Things NOT To Do To Solve These 4 Problems

Image result for Benjamin Franklin Its what we call the Duh Theory

Though humor will be employed in this lesson, this will still be a serious look at four of the “Hot Button” issues that are presently making the (same, tired) rounds again. Liberals, whether Dem or R.I.N.O., always trot out their repeatedly debunked straw-man arguments, engage in circular “thinking”; and then when they are, once again, confronted with such things as logic, reality, facts, truth, evidence, and expert testimony, they begin their (tired, weak) campaign of name-calling, cursing, and general demagoguery, ( which is an appeal to people that plays on their emotions and prejudices rather than on their rational side, a manipulative approach — often associated with dictators and sleazy politicians — that appeals to the worst nature of people, can you say #TrumpTrolls ).

Let us commence shall we.

Image result for school with a "No Guns" sign stopping two men with guns


Things NOT to do to Fight Crime.

  1. “Have LOTS of “NO Gun Zones”. “ I use to be a thief, vandal, arsonist, and involved in many B&E’s…I, NOR ANY CRIMINAL, would EVER knowingly confront an armed person or and armed household. Criminals fear/respect one: thing violent, deadly force. AND NO criminal would EVER be deterred by a “NO Gun” sign! Contrariwise, a place, building, zone, or as in the case of Fort Hood, a MILITARY BASE, that is a NO GUN ZONE is a TARGET FOR CRIME! 
  2. “Have/pass laws that grant more rights and protections to criminals than to their victims.” To do so only emboldens the criminal/one contemplating a crime to ACTUALLY commit a crime because even if they go to court, they may get off with a slap on the wrist. And IF perchance they go to prison it usually is on a lighter charge and lighter sentence, and most view prison as “school”, a place to think and plan on how to commit crime and get away with, OR plot their revenge on the ones who sent them there.  Instead, make trial dates quicker, ONLY ONE appeal, after that DO THE MOST TIME POSSIBLE. And make prisons/jails PRISONS/jails again. NO more country clubs that the “bad widdle criminal” can’t leave! FORGET “rehabilitation”! That’s what churches, counselors, families, and charities/ministries are for. Prison is for PUNISHMENT- make it the worst possible. 
  3. “Ban Guns, or at least the “scary” ones, like AR15’s”.  THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS BOTH THE ONLY GUN LAW WE NEED, AND THE ONLY ONE THAT IS CONSTITUTIONAL. First, Criminals do NOT obey laws, not even the 1,700″+” anti-gun/anti-2nd Amendment laws we ALREADY have on the books. PLEASE, Libs, consider THIS: It is already ILLEGAL to: steal, rape, commit arson, assault, and murder. Those with criminal intent do NOT care about laws, and certainly do NOT care about your Liberal anti-gun “laws”. ALL laws that make it hard(er) for legal, law-abiding, peaceful citizens to get, have and carry a gun are on their face un-Constitutional, an act of TYRANNY, and 100% COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE. NO gun or ammo registration! NO bans on clips, ammo, stocks, or semi or fully automatic. WHY? Two reasons: Because legal, law-abiding, peaceful citizens do NOT and will NOT commit crimes, and Because CRIMINALS do NOT obey laws…that’s what makes them a criminal, being a law breaker. The ONLY things/laws that are Constitutional regarding gun laws would possibly be 1) background check (have a national-data base to see if someone is a druggie, insane, felon, or VERY ill-tempered and violent history), 2) Gun safety/handling class. Make them thorough, but quick.
  4. “Leave ALL crime fighting and self-defense to Law Enforcement.” Real Life Scenarios: An intruder breaks into your home…an intruder approaches you in an alley with a knife or gun, or club….you’re cornered by someone threatening assault or rape… DO YOU: call 9-11 (arrival time for LE is 20-30 minutes or MORE, a bullet is pretty dad burn QUICK)? wet yourself and stammer hoping they’ll leave you alone (actual Liberal advice)? get out your “rape whistle” (real thing) and toot on it? IF you chose ANY of the three things other than YOUR OWN SELF-DEFENSE…your dead.
  5. “Moralise every shooting as an opportunity to get on your soap-box and extoll life, children, and denounce ALL gun owners.” 99.99% of the time the same Liberals making the emotional plea to ban ALL guns are also the SAME Liberals with whom abortion is just fine and dandy. Emotions do NOT solve problems NOR save lives. I thank GOD for emotions, love them. BUT what IS needed, and what WORKS are practical, common-sense applications of logical, well thought out answers. Libs are good at cursing the darkness. Solution though? LIGHT A CANDLE OF REASON AND LOGIC AND DO WHAT IS PRACTICAL TO FIGHT CRIME, LIKE ACTUALLY PUNISH CRIMINALS AND NOT AN INANIMATE OBJECT.


Image result for only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy


Let me close this part with this:

  1. A gun has NEVER killed anyone.
  2. A gun has NEVER injured anyone.
  3. A PERSON using a gun HAS killed and injured many countless millions of people through out history.
  4. NOT all killing is murder, (times of war, self defense).
  5. Since it is a PERSON using the gun that commits the crime punish the person: arrest, try, upon conviction lock up or execute the PERSON. QUICKLY.
  6. Allow ONLY ONE appeal. MUST be within 3 months of original conviction.
  7. AFTER 2nd conviction either LOCK UP, OR EXECUTE- that day.
  8. Dead people do NOT commit crimes- NOR do inanimate objects.
  9. Punish CRIMINALS- NOT inanimate objects.


Image result for Dianne Feinstein: If people would disarm and give up their guns, criminals would too


Related image

Related image



Image result for the problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money

Things NOT To Do To Solve Our Economic Woes.

  1. “Tax your way to prosperity, keep raising taxes until prosperity abound via a robust economy, with everyone paying their “fair share”. ” Businesses can NOT hire more people, give them raises, benefits and retirement… IF Government keeps taking more and more $$$ via taxation. Here’s the REAL break down on taxation: The Top 1% pay 33.89% of ALL taxes. The Top 5% pay 53.25% of ALL Taxes. The Top 10% pay 64.89% of ALL taxes. The Top 25% pay 82.90% of ALL taxes. The Top 50% pay 96.03% of ALL taxes. That was in 2003, SOURCE . BUT by October of 2017, just 5 months ago, The Top 20% paid 95% of ALL Taxes!! SOURCESOURCE .
  2. “SPEND our way out of debt. The Government keep “investing” OUR tax $$$ in public and private sector jobs/businesses, keep them solvent, and voila! They’ll “gain traction”, take off and the economy will be booming, and jobs created.” TRY to do THAT as a private citizen, or a family, or private business. SPEND, and spend, and spend, and spend…and one morning you just wake up and “BOOM!!” you are “somehow” out of debt. THIS NEVER works in reality. It CAN’T work.
  3. “The Government needs to get involved, to regulate and manage the economy and make sure the “Fat Cats” at the top don’t shaft the little guy and make money.” UGH!! 1] Name ONE business that government does BETTER THAN the private sector/free market. 2] Name ONE time that government meddled in the private sector/free market where it A) Created jobs? B) Lowered costs? C) Made a REAL profit? When government began getting involved in, aka MEDDLING WITH, health-care, insurance, and drug manufactures (Pharmacy) costs went UP, efficiency went DOWN, coverage EVAPORATED, premiums and co-pays went UP, and the waiting and referring TOOK LONGER. Government took over the passenger train business, WHY? Because from 1917-1070 the government was so regulating, micro-managing, taxing, and penalising the privately owned railroad businesses that THEY KEPT GOING BANKRUPT! So in 1970 Congress took over passenger rail service.What happened when government took over a formerly PRIVATE SECTOR/FREE MARKET BUSINESS THAT WAS DOING VERY WELL BEFORE GOVERNMENT?? Amtrak has NEVER made a profit, has ALWAYS operated in the RED, and has mediocre/poor service, LOSING OVER A BILLION $$$ A YEAR!! SOURCE . What other businesses have suffered or disappeared because of meddling government? Nuclear power plants. Coal (which IS clean and generates electricity). Oil and Gas drilling and production. And countless TENS OF THOUSANDS of Pop-n-Mom businesses.
  4. Lastly on this: Name ONE POOR person that ever created ONE job? ever hired so much as ONE person and paid them a wage they could live on? Name ONE POOR person who ever made capitol improvements to their business? I’ll wait…oh, and while waiting inform those with COMMON-SENSE that the POOR do NOT do those things, it’s the “eViL rICh” that create jobs, hire people, giver raises/benefits/retirement packages, and make capitol improvements that the business better, more efficient, and more profitable FOR ALL.  


Image result for the problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money


Related image


Related image




Things NOT To Do To Achieve And Insure National Security.

(The logic here will be similar to that used for anti-gun laws, only at a National level).

  1. “America needs to be the world leader and disarm first. If we set the example then other nations like Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran, Pakistan, et al will disarm as well.” Senator Diane Feinstein has ACTUALLY said that if “legal, law-abiding, people would lay down their arms that the CRIMINAL would too”!!! Just as that is soooo NOT true for individuals it is NOT true for nations, WHY? Sit down for this: Because nations are made up by and ran by…wait for it…INDIVIDUALS. We MUST ask the questions: A) What makes a CRIMINAL a CRIMINAL? Many factors come in to play- upbringing, background, mental, emotional, and spiritual disposition among them- BUT it boils down to this: A CRIMINAL IS a person, persons, or Nation(via it’s leaders) that does NOT have any regard for law, and IS determined to BREAK the law…whatever it may be. B) What actually DOES deter a CRIMINAL and/or a BULLY, whether a person, group or nation? Words do NOT work. Criminals and bullies are NOT swayed, appeased, NOR stopped by MERE WORDS, that includes promises, bargaining, negotiating, or empty threats that the Criminal/Bully KNOWS you WILL NOT back up WITH ACTION. The ONLY thing that stops a criminal or bully IS FORCE.
  2. “America should NOT be the world leader. The solution for global peace is for a coalition of many nations working together to have peace and security around the world.” BUT…NOT so fast. The overwhelming MAJORITY of U.N. member nations are either socialist, dictatorships, Islamist, Communist, or some other form of authoriantarianism, SOURCEAs such this MAJORITY does NOT like, support, NOR in any way promote: Liberty, free/open elections, Capitalism/Free Markets, honesty in negotiations or treaties; NOR do they promote a free and secure Israel (actually MOST blame and denounce Israel, and want Israel diminished, even DESTROYED), NOR do they want a strong and free America (they often and openly advocate for a Globalist control of America, and One World Government/Governance…BY THEM!) . Does ANY real, serious, and honest U.S. Patriot-Citizen honestly think that such a rabble would have OUR “best interests” in mind?? People who IN their own nations want and HAVE some form and some degree of GOVERNMENT CONTROL are NOT our friends! They are OUR ENEMIES AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS SUCH! Notice how we/America SHOULD be the leader in becoming WEAK (disarmament), but should NOT be the leader in Liberty, Freedom, and true Constitutional governance. This by design- NOT an accident or “by-product” of the U.N.’s goal. WE/America SHOULD always advocate for LIBERTY, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, FREE/OPEN ELECTIONS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE WHEREVER A FREE PEOPLE CHOOSE IT.

Conclusion: To our many enemies, some feigning to be allies, we/America MUST BE strong, INDEPENDENT, Free, and moral/just. We MUST NOT BE weak, dependent upon others, especially the vast majority that WANT TO WEAKEN/DESTROY US, controlled, and degenerate/unjust.



Things NOT To Do Promote And Secure Life, Marriage, And Family.

  1. “Have legal and ‘safe’ abortions for any reason and any point during, or even shortly AFTER the birth of THE CHILD.” FIRST) America’s Founding Fathers codified the God-given RIGHT TO AND OF LIFE INTO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SOURCE . SOURCE . SOURCE . And let’s STOP the utter rubbish of “when does life begin?” or “when does it become human?” That IS Marxist GARBAGE and NO WHERE found among the thinking of America’s Founders, NOR of ANY rational, sane people! SECOND) Life as been defined by scientists/doctors BEGINS AT CONCEPTION . THIRD) And, of course, it IS HUMAN LIFE!! What banal, insipid, blathering drivel to say otherwise. Two humans have sex and CONCEIVE A HUMAN BABY, NOT an ape, chimp, dog, cow, skunk, BUT IT IS HUMAN LIFE, a human baby/child. FOURTHLY) “safe abortions”?!! HOW is it safe to THE HUMAN BABY to burn, chop, crush, or poison the child so it DIES?!! Remember: Words mean things. They are ALREADY CLEARLY DEFINED. It’s called a DICTIONARY. To cut to the chase, abortion is murder. Period.
  2. “Marriage is between any two or more consenting people, whether of same-sex or opposite, regardless of age. To define sex/gender is sexist and bigoted.” Um, NO, it is NOT “sexist or bigoted” to use DEFINITIONS for words that date back in every civilization to ADAM AND EVE. Yes, in most of these same civilizations one WILL also find sodomy, incest, adultery, fornication, pedophilia, bigamy/polygamy, bestiality, necrophilia, and other depravity. BUT those are ALWAYS evidences of moral decay, depravity and corruption, AND were soon followed by tyranny, slavery, and destruction, see ancient Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, ancient Syria, the Hittites, the Hivites, the Philistines, Persia, ancient Greece, Rome, Nazi Germany, modern Europe, and now, America. EVERY society and civilization that strays from the Traditional definition and view of Marriage goes into depravity and slavery/destruction. EVERY. Again, words mean things.
  3. “Family can any number/group of people who consent to live together, whether related by birth, adoption, “marriage”, or just living together.” NO. Again: Words mean things. Family is ALREADY LONG DEFINED as: Husband/father+Wife/mother+their children (birth or legal adoption)= FAMILY. It is IMPOSSIBLE for ONE person to have children. It is IMPOSSIBLE for two people of the SAME sex to have children. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a person and an animal or plant to have children. Hence, those are NOT families. Those have traditionally, and historically been called: fornication, adultery, incest, rape, sodomy, pedophilia, bestiality, and depravity.

You may ask, “WHY include the discussion of Life, Marriage, and Family in the discussion of such ‘more important and vital issues like gun control, the economy, and National Security?”

Here’s WHY:

  1. Our Enemies think it’s IMPORTANT/VITAL to attack them, SOURCE . 19 of the 45 stated Marxist goals to weaken and take-over America are either direct or indirect attacks on Life, Marriage, and Family. A strong, independent, resolute America is a road-block that the entire world can not hurdle, so they MUST weaken us, they have a plan, THEY ARE SUCCEEDING.
  2. Weaken the Foundational Building Block of society=Weaken the Society. Meaning, the inability to resist ever encroaching Liberalism/Marxism; the inability to adequately protect ourselves, and eventually NOT be able to protect ourselves; the inability to protect and maintain Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness/Property.
  3. Let the above two happen and WE/America is NO LONGER free and Sovereign.

As for me, I am NOT willing to surrender LIFE, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness/Property to ANYONE ANYWHERE, ANY TIME- PERIOD. EVER.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


Conservatism: 101 Revisited. Truth Matters.

Related image

Links to provide a foundation and support:






Related image




My site is filled with a plethora of evidence, facts, quotes to support and bolster any Conservative p.o.v. , IF you need or want more there is Google, just type in “Conservative view on…” or “Constitutional view on…”


I’ve already provided the foundation, so I wont do so again here. What I’ll do is look at several hot-topic issues from a Constitutional, Conservative, and Christian p.o.v., let us commence-


  1. A gun has NEVER killed anyone.
  2. A gun has NEVER injured anyone.
  3. A PERSON using a gun HAS killed and injured many countless millions of people through out history.
  4. NOT all killing is murder, (times of war, self defense).
  5. Since it is a PERSON using the gun that commits the crime punish the person: arrest, try, upon conviction lock up or execute the PERSON. QUICKLY.
  6. Allow ONLY ONE appeal. MUST be within 3 months of original conviction.
  7. AFTER 2nd conviction either LOCK UP, OR EXECUTE- that day.
  8. Dead people do NOT commit crimes- NOR do inanimate objects.
  9. Punish CRIMINALS- NOT inanimate objects.


Image result for Benjamin Franklin Its what we call the Duh Theory



  2. No can TRULY twist words UNLESS allowed to do so.
  3. Hold EVERYONE ACCOUNTABLE for what they say.
  4. Do NOT let anyone say ANYTHING and when called on it try to “weasel out” by saying “they meant” thus-and-so, or that “everyone has their own opinion/view”. IF the question is marriage, marriage has for thousands of years ALREADY BEEN DEFINED: 1man+1woman=marriage. What Liberals, Progressives, Communists, and the depraved say does NOT alter FACTS. SOURCE
  5. Rioting, looting, raping, and pillaging are NOT “protests”- they are CRIMES. Arrest and lock up ALL who do so.
  6. Speech and the press ARE strongly and clearly protected. VERY LITTLE is prohibited at all. You can NOT cry out in a crowded area “FIRE!” IF there is NO fire. You can NOT walk through an airport talking about your bomb. BUT if a vile, wretched Liberal says it is “ok” to MURDER the unborn, most defenseless, then as wicked and wrong as that is they are protected to say it. Just as a KKK or Nazi is protected to say that all that not like them are 2nd-rate…BUT…  
  7. Free speech does NOT mean that anyone HAS to listen. The stupid and the evil can say what they want. But NO ONE HAS TO LISTEN.
  8. ALL religion is protected. Even cults and false religions. BUT NOT everything that says it’s a religion IS a religion. Signs to look for: is there a LAW that MUST be observed by EVERYONE, whether they believe or not? does that LAW empower arrest, torture, rape, and murder against “violators” of the LAW even if they don’t believe in said “religion”? does this “religion” with its LAW empower and promote certain people while it restricts, confines and even punishes other people, even those who do NOT share that “religion”? if the so-called “religion” says it’s LAW is superior to, and should replace The Constitution, thereby promoting sedition, insurrection, and rebellion, is THAT protected as a “religion”? IF those criteria exist then THAT is NOT religion it IS a totalitarian world-view akin to Communism and Nazism, and is NOT protected as a religion.


Image result for means to be an american


  1. The Leaders and “Movers-and-Shakers” in the Global Warming Movement are Socialists/Marxists. More: SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE . DIRECT QUOTE: Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.

    At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

    “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said. MORE: SOURCE , SOURCE : DIRECT QUOTE- To avoid the worst effects of climate change, decisive action needs to be taken now, but there is no sign of this happening due to the rivalries between the main industrial powers. It falls on the shoulders of the international workers’ movement to implement a programme that can tackle climate change – replacing capitalism with a democratic socialist system.

  2. There is NO “Global Warming”. Planet has been cooling for 20 yearsSOURCE . DIRECT QUOTE: Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI).

    Ever since December temperatures in the Arctic have consistently been lower than minus 20 C. In April the extent of Arctic sea ice was back to where it was in April 13 years ago. Furthermore, whereas in 2008 most of the ice was extremely thin, this year most has been at least two metres thick. The Greenland ice cap last winter increased in volume faster than at any time for years.

    As for those record temperatures brought in 2016 by an exceptionally strong El Niño, the satellites now show that in recent months global temperatures have plummeted by more that 0.6 degrees: just as happened 17 years ago after a similarly strong El Niño had also made 1998 the “hottest year on record”.

    This means the global temperature trend has now shown no further warming for 19 years. But the BBC won’t be telling us any of this. And we are still stuck with that insanely damaging Climate Change Act, which in this election will scarcely get a mention.

Research shows a natural cooling cycle that occurs every 230 years began in 2014 and will send temperatures plummeting even further by 2019.

Scientists are also expecting a “huge reduction” in solar activity for 33 years between 2020 and 2053 that will cause thermometers to crash.

Both cycles suggest Earth is entering a global cooling cycle that could have devastating consequences for global economy, human life and society as we know it.

If predictions of the world-wide big freeze come true, the plot to 2004 film The Day After Tomorrow would not be far from reality during winter. …

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations, told Daily Star Online global warming and cooling cycles are determined by the gravitational forces of the Earth, moon and sun.

Each cycle lasts around 120,000 years, with sub-cycles of around 230 years.

He said: “We have had five warming cycles since about 900AD, each followed by a dramatic cooling cycle.

“The last global warming cycle ended in 1790 and the year 2020 is 230 following this – thus I have been talking about rapid cooling beginning in 2019.”

He said the oncoming cooling will send temperatures plummeting to lows last seen in the 1940s – when the mercury bottomed out at -21C during winter in the UK.

He said: “Cooling from 2019 into about 2020 to 2021 will bring world temperatures back to where they were in the 1940s through the 1960s.

3. The “data” that was USED/misused to “prove” Global Warming/Climate-change is based on false, heavily doctored, “data”. SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE .

4. There is NO “97% consensus” among scientists on global warming. This in itself is a myth, aka a LIE. SOURCE ,  SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE .

5. OVER 30,000 Scientists utterly REJECT Global Warming. SOURCE . SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE .

In Conservatism TRUTH MATTERS MOST. All else is subject to TRUTH. What can we conclude about “Global Warming/Climate Change” based upon the facts, i.e. THE TRUTH?

  1. It is NOT a science. NO consensus is science. It either IS OR IS NOT. Period.
  2. There is NO “97%” consensus” to begin with anyway.
  3. The “data” used to “prove” global warming/climate change IS BOGUS, DOCTORED, AKA FALSE.
  4. The founders, leaders, and movers-n-shakers in The Green Movement are SOCIALISTS.
  5. Their aim is NOT to “save the world” BUT TO CONTROL THE WORLD.
  6. Lastly, we are NOT “running out of oil or gas”. SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE , SOURCE , AND LASTLY, SOURCE .
  7. Lastly, CO2, Methane, and other “emissions” ARE NATURAL GASES. ALL of human and animal activity COMBINED ONLY contribute 4% of “carbon emissions”. There is NO way that HUMAN activity is “the cause” of global warming/climate change. REAL Scientists say it IS NATURAL weather/climate patterns, with the warming caused by, sit down for this…THE SUN’S ACTIVITY. What are we to do “combat global warming”? Extinguish the sun?!!!!

Image result for Consensus is not science


Image result for Global warming is a hoax


Related image


Image result for Global warming is a hoax


Image result for Global warming is a hoax




  2. Meaning DEREGULATE completely.
  4. ABOLISHObama-Care, welfare, The IRS, The Federal Reserve, WIC, food stamps, The EPA, both NEA’s, Planned Parenthood, and ALL Cabinet, Bureau, and Agencies NOT mentioned NOR provided FOR IN The Constitution.
  5. ABOLISH: the death/inheritance tax, capital gains tax, windfall profits tax, THE INCOME TAX, Corporate Income Tax, payroll tax, marriage penalty tax…

THAT will free up the economy and create jobs.

THAT IS Constitutional-Conservatism in a nut-shell.

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


NUNESBURGER: The Tale of Nothing to See Here

Image result for devin nunes in jail


A little over a year ago there was still some expectation among many (some even who were lukewarm in their attitude about Trump) that it may be rocky, BUT we’d see at the least some steady-but-shaky improvement in the morale, economy, jobs, morals (why, I do NOT know), military, and in our standing around the world.

Let me be the first to say:


What were you nimcowpoops thinking?!!

We’re talking about a man who has 4-5 bankruptcies, double-digit FAILED businesses, 4 FAILED marriages, MULTIPLE/SERIAL Adulterer, sexual assaulter, pedophile, con, fraud, and LIFE-LONG LIAR AND NY LIBERAL!!!


#TrumpTards make a diseased Yak, high on peyote seem intelligent!!! And the so-called “Wait-N-Seers”/”Fence-Riders”…have ya seen enough?!!

How much more of America, and her Constitution and Liberties are YOU willing to see OBLITERATED by DT before you say “Enough!!”??

Let’s start with THIS:

Devin Nunes illustrates just how outrageously inappropriate it is for a Trump transition team member to chair a Congressional committee with jurisdiction relevant to investigations of that team. It causes a breakdown in the separation of powers and jeopardizes national security.


I don’t expect the blathering Drool-Monkeys that make up the gaggle of the “#TrumpTurd Elite” to understand the import of this. Between all of them COMBINED you might get a room temperature IQ… But C’MON, you folks supposedly on the fence…don’t YOU see and hear how bad it is, and is ONLY, DAILY GETTING WORSE?!!

Let’s look at the ACTUAL timeline of what exactly started the investigation into DT-Putin, and how it progressed.

  1. The investigation into the Trump-Putin ties began NOT because of the Steele dossier, NOR because of the MYTHICAL “deep state” being against Trump. The FBI agents under question from Comey down, were as anti HRC as the were (supposedly) anti DT. The investigation  into Trump’s criminal and treasonous ties with Putin-Russia began because George Papadopoulos, who became Trump campaign foreign policy adviser in early March 2016, was tossing back some brewskis, and in  May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton. 

    About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.

    Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role. SOURCE  SOURCE  SOURCE

  2. The investigation of Carter Page’s ties to Russia, Putin, and The Kremlin goes back to 2013. Yes, that Carter Page. The rather eccentric former Trump campaign adviser, infamous for his extremely pro-Russia views and strange media appearances, has unexpectedly turned out to be the centerpiece of the GOP’s effort to discredit the Russia investigation.The FBI, they say, had good reason to suspect Page beyond the dossier. (Indeed, Page drew investigative scrutiny for his contacts with Russian intelligence in 2013, long before the Trump campaign was a glimmer in anyone’s eye.) SOURCE  Page, who has made his living as an energy consultanthas been open about his ties to Russia and Russians. Last week Time magazine reported that Page had described himself as a Kremlin adviser, and he subsequently made public the 2013 letter in which he made the comment.

    “Over the past half year, I have had the privilege to serve as an informal adviser to the staff of the Kremlin in preparation for their presidency of the G-20 Summit next month, where energy issues will be a prominent point on the agenda,” the letter said.

    Page says that is nothing to be ashamed of. SOURCE    THIS all begs the question: WHY did Trump pick Page to be HIS campaign ADVISER then???

  3.  November 9, 2013, (WHO else was in Russia besides Carter Page in 2013?)

    Donald Trump and family members attend the 2013 Miss Universe competition in Moscow. The pageant, owned by Trump at the time, was sponsored by Aras Agalarov, a Russian real estate developer. Following the pageant, Trump signed a deal with Agalarov to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, though the deal was stalled at some point during Trump’s campaign for president.

  4. April 2014

    The Obama White House moves to fire Michael Flynn from his post as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency over his brusque management style.

  5.  June 16, 2015

    Trump launches his campaign for president.

  6.  December 10, 2015

    Michael Flynn takes a paid trip to Russia to appear at a gala for the Russian media outlet RT. Flynn dined at a table with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

  7. January 2016

    Carter Page shows up at Corey Lewandowski’s office to begin volunteer work for the Trump campaign. That month, attends an initial meeting as a volunteer with an unpaid informal committee: the “initial foreign policy committee.”

  8. Early March 2016

    George Papadopoulos, an international energy and oil consultant who was living in London at the time, learned he would be a foreign policy adviser for the Trump campaign.

  9. March 6, 2016

    George Papadopoulos spoke with a Trump campaign official identified in court records as just “Campaign Supervisor” and says that he learned that a principal foreign policy focus of the Trump campaign was an improved U.S. relationship with Russia.

  10. March 14, 2016

    Traveling in Italy, George Papadopoulos met an individual who was a professor based in London. Later identified in federal court records as “The Professor,” the man initially seemed uninterested in Papadopoulos. However, after Papadopoulos informed the Professor he had joined the Trump campaign, the Professor appeared to take great interest, court documents said. Papadopoulos was interested in the Professor because he claimed to have substantial connections with Russian government officials, which Papadopoulos thought could increase his importance as a policy adviser to the Trump campaign.

  11. March 17, 2016

    The campaign’s senior policy advisor, Stephen Miller, announces on Fox News that U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., will choose Trump’s foreign policy team.

  12. March 19, 2016

    Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email is hacked.

  13. March 21, 2016

    In a meeting with The Washington Post editorial board, Trump provides a list of five foreign policy advisers: Walid Phares, Carter Page, Joe Schmitz, ret. Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg and George Papadopoulos. “George Papadopoulos, he’s an energy and oil consultant, excellent guy,” Trump said.

  14.  March 24, 2016

    Trump adviser Papadopoulos met with “The Professor” in London, according to federal court records about his guilty plea. The Professor brought with him a woman — identified in court records as the “Female Russian National” — who was introduced as a relative of Russian President Vladimir Putin with connections to senior Russian government officials. Papadopoulos emailed a person identified in court records as “Campaign Supervisor” and several members of the campaign’s foreign policy team: “Just finished a very productive lunch with a good friend of minewho introduced me to both Putin’s niece and the Russian Ambassador in London — who also acts as the Deputy Foreign Minister,” according to court records. Papadopoulos added: “The topic of the lunch was to arrange a meeting between us and the Russian leadership to discuss U.S.-Russia ties under President Trump. They are keen to host us in a ‘neutral’ city, or directly in Moscow. They said the leadership, including Putin, is ready to meet with us and Mr. Trump should there be interest. Waiting for everyone’s thoughts on moving forward with this very important issue.” The person identified in court records only as “Campaign Supervisor” responded that he would “work it through the campaign,” but that no commitments should be made at that point. The Campaign Supervisor added: “Great work,” according to the court records.

  15.  March 28, 2016

    Trump campaign hires Paul Manafort, a longtime domestic and international political consultant, to oversee delegate operations for campaign.

  16.  Late March 2016

    Carter Page is among a group of people on the Trump campaign’s national security advisory committee, who received an email from George Papadopoulos concerning a professor, according to Page’s 2017 testimony to Congressional investigators.

  17. March 31, 2016

    George Papadopoulos attended a “national security meeting” in Washington with then-candidate Trump, Jeff Sessions and other foreign policy advisers for the campaign. When Papadopoulos introduced himself, he said he had connections that could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Putin. After this trip to Washington, court documents show Papadopoulos worked with the Professor and the Female Russian National to arrange a meeting between the campaign and the Russian government, and took steps to advise the Trump campaign of his progress.

  18. Early April 2016

    George Papadopoulos sent multiple emails to other members of the campaign’s foreign policy team regarding his contacts with “the Russians” and his “outreach to Russia.”

  19. April 10, 2016

    George Papadopoulos emailed the Female Russian National, according to court records citing documents obtained by federal investigators, re-introducing himself and noting that “[w]e met with [“Professor”] in London. The reason for my message is because [“Professor”] sent an email that you tried contacting me.” Papadopoulos added: “It would be a pleasure to meet again. If not, we should have a call and discuss some things.” He ended the email with his mobile number and asking the woman’s mobile number.

  20. April 11, 2016

    The person identified in court records as a “Female Russian National” responded to Papadopoulos’ April 10 email, saying she was “now back in St. Petersburg” but “would be very pleased to support your initiatives between our two countries and of course I would be very pleased to meet you again.” Papadopoulos responded, copying The Professor, saying: “I think a good step would be for me to meet with the Russian Ambassador in London sometime this month.” Papadopoulos said he would “like to discuss with him, or anyone else you recommend, about a potential foreign policy trip to Russia.” The court records go on to say that the Professor responded to Papadopoulos later that same day: “This is already been agreed. I am flying to Moscow on the 18th for a Valdai meeting, plus other meetings at the Duma.” The Female Russian National responded that she had “already alerted my personal links to our conversation and your request…As mentioned we are all very excited by the possibility of a good relationship with Mr. Trump. The Russian Federation would love to welcome him once his candidature would be officially announced.”

  21. April 12, 2016

    Papadopoulos receives an email from a person identified in court records as “Russian MFA Connection” – referencing the Russia Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The emailer said: “I have already alerted my personal links to our conversation and your request. The Embassy in London is very much aware of this. As mentioned we are all very excited about the possibility of a good relationship with Mr. Trump. The Russian Federation would love to welcome him once his candidature would be officially announced.”

    April 18, 2016

    The man identified in federal court records as the “Professor” emailed Papadopoulos, saying that he had a “long conversation in Moscow with my dear friend [“Russian MFA Connection”] …about a possible meeting between the two of you. [“Russian MFA Connection”] is ready to meet with you in London (or USA or Moscow). I am putting the two of you in touch to discuss when and where this potential meeting can actually take place.” The court records say that the Russian MFA Connection was copied on the email. Papadopoulos responded by offering to “try and come to Moscow” and setting up a Skype call with the Russian MFA Connection for 3:00 p.m. Moscow time.” Over the next several weeks, the court records describe that Papadopoulos and the Russian MFA Connection had multiple conversations over Skype and email about setting “the groundwork” for a “potential” meeting between the campaign and Russian government officials.

    April 22, 2016

    The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Connection sent Papadopoulos an email thanking him “for an extensive talk” and proposing “to meet in London or in Moscow.” Papadopoulos replied by suggesting that “we set one up here in London with the Ambassador as well to discuss a process moving forward.”

    April 25, 2016

    George Papadopoulos emailed a senior policy adviser for the campaign: The Russian government has an open invitation by Putin for Mr. Trump to meet him when he is ready. The advantage of being in London is that these governments tend to speak a bit more openly in ‘neutral’ cities.”

    April 26, 2016

    Papadopoulos met the man identified in court records as the “Professor” for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told Papadopoulos that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high-level Russian government officials. The Professor told Papadopoulos that on that trip he learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. The Professor told Papadopoulos, according to Papadopoulos’ later description to the FBI, that “they [the Russians] have dirt on her”; that “the Russians had emails of Clinton”; and that “they have thousands of emails.” George Papadopoulos continued to correspond with Trump campaign officials, and continued to communicate with the Professor and the Russian MFA Connection, in an effort to arrange a meeting between the campaign and the Russian government.

    April 27, 2016

    Papadopoulos emailed a person identified in court records as a Trump senior policy adviser: “Have some interesting messages coming in from Moscow about a trip when the time is right.” Papadopoulos also emailed another person identified in court records as “high-ranking” campaign official “to discuss Russia’s interest in hosting Mr. Trump. Have been receiving a lot of calls over the last month about Putin wanting to host him and the team when the time is right.”

    April 29, 2016

    Papadopoulos wrote in an email to the Russian MFA Connection:I am now in the process of seeing if we will come to Russia. Do you recommend I get in touch with a minister or embassy person in Washington or London to begin organizing the trip?” The Russian MFA Connection replied: “I think it would be better to discuss this question with [The Professor].” Papadopoulos responded: “Ok. I called him.”

    April 30, 2016

    Papadopoulos thanked the Professor for his “critical help” in arranging a meeting between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. “It’s history making if it happens,” he said, according to court records.

    May 4, 2016

    The Russian identified in court records as a Ministry of Foreign Affairs Connection sent an email to Papadopoulos and the Professor, saying: “I have just talked to my colleagues from the MFA. The[y] are open for cooperation. One of the options is to make a meeting for you at the North America Desk, if you are in Moscow.” Papadopoulos responded that he was “[g]lad the MFA is interested.” Papadopoulos forwarded the Russian’s email to the High-Ranking Campaign Official, adding: “What do you think? Is this something we want to move forward with?”

    May 5, 2016

    George Papadopoulos had a phone call with the Campaign Supervisor, and then forwarded the May 4 email from the Russian ministry of foreign affairs to him, adding to the top: “Russia updates.”

    May 8, 2016

    The person identified in federal court records as “Russian MFA Connection” emailed Papadopoulos and “The Professor” about putting Papadopoulos in touch with the ministry’s “head of US desk.” In subsequent weeks, the Russian foreign ministry connection set up Skype calls with Papadopoulos and discussed, among other things, the fact that “Russian MFA Connection” reported “good reaction from the US desk at MFA.”

    May 13, 2016

    “The Professor” emailed Papadopoulos with “an update” of what they had discussed in their “recent conversations,” according to federal court records. The Professor said: “We will continue to liaise through you with the Russian counterparts in terms of what is needed for a high level meeting of Mr. Trump with the Russian Federation.”

    May 14, 2016

    Papadopoulos emailed the person identified in court records as “High-Ranking Campaign Official” and said the “Russian government ha[s] also relayed to me that they are interested in hosting Mr. Trump.”

    May 19, 2016

    Michael Flynn describes himself as an informal advisor to Trump in Al Jazeera English interview.

    May 21, 2016

    George Papadopoulos emailed an unnamed Trump campaign official, with the subject line “Request from Russia to meet Mr. Trump,” according to federal court records. The email included the May 4 message that Papadopoulos received from the Russian ministry of foreign affairs connection and added: “Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite sometime and have been reaching out to me to discuss.” The campaign official forwarded that email to another Trump campaign official (without including Papadopoulos), saying: “Let[‘]s discuss. We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.

    May 26, 2016

    Trump’s primary victories give him enough delegates to be deemed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

    June 1, 2016

    George Papadopoulos emails the person identified in court records as “High-Ranking Campaign Official” asking about Russia. The High-Ranking Campaign Official referred him to another person identified in court records only as “Campaign Supervisor” because “[h]e is running point.” Papadopoulos then emailed the Campaign Supervisor, with the subject line “Re: Messages from Russia.” “I have the Russian MFA asking me if Mr. Trump is interested in visiting Russia at some point. Wanted to pass this info along to you for you to decide what’s best to do with it and what message I should send (or to ignore).” Federal court records related to his guilty plea say that from mid-June through mid-August 2016, Papadopoulos pursued an “off the record” meeting between one or more campaign representatives and “members of President Putin’s office and the MFA.”

    June 3, 2016

    Donald Trump Jr. receives an email from entertainment publicist Rob Goldstone saying that Trump’s business associate in Russia, an oligarch named Aras Agalrov, was contacted by someone he identified as the crown prosecutor of Russia, who wanted to provide the Trump campaign with damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Goldstone said the information “would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.Goldstone, in emails later released by Donald Trump Jr., continued: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trumphelped along by Aras and Ermin.” Minutes later, Trump Jr. responded: “If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer.”

    June 6, 2016

    The publicist Goldstone emails Trump Jr. asking him when he is available to speak over the phone “about this Hillary info.”

  22. June 7, 2016

    The final primaries of the 2016 election season take place. The Russian oligarch family’s publicist, Rob Goldstone, emails Trump Jr. again asking him to meet with “a Russian government attorney.” Trump Jr. responds, agreeing to the meeting and stating he would most likely bring Donald Trump’s son-in-law and now-adviser Jared Kushner and Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Separately, in a speech that day, Trump promotes a “major speech” to reveal damaging information about Clinton “probably” June 13.

    June 9, 2016

    Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya meets with Trump Jr., Kushner and Manafort in Trump Jr.’s office at Trump Tower in New York.

  23. June 13, 2016

    Trump acknowledges that he had promised a major speech about Clinton, but instead said he would discuss her failings in depth another time. “This was going to be a speech on Hillary Clinton and how bad a President, especially in these times of radical Islamic terrorism, she would be,” Trump said. “There will be plenty of opportunity to discuss these important issues at a later time, and I will deliver that speech soon.”

    June 15, 2016

    Democratic National Committee opposition research files are released by a hacker called Guccifer 2.0. The release of the files is allegedly tied to Russian hackers.

    June 19, 2016

    After several email and Skype exchanges with the Russian ministry of foreign affairs connection, the foreign policy adviser Papadopoulos emailed the Trump team member described in court records as “High-Ranking Campaign Official,” with the subject line “New message from Russia.” “The Russian ministry of foreign affairs messaged and said that if Mr. Trump is unable to make it to Russia, if a campaign rep (me or someone else) can make it for meetings? I am willing to make the trip off the record if it’s in the interest of Mr. Trump and the campaign to meet specific people.”

    June 21, 2016

    Corey Lewandowski departs as Trump’s campaign manager. Paul Manafort, who had been leading the wrangling of delegates for Trump during the primaries, replaces Lewandowski.

  24. June 22, 2016

    WikiLeaks releases private emails from DNC officials in the days leading up to the Democratic National Convention. Some emails show DNC staffers favoring Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

    June 27, 2016

    Trump says he doubts Russian involvement in the DNC hack. But he invites them to hack emails Clinton had deleted for her official account when she was Secretary of State. “I will tell you this, Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

    Late June 2016

    Some members of the Trump campaign national security advisory committee meet at the Capitol Hill Club, a meeting organized by Sessions that also included Keith Kellogg and George Papadopoulos. At the end, Page said he mentioned his Moscow trip to Sessions.

    Early July 2016

    Carter Page mentioned in an email to Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and J.D. Gordon that he received an invitation to speak at the New Economic School. Page’s email states “Please let me know if you have any reservations or thoughts on how you’d prefer me to focus these remarks.”

    July 8, 2016

    Carter Page gives commencement speech at New Economic School in Moscow Page says he met Arkadiy Dvorkovich, a senior Russian government official. Page “greeted him briefly as he was walking off the stage” after his speech. Page communicates back to the campaign about his trip, including an email to campaign colleagues Tera Dahl and J.D. Gordon:  “On a related front, I’ll send you guys a readout soon regarding some incredible insights and outreach I’ve received from a few Russian legislators and senior members of the Presidential administration here.”

    July 14, 2016

    George Papadopoulos emailed the Russian foreign ministry connection and proposed “a meeting for August or September in the UK (London) with me and my national chairman, and maybe one other foreign policy adviser and you, members of President Putin’s office and the MFA to hold a day of consultations and to meet one another. It has been approved from our side,” according to federal court records associated with his guilty plea.

    July 15, 2016

    George Papadopoulos sent a private Facebook message to a Facebook account identified with Russian ministry of foreign affairs connection, stating: “We can chat on this, this weekend if you can’t tonight,” according to court records. The Russian connection messaged back, via Facebook, a “thumbs up.”

    July 18-21, 2016

    While attending events coinciding with the Republican convention in Cleveland, Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak spoke with then-Senator Jeff Sessions, who was chairman of the Trump campaign’s national security advisory committee, along with committee member Carter Page and J.D. Gordon, who managed the committee as the campaign’s director of national security.

    July 19, 2016

    Trump officially becomes the GOP presidential nominee at the Republican National Convention.

    July 18, 2016

    At the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Michael Flynn leads chants of “Lock Her Up!” aimed at Hillary Clinton during speech endorsing Trump. “You know why we’re saying that? We’re saying that because if I, a guy who knows this business, if I did a tenth of what (Clinton) did I would be in jail today.”

  25. July 21, 2016

    George Papadopoulos sent another private Facebook message to Russian ministry of foreign affairs connection, according to court records. “How are things?” he asked the Russian, adding, “Keep an eye on the speech tonight. Should be good” Trump gives his speech accepting the Republican nomination that night.

    July 22, 2016

    On the Friday before the Democratic National Convention began, WikiLeaks released emails dating from January 2015 to May 2016 believed to have been stolen from the DNC by the Russian government or its agents. Papadopoulos messaged Russian ministry of foreign affairs connection on Facebook to ask whether the connection knew a particular individual with extensive ties to Russian-based businesses and persons. Papadopoulos asked Russian MFA Connection “[i]f you know any background on him that is noteworthy before I see him, kindly send my way.” In the following weeks, Papadopoulos continued further communications regarding a potential “off the record” meeting with Russian officials.

    August 14, 2016

    The New York Times publishes a story raising questions about Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort’s work in the Ukraine, detailing handwritten ledgers showing “$12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort from Mr. Yanukovych’s pro-Russian political party from 2007 to 2012, according to Ukraine’s newly formed National Anti-Corruption Bureau.”

    August 15, 2016

    Following several weeks of communications regarding a potential “off the record” meeting with Russian officials, federal court records say that the Trump Campaign Supervisor told George Papadopoulos that “I would encourage you” and another foreign policy adviser to the campaign to “make the trip, if it is feasible.” The trip did not take place.

    August 17, 2016

    Trump receives his first intelligence briefing as the Republican nominee for president. Michael Flynn is in attendance.

    August 19, 2016

    Paul Manafort resigns from the Trump campaign.

    August 21, 2016

    Trump’s friend and informal adviser Roger Stone tweets: “Trust me, it will soon the Podesta’s time in the barrel.”

    September 21, 2016

    Donald Trump Jr. responds to a Twitter direct message from WikiLeaks about an anti-Trump site. “Off the record I don’t know who that is but I’ll ask around. Thanks,” Trump Jr. wrote, according to copies of the private messages that Trump Jr. later released himself via Twitter.

    September 23, 2016

    Yahoo News reports that U.S. intelligence officials were investigating whether Carter Page met privately with Russian officials while visiting Moscow in July.

  26. September 26, 2016

    Trump, in his first debate with Clinton, continues to express skepticism about Russian involvement. “I mean it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?” That same day, Carter Page says he is taking a leave of absence from the Trump campaign.

    September 30, 2016

    The Russian news agency Interfax publishes an interview with the Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos in which he expresses critical views toward U.S. sanctions against Russia. The next day, according to federal court records, George Papadopoulos sent the person identified in federal court records only as “The Professor” a private Facebook message with a link to the article.

    October 3, 2016

    In response to a WikiLeaks message on Twitter suggesting he “push” a story about Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. writes two messages: “Already did that earlier today. It’s amazing what she can get away with,” followed by “What’s behind this Wednesday leak I keep reading about?”

    October 7, 2016

    In a joint statement, U.S. intelligence agencies express confidence the Russian government has attempted to interfere in the election: “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.” That same day, Wikileaks begins publishing Clinton campaign aide John Podesta’s emails, which had been hacked in March 2016. 

    October 12, 2016

    WikiLeaks messages Donald Trump Jr. with a suggestion that Donald Trump tweets a link to Fifteen minutes later, Donald Trump tweets: “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!” Two days later, Trump Jr. tweets the link WikiLeaks provided to him: “For those who have the time to read about all the corruption and hypocrisy all the @wikileaks emails are right here:”

  27. October 21, 2016

    WikiLeaks messages Donald Trump Jr. on Twitter “btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4″ at 8:31 a.m. At 8:38 a.m., WikiLeaks publicly tweets out a link to the Podesta emails.

    November 8, 2016

    Donald Trump is elected the 45th President of the United States, defeating Hillary Clinton.

    November 17, 2016

    President-Elect Trump names Michael Flynn his national security adviser.

    December 9, 2016

    President Obama orders a review of foreign attempts to tamper with U.S. elections. Trump dismisses the CIA’s finding that the Russians sought to sway the election in his favor. “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.” [NOTE: HE DID.}

    December 12, 2016

    Republican leaders announce that congressional committees will investigate the CIA findings.

    December 16, 2016

    President Obama says the Russian government, at the “highest levels,” initiated the hacks of emails, not voting machines. He vows to retaliate. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr announces plans to “continue its review of the intelligence surrounding” Russian influence in U.S. elections

    December 22, 2016

    A person identified in federal court records as a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team” directed Michael Flynn to contact government officials from foreign countries, including Russia, to determine their positions on a United Nations Security Council resolution about Israeli settlements that was set for a vote the next day. Flynn called the Russian ambassador, told him the incoming president opposed the resolution, and he asked the Russian ambassador to delay the vote on or defeat the resolution, according to the documents about Flynn’s subsequent guilty plea entered Dec. 1, 2017, to charges he lied to the FBI about those discussions. The Russian ambassador informed Flynn the following day that his country would oppose the resolution.

  28. December 28, 2016

    President Obama signs an executive order announcing sanctions against Russia, including expelling 35 diplomats and the closing of Russian compounds in Maryland and New York that had been suspected of spying. Trump insists the issue should be put to bed, but agrees to meet with intelligence officials for a briefing. “It’s time for our country to move on to bigger and better things,” Trump says. Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak contacts Michael Flynn, the incoming administration’s National Security Adviser, according to court records related to Flynn’s Dec. 1, 2017, guilty plea to federal charges including lying to the FBI about those discussions.

    December 29, 2016

    Michael Flynn called someone identified in court records only as “a senior official of the Presidential Transition Team” at Trump’s Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach with other members of the presidential transition team. Flynn asked “what, if anything, to communicate to the Russian ambassador about the U.S. sanctions,” according to the court records. Immediately after that phone call, Flynn called the Russian ambassador and asked him not to “escalate the situation” in response to the sactions, according to the court records.

    December 30, 2016

    Russia’s Putin announces his country will not retaliate, a message that the ambassador also relayed to Flynn, according to Flynn’s guilty plea in the federal case against him. Trump later praises Putin in a tweet.

    January 2017

    Jared Kushner, Trump’s son in law and a leader on the campaign, accepts a job as a White House adviser. He is cleared to take it on Jan. 21. As part of security clearance, he is required to report meetings with foreign officials such as the one he’d had with the Russian lawyer, Veselnitskaya, in Donald Trump Jr.’s office at Trump Tower.

    January 6, 2017

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence releases its report “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections.” Then FBI Director James Comey said that he met with the president-elect that same day at Trump Tower in New York, a meeting that Comey would later testify was tense and made him so uncomfortable that he immediately created a written record of it.

    January 10, 2017

    BuzzFeed publishes a document prepared by Christopher Steele, a former British spy who compiled a dossier on Donald Trump and his alleged ties to the Russian government. The dossier alleges that Russian operatives obtained potentially compromising personal and financial information about Trump. Moscow has denied having any “compromising materials” on Trump, who dismissed the reports. [NOTE: This is much AFTER the investigation had ALREADY started. Steele Dossier was NOT the “trigger” to the investigation.]

  29. January 11, 2017

    Trump says in a news conference that while Russia was most likely behind the DNC election-year hack, “we also get hacked by other countries and other people.”

    January 12, 2017

    The Washington Post first reports that Michael Flynn and Russian Ambassador Kislyak had secretly spoken on Dec. 29. [NOTE: The “not-so-fake” news.]

    January 13, 2017

    Trump press aide Sean Spicer acknowledges one call between Flynn and Kislyak, but he says it was for “logistical information.” [NOTE: Right…sure…]

    January 15, 2017

    On CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Vice President-Elect Pence appears discusses the calls between Flynn and the Russian ambassador, saying it was “strictly coincidental that they had a conversation.” [NOTE: Right…sure…]

    January 19, 2017

    The New York Times reports that the FBI is leading an interagency task force probing ties between Russia and three close Trump associates: Paul Manafort, Carter Page and Roger Stone.

    January 20, 2017

    Trump takes the oath of office, becoming the 45th President of the United States.

    January 22, 2017

    Michael Flynn is sworn in as national security adviser, a position that does not require Senate confirmation.

    January 24, 2017

    Michael Flynn denies to FBI agents in an interview that he discussed U.S. sanctions with Russia before Trump took office, a statement he has since contradicted in a guilty plea to federal charges brought by the special counsel that he lied to the FBI in that interview.

    January 26, 2017

    Acting Attorney General Sally Yates informs the White House counsel that Flynn lied about the nature of his calls with Kislyak and is vulnerable to blackmail. Trump would later fire Yates in the midst of the controversy over his travel ban.

    January 27, 2017

    Then FBI Director James Comey has testified he had a private dinner with President Trump at the White House. Comey’s written testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee months later described how the president told him at that dinner, “I need loyalty. I expect loyalty.” Comey said of the exchange: “I didn’t move, speak or change my facial expression in any way during the awkward silence that followed.”

    February 13, 2017

    White House adviser Kellyanne Conway tells MSNBC that Trump has “full confidence” in Flynn. Hours later, Flynn resigns, saying he had “inadvertently briefed the Vice President-Elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian ambassador.” [NOTE: Or what is better known as, and more accurately called: LIED.]

    February 14, 2017

    White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says Trump asked Flynn to resign because of an “erosion of trust.” That same day is when James Comey, then director of the FBI, has since testified that President Trump met with him privately and pressed him to drop the investigation of Flynn. “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go,” Comey quoted the president as saying. “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee during testimony months later that he was “so stunned by the conversation that I just took it in.”

    February 15, 2017

    The New York Times reports that telephone records and intercepted calls show that “members of Donald J. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election.” [NOTE: Did you see THAT? “In The YEAR BEFORE the election”. This was NOT precipitated by the Steele Dossier, NOR by The NunesBurger memo.]

    March 2017

    Carter Page “was in a lobby near Lincoln Center in the upper west side of Manhattan” and FBI agents “just walked up to me,” according to his testimony to Congressional investigators. Page said this is when the FBI “first approached” him.

    March 16, 2017

    Documents released by U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, show Michael Flynn received $33,750 from Russia’s state-owned television network for a 2015 speech he made in Moscow.

    March 20, 2017

    During a public hearing with the House Intelligence Committee, FBI Director James Comey publicly acknowledged that the bureau is investigating whether there was collusion between members of Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia. Additionally, Comey dismissed Trump’s claims that Trump was wiretapped by the Obama administration.

    30. May 9, 2017

    President Trump fires FBI Director James Comey.

    May 10, 2017

    Trump met with top Russian diplomats in the White House, during which he reportedly revealed classified information. According to a later New York Times report, the president also told them that day, “I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”

    May 11, 2017

    In an interview with NBC News, Trump called out Comey publicly: “Look he’s a showboat, he’s a grandstander. The FBI has been in turmoil. You know that, I know that. Everybody knows that. You take a look at the FBI a year ago, it was in virtual turmoil – less than a year ago. It hasn’t recovered from that.” He also said that the Russia investigation was indeed on his mind when firing Comey. Trump told NBC’s Lester Holt that he said to himself, in making the decision to fire the FBI director: “You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story. It’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won.”

    May 16, 2017

    News breaks that Trump had asked Comey to close the investigation into Michael Flynn, the resigned national security adviser back in February. Comey kept detailed memos of his conversations with Trump, including of a dinner in which the president reportedly said, “I hope you can let this go.”

    May 17, 2017

    The Justice Department taps former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to lead an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Sources tell the New York Times that Trump’s team knew Flynn was under investigation for secretly working as a paid lobbyist for Turkey during the presidential campaign.

    May 22, 2017

    Flynn tells the Senate Intelligence Committee he will invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in declining to provide the committee documents related to its investigation into collusion between associates of Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

    June 7, 2017

    Former FBI director James Comey says President Trump privately requested his loyalty and later urged him to drop the investigation into Flynn in written testimony released ahead of Comey’s public questioning by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    July 6, 2016

    Carter Page testified that he met with Andrey Baranov, head of investor relations at Rosneft, while in Russia. They watch the Portugal versus Wales soccer match at the Europa cup.

    July 8, 2017

    The New York Times first reveals the previously undisclosed meeting between Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort and Veselnitskaya. The Times reported that Trump Jr. told them in a statement the meeting was “primarily about an adoption program. The statement did not address whether the presidential campaign was discussed.” [NOTE: Once again the so-called “fake news” gets it RIGHT and gets it FIRST. And “adoption” my eye!! LIAR!]

    31. July 9, 2017

    The New York Times reports the presidential campaign was a topic of the meeting between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer. The article cited five sources who stated Trump Jr. agreed to the meeting on the premise that damaging information on Hillary Clinton would be provided. Following the article, Trump Jr. confirmed he agreed to the meeting because of the information on Clinton, though the information provided was not useful and the meeting was actually about adoption: “It became clear to me that this was the true agenda all along and that the claims of potentially helpful information were a pretext for the meeting,” Trump Jr. stated.

    July 10, 2017

    The Washington Post reports the meeting between Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer was arranged at the request Emin Agalrov by Goldstone. Later that evening, the New York Times reports Goldstone presented the meeting in an email to Trump Jr. promising information on Clinton. According to the article, Trump Jr. did not indicate he believed Veselnitskaya was connected to the Russian governmentsomething she has denied.

    July 11, 2017

    After several days of increasingly revealing statements, Donald Trump Jr. posts screenshots of the emails between him and Goldstone on Twitter. He also includes a statement saying he believed the meeting would be about “Political Opposition Research” and originally wanted to have the meeting over the phone.  “To put this in context,” Trump Jr. stated, “this occurred before the current Russian fever was in vogue.” [NOTE: But as is seen by this time-line Trump Jr. IS LYING…AGAIN.]

    July 12, 2017

    President Trump, aboard Air Force One, tells reporters, “Don is — as many of you know Don — he’s a good boy. He’s a good kid. And he had a meeting, nothing happened with the meeting.” The president said, “I only heard about it two or three days ago,” but his understanding was the meeting was arranged to discuss some opposition research and nothing came of it. “Honestly, in a world of politics, most people are going to take that meeting,” Trump said.

    July 13, 2017

    Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said he wants Trump Jr. to testify before the committee and would be willing to issue a subpoena to compel his testimony if necessary.

    32. July 14, 2017

    NBC News reported that a Russian-American lobbyist who is a veteran of the Russian military also attended the Trump Tower meeting involving the Russian lawyer, Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort. The lobbyist, Rinat Akhmetshin, confirmed to The Washington Post that he had been in the room, and said he had been invited to the meeting by Veselnitskaya.

    August 4, 2017

    The New York Times reports Mueller asked the White House for documents related to Michael Flynn. The Times reported investigators questioned witnesses as to whether the Turkish government made secret payments to Flynn during the 2016 campaign.

    August 5, 2017

    Russia’s former ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, denies he discussed secrets or sanctions with Flynn. The comments were made during an interview on Russian television.

    November 10, 2017

    The Wall Street Journal reports Mueller is investigating Flynn and his son Michael Flynn Jr.’s attempts to forcibly remove a Muslim cleric from the United States. The Journal said the two were involved in a plan to deliver Fethullah Gulen to the Turkish government, which views Gulen as an enemy.​

    November 23, 2017

    News breaks that Flynn’s lawyers told President Trump’s legal team they can no longer share information about special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election. A Trump administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, described the move as routine and that it would not affect the president.

    December 1, 2017

    Special counsel Robert Mueller charged Flynn with lying about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Flynn pleaded guilty. The court filing, which was made public Dec. 1, states Flynn “did willfully and knowingly make materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements” to FBI agents during a Jan. 24 interview.

    Contributing: Steve Reilly, John Kelly, Brad Heath, Kevin Johnson, Gregory Korte and David Jackson.



So, what have we learned from all this?

We’ve learned thusly:

  1. The investigation into Trump-Putin did NOT begin, was NOT “triggered” by Steele Dossier.
  2. The investigation into Trump-Putin did NOT begin, was NOT “triggered” by the “NunesBurger Memo”.

WHY would DT be so attracted to Putin-Russia?


Now, #TrumpTards will NOT be swayed by anything, NOT even an invasion by Russia led by Putin himself, with Little, Lying, Liberal Donnie Trump at his side.

BUT…you so-called fence-setters/wait-n-seers…GET OVER IT ALREADY!!

America’s very SURVIVAL is at stake!!

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


#TrumpTurds And The Klingon Cloaking Devise. Part 2.

Related image

The above is applicable to every President since William McKinley (1897-1901) with the exception of Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan. Hoover, FDR, LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, Obama, and, YES, Trump are the most egregious examples of LibTardism run amok.


Intro to Part 2.

Apparently there is some type of advanced technology that prohibits Trump supporters from seeing and hearing “inconvenient things”, like:

  • REALITY and

Apparently this devise is Klingon in origin and/or nature, as in the Klingon Cloaking devise.

Most folks when they read, see, hear, and study the facts and evidence come to logical conclusions.

NOT so with Trump and his navel gazing supporters. 

Put on a pot of coffee…below is a detailed look at the facts and the law, and the possible conclusion of following the law. Part 2 will present “H-N-S”, Headlines And Snippets. This is done so as to look at a larger segment of evidence.

ICYMI here is Part ONE.

Shall we commence? We’ll begin with the longest one and proceed…


Stressing out about the day’s news? This may help. A shortie on the doings at the FBI. 1/

Earlier today, it was announced that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was leaving effective immediately. With Trump’s endless criticism of McCabe, it’s pretty natural that the collective reaction was shock and fear… as if Trump had won here somehow. 2/

In reality, McCabe was poised to leave in two months anyway. He reaches full retirement in March-ish. His departure in and of itself isn’t shocking. The timing seemed sudden and sharp though of course. 3/

The key thing is looking at who Chris Wray appoints to replaces him. Now, as background, Trump thought Wray was going to be a loyalist because Wray had been involved in helping Chris Christie during Bridgegate. Wray ain’t a dirty bird though. 4/

Wray is ex-Department of Justice. He worked under Jim Comey. He won the highest award for service in DOJ. He’s a Justice Department veteran. He ain’t a Trump sleazeball hanger-on. 5/

As FBI Director he has now pushed aside two people Trump was critical of… James Baker and Andrew McCabe. In normal times, those moves would raise an eyebrow. New bosses bring in their people. In these abnormal times, they raise plenty of eyebrows. 6/

…but while people worry Wray may be less than a good guy, his actions thus far are incredibly comforting. After he pushed James Baker aside he appointed someone SURE to rankle Trump. The U.S. Attorney closest to Mueller’s investigation. Dana Boente. 7/

Today, immediately after apparently nudging McCabe out the door, Wray announced his replacement… …and the guy he picked is in many ways Trump’s worst nightmare. David Bowditch. An FBI career man. A mini-Mueller. 8/

Bowditch isn’t JUST an FBI veteran, he has the kind of pedigree Republicans would usually experience the kind of erection you have to call your urologist over. He was a police officer. He joined the FBI and was a sniper on SWAT teams. He was on the Joint Terrorism Task Force 9/

He fought gangs and was instrumental in a history-making gang prosecution. The guy is a caricature of the kind of “Law and Order” background Trump alleges he cares about. In a word: he’s unimpeachable. 10/

Andrew McCabe had become a distraction and Trump had found some storylines that were effectively muddying the waters. Chris Wray just did exactly what he did with James Baker’s role. He not only robbed Trump of his ammo, he returned fire with a Howitzer. 11/

Wray just screwed Trump so d*mn hard, it’s gonna leave a mark… and Trump is too dumb to even realize he just got game-set-matched by an appointee who ain’t having any of it. Wray just stole Trump’s talking points AND turned up the heat on him. 12/

Even better, Bowditch’s elevation entirely earns the trust of the rank and file FBI. They have now seen twice that Wray is on their side not Trump’s. Comey was their homey but now it’s Wray all the way. 13/

The most delicious little morsel in this pie to the face is this though… Chris Wray just sent a 90-decibel message right into Trump’s earhole: “Come after whoever you want. There are a million more behind ’em. There is no stopping the FBI.” So good. So d*mn good. <end>

p.s. Bowditch is so perfect an appointee, I’m LOLing

Wray just took Trump’s rhetoric and shoved it down his throat by appointing someone who it would be absurd to criticize The guy is a mini-Mueller. Wray replaced McCabe with someone even worse for Trump.

David Bowdich Named Assistant Director in Charge of FBI Los Angeles


I could post article after article about Bowditch. Just Google the guy. He is comically perfect as the face of law enforcement. Trump is going to lose his mind when he realizes his win was actually a loss



Fmr. Member of Congress, Bull Moose Republican, STOP Act Author. Chair of Dusty Face Enterprises.



So if you’re our FBI tonight, the Republicans plan to investigate you.

If you’re Russia, you get a pass.


Next up is another Twitter Patriot, [True] Conservative, and good friend, Lisa Marie’s response to the recent rash of irrational #TrumpTrolls. Lisa takes what THEY ACTUALLY POSTED, condenses into ONE tweet, what follows is comedic silence from the blathering idiot, aka #TrumpTurd.


Let’s recap your comments today.

You do not care that Trump conned you.

You do not know what conservatism is.

You like spreading conspiracy theories.

You are a tribalist binary thinker.

You are on your 2nd Account (TOS violations thumped the first one.)



The 425 People, Places and Things Donald
Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List


Featured image



To recap: Trump asked Comey for loyalty;

asked him to drop the Flynn probe; fired Comey;

pressured Sessions not to recuse;

pressured Sessions to fire McCabe;

pressured Coats, Rogers, Pompeo &multiple congressmen to say he wasn’t under FBI investigation;

and tried to fire Mueller.


Yet another solid Twitter Patriot writes:


Never. Trust. This. President.

5 things Trump’s attempted firing of Robert Mueller teaches us

Reminder: The Guy who speaks openly about grabbing women by their Pussies while a tape rolls believes the Feds shouldn’t protect America with wiretaps against shady corrupt businessmen working with a Hostile Foreign Nation.

Let Trump formally leak the so called Memo. He’s his own worst enemy. Desperate moves from a failing man.

It’s hard to play a fair game when one side cheats and then changes the rules while the other side acts with Honour and Integrity

Lets use the proper term .. They conspired with a foreign adversary. His low thinking base really believe this memo written by Nunes and Gowdy with no corroborating evidence is proof.

Yet with 4 indictments, 2 guilty pleas, our law enforcement agencies. 😑

The GOP is engaged in an effort to discredit the FBI. This is what dictators do, so they can get absolute power, without checks and balances. If you are OK with this, you don’t love true America.

Just because someone gets away with something over and over doesn’t make it legal! Trump has repeatedly Obstructed Justice!! Each time it is Criminal!

It’s irresponsible and criminal for Trump to interfere with an Ongoing Federal Investigation. Every time he says “nothing was found” he is interfering with an ongoing investigation. Criminal!


Next up is a good friend and Twitter Patriot, CJF:

With all due respect, was an Exec. Order & Trump promised to “rescind it on day 1”.  He didn’t.

Under the Secure Fence Act of 2006 Trump could have had DHS start construction of on Day 1 using DHS’s discretionary funds: He didn’t.

No “deal” is needed.


This next one is from someone who usually goes to bat FOR Trump, Joe Walsh:

He fired FBI Dir Comey.

He tried to fire Asst FBI Dir McCabe.

He wanted to fire Att Gen Sessions.

He ordered the firing of Special Counsel Mueller.

I could go on.

For a guy who says he didn’t do anything wrong, why does he try to fire everyone who’s investigating him?


And, lastly, NOT because I ran out of stuff, but because there will be more in this series forthcoming, so I’ll close with THIS…this LIE should infuriate EVERY LAST SINGLE #TrumpoTard left…

Trump Says He Is Open to a Path to Citizenship for ‘Dreamers’

“But…but…build the wall…deport illegals…deport Muslims…But….”

-Average #TrumpTroll.

Yeah, YOU’VE been LIED to…

We warned.

You Deflected-N-Defended.

Now it’s too late…the horse is out of the barn…

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


#TrumpTurds And The Klingon Cloaking Devise. Pt. 1

Related image


Apparently there is some type of advanced technology that prohibits Trump supporters from seeing and hearing “inconvenient things”, like:

  • REALITY and

Apparently this devise is Klingon in origin and/or nature, as in the Klingon Cloaking devise.

Most folks when they read, see, hear, and study the facts and evidence come to logical conclusions.

NOT so with Trump and his navel gazing supporters. 

Put on a pot of coffee…below is a detailed look at the facts and the law, and the possible conclusion of following the law. It is long, BUT it dissects and details a goodly portion of what IS necessary to evict the fraud and con, Trump…

(THREAD) Last June, I and some others said Mueller had a “prima facie” case on Trump for Obstruction—that is, a case that’s evidently correct unless proven otherwise. Today, that’s the consensus. But Obstruction is more confusing than some realize. Here’s a thread on why that is.

2/ On June 8, a day after I wrote about bringing an Obstruction case against Trump under one of the several means to do so—18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)—the New York Times posted a helpful note on the various subsections of the Federal Code that prohibit obstructing an official proceeding.

3/ 18 U.S.C. § 1503 prohibits “corruptly endeavoring to influence any officer of any court in the discharge of his duty.” This is the most direct way to charge someone, and carries a maximum penalty of 10 years.


4/ You will often hear people say that Obstruction is a “specific intent crime.” “Specific intent” means that you intended your actions to achieve a specific result and desired that that specific result be achieved.

5/ “Specific intent crimes” require that a prosecutor show “specific intent,” considered the highest level of intent a prosecutor can have to prove in a case. Usually we see the words “intentionally” or “purposefully” in a statute when we’re looking at a “specific intent crime.”

6/ Working our way down from the highest level of intent, we next come to “general intent”—usually indicated in statutes by the word “knowingly.” To “knowingly” do something is to appreciate the nature of your actions without necessarily intending them to cause a specific result.

7/ So if you stand in a crowd windmilling your arms and hit someone in the nose, “specific intent” means you intended to injure someone (whether or not that particular victim) by windmilling your arms; “general intent” simply means you were aware you were windmilling your arms.

8/ Other levels of intent include “recklessly” doing something and “negligently” doing something (I’m putting aside the complication of so-called “involuntary” statutes, crimes subject to a “duress” defense, and a “diminished capacity” to form intent caused by drugs or alcohol).

9/ So when people call Obstruction a specific-intent crime, which they do, they are saying the alleged obstructor has to have acted with the “specific intent” that their actions obstruct the administration of justice—whether or not (this is key) justice ended up being obstructed.

10/ But one thing you’ll notice is that when people write articles about a possible Obstruction charge against Trump in the Trump-Russia case, they almost never say which statute they’re referring to. So go back for a moment and look at 18 U.S. Code § 1503:

11/ The language there—”corruptly endeavoring to influence any officer of any court in the discharge of his duty.”

1512(b)(3) says “corruptly attempts to persuade another person with intent to prevent communication to a judge relating to possible commission of a federal offense.”

12/ Meanwhile, 18 U.S. Code § 1505—the third federal criminal statute mentioned by the Times—prohibits “corruptly attempting to influence the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States.”

13/ The upshot is this: lawyers who write about Trump being charged with Obstruction always focus on the word “corruptly”—because that’s a constant in all the statutes potentially in play—but never name a statute, because there are other elements that differ between the statutes.

14/ Here’s how confusing it all is: because we don’t know what evidence Mueller will rely upon, and because we don’t even know all the evidence he has, and because we technically don’t even know which statute he’ll focus on, many disagree on where we are:

3 potential problems for an obstruction of justice case against Trump

Why some experts think Mueller would need a lot more to make a case.

15/ I’ll say this: the Dershowitz argument—that a president can’t break the law when exercising his constitutional authority—is false. No one else says this or believes it. A president can exercise his constitutional authority in every way BUT corruptly—this is a legal certainty.

16/ A basic principle of constitutional and statutory interpretation is this—a court will *never* interpret the U.S. Constitution or a statute in any way that renders it nonsensical. The Constitution would be nonsensical if it explicitly authorized the president to commit crimes.

17/ What this means is that Trump CAN fire James Comey because he doesn’t like his fashion sense—Comey is in the Executive Branch of government, and Trump runs the Executive Branch. But Trump CANNOT fire Comey if his intention is to obstruct the proper administration of justice.

18/ 1503—”corruptly endeavor to influence an officer of the court in his duty” 1505—”corruptly attempt to influence administration of the law in pending proceeding” 1512—”corruptly attempt to persuade a person with intent to prevent communication to a judge commission of a crime”

19/ You can see that 1512 is the highest bar in some respects—it says “persuade,” not “influence,” which is more specific; it says “with intent to prevent communication,” whereas the other two don’t require that intent or aim—but on the other hand it does seem to fit these facts.

20/ Some falsely say there was no “official proceeding” pending at the time Trump had his conversations with Comey. But in fact, even if the FBI had brought no charges against anyone yet, and had no grand jury, it was still before the FISA court seeking (and receiving) warrants.

21/ It doesn’t matter if Trump knew or didn’t know that the FBI was already before a court on its broader investigation into Trump-Russia ties. And it shouldn’t matter that Comey hadn’t been before a court yet—we don’t think—on Flynn, as Flynn was part of a broader investigation.

22/ Moreover, there’s a chance—though we don’t know this—that the FBI may have been before a court at some point in its surveillance of Kislyak, or as part of the unmasking of Flynn which came as a result of the counter-intelligence capture of Kislyak’s telephonic communications.

23/ Generally speaking, FBI agents aren’t officers of the court (that refers to judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, or attorneys for a civil party). That’s why 1505 is what we’re looking at—unless Comey is seen as a “witness” (because he’s an FBI agent, not a DOJ prosecutor).

24/ For this reason, 18 U.S. Code § 1515 suddenly becomes important—because it offers us the *definition* of “corruptly” as it is used in 1505. Here’s the definition: “acting with an improper purpose…by…concealing information.” So what would the concealed information be here?

25/ Well, the “improper purpose” Trump would have for trying to convince FBI Director Comey to drop the Flynn case and stop investigating his (Trump’s) ties to Russia is pretty clear: protecting himself from prosecution—and thus, presumably, concealing they had committed a crime.

26/ So here are the major problems I have with the Obstruction analyses I’ve seen so far: (a) They don’t specify statute.

(b) They don’t acknowledge that statutes differ.

(c) They don’t acknowledge some are harder to prove than others.

(d) They don’t clarify the issue of intent.

27/ Under 1505, the only “specific intent” Trump would have to have would be (a) the aim of influencing a pending case, (b) to protect himself from prosecution—which, as I said last June, we already have from just *two pieces of evidence* that are more or less incontrovertible.

28/ PIECE OF EVIDENCE 1: Comey says, contemporaneously memorialized, and told others Trump at a minimum tried to “influence” him on whether to charge Flynn.

PIECE OF EVIDENCE 2: Trump told NBC he fired Comey because “this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.”

29/ The first piece of evidence is inarguably an effort to “influence” Comey’s pending Flynn investigation; the second piece of evidence shows Trump’s awareness that *he himself* was caught up in the Russia probe and was therefore in possible legal jeopardy from its continuation.

30/ So on those facts *alone* Mueller would have proof of an “attempt to influence” and an “improper purpose” for attempting to influence. This is not to mention Trump telling the Russians that firing Comey “took pressure off him”—*more* proof of Trump’s clearly improper purpose.

31/ And it goes without saying we have *much* more evidence of the “attempt to influence” (trying to get Sessions to recuse himself, pressuring Congress to drop its probes) and “improper purpose” (asking Comey to pledge loyalty to *him* rather than the Constitution or U.S. laws).

32/ If the case were under 1503 (assuming Comey were somehow treated as an “officer of the court”) it’d be just as easy: all you’d need is “endeavoring to influence for an improper purpose.” Under 1512? An improper purpose for trying to keep Comey from bringing Flynn into court.

With all this in mind, I turn to Renato’s article today in POLITICO:

It’s Now Likely Mueller Thinks Trump Obstructed Justice

Thursday’s bombshell news points toward one conclusion: The special counsel has the goods on the president.


33/ Renato believed and wrote on June 8—as did I—that an average person would almost certainly be charged with Obstruction on these facts. Unlike Renato, I didn’t and don’t think a federal prosecutor has right or authority to treat a president differently from an average citizen.

34/ Federal prosecutors are political beings—they’re influenced by politics and sometimes end up running for political office. So they’re sometimes wrongly swayed by the political implications of their decisions. But there’s zero support in the law or Constitution for doing this.

35/ From Day One on this feed, I’ve analyzed the Trump-Russia case under the (correct) presumption all citizens are equal under U.S. law—including presidents. While the Constitution gives POTUS special authority, as we’ve noted that authority does NOT extend to committing crimes.

36/ So I, and you, and EVERYONE should dismiss any part of any legal analysis that says a president gets more leash to commit a crime without being prosecuted than the average citizen does—that’s a political calculation that benefits the rich and powerful and has no basis in law.

37/ Here’s the second paragraph of Renato’s piece in POLITICO:

38/ The word “prudent” here means “political”—Renato is, quite understandably, speaking of a prosecutor who wants to keep his or her job and (moreover) possibly advance in their legal career or make the jump into politics. But let’s be clear—such an analysis isn’t based in *law*.

39/ In Renato’s defense, he cites the Dershowitz Defense as a basis for thinking Trump might get more leeway in firing Comey. But that defense is a binary (either right or wrong). If being POTUS doesn’t permit you to commit crimes, POTUS is no different from a citizen under 1505.

40/ Any jury looking at Obstruction for Trump would bifurcate the issues: 1) Can a POTUS commit crimes if he’s exercising constitutional authority? 2) If not—and the answer is indeed “no”—did Trump violate 1505 under the same standard as would be applied to the average citizen?

41/ Where I think Renato *does* have a point is in implying that referring an indictment against a president is *in the first instance* a political issue—as a sitting president can’t be indicted (he must be impeached first). So a prosecutor might well *have* to consider politics.

42/ But Mueller isn’t a prosecutor—at least as to Trump—he’s an investigator.His decision will be on whether Trump violated the law. Likewise, Rosenstein (DOJ) is simply charged with deciding whether Trump violated the law.

It’s CONGRESS that will make political calculations.

43/ So the “prudent” prosecutor Renato describes (a) wouldn’t be Mueller, who must simply look at the law and refer to DOJ, and (b) isn’t Rosenstein at DOJ, because *he* wouldn’t be the prosecutor of Trump in the first instance (i.e., at an impeachment). Thus, Renato errs, here.

44/ So I go back to my point that there’s no “prudent prosecutor” at the FBI or DOJ who must—or even can—take politics into account here, and that that sort of “prudence” (if it arose) would just be a Special Counsel or DOJ lawyer making a political calculation *for themselves*.

45/ I think Renato also errs in equating “impeding” and “influencing” the administration of justice. He admits both words can apply to 1505, but the moment he moves to the question of intent he opts for the *higher* standard—”impede.” This is where—I fear—politics is creeping in.

46/ Unless he or she is making a political calculation inapplicable to an average citizen, no prosecutor opts for a higher mental state in a case than they’re required to prove. “Intent to influence” and “intent to impede” are both “specific intent”—the latter is harder to prove.

47/ Consider: “intent to impede” might require a prosecutor to show that Trump wanted to *shut down the entire Trump-Russia probe permanently*. “Intent to influence” is proven the *moment* Trump knowingly inserts himself into the issue at *all*—even if it’s entirely haplessly.

48/ So when Renato says of Trump’s comments to NBC, “Trump followed them up by indicating he thought the investigation was bogus—his defense to obstruction could be he genuinely believed the Russia investigation was meritless.”

No! It couldn’t be. Not under “intent to influence.”

49/ So what I see some federal prosecutors doing here is—with the best intentions—arrogating to themselves the “political calculations” that are *Congress’ to make*, and thereby making the Obstruction case against Trump *much* harder to make out than it actually is under the law.

50/ It’s literally *no defense whatsoever* under 18 U.S. Code § 1505 to say “I thought the investigation of me was stupid!”Imagine for a moment if citizens charged with obstructing investigations into them could say, “Well, I thought it was bullsh*t, so why can’t I obstruct it?”

51/ Renato even says Trump could defend himself by saying he “didn’t understand the consequences of firing Comey.”

No—he couldn’t.

As long as he understood he was talking to the federal agent working on Flynn’s case and hoped to “influence” that person as to that case, it’s over.

52/ What I think Renato does a great job of is showing how Mueller can make his Obstruction case against Trump *as strong as possible*—but that is *entirely* separate from the question of whether Mueller had a “prima facie” Obstruction case on Trump in June 2017. He did. He does.

53/ Here’s why this matters:

(1) Trump wants to fire Mueller.

(2) If Mueller refers Obstruction, he comes unfireable.

(3) If Mueller artificially raises the bar for Obstruction, he might never refer it.

(4) If he delays referring it, he’ll be fired before he can.

See the issue?

54/ We always wonder why the rich and powerful get away with things the rest of us couldn’t. What this thread has been about is breaking down the Obstruction case against Trump to show that how we’re discussing it perfectly explains why the rich and powerful get better treatment.

55/ *This* is why—not to be salacious, or to get more widely read, or to get ahead of a story—I said last June Trump was guilty of Obstruction. As a former public defender—not a federal prosecutor with a “political” mind—I proudly look *only* at the law, *not* at the defendant.

PS/ A smart reader notes Mueller could choose to test the “you can’t indict a sitting POTUS” presumption by indicting Trump *now* and going all the way to SCOTUS to *test* the Dershowitz Defense. If he wins, he declaws Trump allies dramatically at subsequent impeachment hearings.

NOTE/ I like and respect Renato. In noting federal prosecutors have to be political beings to avoid being fired, I’m not impugning anyone’s character—the reality is the reality, and no individual federal prosecutor could change it. But that culture has dangerous implications now.

Part 2. will also present evidence and facts that “somehow” eludes the detection of #TrumpTards.

The egregious problem of the “ostrich with it’s head in the sand” approach here and now is that, well, America, The Constitution, and LIBERTY are at stake.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


Snippets and Blasts

This will be a posting of headlines, links, memes, evidence, and the like in a short, concise manner, followed with a “the trumpet blast” of truth, hence the article’s title.


Jeff Sessions has sold out Donald Trump to Robert Mueller

[NOTE: This is so good I will post excerpts, let it speak for itself, with minimal commetary.]

All along we’ve known two things about Jeff Sessions:

  1. He loves using the Attorney General job to carry out his racist agenda,
  2.  And his early recusal meant that he was never going to show Donald Trump any loyalty when it came time to protect himself.

That meant Sessions was always going to keep the AG job as long as he could, and then sell out Trump to Robert Mueller as soon as he had to. It turns out that moment was last week.

It was clear something was up last night when it leaked that Trump and Sessions had asked FBI Director Christopher Wray to fire FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in an attempt at obstructing the Trump-Russia investigation. This meant that Mueller had Sessions nailed not just for famously lying to the Senate a year ago, but also for obstruction of justice. In other words, Mueller had Sessions nailed, meaning Sessions was going to have to flip on Trump – and he has.

Sessions gave a voluntary interview to Mueller last week which lasted several hours, according to the a new report from the New York Times today (link). The fact that the interview took place at all means that Sessions decided to cooperate. The fact that it lasted for several hours means that Sessions did indeed give Mueller much or all of what he wanted; otherwise the interview would have been rather short and Mueller would have instead hit Sessions with a grand jury subpoena. SOURCE

As we explained, Jeff Sessions was always going to sell out Donald Trump in the end to save himself. That part isn’t a surprise. But it’s a big deal that it’s happening right now. Mueller has managed to get Sessions on board with the prosecution before Mueller’s interview with Trump takes place. This means Mueller will go into that interview armed with far more evidentiary ammunition.


How many Trumpanzees have now been charged, indicted, and flipped?

Paul Manafort, former Trump campaign chairman. CHARGED.

Rick Gates, one of Manafort’s business partners. CHARGED.

Steve Bannon, Trump’s chief of staff, and right hand man. FLIPPED

George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign adviser. CHARGED AND FLIPPED.

Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser. CHARGED AND FLIPPED.


Jeff Sessions has NOT been indicted- yet- and may not be because he preemptively went and VOLUNTARILY MET AND COOPERATED with Mueller…i.e. FLIPPED AND CUT A DEAL.

Watch for Jared Kushner and Donnie Trump, Jr. to be next.


Besides Flynn, Sessions, and Papadopoulos, who else has been interviewed and is cooperating with Mueller? Oh, just THIS GUY:

Breaking: Trump Panics As Mueller’s Secret Interview with James Comey Comes to Light


Probably the ONLY time DT was HONEST (other than when he expressed HIS TRUE feelings about certain countries calling them “Sh*tholes”) was when in an LIVE INTERVIEW admitted he fired Comey because Comey wouldn’t drop the Russian investigation…how’d that work for you “Dumpster Fire” Donnie?


When a porn star, or ANYONE (Putin) for that matter, have dirt on you they WILL use it to blackmail, and manipulate you into doing what they want, witness this:

Trump’s Porn-Star Scandal Just Took a Worse Turn

If the nation weren’t already in the midst of a historic crisis created by a mentally unstable racist traitor illegally occupying the office of President of the United States, the fact that he’s being blackmailed by a porn star would be getting bigger headlines. 

BREAKING: We just filed a complaint with the & alleging ‘s $130,000 hush money to Stormy Daniels is a violation of federal campaign finance law:


Mike Pence certainly didn’t help Trump out today, and in fact he may have been purposely trying to hurt Trump, when he made a point of denying the allegations – but that’s not the big story here. It turns out Trump violated campaign finance laws with the method he used for paying the $130,000 to Stormy Daniels.

Now a criminal complaint has been filed against him (Trump) by an activist group called Common Cause, and we’ve learned from past sex-and-hush-money scandals that this is where it gets ugly for him.

When John Edwards tried paying off his mistress years ago, he ended up facing criminal charges for violating campaign finance laws. Those charges ultimately didn’t stick, but as it dragged out in the court of law, it ensured that the scandal stuck to Edwards in the court of public opinion. Now that Trump’s payoff to Daniels is a criminal matter, it’s going to be around for quite a while. The criminal developments regarding the money will force it to remain in the news; the media will respond by focusing on the salacious aspects of it.


German Bank Rats Out Jared Kushner to Robert Mueller



A Florida Newspaper Just Exposed Trump In A Massive Tax Evasion Scheme



FBI Just Found $30M Money Funnel Into Trump’s Campaign – White House Panics


Mueller Just Uncovered Over 50 Checks Made Out To Trump’s Russian Contacts



Former Top FBI Investigator: Kushner Is ‘Criminally Exposed’ on Russia and Money Laundering




The SAME is true on Twitter. REAL Conservatives are talking issues and current events surrounding the FRAUD/LIAR/CON Trump…then the FAUX “Conservatives” show up. They begin to name call, post unsubstantiated lies, reject ANY THING that doesn’t fit their narrative, regardless of the MOUNTAINS OF PROOF given them. Then these phony-baloney “Conservatives” get mad, report US and we get suspended or banned.
NOT your propaganda. NOT your racist agenda. NOT your unfounded OPINION.
Jesus said: Ye shall KNOW THE TRUTH and THE TRUTH shall make you FREE.




Trump Groups Raised Millions, Then Paid It Out to Loyalists and a Trump Hotel



WASHINGTON — A pair of groups supporting President Trump say they raised $30 million last year, then spent tens of thousands of those dollars at the Trump International Hotel here and on payments to a few Trump loyalists like the former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and the former Milwaukee County sheriff David A. Clarke Jr., according to new campaign finance reports and news reports.

Of the millions raised, at least $1 million came from a coal company that has gained extraordinary access to the Trump administration to push for pro-coal policy changes.

The campaign finance reports shed light on a network of groups that were formed to support Mr. Trump, but have spent less than other groups bolstering his agenda, while steering money to the president’s businesses and his most ardent surrogates.

One of the groups — a “super PAC” called America First Action — spent nearly $33,000 at the Trump International Hotel, primarily on events for donors, and paid tens of thousands of dollars each to Mr. Lewandowski; Brad Parscale, a digital strategist for Mr. Trump’s campaign; and Katrina Pierson, a campaign spokeswoman. Those figures were revealed in a report filed on Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission, which shows that the group raised $4 million last year.

An affiliated nonprofit group, America First Policies, raised $26 million last year, according to a report by Axios. That group is registered under a section of the tax code — 501(c)(4) — that allows it to shield most information about its finances, including the identity of its donors…

…Republican operatives have grumbled that the amount the groups say they have raised have dwarfed the amount they have spent to support Mr. Trump’s political and policy goals during his first year in office.

Reports filed with the election commission show that the groups combined to spend about $3.2 million — just over 10 percent of what they raised — supporting Republican candidates in special elections, including former Senator Luther Strange and Roy S. Moore, who lost their bids for an Alabama Senate seat, and Karen Handel, who won her House campaign in Georgia.


A Primer on the Foreign Agents Registration Act—and Related Laws Trump Officials May Have Broken


April 3, 2017



Now, for a look at two wholly “unrelated” Lists:



Lastly, for now anyway…

Is Trump’s presidency finally becoming normal?

There seems to be something of an anti-anti-Trump backlash underway in GOP circles.

by Charles Sykes / 



…[Erstwhile and tentative supporters are saying]In his recent column, Brooks argues that it is “almost as if there are two White Houses.” There is the reality television White House and “the Invisible White House,” which is quietly effective “at managing around the distracted boss…aka Trump.”

Ironically, by raising questions about Trump’s basic mental fitness, the book (Fire and Fury, by Michael Woolf) has also encouraged some in the media to lower the bar for Trump [even lower]. At a meeting with congressional negotiators on immigration, for example, Trump was clearly unfamiliar with the details of his own position on proposed legislation. But, expectations were apparently so low for the president some reviewers passed over his ignorance and praised him for his coherence. [Meaning that they were just glad be wasn’t a babbling, drooling idiot.]

Here is the problem with that perspective: You don’t have to think that Trump is crazy or suffering from pre-dementia to recognize him as a dishonest, erratic, narcissist who is demeaning the presidency and potentially rendering conservatism toxic for a generation. We absolutely should beware the kind of mindless oppositionalism that lowers our intellectual and journalistic standards.

But to regard Trump’s presidency as normal, or something approaching normal, conservatives would have to ignore:

The president’s many rationalizers would like to believe that objections to Trump are merely matters of taste or style or the president’s “personality.” But as this list (which is hardly comprehensive) suggests, the objections are far more serious. Even with tax cuts and Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, the Trump presidency continues to pose a moral, political and perhaps even existential challenge to conservatives. That has been true from the beginning and there is no sign that will change anytime soon.


Let me sum this up, IF possible:

  1. Trump IS, above and before ALL else, a life-long NY Liberal,
  2. Trump IS a racist, ONLY position, power, $$$, or heaps of flattery get him to see beyond color, nationality, creed, and religion,
  3. Trump IS a pagan. Imagine a 70 year old telling THE LORD JESUS CHRIST that he has NEVER thought, believed, said, or did ANYTHING wrong that he NEEDED to EVER ask FORGIVENESS for NOR repent of!!
  4. Trump has ONLY ONE Core “Principle”: What’s in it for me?” ALL ELSE, as HE has said he is “totally, very, very flexible on”. That’s why DT can say he’d nominate HIS Hard-Left, Ultra-Pro Choice sister to THE SUPREME COURT, and then say he’s “pro-life”. It is simply a matter of WHAT will make “Captain Chameleon” fit in and get HIM what HE wants at the time.
  5. Trump, hence, based on all the above, IS an incoherrant, lying, blathering, nincompoop, a bully, cheat, liar, fraud, con, and uber insecure, arrogant jackass.



So, as I prepare to go take a long, hot shower to wash all this “Trump” off me let me leave you with this:




HOW is such an unmitigated LOSER going to “Make America Great Again”???

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

Trump: What We Actually KNOW

Related image


There’s a lot of talk going on about Trump and his cabal of Putin-Pals, Hard-Core Liberals, White-Nationalists, Protectionists, and general morons, mooks, and Knuckle-Walking, Drool-Monkeys. A lot of rumor, speculation, and out of context guessing. 

THIS will NOT follow that pattern. Nope. What we WILL do is look at WHAT WE ACTUALLY KNOW ABOUT “TRUMP & GANG”, BEGINNING WITH Trumps ACTUAL voting record and who Trump REALLY supported financially…THIS IS REALITY, NOT RHETORIC:
































1) any of that IS Conservative,

2) how YOU can be truly Conservative and support THAT.

That is NOT “speculation”.

That is NOT “mere rhetoric”.

That is NOT simply “talking points”.



Image result for trump is a liberal democrat

Trump was raced by racists, and has a ACTUAL HISTORY of Racism.

In 1927, Donald Trump’s father was arrested after a Klan riot in Queens


FBI releases documents related to Trump apartment discrimination case

Image result for trump's and his dad charged for discrimination against blacks in apartments and condos



In many cases, I probably identify more as Democrat,” explaining: “It just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans. Now, it shouldn’t be that way. But if you go back, I mean it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats … But certainly we had some very good economies under Democrats, as well as Republicans. But we’ve had some pretty bad disaster under the Republicans.”[21] In a July 2015 interview, Trump said that he has a broad range of political positions and that “I identify with some things as a Democrat.”[20]

Trump said that “I alone can fix” the system…


Mueller Just Uncovered Over 50 Checks Made Out To Trump’s Russian Contacts


Trump Devastated As Steve Bannon ‘Strikes Deal’ with Robert Mueller (Details)

Adult Movie Star Said She Had a Year Long Affair With Donald Trump (Details)


[NOTE: Trump has openly admitted to, and even bragged, about being a serial fornicator, adulterer, and sexual predator/assaulter. Trump’s grandpa ran a brothel for the gold miners!! In an interview Trump said “not getting an STD was his personal Vietnam”. The whole family is rife with perversion and depravity.]

Former Top FBI Investigator: Kushner Is ‘Criminally Exposed’ on Russia and Money Laundering


Robert Mueller May Have Trump On Tape Admitting He Conspired With Russia (Details)


One thing we do know for certain: In the closing days of the campaign, Trump was urged to make extra appearances in the key battleground state of Michigan, which we now know was where the Russians did much of their behind the scenes work by spreading lies on social media and attempting to hack into voter records.

Image result for trump is not conservative meme

Another Porn Star Just Came Forward, Says She Was Invited To Trump’s Hotel Room



President Trump has now been linked to three porn stars over the last two days1, as allegations of extramarital affairs with two of them first made during the campaign have resurfaced in spectacular fashion.

On the morning of January 12th, the Wall Street Journal reported that Michael Cohen, a long time lawyer for the Trump Organization and Trump family, paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about a sexual encounter she and Donald Trump had back in 2006 – a year after he married current wife and first lady, Melania Trump.

A second porn star, Alana Evans, corroborated the encounter later that day, when she confirmed that Trump and Daniels invited her to join them in a threesome.

Daniels has admitted to friends privately that the consensual encounter did indeed take place at a golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, the Journal reported, but she did not go public. In October of 2016, shortly after the release of the infamous Access Hollywood tape threatened to sink Trump’s presidential hopes, Cohen negotiated a non-disclosure agreement with Daniels, which she signed, effectively silencing her before she had a chance to speak out…

One of the lesser reported anecdotes in “Fire and Fury” is an exchange the author had with Bannon about how Trump’s lawyers “took care” of a hundred women in the run up to the election.1

“Look, [Trump’s chief attorney] Kasowitz has known Trump for twenty-five years. Kasowitz has gotten him out of all kinds of jams,” Bannon told Wolff. “Kasowitz on the campaign — what did we have, a hundred women? Kasowitz took care of all of them.”1

And now, the spotlight has shifted to a third porn star, Jessica Drake. Unlike Stormy Daniels, Jessica Drake went public during the campaign with her allegations of impropriety against then-candidate Trump…After some drinks and conversation they both left. Trump called her room shortly thereafter and offered her $10,000 to come back and spend the night with him, she alleged.

Drake hired high-profile lawyer Gloria Allred and held a press conference to report the incident in October of 2016, after the Access Hollywood tape became public. At the time, she was the 11th woman to accuse Trump of sexual impropriety.

But then something odd happened. Drake stopped talking about the incident. In the few interviews she gave, she avoided offering any details about her encounter with Trump, and referred further questions to her lawyer.

Late Friday evening, however, after the revelations of Cohen’s alleged payments to Stormy Daniels swirled for an entire news cycle, The Daily Beast confirmed that Jessica Drake is subject to a non-disclosure agreement negotiated with the president’s legal representatives, too.

“Jessica’s NDA blankets any and every mention of Trump, so she’s legally unable to comment,” her publicist told The Daily Beast. “Jessica signed a non-disclosure agreement after her allegations of misconduct, and she can’t do as much as peep his name publicly.”


Trump’s Money Laundering Pipeline Was Just Exposed, Trump is Furious



No matter how hard he tries, Donald Trump just cannot escape the looming shadow of federal investigation. You might think that Trump merely sold his soul to Russia for a chance at the presidency of the United States, but the depth of his entanglement is unimaginably deeper. Despite his increasingly unhinged denials…Trump is in deep.

Image result for north korea and trump war memes

FBI investigating whether Russian money went to NRA to help Trump

January 18, 2018 05:00 AM

Updated 1 hour 18 minutes ago


You may ask why I include the seedy, sexy, salacious reality about Trump? BECAUSE if we know this NOW…what did the Russian spies/hackers KNOW…and WHEN DID THEY KNOW? And, more importantly, HOW WAS that KNOWLEDGE used against Trump & Company? 


  • political scientist Pippa Norris has described Trump as a “populist authoritarian”
  •  Columnist Walter Shapiro and political commentator Jonathan Chait describe Trump as authoritarian.[38][39]
  • Conservative commentator Mary Katharine Ham characterized Trump as a “casual authoritarian,” saying “he is a candidate who has happily and proudly spurned the entire idea of limits on his power as an executive and doesn’t have any interest in the Constitution and what it allows him to do and what does not allow him to do. That is concerning for people who are interested in limited government.”[40]
  • Charles C. W. Cooke of the National Review has expressed similar views, terming Trump an “anti-constitutional authoritarian.”[41] 
  • Law professors Randy E. BarnettRichard Epstein, and David G. Post, for example, suggest that Trump has little or no awareness of, or commitment to, the constitutional principles of separation of powers and federalism.[43]
  •  Journalist and political analyst John Heilemann characterized Trump as liberal on social issues,[47]

Image result for trump is a liberal democrat

“BUT…Trump is a Republican/Conservative  now…isn’t he?”

Trump’s political positions, and his descriptions of his beliefs, have frequently changed.[13] Politico has described his positions as “eclectic, improvisational and often contradictory.”[14] According to an NBC News count, over the course of his campaign Trump made “141 distinct shifts on 23 major issues.”[15] Fact-checking organizations reported that during the campaign, Trump made a record number of false statements compared to other candidates.[19]

Trump has said that he is “totally flexible on very, very many issues.[2]

The tally of Trump lies has risen considerably…see this:

President Trump has made 1,950 false or misleading claims over 347 days

 January 2



Oh, but that’s NOT all…since the above was reported, AND there have been MORE DAYS for Trump to tell MORE LIES…the above article links to THIS:

In 355 days, President Trump has made 2,001 false or misleading claims

The Fact Checker’s ongoing database of the false or misleading claims made by President Trump during his first 365 days in office.



In Trump’s own words “he’s totally FLEXIBLE on very, very MANY issues.” IN Trump’s own actions he has changed party affiliation over 5 times, ALWAYS remaining a NY Liberal regardless of the Party title.

Then in DOCUMENTING Trump’s own words/actions we see a pathological liar, fraud, and con.

So those saying that Trump “is a Conservative (now)” are either:

  1. Deluded and delusional,
  2. Dishonest and Liars, OR
  3. Too STUPID to know what REAL Conservatism is.

Yo, Hannity, Rush, Savage, Levin, Ingrham, Malkin, Coulter, et al…YES, I’m INCLUDING you in the SAME clumping as Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, David Pecker of National Enquirer “fame”…YOU jackasses along with your Mother Russia ARE responsible for the destruction of Conservatism, Liberty, The Constitution, and America.

So, why isn’t any in the G.O.P. doing anything to stop this?

Remember: BOTH the DNC & RNC servers were hacked by Putin/Russia. ONLY the DNC was leaked to enable Trump to win, WHY? Because the Democrats are ALREADY Leftists. No need for blackmail. On the other hand, the RNC server has NOT been leaked, WHY? Because the G.O.P. is/was anti-Liberal, anti-Communism, and took a hard-line against Russia, China, N. Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and the Muslim and other totalitarian nations…notice I said they WERE…Putin and Russia are using the mountainous volumes of info and evidence from the RNC server to blackmail, bully, and bribe into silence and compliance the G.O.P. …pretty clear really.

MY prediction? UNLESS we have a REAL Constitutional-Conservative Leader/Leaders step forward, OR States actually begin to NULLIFY ALL non-Constitutional laws, rulings and EOs, OR Secession…there is NO hope. I give America 3-5 years…tops. Hope I’m wrong.  

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


Charge v Counter-Charge: Who Is Right

Image result for lord voldemort

Related image



Trump Tower meeting with Russians ‘treasonous’, Bannon says in explosive book


The meeting was revealed by the New York Times in July last year, prompting Trump Jr to say no consequential material was produced. Soon after, Wolff writes, Bannon remarked mockingly: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers.

“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad sh*t, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”

Bannon went on, Wolff writes, to say that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people”. Any information, he said, could then be “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication”.

Bannon added: “You never see it, you never know it, because you don’t need to … But that’s the brain trust that they had.”

Bannon also speculated that Trump Jr had involved his father in the meeting. “The chance that Don Jr did not walk these jumos up to his father’s office on the twenty-sixth floor is zero.”


Now is there any veracity to these allegations of treason transpiring?
Read this and judge for yourself, here are links to much PROOF AND EVIDENCE that DT is a Putin Puppet-Pal, aka a Traitor.

Newest, Uber, DT-Putin Article

“Where-the-Rubber-Meets-the-Road” Truth About DT’s ties to Putin and Russian Mob

Jonathan Gruber Told ONLY A “Sort Of” Lie: Part 1.

The “Sort Of Lie”: Part 2.

“Sort Of Lie”: Part 3

Viral News Dump: Part 1.

Viral News Dump: Part 2.

America’s Godfather

and, lastly,

DT: The Turd In The Punch Bowl


Conclusion on Part 1.

There seems to be a plethora of evidence Steve Bannon’s charges are 100%, and absolutely, sadly TRUE.


Now, Trump’s “very, stable genius, with a very good brain, and all the best words” Counter Charge.

“Steve Bannon lost his job then lost his mind. Sloppy Steve.”

The equivalent of The President of The United States going:
“Neener, Neener! You’re a poopy-head!”


Now, is there any veracity to the charge that “Sloppy” Steve has lost his mind???
Evil? Yes.
A Drunk? Yes.
Clinically insane? No.


Now, keep in mind that there are mountains (plural) of evidence that DT is indeed a traitor, and that HE might be truly INSANE as we read the following…
Remember in my last write-up that I mentioned Kim Jung Un, another unhinged, egotistical maniac with NUKES, said the following:

Kim Jong Un’s New Year’s Day speech is being widely described as an “olive branch”—despite the fact that he warned the nuclear button is “always on his table” and bragged that the entire US is now within the range of his country’s nuclear weapons. “This is reality, not a threat,” the North Korean leader said, though he also said he was “open to dialogue” with South Korea and suggested his country might send a delegation to the Winter Olympics being held in the South next month, the BBC reports. He said North Korea will focus on mass-producing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles in 2018, but these “weapons will be used only if our security is threatened.”

So, what was the well measured, reasoned, thought out, ADULT response from OUR President?

Trump to Kim: My Button Is Bigger Than Yours

‘And my button works,’ he tweets

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff
Posted Jan 3, 2018 1:34 AM CST
Updated Jan 3, 2018 5:31 AM CST

(NEWSER) President Trump fired back at Kim Jong Un’s claim to have a nuclear button on his desk by telling the North Korean leader that his button is bigger—and more functional. Kim “just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times,'” Trump tweeted Tuesday. “Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!” Trump, who appears to be stepping up his rhetoric against Pyongyang after months of relatively restrained remarks, also brought back his “Rocket Man” nickname for Kim earlier Tuesday, the Washington Post reports.


The reaction from concerned patriots? THIS is a sample:


This dude *really* wants an excuse to kill millions of people, doesn’t he?


To wrap this up we have an egotistical, unhinged, narcissistic, NY Liberal, and maniac who routinely threatens nuclear war like I’d say “I want some Lays Potato Chips”…oh, and he’s in DEEP with Putin, and the Russian mob.
Don’t forget that $500,000,000,000– yes 500 BILLION, HALF A TRILLION DOLLAR- Russian oil and gas deal with Trump-Tillerson-Putin.


Faux, sell-out, “Conservatives” sold-out for power and position thinking they could control an egotistical, unhinged, narcissistic, NY Liberal, maniac…now we and the whole world might pay dearly for it.


This maniac is control of the most powerful nuclear arsenal on earth…sleep well…

Image result for Trump unhinged


 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


Just keep eating your own boogers.

Image result for If Trump is the answer it must have been a stupid question.


Kim Warns of ‘Nuclear Button’ on His Desk

But he has warm words for Seoul in New Year’s Day speech

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff
Posted Jan 1, 2018 8:02 AM CST


NEWSER) – Kim Jong Un’s New Year’s Day speech is being widely described as an “olive branch”—despite the fact that he warned the nuclear button is “always on his table” and bragged that the entire US is now within the range of his country’s nuclear weapons. “This is reality, not a threat,” the North Korean leader said, though he also said he was “open to dialogue” with South Korea and suggested his country might send a delegation to the Winter Olympics being held in the South next month, the BBC reports. He said North Korea will focus on mass-producing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles in 2018, but these “weapons will be used only if our security is threatened.”

“We should melt the frozen North-South relations,” Kim said, adding that the “Winter Games will be a good opportunity to show unity of the people, and we wish the Games will be a success.” John Delury at Seoul’s Yonsei University tells the Washington Post that Kim’s words “should give hope to those in the South who are trying to get something going and open a channel at least.” He says Kim may be trying to drive a wedge between Seoul and Washington, though the fact that the North Korean leader refrained from insulting President Trump may be a good sign. Asked about Kim’s “nuclear button” remarks by reporters at the Mar-a-Lago New Year’s Eve party, Trump said “We’ll see.”


My take-aways from this:

  1. “Olive branch”? Um, NO. NOT an “olive branch” when the ONLY way of “peace” proffered is to do it the way that a despotic, meglo-maniacal, Marxist Dictator (that is supported and propped up by China and Russia) says to,
  2. “Drive a wedge” between South Korea and The U.S.? The entirety of South Korea would have to have become as stupid as South PARK, or Trump, to side with Kim Jung Un and North Korea rather than The U.S. ,
  3. Marxist maniacs should be listened to when they make threats…one those threats can be a BIG KAAA-BOOOM!! This is NOT just a maniac, as bad as Charles Manson was he did NOT have a nuclear arsenal at HIS disposal. This is NOT just another Marxist with nukes. Stalin had them. BUT Stalin had enough cold-blooded rationale to know that he did NOT want to start something that in NO way could possibly end well, reference the scariest movie EVER made HERE.  ENTIRE MOVIE HERE. No. Kim Jung Un, and I believe Trump as well, are both so vain and so egomaniacal that they actually LOVE easing and taunting and the “thrill” of inching closer to the Nuclear Button.
  4. He said North Korea will focus on mass-producing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles in 2018, but these “weapons will be used only if our security is threatened.” But in the “thinking” of someone as vain and self-centric as either Kim or DT what constitutes a “threat” to their ego, their vanity, may be enough of a “threat” to launch Nuclear WWIII! We are NOT dealing with rational thought, nor even cold-blooded pragmatism. These are two hot tempered, all-about-me, LOONS!


Image result for trump crazy meme


These Iran Protests Could Be a Very Big Deal

President Rouhani calls for calm demonstrations, rebuffs Trump

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Dec 31, 2017 2:26 PM CST


  • Backfired? An explainer at BuzzFeed notes that some analysts think hardliners encouraged the original economic protests in a bid to embarrass Rouhani. But if so, that strategy has backfired now that the protests have expanded to larger issues. Protesters not only want the current regime gone, they’re calling for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to step down.
  • A different feel: These protests are different than those that broke out after the 2009 Iranian elections, writes Trita Parsi at CNN. For one thing, the demonstrations are not being driven by the usual reformists. “Their uncompromisingly anti-regime slogans suggest they may belong to the segment of the population who tends not to vote, doesn’t believe the system can be reformed and either never subscribed to or has lost hope in the idea of gradual change,” writes Parsi. “Add to that those who have joined the protests out of a sense of economic desperation and humiliation.” All of the above makes the outcome hard to predict.
  • Trump: He has been supporting the protests. “The people are finally getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered on terrorism,” he tweetedSunday. “Looks like they will not take it any longer. The USA is watching very closely for human rights violations!” Sen. Lindsey Graham, meanwhile, implored Trump to do more than tweet. “You have to lay out a plan,” he said on Face the Nation, per the Washington Post. “We’ve got a chance here to deliver some fatal blows to really bad actors in 2018, but if we blink, God help us all.” [More on the “God help us all” aspect in a bit.]
  • Rebuff to Trump: Rouhani shot back at Trump: “This man in America who is sympathizing today with our people has forgotten that he called the Iranian nation terrorists a few months ago. This man who is against the Iranian nation to his core has no right to sympathize with Iranians.” [ME: I side more with “Iran is a terrorist nation” than not. Past and current experience say so.]
  • Lousy coverage? A critique at Tablet makes the case that American journalists are grossly underplaying a potentially history-making series of events. Why? “The short answer is that the American media is incapable of covering the story, because its resources and available story-lines for Iran reporting and expertise were shaped by two powerful official forces—the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Obama White House,” writes Lee Smith. “Without government minders providing them with story-lines and experts, American reporters are simply lost—and it shows.” Essentially, only “regime-friendly” journalists are operating in Iran, argues Smith.
  • More advice for US: In the New York TimesPhilip Gordon has some specific advice of his own for Trump: “Keep quiet and do nothing.” Doing otherwise might actually hurt the movement, he argues.


Now, let’s address the “God help us” aspect.

IF, like with North Korea, Trump gets into a “ego snit game of one-upmanship” with Iran, we have yet another enemy WITH NUKES who has PROMISED COUNTLESS TIMES that they WILL use them to OBLITERATE US, ISRAEL, THE WEST, AND, WELL, THE WORLD.

OH, and like with North Korea, Iran is also supported by Russia and China, and by North Korea as well.

Are you beginning to see an emerging pattern?


White House aides lean on delays and distraction to manage Trump

In interviews, senior staff and others close to the president have described a series of guardrails they use to push the president away from rash decisions.


Donald Trump and John Kelly are pictured. | Getty Images

As White House chief of staff, Reince Priebus mused to associates that telling President Donald Trump no was usually not an effective strategy. Telling him “next week” was often the better idea.

Trump would impulsively want to fire someone like Attorney General Jeff Sessions; create a new, wide–ranging policy with far–flung implications, like increasing tariffs on Chinese steel imports; or end a decades–old deal like the North American Free Trade Agreement. Enraged with a TV segment or frustrated after a meandering meeting, the president would order it done immediately.

Delaying the decision would give Priebus and others a chance to change his mind or bring in advisers to speak with Trump — and in some cases, to ensure Trump would drop the idea altogether and move on.

Publicly, the White House has pushed back against Tennessee Republican Sen. Bob Corker’s suggestion that Trump must be managed like a toddler — he called the White House an “adult day care center” on Twitter on Sunday. In a separate New York Times interview, Corker said aides are forced to spend their days trying to keep the president from going off the rails.

But interviews with 10 current and former administration officials, advisers, longtime business associates and others close to Trump describe a process in which they try to install guardrails for a president who goes on gut feeling — and many days are spent managing the president, just as Corker said.

“You either had to just convince him something better was his idea or ignore what he said to do and hoped he forgot about it the next day, said Barbara Res, a former executive in the Trump Organization.


Did YOU read what I just read??
The WH administration, staff, aides, and close friends HAVE to either:

  2. OR Make THE PRESIDENT think that a better (less rash, less stupid) idea “is his own”!!!





Trump’s first 2018 tweet: Pakistan has ‘given us nothing but lies & deceit’


Washington (CNN)In his first tweet of the new year President Donald Trump slammed Pakistan, saying the country has given the US nothing but “lies and deceit.”

“The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools,” Trump tweeted Monday morning. “They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!”

First, IF this were Eisenhower, Reagan, GWB, or even Nixon saying this I’d be comforted that AN ADULT was in charge…NOT a raging, maniacal, egotistical, blathering, NY Liberal Drool-Monkey who is a Marxist Moon-Bat, and Putin Puppet-Pal!!!

Trump seems hell-bent on insulting every Nuclear power ran by “leaders” who challenge him in the EGO department!!! Oh, and that pattern again? Yep. Pakistan supported by Russia and China, and Iran, and North Korea. See how it works? The “Big-2”, Russia and China, have smaller nuclear allies who are basically insane, each either threatening us or in some way defying us. THIS did NOT happen under either Bush, or under Reagan. These were ADULTS. Not even under JFK, Nixon. ADULTS. We may have vastly differed on politics, but they were ADULTS. Trump is NOT, except in age.


TWO, and, Lastly….the Numero Uno thing making an already unstable man even more edgy?


. tick tick BOOM.

It wasn’t the Steele Dossier.

It wasn’t the “Deep State” conspiracy led by Strzok or Ohr.

It was a Trump policy adviser running his mouth to an Australian diplomat that started the Russia investigation.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

How the Russia Inquiry [REALLY] Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt


WASHINGTON — During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton.

About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.

Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role.

The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired…


Conclusion, sort of, (because THIS is NOT over by a long shot.)

The more Mueller digs the more he finds out.
The more Mueller finds out the more he digs to find other connections.
ALWAYS crossing his T’s and dotting his i’s.
Leaving NO stone unturned.

As this happens an already unhinged, egotist, narcissist, racist, liar, cheat, adulterer, fraud, and con who just happens to be filling the office of PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA gets a little edgier and more unhinged.

If true; this is Fantastic…please read, you won’t be disappointed.

Unless you are MAGA, which don’t bother;

Just keep eating your own boogers.




 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.


Can We (Please) Learn From The Past As We Go Into The Future?




This will be in two parts.

The first part largely links and headlines, with (maybe) the occasional excerpt or comment. It will remind us of what we’ve already come through.

The second part will be my comments, and predictions of what to expect in the future. It will be in two-parts: 1) IF we LISTEN and do what is RIGHT, 2) IF we do anything but that.

Part One.

‘Drinking the Orange Kool-Aid’: Cult expert says Trump is like Rev. Jim Jones — but far more dangerous


Former Bush ethics lawyer rails against Trump: ‘I think he picked the wrong country to be the president of’

Bush-era chief White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter



Trump Says ‘It’s Not A Crime’ Even If His Team Colluded With Russia (Details)

russia accuses us election interference



Mueller reportedly looking at whether Russians targeted key swing state voters with RNC data


Robert Mueller Just Gained Access to All of Trump’s Financials

robert mueller rip trump white house

Just In: Robert Mueller is Set to Rip Trump’s White House Apart as Early as This Week


Trump Jr., Jared Kushner Expected to be Arrested according to Former DOJ Official

Image result for Trump Jr., Jared Kushner Expected To Be Arrested According to Former DOJ Official



After Flynn’s plea deal, Trump has two moves: betray Flynn or fire Mueller

One option leads to a potentially bleak future.


Robert Mueller Just Subpoenaed Trump’s Offshore Accounts

Image result for Robert Mueller Just Subpoenaed Trump’s Offshore Accounts


‘These are things we’ve never seen before’: The Russia investigation is moving into uncharted territory

Robert Mueller

Part 2: A

First of all the term and charge of “collusion” is BOTH real and accurate as it relates to the Trump-Putin relations, AND it is too soft a term for what happened.

Here is the Merriam Webster Dictionary definition of collusion:

Definition of collusion

secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose 

  • acting in collusion with the enemy


A FOREIGN power who is a long standing ADVERSARY was, and IS still, in intimate contact with every single person on DT’s team, including DT. Some had ties going back DECADES, including DT. Using this relationship, bribery ($500,000,000,000), blackmail, and threats the FOREIGN power was able in many ways meddle with, and rig the election FOR Trump.

When THAT happens it is called TREASON.

WHY haven’t impeachment proceedings, OR Amendment 25/Mentally unfit proceedings began IN Congress? There IS bountiful evidence and reason to.


BOTH the DNC and RNC files were hacked by Russia.
Russia, so far, as ONLY released the DNC portion.
Based on this, and the absolute NOTHING from Congress I surmise that the RNC files are as DAMNING as the DNC files are.

Putin is blackmailing our entire government, using Trump as an all-too-willing accomplice to get what he (Putin) and Russia want.

And IF DT gets a wild hair and quits complying??

Then the RNC files will be released.


Part 2: B


IF we listen and learn from this we WILL post haste return immediately and completely TO Constitutional governance.

I do NOT see that happening, though it is  a slim possibility.

What I DO see is the alternative: further, quickened, corruption, and decay, and the FINAL DEMISE of America as she once was.

I could be wrong.

I hope I am.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.