called WH counsel McGahn at home to get Rosenstein to fire Mueller 32/

When asked Vance said these facts show obstruction of justice. Further McQuade said McGahn wanted to resign 33/

THE ENTIRE REPORT IS 110 TWEETS LONG, AGAIN, HERE IS THE LINK TO THE WHOLE REPORT.

===

LINKS TO 2 MORE REPORTS BY JENNIFER TAUB:

HERE .

[RESPONDING TO TRUMP]
Sir, let’s be honest.

The Mueller investigation exposed crimes and the cover up.

Crimes: Russian hacking and disinformation campaign.

Coverup: Your obstruction of justice, including telling staff to fire Mueller. The hearings will further explore the crimes and the cover up

HERE .

===

NOW, LET’S LINK TO SEVERAL OF BILL PALMER’S REPORTS:

SOURCE .

[SAME DAY AS DAY 1 OF THE MUELLER REPORT HEARING.]

Donald Trump’s day so far:

House Republicans humiliate themselves as John Dean Slam Dunks Trump

John Dean testifying that #TrumpsWorseThanNixon

William Barr caves to Jerry Nadler

Jared Kushner foreign money scandal

– Elaine Chao financial scandal

Trump CNBC meltdown

Impeachment is coming

Trump is going to prison

TRUMP GIVES INSANE INTERVIEW ON ABC AND VOWS TO COMMIT MORE TREASON

AND

AND

AND

– It’s still only 1pm

SOURCE .

AND TODAY:

Donald Trump’s day so far:

– Hope Hicks is testifying against him

– His poll numbers nosedive

– Trump vows to accept foreign help in 2020 election

– Attacks the FBI Director

– Trump is a traitor

– Impeach the **CENSORED** now! –

Trump is going to prison

– It’s still only 8pm

SOURCE .

===

and, lastly,

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

SOURCE .

[BECAUSE THERE IS SO MUCH DETAIL THAT IS PERTINENT I AM REPORTING THIS AGAIN.]

NEXT, JUSTIN AMASH OFFERS A 4-PRONGED RATIONALE FOR IMPEACHING TRUMP:

[FOR WHOLE THING GO HERE.]

1. They say there were no underlying crimes.
In fact, there were many crimes revealed by the investigation, some of which were charged, and some of which were not but are nonetheless described in Mueller’s report.
2. They say obstruction of justice requires an underlying crime.
In fact, obstruction of justice does not require the prosecution of an underlying crime, and there is a logical reason for that. Prosecutors might not charge a crime precisely *because* obstruction of justice denied them timely access to evidence that could lead to a prosecution.
If an underlying crime were required, then prosecutors could charge obstruction of justice only if it were unsuccessful in completely obstructing the investigation. This would make no sense.
3. They imply the president should be permitted to use any means to end what he claims to be a frivolous investigation, no matter how unreasonable his claim.
In fact, the president could not have known whether every single person Mueller investigated did or did not commit any crimes.
4. They imply “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” requires charges of a statutory crime or misdemeanor.
In fact, “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined in the Constitution and does not require corresponding statutory charges. The context implies conduct that violates the public trust—and that view is echoed by the Framers of the Constitution and early American scholars.
===

Here are my principal conclusions:

1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.

2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.

3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.

4. Few members of Congress have read the report.

I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.

In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.

Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.

Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.

Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.

In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.

Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.

While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.

Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.

We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degreeson the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.

Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.

America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.

 

 

 

 

IN CLOSING:

 

CONGRESS MUST REMOVE TRUMP AND HIS ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION!
RUSSIA, WITH TRUMP KNOWING AND HELPING, COMMITTED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A. !!
TRUMP HAS THEN COMMITTED MULTIPLE CRIMES OF OBSTRUCTION, PERJURY, FRAUD, BRIBERY, AND BLACKMAILING!!

enough is ENOUGH!!!

#PRINCIPLESMATTER.

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

A LOOK AT TRUMP THROUGH THE YEARS IN PICTURES

THIS WILL BE A SIMPLE SHOWING OF JUST WHO TRUMPUTIN IS VIA PICTURES/MEMES, AND A SMATTERING OF COMMENTARY. THERE WILL ALSO BE TIME TO TIME SOME SANITY INCLUDED SO WE ALL DON’T GO MAD…LET’S ROLL…

 

THE DEBT HAS GONE UP 2-3 TRILLION $$$$ UNDER “I’LL GET RID OF THE DEBT” TRUMPUTIN

SAID JESUS- NEVER.

TRUMP HAS ALREADY BANNED BUMP STOCKS AND IS LOOKING AT MORE ANTI-2ND AMENDMENT “LAWS”!!!!

Trump says take guns first and worry about ‘due process second’ in White House gun meeting

Franklin Graham is pathetic. He threatens a civil war if Donnie is impeached!

U.S. economy slips from first to third place in global competitiveness ranking amid Trump’s tariffs

Crime After Crime

=======================

 

AS FOR ME AND THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVES AKA #NEVERTRUMPERS…

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.