I appreciate @maddow finally reporting on Semion Mogilevich. I do. And I can tell you with 100% certainty that she has had plenty of information on Seva & his history with @realdonaldtrump for well over a year.
Though the focus will be on “the ingredients” we need to have an agreed, and consistent definition of insanity as we go along because what this is and what it leads up to IS insane.
FIRST INGREDIENT: POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
The Left in America would have us (Constitutionalists, Realists, Conservatives, Christians) believe several things about the term Political Correctness, or Politically Correct (PC), they are thusly:
It’s an innocuous, benign term, to convey civility in thought, speech and actions.
To BE Politically Correct (PC) is good, acceptable, preferable, and lauded.
To NOT be PC is to make one the target of scorn, ridicule, mockery, lampooning, and even being banned, boycotted, and physically attacked, and even arrested.
Where did this term get it’s impetus? From whence did it get it’s start, grounding, as it were in modern day usage? Notice that PC is all about control and conformity. While being for Law and Order, and Justice are good and commendable, thought, word, and life control is not. So, where did it arise? HERE :
The phrase “politically correct” is ubiquitous in America today. I complain about political correctness now and again, but I’d never given any thought to the phrase’s origins. Codevilla, however, offers a fascinating look.
“The notion of political correctness came into use among Communists in the 1930s as a semi-humorous reminder that the Party’s interest is to be treated as a reality that ranks above reality itself,” writes Codevilla, Professor Emeritus of International Relations at Boston University.
The semi-humorous reminder went something like this:
“Comrade, your statement is factually incorrect.” “Yes, it is. But it is politically correct.”
The anecdote was a vital reminder in Stalin’s empire: Stray from the party’s official position and it could mean death. Whether or not something was true mattered less than whether or not it advanced the Idea (i.e. the Party’s interest).
How does this apply to America today? Codevilla says progressives, like the Marxists before them, have a simple raison d’etre: fix a broken society.
“The formula is straightforward: the world is not as it should be because society’s basic, ‘structural’ feature is ordered badly….For Marx and his followers that feature is conflict over the means of production in present-day society…. For Freudians it’s sexual maladjustment, for followers of Rousseau it’s social constraint, for positivists it is the insufficient application of scientific method, for others it is oppression of one race by another. Once control of society passes exclusively into the hands of the proper set of progressives, each sect’s contradictions must disappear as the basic structural problem is straightened out.”
The methods of the Communists and progressives differ, but the goal is one and the same: achieve “cultural hegemony,” a political phrase popularized by Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937), an Italian Marxist and politician who became prominent in progressive circles decades after his death.
NEXT INGREDIENT: MULTICULTURALISM.
multiculturalism. The view that the various cultures in a society merit equal respect and scholarly interest. It became a significant force in American society in the 1970s and 1980s as African-Americans, Latinos, and other ethnic groups explored their own history.
Sounds innocuous, just like Political Correctness, eh? BUT…as with ALL Leftist ideas it is not what it sounds nor seems. More sourcing HERE .
As The Leftists define and explain it to US (Constitutionalists, Conservatives, Realists, Christians) it goes thusly:
Multiculturalism is a situation in which all the different cultural or racial groups in a society have equal rights and opportunities, and none is ignored or regarded as unimportant.
What it really means:
The birth of the concept of multiculturalism can be traced back to the writings of Horace Kallen, who advocated a policy of “cultural pluralism”. Kallen, a German-born Jewish-American philosopher, first published his ideas in 1915. He attacked assimilation and the melting-pot theory, and instead proposed that America should become a “commonwealth of… nationalities”. Ignoring the potential threats to the ideal of a unified society, Kallen encouraged a philosophy of ethnic separatism, despite warnings that cultural pluralism would “result in the Balkanisation of the United States”.(14)
In his critique of the “cult of ethnicity”, The Disuniting of America, Arthur Schlesinger relates how “The gospel of cultural pluralism was at first largely confined to academics, intellectuals, and artists“ but that, after the Second World War “The civil rights revolution provoked new expressions of ethnic identity by the now long-resident ‘new migration’ from southern and eastern Europe”. He notes that the pressure for the new cult of ethnicity came not from the ethnic minorities en masse (who saw themselves as Americans),but “from their often self-appointed spokesmen“. Schlesinger says that the ethnic upsurge “began as a gesture of protest against the Anglocentric culture”, but became a “cult”, and now threatens the unity of America.(15)
The fatally flawed concept of cultural pluralism eventually took hold in other countries…
…the ideology of multiculturalism took root…where it became the rallying cry of various academics , liberals, and “lefties”..
…It was a concept popular with the liberalistic academia and “migrant intellectuals … [who] found the idea of multiculturalism attractive”. Not only was the concept “a popular idea with the new intelligentsia, but more important, it had clearly struck a responsive chord with many immigrant communities, particularly those from southern Europe”.(19) …
WITH THESE TWO AS THE MAIN INGREDIENTS LET’S LOOK AT THE “SEASONINGS”, “SPICES”, AS IT WERE…
FREEDOM OF TRANSFORMED INTO FREEDOM FROM.
Back in 1962 one, lone, bitter (is there any other kind) Atheist went through the U.S. Courts all the way to The Supreme Court, where the most vile, Liberal court we’ve ever had agreed with the one, lone, bitter atheist that God had/has NO part in Public School, Public lands, or Public proceedings, and, essentially God was BANNED from America.
Which led to another bitter, lone atheist attacking America’s Pledge of Allegiance in 2004 to have the mention of God removed, and to have America’s Motto changed to remove God from it, AND to have said motto removed from all our currency.
What we saw in this modern, materialistic era was America’s roots, history, heritage, and identity attacked and undermined. America was FOUND BY Christians, FOUNDED BY Christians, and FOUNDED UPON Christian, Biblical Principles, see:
UPON REMOVING/BANNING GOD, THE BIBLE, AND CHRISTIANITY FROM ALL PUBLIC DISCOURSE AND CONSIDERATION LIBERALISM BEGAN TO FLOOD THE VOID WITH MORE AUTHORITARIANISM AND TYRANNY. WHY? IF GOD, THE BIBLE, AND CHRISTIAN MORALS ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO MAINTAIN A CIVIL SOCIETY WITH LAW AND ORDER…SOME OTHER “STRONG MAN” MUST NEEDS STEP IN OR THERE IS ANARCHY AND CHAOS….WHICH IS WHY LEFTISTS INSIGHT CHAOS BEFORE STEPPING IN TO TAKE CONTROL.
Do even a cursory study of history and you’ll see that BEFORE a Tyrant or Authoritarian government can step into power they MUST NEEDS via chaos, unrest, rioting and protests confuse, muddle and generate HATE for what was, destroy it, and replace with their brand of tyranny. Each time something good, or at least better than what
was to follow, was in place. Rather than actually work to IMPROVE any of the ills the malcontents railed about their ONLY plan and course of action was to burn it all down and rebuild in THEIR IMAGE.
THIS is what we see and suffer through in America since at least 1962.
Rather than actually SOLVE the problems that the few decried, they sat out to overturn, overthrow, and takeover.
Some it was little by little.
Others wanted to burn it all down and rebuild.
BUT BOTH groups of Leftists wanted ultimate control…one way or another.
If we promote the idea that Liberty INCLUDES personal responsibility, accountability, a strong work ethic, free markets, private property, and our other God given rights then we are labeled as NOT PC, and enemies.
Because the end game with Leftists is NOT to solve problems-
BUT TO TAKE, HAVE, AND KEEP CONTROL.
They know better than anyone else.
They know better than everyone else.
They lead. We, the masses, are to comply and follow…because while they may be incorrect in every way imaginable…they ARE POLITICALLY CORRECT…KOMRADE…
If there was nothing wrong with that meeting, why have Trump, his lawyers, & Jr lied about it from the very beginning?
REAL TIME TIMELINE OF TRUMP TOWER MEETING LIES:
July 8, 2017- it was about adoption; The New York Timesreports on the Trump campaign meeting with Veselnitskaya, who was described by the paper as “a Russian lawyer who has connections to the Kremlin.”
July 9, 2017 , a mere one day later- In a second story, the Timesreports that Donald Trump Jr. was “promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign.” The president’s son issued a second statement that, in part, read: “[T]he woman stated that she had information that individuals connected to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Mrs. Clinton,” Trump Jr.’s statement read. “Her statements were vague, ambiguous and made no sense. No details or supporting information was provided or even offered.”
July 11, 2017 – The New York Timesreports that “the president signed off” on Donald Trump Jr.’s initial statement to the Times “that was so incomplete that it required day after day of follow-up statements.” The president’s son on the same day tweetsimages of the email chain about that June 9, 2016, meeting, disclosing his interest in obtaining incriminating information on Clinton from the “Russian government lawyer.” (See our story, “Donald Trump Jr.’s Evolving Statements.”)
A mere ONE day after that, July 12, 2017 – On CNN’s “New Day,” Sekulow denies that the president had any involvement in drafting Donald Trump Jr.’s incomplete and misleading first statement to the New York Times. “I wasn’t involved in the statement drafting at all, nor was the president,” Sekulow says.
July 16, 2017 – On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Sekulow repeats that the president was not involved in drafting Donald Trump Jr.’s initial response to the Times. “I do want to be clear that the president was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement,” Sekulow says. “It came from Donald Trump Jr. So that’s what I can tell you because that’s what we know.” [MY NOTE: IF that is what you “know” then WHY all the LIES before and since???]
July 31, 2017 – The Washington Postreports that the president “personally dictated a statement in which Trump Jr. said that he and the Russian lawyer had ‘primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children’ when they met in June 2016, according to multiple people with knowledge of the deliberations.” [MY NOTE: But I thought on July 16th that Trump knew NOTHING about this?!!]
Aug. 1, 2017 – White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders denies that the president “personally dictated” the statement to the Times, but confirms for the first time that the president was involved in drafting the statement. “The president weighed in, as any father would, based on the limited information that he had,” she says. “He certainly didn’t dictate, but like I said, he weighed in, offered suggestions like any father would do.” [MY NOTE: Getting a little closer to telling the truth while still being iffy.]
Jan. 29, 2018 – In a letter to special counsel Mueller, Dowd and Sekulow write that the president did dictate the letter to the New York Times – contradicting the White House press secretary. They write, “You have received all of the notes, communications and testimony indicating that the President dictated a short but accurate response to the New York Times article on behalf of his son, Donald Trump, Jr.” [MY NOTE: Really?!! “ALL”??? You’ve posited that LIE each step of the way. This is but another lie.]
June 3, 2018 — Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has joined the Trump legal team, says that Sekulow was “uninformed” when he said that the president wasn’t involved in drafting his son’s initial statement to the Times. “I think he was uninformed at the time just like I was when I came into the case,” Giuliani said. [MY NOTE: Yeah, it IS hard to keep all those LIES sorted out…]
June 4, 2018 — Sanders, the president’s press secretary, declines to answer questions about the contradiction between the January letter and her statement in August that the president “certainly didn’t dictate” his son’s letter. “I’m not going to respond to a letter from the president’s outside counsel,” Sanders says. “We’ve purposely walled off, and I would refer you to them for comment.” [MY NOTE: Pontius Pilate washed his hands of Jesus…how’d that go for him, hmmm?]
SUMMARY OF ALL THE LIES (SO FAR):
Since we KNOW for a FACT that Trump Sr. and ALL associated with him, including Fox “News”, Alex Jones/InfoWars, Breitbart, The National Enquirer, Hannity, Rush, Levin. Coulter, et al have done absolutely NOTHING but lie, and echo lies, and then lie about the lies, and then invent new lies…well, this leads us to a conundrum that BEGS these questions…let’s ask them shall we:
Since it is undeniable that Trump & Co. LIE 24/7/365 should we then believe what our eyes and ears daily tell us? OR believe Trump’s blather about “fake news”/”enemy of the people”?
Since it is undeniable that Trump & Co. LIE 24/7/365 what leads ANY RATIONAL AND THINKING PERSON to think that Trump & Co. will “somehow” now become a fount of truth and facts??
Since it is undeniable that Trump & Co. LIE 24/7/365 then what do the TrumpHumpers believe? Which LIE do they now hold to? Which Trump LIE is their “truth”??
Especially in the light that Trump OPENLY called FOR Putin-Russia to DO what Trump & Co. have LIED about ever since…again, from a Twitter Patriot:
ADD TO THE FACT THAT TRUMP & CO. ARE UNMITIGATED LIARS THE FACT THAT THEY ALSO ARE LIBERALS-
THESE CONSERVATIVES SAY TRUMP IS A LIBERAL…YES, SOME SOLD OUT LATER AND NOW SUPPORT HIM…BUT IN A MOMENT OF HONESTY AND CLARITY THEY SAID THIS . ALSO SEE HERE . AND EVEN THE BIGGEST SELL OUT SAYS TRUMP IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE .
So what do we have so far?
TRUMP & CO. ARE LIARS.
TRUMP & CO. ARE LIBERALS.
AND SINCE THE BIGGEST LIE SURROUNDS THEIR CONSPIRING WITH PUTIN-RUSSIA TO STEAL AN AMERICAN ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT WE CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT TRUMP & CO. ARE TRAITORS THAT HAVE SOLD OUT TO SOCIALISM FOR WHATEVER REASON, BLACKMAIL, BULLYING, OR BRIBERY.
BUT…Socialism has been, and IS an EPIC FAILURE everywhere it is tried…WHY try again??? The below meme gives a humorous take on it-
But the reality is much darker.
Trump & Co. have been bullied, bribed, and/or blackmailed into attacking:
and Americans in general
ALL WHILE sucking up to:
and every other tyrant and tin pot despot that hates America
The ONLY difference between Trump & Co. and any other Democrat/Liberal including BHO, HRC, Biden, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Pelosi, Waters, and Schumer???
Is Trump & Co. have a hair trigger temper and are much more stupid.
That’s why we need a #Congress that will stand up to this president, and curb his efforts to stir rage and paranoia among the American people. We need to #vote for @TheDemocrats in the #MidTerms, and for as long as it takes to get our country back on track.
Twitter Patriot, Mike Bates then added:
If you had told Ronald Reagan in 1988 that in 30 years, the president of the US would be chummy with communist dictators in China and North Korea and eager to please a brutal Kremlin autocrat.. .he might have said: “That’s what you get for electing a Democrat.
There IS a swath of people who think that “the ONLY way to get rid of Trump is to vote ONLY AND ALWAYS for Democrats and other Liberals”.
Before going any further, WHAT would possess a person, let alone a whole group of people, to “think” that to get rid of one group of Liberals (Trumpers/RINO’s) and replace them with ANOTHER group of Liberals (Democrats), makes things “better”, and is “The ONLY way to save America”??
Let’s examine this line of “thinking” closely because this is very flawed, very dangerous, and very DISHONEST “thinking”, let’s take a looksey:
SOME in the “Revolving Door Liberal” (RDL) group may actually be war weary, tired, wore out, scorned Conservatives who have thought they have tried EVERYTHING and it just didn’t work. So screw with voting FOR the most Constitutional/Conservative! Let’s vote Liberal Democrat. This group has been hurt, scorned, mocked, ridiculed, and threatened, and instead of doing their due diligence to FIND actual Conservatives with backbone, they throw a hissy-fit and take their “Conservative ball” and go home….only to reappear and push FOR supporting/voting FOR ONLY DEMOCRATS!!! Boo-the-freaking-HOO! Grow up ya pansies!!! IF you’re a REAL Conservative like you say/said you are then find or BE the Conservative alternative! Quit being butt-hurt babies about it. Let me be plain. I was part of a group on Twitter, “Who Dares Wins/WDW”. THIS group belongs for the most part right here. They were a group of #NeverTrumpers who got butt-hurt and boo-hooed, and now push, and promote the support/voting for DEMS/LIBS ONLY. Because I tried to present common-sense reasoning based squarely upon Biblical-Christian, Constitutional-Conservative PRINCIPLES the leaders began to LIE ABOUT ME AND LIE TO ME. Why? Because they got their feelings hurt, and instead of getting CLARITY they got whiny, even bullying. THEY became exactly like, and pushed FOR exactly like what they said they were against!! This group have let their hurt, scorn, anger, fear, trauma, so muddy their “thinking” that they promote what they say they’re against, and “somehow” hope to achieve a Conservative end!! You CAN NOT push Liberalism/Liberals and expect to get Conservatives/Conservatism!! THAT IS INSANITY.
The next group is more HONEST, even more Logical, though still flawed, wrong, and dangerous in their thinking. These are Liberal Democrats who admit they are Liberal Democrats pushing FOR Liberal Democrats. They are honest. BUT honestly wrong. The problem is NOT that “America is too Conservative”. Crikey! We’re NOT hardly Conservative at all! Since 1913 with Woodrow Wilson America has steadily moved further, and further LEFT/Liberal. ONLY Coolidge, Reagan, and to a much lesser extent GWB, slowed or reversed it. Trump has taken the BHO/HRC agenda, hooked it on Crack, Crank, and Steroids with massive does of idiotic rage and pushed us to the brink…IF we’re not already falling over the cliff.
The Last Group of so-called “#NeverTrumpers”, is even WORSE than group #1, matter of FACT Group #1’s Leadership may actually BE IN THIS Group, the deep cell, Stealth Liberal. This group posed as Conservatives for years, maybe even decades, but when under fire, or they felt no one was paying attention their actions/votes were always as far Left’Liberal as they could go…and have a convenient excuse as to why they “had to” support/vote/act Liberal on that “one, lone issue/instance”. This group has articulated Conservatism while pushing for as much Liberalism as they can. They say things like “Cruz is the most Conservative…BUT Trump is THE ONLY ONE who can defeat Hillary”. They will say they’re FOR tax CUTS…except when they say “THE ONLY way to balance the budget was to RAISE taxes”. They will say they are “strong 2nd Amendment defenders”…until the next big shooting and then say “we need common-sense gun control”… so on and so forth…
There is NO HONEST reason to promote LIBERALS/LIBERALISM and to expect a Conservative result. NONE.
WHAT is the common-ground that Liberals and Conservatives can via compromise agree on and then vote into policy/law?
Does compromising with Liberals actually mean in real world application and results that Conservatives cave, i.e. surrender Conservative Principles?
ARE Principles negotiable? Something to be compromised, bartered, bantied, and abandoned when “things get really bad”?
IS there actual right and wrong? Liberals say everything is relative, negotiable, and, hence, open for compromise. Conservatives say right is right- period; wrong is wrong- period. That to get good RESULTS we must needs make decisions based on and rooted in what IS good and right. HOW can Conservatives compromise with someone who thinks that WHATEVER is just as right/good as anything else…as long as the Liberal goal is achieved?
Liberalism is a world-view of Big-Government tyranny. Conservatism is a world-view of “Life, LIBERTY, and The Pursuit of Happiness”. WHERE, and WHY, do Conservatives then abandon Conservative Principles to compromise with someone that is wholly, and entirely opposed to their Conservative Principles?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between a Leftist and a Patriot/Conservative?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between Big Government Liberals, and Small, Restricted by The Constitution Conservatives?
Where is the COMMON-GROUND between supporters of National Socialised Medicine (like Obama-Care, or Single-Payer), and The Constitutional-Conservative solution of getting gov. OUT of the free markets, OUT of the private sector, and encourage free market/private sector solutions?
Where is the COMMON-GROUND between the Liberal support of gay/sodomite marriage/rights, and The Conservative’s core belief of Traditional Family Values?
Where is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat Party’s daily and historic move toward Socialism and Marxism, and The Conservative’s embrace of America’s Founding Principles?
Where is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s support and FUNDING of Abortion, euthanasia, and doctor assisted suicide, and The Conservative’s belief that LIFE is the FIRST right given to us ALL by God, and three times FIRST mentioned in America’s Founding documents, (Declaration of Independence, 5th, and 14th Amendment)?
Where is the COMMON-GROUND between between the Democrat’s gun-grabbing, gun-registration, gun-banning principle(s), and Conservatism’s embrace and defense of 2nd Amendment rights?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s belief in Big Government authoritarianism, and the Conservative’s CORE belief that we ARE a Constitutional Republic and that government is defined and RESTRAINED by The Constitution?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between the Liberal’s view that The Constitution is “a living document” to be interpreted and applied HOWEVER is necessary to advance Liberalism, and The Conservative’s belief that America’s Founders said what they meant and meant what they said?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s embrace of the Marxist Progressive Income Tax, tax and spending HIKES, and the Conservative’s belief in ONLY Constitutional spending, programs, and as LOW a taxation as feasible?
Lastly, What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s view that government, and even Globalism/world government, IS THE Solution to ALL mankind’s ills, and the Conservative’s belief that we are each responsible for our own actions, and that FIRST line of aid is to be family, then church, then LOCAL charity, then, LASTLY, local government?
What is the COMMON-GROUND between Liberals, whether Democrats or RINO/Trumpers, and US REAL Conservatives? Hmmm, WDW and “whomever”?
Seeing Mike Bate’s Tweet this morning made me KNOW that NOT everyone calling themselves Conservative has lost their freaking mind.
To those who have been paying attention it is obvious that there is a massive vacuum of moral, strong leadership. We have NO ONE who can, nor does:
Say what they mean,
Mean what they say,
Have a LIFE-TIME of standing by and standing on Principle(s) no matter the cost,
Is intelligent, wise, BUT also has common-sense AND the courage of their convictions to NEVER cave,
Is FOR “LIFE, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness”, i.e. a free market capitalist, stands for and defends the private sector, private property, State’s and Citizen’s rights, PRO-tax & spending CUTS for everybody, IS for government AS SMALL AS POSSIBLE that IS DEFINED AND RESTRICTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
There are a plethora of those who do the first 2 or 3. Crikey, Trump is not afraid to say whatever pops into his treasonous, festering mind!
BUT what we so desperately NEED is someone with rock-solid, rock-ribbed Constitutional Conservative Principles and values who will proclaim them with clarity and with courage! Not merely a Liberal lunatic who’s unafraid to spew Hard-Left, Marxist blather! We have THAT in spades! And look at what THAT has given us!
No. What we NEED is a person of conviction, and courage to unwaveringly proclaim Constitutional Conservative Principles and values.
Let me use Passionate Reason/Reasoned Passion to address several issues confronting us today that desperately need a voice of Reasoned Passion to stand and proclaim the Founding Principles in the face of the mounting opposition…we begin with:
When the issue of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION/INVASION comes up Conservatives have let the Liberals get away with using watered-down, generic, innocent sounding terms, or flat-out LIES, like:
Undocumented immigrants. They’re UNDOCUMENTED BECAUSE they entered OUR Sovereign territory ILLEGALLY. At the very least they WILL at the least also BREAK these laws too: illegal SS#, illegal DL, illegal Food Stamps/SNAP/WIC, illegal Visa, illegal Green Card, illegal Welfare/Housing, illegal voter registration and voting, and NOT pay taxes.
Undocumented workers. See above. Then add this: I am NOT a legal, licensed, trained Doctor…hey, let me preform surgery on you, eh. Calling someone who ILLEGALLY INVADED U.S. Sovereign territory an “undocumented worker” is like calling a drug pusher an “undocumented pharmacist”! ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL- PERIOD.
And the new one that’s supposed to tug at our heart strings,Sanctuary/Asylum Seekers. IN the cases where this is legit there already exists a means to enter LEGALLY, just as are there ARE LEGAL means for all of them to enter legally. Then WHY don’t they? Why SNEAK & STEAL into OUR Sovereign territory ILLEGALLY?? Because they have something to HIDE. Either a shady, immoral, and/or criminal past, OR a they plan on a shady, immoral, and/or criminal future. Law-abiding people, who value the law, and are opposed to crime DO NOT MAKE THEIR ENTRANCE COMMITTING CRIMES!!!
Another term the 2-sided coin of Dems & GOP use is “immigration reform”, aka AMNESTY.
Let me without hesitation say: NO! We do NOT reward CRIMINALS for BREAKING THE LAW!!! NO. NO. NO!!
Build a 30 ft. tall DOUBLE REINFORCED Security Fence along our ENTIRE Southern Border. Place barbed and razor wire at the top and bottom on BOTH sides of the fence. Have armed gun towers, motorized Border Patrol, and a rotating of each State’s National Guard along our border.
Have a 50 ft. wide and 50 ft. deep trench along the ENTIRE border on BOTH sides of the fence. Fill it with barbed and razor wire, embed glass shards and sharp pieces of metal in the trenches.
Install a network of motion detectors, sound detectors, ultra violet and infra red sensors, cameras along our ENTIRE BORDER.
Have a standing ORDER that ALL who will NOT halt their attempt to ILLEGALLY INVADE OUR Sovereign territory to be shot, and MADE to leave IMMEDIATELY.
Fine ALL businesses $250,000 per ILLEGAL hired. ALL businesses. The fines collected go DIRECTLY TO Border Security.
Absolutely NO Welfare, entitlements, food-stamps, SNAP/WIC, NONE to any ILLEGAL. You MUST provide photo ID to PROVE you’re here LEGALLY.
Triple the man-power along our ENTIRE BORDER.
Abolish ALL Sanctuary Cities and States. Cut of ALL aid of any kind to them. Arrest ALL who violate the law, from the Governor down.
Do THAT and watch the ILLEGAL INVASION drop 87% or more! Guaranteed.
NEXT, “GUN CONTROL” LAWS.
Again, Conservatives let Liberals choose the terms used and set the grounds for the debate…THAT IS STUPID! QUIT DOING IT!
Terms Liberals use that Conservatives not only let then get away with, but are NOW adopting, and in some cases promoting themselves are:
Longer waiting periods to buy a gun,
Common-sense gun control,
Ban on “assault weapons”,
Common-sense Ban on clips and magazines,
Gun Free Zones.
Let me be CLEAR, ALL of the above is 100%, ANTI-2nd Amendment!
THE DISARMING OF LEGAL, LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS DOES NOT MAKE THEM SAFE/SECURE, CONTRAWISE IT’S MAKES US VICTIMS TO CRIMINALS,
CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY LAWS,
The 2nd Amendment is NOT for hunting, BUT FOR protection against invasion and attack from CRIMINALS, including a rogue, oppressive government, INCLUDING OUR OWN.