Fixing What’s Broke: Reality Time

Image result for America's inner cities

America and all she stands for and represents is broke.

There are but only two ways to approach this.

The right way, the way of accessing WHAT is broke, HOW is it broke, HOW did it get broken, and, lastly HOW to fix it, aka The Conservative Way.

And the wrong way. To ignore WHAT happened, ignore HOW it happened, ignore WHY it happened, ignore HOW to prevent it, and then sloppily, hurry through and give a SHORT TERM “fix” to a LONG TERM, deep rooted, severe problem, aka The Liberal Way.

FOR BACKGROUND, DEFINING OF TERMS USED, EVIDENCE OF SUPPORT, SEE:

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE

===

Image result for The Never Trump Movement

First “Broke Thing” to look at, The #NeverTrump movement.

Since Trump announced he was running for President in 2015, and especially since being nominated, and then elected, there has developed a #NeverTrump movement that has grown. On the surface it looks like ONE Group, ONE Movement…it is NOT.

It is three separate, and very different groups. The first two ARE quite similar, if not the same altogether, the third on stands alone. Let us look at them.

  1. The Democrat/Liberal #NeverTrump movement. These are Democrats and other Liberals who hate DT because he 1. Ran as a GOP, though he’s a life-long Democrat/Liberal, 2. He defeated HRC, their “golden calf”, 3. He’s a rude, vile, loud, vulgar, mean, hate-filled jerk,
  2. The Faux “Conservative” #NeverTrump movement. These claim to be Conservatives all while pushing FOR, even demanding, and bullying everyone else to support and vote IN as many Liberals/Democrats as possible just to be rid of DT and his supporters. Let me be crystal clear: NO ONE can push, promote, and demand support and votes FOR Democrats/Liberals AND BE a REAL Conservative. You can NOT go in two opposite directions at once. You CAN NOT achieve Conservative ends via Liberal means. THEY ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. Group #2 IS a dishonest version of Group #1. At least Group #1 ADMITS that pushing FOR Liberals IS Liberalism.
  3. The Real Conservative #NeverTrump movement. We believe that ONLY Constitutional-Conservatism has the answers, and IS THE Answer. We see any and every move toward more Liberals/Democrats in offices, in positions of power, as being poison to Liberty, Constitutionalism, and America. We 100% want Trump gone, even in prison, BUT do not see more Liberalism as the answer. 

The Reality?

Will these groups ever be reconciled together?

Well, Groups #’s 1 and 2 already work closely together. There is a LOT of “bleeding over” from Group #1 to Group #2 and vice versa. The Faux “Conservatives” of group 2 see NO problem with voting for any and all Democrats and Liberals they can…just so they can get rid of DT. They really think they can achieve a Conservative end via Liberal means.

But Group #3…we want DT gone…BUT WE ALSO WANT ALL LIBERALS AND DEMOCRATS GONE. WE WANT CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVES…and wont settle for a crappy Liberal knock-off.

So, no, the three will never reconcile. The first two groups in reality are the same, like RINOs and Democrats are the same.

But there are some who will never compromise for short term goals when IT means long term destruction of ALL America IS and stands for…that’s Group #3, the group I proudly belong to.

So, what can be done?

Same as always.

Conservatives, BE CONSERVATIVE. Be proud you’re Conservative. In reasoned passion and passionate reason present Constitutional-Conservatism. Promote “Life, LIBERTY, and The Pursuit of Happiness”.

Those who identify with Conservatism will gravitate TO you.

Those who LIKE what they’re hearing, regardless of where they were or came from, will gravitate TO you.

Just BE Conservative.

Learn Conservatism.

Love Conservatism.

Teach Conservatism.

Live Conservatism.

SIMPLY. BE CONSERVATIVE.

INCREMENTALISM.

The change will NOT happen “over night”.

This will take time.

We need to daily BE, live, as Conservatives.

And those who LIKE what they see and hear will join us.

It will happen bit by bit, a little here, a little there, be patient.

America may not have time. We may have said NO to God, what is right, to Constitutional-Conservatism for too long…BUT we don’t know that, and what other way to be, believe and to live other than the Conservative life.

If you answer Liberal, “Moderate”, “Centrist”, “whatever”…and you have NO desire to change…this is NOT for you.

=======

The Next Broke Thing To Look At Is America’s Tax Code/Taxation.

America’s Founding Fathers did at least three things:

  1. The resented, protested, and railed against the increasing tax burden laid on the colonies, especially since they had NO representation in Parliament, nor before King George III.
  2. They FOUGHT A WAR AGAINST THE MIGHTIEST NATION ON EARTH OVER TAXATION- AND WON!
  3. Lastly, America’s Founders so detested runaway taxation/government regulation that they deliberately designed The Constitution/Bill of Rights to be as 1. CLEAR, 2. DEFINING, and 3. RESTRICTIVE ON GOV. as possible. See Article 1, Sections 8 & 9, and Amendments 9, 10, 11.

The Reality?

Today we have a punishing tax code.

  1. FIRST, our INCOME is taxed BEFORE we even see/get it. Something the Founders loathed and prohibited,
  2. Then with what is left over AFTER Income Tax we buy goods, let say corn,
  3. There is a sales tax on the corn,
  4. When it was transported it required fuel, there was a gas tax and sales tax,
  5. The supplier bought it from a farmer, there was a tax in the sale/purchase,
  6. The farmer to grow it had to first buy seed- another sales tax,
  7. Then buy fertilizer- another sales tax,
  8. Then buy insecticide- another sales tax,
  9. Buy the tractor, plow, tiller, equipment to plant and harvest the corn- more sales taxes,
  10. Has a farm, house, barn, land- property tax…

ALL of that gets passed on to the consumer.

What Can Be Done About It?

There is NO OTHER ANSWER BUT TO GUT AND CUT TAXES, GOV. SPENDING, AND GOV. REGULATIONS. NO other “solution” will remotely solve the problem.

Incrementalism.

I propose:

  1. ABOLISH ALL WELFARE/ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS; MOVE ALL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL LEVEL.
  2. ABOLISH THE FEDERAL RESERVE, IRS, INCOME TAX, DEATH/INHERITANCE TAX, WINDFALL PROFITS TAX, CORPORATE INCOME TAX, CAPITAL GAINS TAX, MARRIAGE PENALTY TAX,
  3. AND INSTITUTE A FLAT 7-12% NATIONAL SALES TAX.

BUT THAT WONT HAPPEN, at least not in my life time.

SO…

We can have Reaganesque across the board tax cuts for everyone at ALL levels, BUT INCLUDE REAL SPENDING CUTS.

From that position move toward more spending CUTS FIRST, then more tax cuts.

Do this bit by bit, incrementally.

BUT… 

Standing pat on what we have now will not make one thing better.

And tax and spending HIKES will ONLY make things worse quicker.

The #1 lesson to learn is:

Government is NOT the solution. Government IS THE Problem. Get government 100% OUT of the FREE Market/PRIVATE Sector. Let the markets be THE Equalizer. And watch Liberty and Prosperity EXPLODE.

VIDEO .

 

Image result for government is not the solution

=======

The Next Broke Thing: Our Border and Immigration Laws.

First, what does The Constitution say:

Article 4, Section 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.

So, Border Security IS important, important enough that America’s Founding Fathers Codified it in The Constitution.

Today though we have thousands of illegals daily streaming across our borders, invading our Sovereign U.S. territory.

Do NOT let the media NOR politicians CONFUSE LEGAL Immigration and assimilation, with people who:

  1. VIOLATE OUR CONSTITUTION, BREAK THE LAWS, AND INVADE U.S. SOVEREIGN TERRITORY. 
  2. Who upon getting here acquire ILLEGAL Green Cards,
  3. Acquire ILLEGAL Visas,
  4. Acquire ILLEGAL Work Permits,
  5. Acquire ILLEGAL Social Security Numbers/Cards, perhaps YOURS,
  6. Acquire ILLEGAL Drivers License, IF they get one at all,
  7. Register for and collect, ILLEGALLY, health-care, welfare, WIC, housing allowance….

The Reality?

Trump and the GOP have so bastardised this issue, the Democrats and Liberals (R.I.N.O.s) have so fought this issue that it sickens me that in all probability NOTHING- Constitutional- will be done.

Related image

What IS The Constitutional solution?

Based squarely upon Article 4, Section 4 AND the Secure Fence Act of 2006, THIS:

  1. ALONG OUR ENTIRE BORDER Build a 30 ft. tall Double Reinforced Security Fence,
  2. Have trenches 30 ft. wide and 30 ft. deep in front and behind the the fence,
  3. Place LOTS of barbed wire and razor wire at the bottom and top of the fence in front and behind it,
  4. Fill the trenches with LOTS MORE barbed and razor wire,
  5. Install the best, highest tech motion detectors, sound detectors, infra read and ultra violet detectors, cameras along our entire border,
  6. Increase Border Patrol 5 fold,
  7. Have each state’s National Guard along the border in rotation,
  8. Standing, PERMANENT, ORDER to call out HALT to ALL invaders, apprehend ALL who will NOT halt (speak in Spanish, Farsi, and Arabic, many INVADING our borders are OTM, other than Mexican, they are Muslims. There currently over 3,000 Somalia Muslims inside our borders ILLEGALLY, operating as terrorists), shoot those who resist,
  9. Fine ALL businesses $250,000 per illegal hired,
  10. NO welfare/assistance of any kind to ILLEGALS AT ALL OF ANY KIND.
  11. DO NOT separate “families”, send them ALL back together,
  12. Begin to find and deport ALL ILLEGALS.

=========

Related image

BUT…because Trump and his cronies have so bastardised and corrupted the very idea of Border Security and Immigration Law, AND The Democrats and Liberals want to roll out the red carpet for them NOTHING WILL NE DONE.

Image result for Illegal is not a race- it's a CRIME.

 

What CAN Be Done?

Constitutionally, and by the 2006 Law we CAN builds the fence along our entire border. Some argue the fence/wall is “racist”, or “wont work”.

BUT in every place we DO HAVE  a Border Security Fence ILLEGAL invasion has DROPPED 87%.

Sooo, BUILD THE FENCE.

And this Constitutional Security is NOT “racist”. It wouldn’t matter if the invaders were British, tea drinkers…IT’S A CRIME TO BREAK THE LAW…DUH!

Image result for Illegal is not a race- it's a CRIME.

Incrementalism.

Begin building the fence THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED OF.

Begin where existing fence is and continue on.

When met with a natural obstacle (river, mountain…) then to err on the side of caution build the fence ON OUR SIDE of said obstacle.

BUT…

BUILD THE FENCE!

========

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The End In Sight??

Related image

This is article (Part 1 in a 3 part series) deals with the end game, the point of no return on three levels. One, are we about to see the end of Trump and his Liberal cronies rude reign of tyranny and fraud? Two, not will, but can America be saved? Meaning, do we as a nation possess the will to return whole-heartedly TO Constitutional-Conservatism? Three, are we as individuals rooted in facts, truth, and Principles that will see us through no matter what?

These, though separate, and ask separate questions, and deal with different issues, do intersect and are intertwined one with the other. Though we may not see it now, maybe by the end of this article we will have a clearer vision of where are, where we came from, how we got here, where we are currently headed, and what can we do about it, if anything.

FIRST, IS THERE AN END IN SIGHT TO THE TRUMP-PUTIN TREASON DEBACLE??

I will defer to an EXCELLENT Twitter Storm and article by Ryan Goodman to begin. I will intersperse links to previous write ups as evidence and support. Let’s begin shall we?

I just published: “Paul Manafort = Evidence of Collusion”

Bottom line up front: Nine significant pieces of info in public record point to conspiracy with Russians and violations of federal campaign finance law…

<THREAD>

Paul Manafort = Evidence of Collusion

SOURCE .

1. Manafort proposes to Putin-linked, Russian oligarch a plan to “greatly benefit Putin,” and they get to work (2005-) Original Scoop for this story is story by :

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/media:9955b8e3abef4aa4a4ad91dbd44126fe/800.jpeg

AP Exclusive: Before Trump job, Manafort worked to aid Putin

SOURCE .

SEE ALSO:  America’s Godfather: Trump, The Don

2. Manafort joins Trump Campaign and stays in frequent contact with a Kiev-based operative who has active ties to Russian military intelligence (March 2016-)

(WaPo got their emails )

SOURCE .

SEE ALSO: Quick Hits, Pt. 2: Extreme Vetting…ONLY The BEST People…

3. Manafort remains an unregistered foreign agent of Kremlin-linked Ukraine political forces.

To understand how deeply Manafort’s Ukrainian principals are connected with, and infiltrated by, Kremlin intelligence, read :

What’s Ukraine Got to do With It? A Sideshow or Central Inquiry in Russia Probe?

SOURCE .

SEE ALSO: K.S.N.: Viral News Dump AND K.S.N.: VIRAL NEWS DUMP, PART 2.

4. Trump Campaign is told Russia has damaging info against Clinton in form of “thousands of emails,” and Manafort and Campaign then continue to set up meeting with Campaign reps and senior Russian officials (April 2016 -)

Note references to Manafort in Papadopoulos guilty plea

5. Manafort and two senior Campaign officials meet with Russian gov’t emissaries offering damaging info on Clinton (June 2016) Two members of the Russian delegation are now thought to be Russian spies.

SEE ALSO: Viral News Dump: Part 3. AND VIRAL NEWS DUMP: PART 4.

One of the Russians at the June 9 meeting “apparently has ties to Russian intelligence” and “allegedly specializes in ‘active measures campaigns’” such as subversive political operations involving disinformation and propaganda. Who said that? Republican Senator Chuck Grassley:

 

Guess who else says two Russians at the June 9 Trump Tower meeting with Manafort were likely Russian spies: In testimony before House Intel Committee, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher “acknowledged that [Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya] were probably spies” based on his own knowledge of them.

SEE ALSO: REAL Conservatives Warned- Faux Conservatives Sold Out: The Rent Is NOW Due

Image result for Moronic Trump supporters

But did Manafort know what the meeting would be about? According to the House Intelligence Committee’s MAJORITY report, Manafort, Trump Jr., Kushner attended the meeting “where they expected to receive…derogatory information on candidate Clinton from Russian sources.”

6. Manafort offers “private briefings” on the campaign to Putin-linked Russian oligarch (July 2016)

7. Manafort oversees Campaign when it intervenes to defeat a call for Republican Party platform to include a provision for arming Ukraine to defend itself against Russian incursions

Important admissions reported by :

It looks like another Trump adviser has significantly changed his story about the GOP’s dramatic shift on Ukraine

SOURCE .

SEE ALSO: DT Supporters: Blind, Deaf, And Deluded

On , Manafort adamantly and categorically denies that the Trump Campaign played any role in the platform discussions.

The same day on , candidate Trump essentially admits his Campaign “softened” the platform language on Ukraine.

This is one of the biggest bombshells of all:

8. Russian operatives reportedly discuss (a) Russia’s efforts to coordinate with Manafort on the election and (b) Manafort’s encouraging help from the Kremlin (CNN’s

SOURCE .

One year into the FBI’s Russia investigation, Mueller is on the Trump money trail

US intercepts of Russians in #8 are consistent with : Steele Dossier: the “well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [Trump campaign] and the Russian leadership…was managed on the TRUMP side by the Republican candidate’s campaign manager, Paul MANAFORT.”

SEE ALSO: The Dark Secrets Of The Trump-Putin Ties

Image result for Trump ties to Putin and Russia

 

9. Manafort officially resigns from the campaign, BUT reportedly continues to be involved up through the transition (August 2016-). (reporting by )

SOURCE .

In sum, the public record on Manafort, on its own, is fairly damning on the question of alleged collusion with Russia. Now just think of what Mueller knows. Anyone who says there is no evidence of collusion is misleading you. <end>

SEE ALSO: “Where-the-Rubber-Meets-the-Road” Truth About DT’s ties to Putin and Russian Mob

P.S. Suspected Russian spy (Akhmetshin) at Trump Tower told reporters “he was a longtime acquaintance” of Manafort! He then told Senate: he’d never met Manafort before in his life. Another testified: “Akhmetshin approached Mr Manafort and suggested that they’ve met previously”

 

SEE ALSO:

DT: The Turd In The Punch Bowl

=

The Kakistocracy of A’s, B’s, C’s: Or The Stupid Morons Defending Trump

=

Pizza: The Kakistocracy Continues…UGH!

=

Pizza: The Kakistocracy Continues…PART 2.

 

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

FOOT-NOTES AND OTHER THINGS:

Image result for trump supporters blame obama

 

FIRST, FATHER RUSSIA. THEN CHINA GIVES IVANKA, TRUMP AND THE GANG “BUSINESS DEALS”, NOW, JUST LIKE IN “THE GODFATHER”, N. KOREA “ASKS A FAVOR ON THE DAY OF THE WEDDING”…

Now it’s all making sense! American financier approached the Trump administration last summer with an unusual proposition: The North Korean government wanted to talk to Jared Kushner….[NOTE: Yeah…”talk”…about “adoptions”…]

President Trump and Kim Jong-un had a historic summit meeting at a colonial-style island hotel in Singapore.

North Korea’s Overture to Jared Kushner

An American businessman who lives in Singapore took advantage of an unusual opening in an administration where matters of policy and business often seem to blur.

SOURCE .

I spoke to my good friend in Europe. They all believe they are witnessing the downfall of the American Empire. They are scared.

==================

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Breaking from : Roger Stone says in May 2016 he met with a Russian man who offered damaging information about Hillary Clinton in exchange for $2 million, which Stone says he rejected [NOTE: And by “rejected” we mean accepted in full.]:

Trump associate Roger Stone reveals new contact with Russian national during 2016 campaign

SOURCE .

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

 

Roger Stone and Michael Caputo’s interactions with that Russian in May 2016 mean that at least 11 Trump associates or campaign officials have now acknowledged interactions with a Russian during the election season or presidential transition.

==============

First Manafort, now this.

Trump’s having a great day.

Cohen signals openness to cooperating with federal investigators

SOURCE .

AND,

CNN source: Cohen telling friends and family he’s willing to cooperate

VIDEO .

========

Political Cartoons by Robert Ariail

Really disappointed in so many at Fox News defending Manafort, who is in jail because of credible evidence he was tampering with witnesses, which is illegal and causes anyone else to be put in jail to await trial too.

LASTLY….

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ADD THE WORD “NOT” AT THE END OF DT’S BLATHERING LIE AND YOU HAVE THE TRUTH.

 

The Road Before Us.

Image result for the road less traveled

Up front let me unequivocally state: 

“I do NOT have a crystal ball, BUT I AM a student of History, The Bible, America’s Founding Documents and Founding Fathers. What follows is the culmination of my 42 year study and daily observation. I believe I am right, meaning that while the exact, specific details I predict may not transpire, I DO 100% believe and am fully convinced that the future is ONLY ONE OF TWO POSSIBLE ENDS…predicated on OUR CHOICES.”

For background on just “who I am”, see these:

Layers Of An Onion

This Is NOT Then

Heart Talk: Parts 1 and 2

Heart Talk: Parts 3 and 4

and,

Coalition of Conservatives Against Trump

=======

Just WHAT Is IT That I See???

Image result for Looking into the future

 To accurately look into our future we MUST have an adequate, workable understanding of: 

WHERE IT IS WE CAME FROM, AND HOW WE GOT HERE.

  1. The first colony was founded at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607. Many of the people who settled in the New World came to escape religious persecution. The Pilgrims, founders of Plymouth, Massachusetts, arrived in 1620. BOTH of these settlements, as well as the ones that followed were by people who were First Christians, Lovers of Freedom and Liberty, and via following The Bible and Biblical scholars of Law became Free Market Capitalists.
  2. America’s Founders were Christians who were well versed and quoted the Bible, William Blackstone, Edmund Burke, Adam Smith, and John Locke, each of which established their views and principles upon The Bible.
  3. On February 29, 1892, The Supreme Court declared (in Holy Trinity v. United States) that the historical record of America overwhelmingly demonstrated that the United States “… is a Christian nation.” Based upon our Founding Documents, Founding Father’s diaries, journals, correspondence, our songs, National and State mottoes, State founding documents…
  4. in 1913 under Woodrow Wilson, Democrat President, who was a Globalist, Socialist, and hate-filled racist, America began her change from a Constitutional Republic that was  founded upon Biblical Principles, Free Markets Capitalism, Constitutional Original Intent/Strict Constructionist, and solid Conservatism to Liberal “Democracy”, founded upon Socialism, Humanism, Secularism, Atheism, Fascism, and Marxism/Communism. Wilson instituted, initiated, and pushed for: The Federal Reserve, The Internal Revenue Service, The Progressive Income Tax, and Globalism via The League of Nations, which was the forerunner of The United Nations. [NOTE: The League of Nations FAILED due to lack of U.S. support and FUNDING. The United Nations is “succeeding” due to U.S. support and footing the majority of the bill. FURTHER NOTE: The United Nations was named by, and started by FDR, another DEMOCRAT, Globalist, Socialist, and racist.]
  5. Herbert Hoover, Liberal Republican (who after FDR defeated him in a landslide, became a staunch Conservative), a precursor of the Liberal R.I.N.O.’s today, began the “Alphabet Soup” Federal Agencies that began to “oversee”/control states and the free market…Hoover beleived that a federal bureaucracy should have limited regulation over a country’s economic system.
  6. FDR took what Hoover started and injected Testosterone AND Adrenaline into. FDR, was the most successful, Marxist-Socialist to ever be president. Others like LBJ, Clinton, and Obama have ran as contenders, with LBJ getting close, BUT NO ONE has been able to rid more of America’s Founding Principles and replace them with Marxist Principles more successfully than FDR. BUT EVEN WITH ALL THIS America’s electorate was STILL predominantly Christian, Capitalist, and Conservative. The dire times of The Great Depression and World War II caused many to lay aside their Conservative Principles “for the better of America”, albeit temporarily…only to find out that “Liberty LOST is NOT easily regained”, a lesson we STILL suffer from.
  7.  Then “The Moment” in our History that would FOREVER redefine us…1962. We let ONE, LONE, bitter, racist, hate-filled Atheist get God, The Bible, Prayer, The Ten Commandments, and The Lord Jesus Christ BANNED FROM public schools, and public lands…all upon the FALSE concept of “separation between church and state”. A view that America’s Founders would view as deceitful, tyrannical, and the antithesis of ALL they even came TO America and FOUGHT A WAR FOR.
  8. From that moment, the moment America OFFICIALLY turned her back on God, the decline has accelerated. A mere decade after BANNING GOD we legalised the murder of babies, which we have committed at the rate of 57-62 MILLION since 1972!
  9. Nixon gave us the Marxist EPA, Minimum Wage, and Wage and Price Freezes…three times…and that is not including Watergate!
  10. ONLY Reagan has been a road block of Christianity and Conservatism in America from FDR to DT!
  11. Since 1972 we’ve seen sodomy/sodomites (homosexuals and lesbians) be declassified as a mental illness, to normal, to protected, to elevated. We’ve witnessed sodomites becoming MINISTERS and getting “married”, again, something America’s Founders were AGAINST. For more see HERE , HERE , and HERE .
  12. The Free Markets, Private Sector, and Business sectors have been assaulted with increasing regulations, taxation, and, now, punishing tariffs from DT.
  13. Civility, honesty, integrity, morality, and Principles that once mattered, that were the Bedrock of what made America good and great have been so attacked, so vilified, so maligned that they are all but extinct! In their place are now, rudeness, lying, deceit, fraud, hypocrisy, depravity, and corruption, and even TREASON.

So, WHAT is next??

NO nation, NO civilisation, NO empire has EVER survived this. NOT ONE. The list is littered with once grand nations and empires that rose the closer they were TO Biblical Principles (OR God raised up as judgment upon the wayward nation), and that fell the further from those Principles they strayed:

CUSH & NIMROD’S BABEL/BABYLON

EGYPT

ASSYRIA

SYRIA

THE HITTITES

THE HIVITES

THE PHILISTINES

NEBUCHADNEZZAR’S BABYLON

MEDO-PERSIA

GREECE

ROME

KING GEORGE III’S BRITISH EMPIRE

NAPOLEON’S FRANCE

HITLER’S GERMANY…

AMERICA NEXT????

Yes.

America IS next.

Even IF we abandon all the tyranny and depravity NOW we have already passed the point of no return long ago, see II Kings chpt. 22 and Judges 2:16-23 ; for further reference see:

ROMANS 1:16-32

II Thessalonians 2:2-12

I TIMOTHY 4:1-3 and

I Timothy 3:1-13 .

You write this off as “Bible-thumping ranting” at your and America’s risk.

In my observation and study we will not stave off the inevitable judgment that WILL befall us…BUT like Josiah, Judah’s Last GOOD King, we can have a calm before the storm…IF we return to America’s Founding Principles asap and fully.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

VIRAL NEWS DUMP: PART 4.

Image result for VIRAL NEWS DUMP

PER USUAL “VIRAL NEWS DUMP” IS A BOTH A SMORGASBORD AND A CLEARINGHOUSE OF NEWS. IF YOU SAW IT BUT CAN’T FIND IT- YOU MAY FIND IT HERE. IF YOU MISSED IT ALTOGETHER, BUT WANT THE “CONSERVATIVE AMMO” AGAINST LIBERALISM AND TRUMPISM- HERE IT IS…YOUR SOURCE OF VIRAL NEWS.

First, for all those who supported DT when he mocked Kim Jung Un a few months ago, AND STILL support DT NOW that he praises and lauds him, and signs away the farm…you have LOST whatever credibility you had, which I’m sure was already in negative number territory…

Here’s the real deal on Trump:
he’s NOT a “genius”.

Image result for kermit the frog offensive meme

By the by, I am not the only one who says this, probably not the first even:

*Trump openly mocks Kim Jong Un

* The Right: Yes! This is the correct approach!

*Trump legitimizes Kim Jong Un and praises him

* The Right: Yes! This is the correct approach!

*Trump stands on his head and yodels

* The Right: Yes! This is the correct approach!

If you were praising Trump a couple of months ago for doing the exact opposite of what he’s doing today, I just can’t take you seriously. And I don’t think you take yourself seriously. And this is why there is no point in even discussing these things anymore.

======

Trump has ALREADY gone Officially ON THE RECORD with such outlandish, insane, claims and views as:

Just grab them by the p*ssy and you can do anything…

I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and not lose ONE supporter…

I think Canada’s and Scotland’s Nationalised Single Payer Socialised Health-Care is GREAT…

I’m all for a $15.00 an hour minimum wage…

Insults and lies to/about all our ALLIES- kisses up and gives away the farm to all our ENEMIES…

Trump says he can trust Kim Jung Un, even says that Kim “loves the Korean people”…

Really??

A comment like this from Obama would have defined him on the right for his entire presidency and would have been endlessly repeated as evidence of his naïveté and stupidity. For Trump it’s just Monday.

President Trump says he got North Korea to commit to destroying a major missile testing site but “we didn’t put it in the agreement because we didn’t have time.”

Now, let’s look at that “Love” Kim Jung Un shows shall we?

What Kim Jong Un did to American Otto Warmbier, he does to his own people every single day.

That’s not love President Trump.

Mr & Mrs Warmbier, Kim didn’t love your son. He killed your son. He kills his own people in front of school children. To scare them.

That’s not love.

=======

Let this sink in…Trump’s comments in past 72 hours.

Justin Trudeau: “Dishonest and weak.”

Kim Jong Un: “Talented guy”, “He’s smart”, “Great personality.”

=======

How can ANYONE at all support Trump?!!

What he stood for a few months ago, yesterday, he is 100% the OPPOSITE OF TODAY!!

  1. IF you supported DT when he was saying grab them by the p*ssy- HOW CAN YOU NOW support him when he says they’re dishonest, and have no credibility?!!
  2. IF you think DT was “strong” call out Trudeau behind his back, after he had LEFT- HOW CAN YOU support Trump when he AGREES with Kim Jung Un that WE would NO longer do military drills in S. Korea- BUT get NOTHING but a photo-op and a handshake from Kim ?!!
  3. IF you supported him DT when he said his sister, a hard-Left, Pro-Abortion Liberal would “make a great Supreme Court Justice- HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT Trump when he says he’s against Abortion and is pro-life? [of course DT is lying. He’s STILL Pro-Abortion. He’s just to each crowd what they want to hear….but there’s more…]
  4. IF you supported DT when pretended to be Pro-Life- HOW CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT Trump when he continues to FULLY FUND Planned Parenthood?!!
  5. IF you supported DT when he said he wanted to repeal Obama-Care- HOW CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT Trump when he then signs a bill INTO LAW that FULLY FUNDS Obama-Care?!!
  6. IF you supported DT when he gave us the “tax cuts” ( that were full of loop-holes, and very targeted to NOT  generate jobs or help the middle class or poor)- HPOW CAN YOU NOW STILL SUPPORT Trump when he’s RAISING TARIFFS ON EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY…which are ACTUALLY TAXES YOU AND I WILL HAVE TO PAY?!! 

Crikey!

Trump is ONLY “for”:

  1. What makes HIM look/sound good
  2. What makes HIM money
  3. What gets revenge on HIS enemies
  4. PERIOD.

==================

BREAKING: Trump says he talked up North Korea’s real estate, beachside hotel opportunities in Kim Jong Un meeting.

====

WHAT THE HECK!!!!!

Things Kim Jong Un cares about:

1) Ensuring the security of his family dynasty

2) Deterring military threat through nuclear weapons and ICBMs

3) Controlling information in country and crushing dissent …

342) Building five star Trump resort hotel on prime beach front property

===================

Soooo, while we get BUPKIS, Kim gets DT/America to sign off on an AGREEMENT that we WONT conduct military drills, manoeuvres, training with/in S. Korea! Oh, and “Rocket Man gets THIS too;

It’s clear that Kim Jong-un walked away from Singapore with exactly what he wanted – the pomp, circumstance and prestige of a meeting with the President of the United States – while making no specific commitments in return.

 ======================
DID YOU READ ALL THAT?!!
THIS INSANITY!!!
Anyone besides me remember THIS?

===================

A little perspective…

If Obama had met with Kim Jong Un and then declared that Kim “loves his people” and that “he trusts me, and I trust him,” Republicans would be losing their minds today.

It is so cringeworthy to watch our president treat a dictator with more respect than our strongest allies.

=======

UGH! But, sadly, there IS more…

Now we know why Spanky didn’t want to give any deets about what they were signing. They were doing the equivalent of signing a blank piece of parchment. Drumpf is 100% ALL BLOW and NO GO. He’s not even style over substance. He’s nothing, nada!  via

U.S.-North Korea summit: Trump, Kim Jong Un sign unspecified document after hours of talks

SOURCE .

…The joint statement said that Trump “committed to provide security guarantees” to the North Korean government, while Kim “reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.”

It did not define “security guarantees,” nor what “complete denuclearization” entails. In the past, North Korea has said it would include a withdrawal of U.S. troops from South Korea and a pullback of the U.S. nuclear umbrella that covers the Korean region.

Similar agreements in the past have not lasted…

…Trump also said he would “absolutely” invite Kim to the White House.

Critics said all the pomp and ceremony — American and North Korean flags stood side-by-side to form the backdrops for many of the photo opps — lent too much prestige to Kim, a dictator who imprisons and murders his opponents, all while pursuing long-range nuclear weapons…

…David Rothkopf, a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, likened the event to Trump’s old reality television show. “But,” he added, “‘The Apprentice’ had more likable characters, more credible plots, and didn’t involve the enslavement of 25 million people or prospect of nuclear war.”…

…Michael McFaul, an ambassador to Russia during the Barack Obama administration, called the summit a victory for North Korea diplomacy.

“Tomorrow, the entire world will be treating Kim Jong un as a global leader, on stage with the leader of the most powerful country in the world,” McFaul tweeted. “Human rights, assassinations abroad, etc. will unlikely be mentioned. That is a tremendous achievement for North Korean diplomacy.”…

…Previously, Trump had pledged to rain “fire and fury” on North Korea if it continued to make nuclear threats. This week, the president said he looked forward to getting to know his new negotiating partner.

[PAY SPECIAL NOTE HERE.]

Kim and his government are developing missiles that can carry nuclear weapons to the USA and have denounced Trump as a blustery “dotard.”…

…Many analysts are skeptical that Kim will agree to fully give up nuclear weapons because he sees them as essential to his nation’s security and self-identity.

Although many still predicted that the initial Trump-Kim summit could at least yield an agreement to keep negotiating.

[NOTE: Whoopty-Freaking-DOO!! We agreed to keep on talking with Lying, Commie,Murderous DICTATOR…but then again, DT is a Lying, NY Liberal/Fascist, Fraud, Narcissist, and wannabe DICTATOR!]

Depends on how you define success,” said James Goldgeier, a visiting senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations. “Both leaders will want to trumpet it as a success, but it seems like this will largely be a photo op both can use for their domestic purposes.”

============

And you Trump-Bots and Trump-Trolls, BEFORE you lay into me for calling DT a “wannabe DICTATOR” YOUR “news” source, Fox “News” called the meeting between DT and Kim Jung Un a meeting BETWEEN TWO DICTAOTRS!!

Fox & Friends host slips: Trump’s North Korea summit is a ‘historic meeting between two dictators’

Fox & Friends host slips: Trump’s North Korea summit is a ‘historic meeting between two dictators

SOURCE .

Abby Huntsman, host of the Fox News morning show Fox & Friends, on Sunday said that summit between North Korea leader Kim Jong-un and U.S. President Donald Trump is a meeting between “two dictators.”

During an interview with former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci, Huntsman interrupted to noted that Trump had arrived for the summit in Singapore.

“There is the president of the United States, Donald Trump, about to walk down those [Air Force One] stairs, stepping foot in Singapore as we wait this historic summit with the North Korea dictator Kim Jong-un.”

“Anthony, talk to us about this moment,” she said, turning to Scaramucci. “This is history. We are living — regardless of what happens in that meeting between the two dictators — what we are seeing right now, this is historic.”

Scaramucci agreed that Trump is a “disruptive” force in the world.

==========================

So, there you have it…FOX “NEWS” ADMITTING THAT TRUMP IS A DICTATOR…YOUR “NEWS” TRUMPTURDS…YOUR “News” said that!

Let me close with two poignant questions:

AND:

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Coalition of Conservatives Against Trump

Image result for The Bill of Rights and Bald Eagle

[NOTE: The name of this group will change once Trump is removed from office, it will be simply: Coalition of Conservatives.]

COALITION OF CONSERVATIVES

Preamble.

When America strays from her Founding Principles it is up to men and women who are like-minded in said Founding Principles to rise as a voice of Passionate Reason/Reasoned Passion, to tirelessly proclaim, point to, and adhere to the Founding Principles. What made America good IS what made America great. When Principles which she was founded upon we are weakened, when we are NO longer good- we are NO longer great. 

MISSION STATEMENT.

The Coalition of Conservatives [Against Trump] has a clearly defined mission. That mission is defined, shaped, and activated by the very Core, Founding Principles that made America BOTH good and, by being good made America Great.

LINKS TO WHAT DEFINES. SHAPES, AND ACTIVATES The Coalition of Conservatives:

 

The Middle Way Is NO Way At All . Links to a 4 part series.

===

A Return To Constitutional Conservatism .

=

Conservatism: 101 Revisited. Truth Matters .

=

Federalism: Taking Back Constitutional Rights And Liberties .

=

Us vs. Them. Period. MAJOR UP-DATE .

=

Conservatism:101 .

===

AND an article by National Review to highlight that MANY good, and great Conservatives, aka REAL CONSERVATIVES, agree in their opposition to Trump, [NOTE: Some of these #NeverTrump-ers have been bribed, bullied, or blackmailed into supporting Trump. BUT it IS interesting, and quite telling, to see WHY they opposed him, only to later wither and become his lap dog.]

Conservatives against Trump .

FOR MORE SEE:

HERE

HERE

TOS: or more appropriately, Terms of Membership.

  1. The Foundational, Defining, and SOLE Principles of this group are America’s Founding Principles. While there can be disagreement among Conservatives among how to implement Conservative Principles, there can NOT be any agreement of Conservatives with Liberals that includes the compromising, abandoning, negotiating away, or even the “temporary setting aside” of Founding, Conservative Principles. Conservatives are, first, defined by WHAT THEY BELIEVE/THEIR WORLD-VIEW. This world-view, aka Core Values/Principles, shapes and defines what (real) Conservatives say and do. EXAMPLE OF COMPROMISE AMONG CONSERVATIVES: Issue- tax cuts. Conservative #1 wants deeper, across the board, Reagan-esque tax cuts. Conservative #2 wants tax cuts for all, but especially for businesses and the upper end of the tax bracket so as to stimulate job growth, increase production, and expansion. Conservative #3 wants to abolish The Federal Reserve, IRS, and The Income Tax, and then GUT spending to ONLY fund what is CLEARLY SPELLED OUT IN ARTICLE 1. SECTIONS 8 & 9 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, and use the 9th, 10th, and 11th Amendments as strict restrictions against any and all NON-Constitutional taxation and spending, and institute a FLAT 7-12% National Sales Tax. Though I am in group #3, I can, will, and DO agree and work fine with folks from groups #1 & #2. BUT as one peruses the linked articles you’ll find absolutely NO COMMON GROUND BETWEEN Liberals and Conservatives. NONE. Not a drop.
  2. Hence, this is a group SOLELY FOR Conservatives expressing Conservative Principles/views, presenting and debating Conservative Principles/views , and taking ACTION based on and rooted in those Conservative Principles/views.
  3. Hence, ANYONE that thinks that to “save America” that we/Conservatives MUST compromise, work with, support, and VOTE FOR Liberals and Liberalism…this group is NOT for you. And ANY attempt to persuade otherwise will meet with immediate BANNING AND BLOCKING. 
  4. The Mission Statement, purpose, and Core, Founding Principles and Views ARE made absolutely and abundantly clear. Join, remain IF you agree. IF you do NOT agree then don’t remain, nor join. This group is FOR Conservatives presenting and pursuing Conservative Principles/values ONLY.
  5. IF you agree that Liberalism and Liberals MUST be included: LEAVE NOW.
  6. IF you think there IS Common Ground between Conservatives and Liberals: LEAVE NOW.
  7. IF you think that Conservatism and Liberalism share any common principles/values: LEAVE NOW.  
  8. In short: THIS is a group FOR Conservatives and Conservatism ONLY. IF you read, view, and listen to Liberals (and so-called “Moderates”) and think we need to compromise and work with them: LEAVE NOW.

To all who agree, stay, and say “Glad for this oasis of Conservatism.”

Image result for WELCOME

 

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

Same Lingo- Different Dictionary: Part 4

Image result for Compromising with evil

 

Image result for a comfortable peace rather than an uncomfortable freedom

 

 

PART 1 .

PART 2 .

PART 3 .

Attributed to  Dr. James Dobson:

“They use our language, but NOT our Dictionary'”

This has been a problem since at least the 1860’s, but has grown exponentially worse since the 1960’s.

Liberals use a common, everyday word or phrase…but with a different, often a very different meaning. This was done deliberately to muddy the language, muddy the discourse, and the end result, advance Liberalism.

We will now look at some of the terms Liberals use that we/Conservatives use, BUT the Liberals have changed the meaning so it sounds like they’re agreeing with us when all the while they’re lying to us. LET US COMMENCE…

This will be “LIBS SAY”, what Conservatives mean by the term, what Libs mean by the term:

“LIBS SAY”

1.We’re for equality.

To a Conservative equality means equal OPPORTUNITY/EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER (THE SAME) LAW(S). This is left to each individual to take advantage of, and use freely as God gives them the ability to do so.

To a Liberal that means equal OUTCOME. This REQUIRES Gov. meddling, regulation, progressive taxation, WELFARE/Entitlements to “level the playing field”. Libs assume most are too ignorant, too incapable, or some other way handicapped and ONLY gov. can help, and LOTS of government.

2. We’re for free speech.

What Conservatives mean: free to say anything (within reason) no matter how hateful, stupid, disgusting, vile, and racist it may be. We draw the line at things like yelling “FIRE!”, or “BOMB!” in crowded areas, that would cause a panic and may get someone hurt or killed. That is called: COMMON-SENSE.

To a Liberal “free speech” means you can say anything that aligns with and agrees with Liberalism. All speech that does not align/agree with Liberalism is “hate speech”, “not PC”, and…possibly “racist”.

3. We’re for Liberty and Freedom.

To a Conservative this means you have the right to say and believe and do almost anything (again, within reason). You can believe in the foolishness of a flat earth, global warming, “socialism is the answer”, you’re the “superior race”…BUT WE ARE NOT obligated to LISTEN to such mindless, hate-filled blather. Conservatives also believe that your right to swing your fist stops at our nose. Mainly, free to do as one ought to, but wont force any to do anything. As long as we can freely choose not to listen, fund, support “whatever”…go ahead, be an idiot and believe that you can “spend your way out of debt/ tax your way to prosperity.” As long as YOUR opinion does NOT infringe on OUR rights…be wrong all you want.

Liberals mean: Freedom to do/say whatever you want, no matter how stupid and vile it may be. AND often the gov, i.e. we the tax payer, also HAVE to PAY for your “freedom”.

4. We’re Pro-Choice.

Conservatives are all about Liberty and Freedom. We fought a Revolution and the War of 1812 to show WE MEANT WHAT WE SAID. Want to be a blacksmith? be one. Want to go to college? go (as long as YOU pay for it). Want to buy a car? go ahead, whatever make, model and year you want. You want a gun? good idea. It’ll help protect against crime and tyrants. Want to own slaves or kill babies? NO! Your rights can NOT infringe on anyone else’s rights.

Liberals mean: we should be allowed to kill as many innocent babies as we want to. Oh, they call it “Pro-Choice”, “The right of the mother over her own body” (except the THE BABY’S body is NOT the mothers. At 18 DAYS the BABY has it’s own blood type, heart beat, brain waves). Study the origins of the infanticide movement via Margret Sanger and you’ll see it was knowingly meant to do two things: 1. KILL BABIES, 2. Particularly BLACK BABIES. Over 78% of all abortion clinics are in inner-city, or heavily minority areas of town. BUT if you want to CHOOSE to have a gun? NO! Liberals are against THAT choice. Also of note, while Liberals are all for murdering millions and millions of INNOCENT BABIES, they are 100% AGAINST the just execution of convicted felons….Liberalism is evil and bi-polar.

5. We are Pro-Jobs.

Conservatives mean: go out and get, or start your own job/business. The individual is responsible for themselves. Family, Friends, and the local church or charity can assist, BUT the weight of getting and having a job lies with THE INDIVIDUAL.

Liberals mean, again, that government MUST step in and help. Liberal ideas like Affirmative Action, and gov. job training, the “minimum wage” COST ALL, especially those WITH a  job already. EVERYBODY must somehow “pull their fair share” for the poor Liberal to get and keep a job. How is it everyone else’s responsibility for Johnny Liberal to get a job paying $15.00 an hour flipping burgers via the Liberal idea of “minimum wage”???

Image result for patrick henry give me liberty

I could go on.
All of this is supported by Part 2 linked above.

So, with language being so DELIBERATELY muddied and changed it makes open and honest discourse impossible.

And the so-called “Conservatives”, and you KNOW WHO YOU ARE, who are crying 24/7/365 for compromise, ie. surrender of Conservative Principles, to get rid of Trump Liberals ONLY TO DELIBERATELY VOTE IN OODLES-N-GOBS OF DEMOCRAT LIBERALS, are either deluded, OR stealth Liberals yourself.

But like the Bible’s Joshua and Patrick Henry, I am NOT so inclined to turn back to Liberalism/Slavery…NeverTrump and NeverLiberal mean NEVER….PERIOD.

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Is Compromise With Liberals & Liberalism Possible: Is There Common-Ground?

Image result for train wreck

First, links to the first two segments:

PART 1 .

PART 2 .

PART 4 .

Let me now re-ask/re-address the line of questioning from Part 2:

  1. WHAT is the common-ground that Liberals and Conservatives can via compromise agree on and then vote into policy/law? [NOTE: See Part 2 above for what both sides believe.]
  2. Does compromising with Liberals actually mean in real world application and results that Conservatives cave, i.e. surrender Conservative Principles?
  3. ARE Principles negotiable? Something to be compromised, bartered, bantied, and abandoned when “things get really bad”?
  4. IS there actual right and wrong? Liberals say everything is relative, negotiable, and, hence, open for compromise. Conservatives say right is right- period; wrong is wrong- period. That to get good RESULTS we must needs make decisions based on and rooted in what IS good and right. HOW can Conservatives compromise with someone who thinks that WHATEVER is just as right/good as anything else…as long as the Liberal goal is achieved?
  5. Liberalism is a world-view of Big-Government tyranny. Conservatism is a world-view of “Life, LIBERTY, and The Pursuit of Happiness”. WHERE, and WHY, do Conservatives then abandon Conservative Principles to compromise with someone that is wholly, and entirely opposed to their Conservative Principles?

Keep Part 2 as a point of reference and then, IF possible, show the shared common-ground that Liberals and Conservatives have.

Rather than simply say yes or no- they do or do not have common-ground- I will ask a series of questions based upon the stated beliefs of both sides, whereby letting each read, think, and decide for themselves.

The Queries:

  1. What is the COMMON-GROUND between a Leftist and a Patriot/Conservative?
  2. What is the COMMON-GROUND between Big Government Liberals, and Small, Restricted by The Constitution Conservatives?
  3. Where is the COMMON-GROUND between supporters of National Socialised Medicine (like Obama-Care, or Single-Payer), and The Constitutional-Conservative solution of getting gov. OUT of the free markets, OUT of the private sector, and encourage free market/private sector solutions?
  4. Where is the COMMON-GROUND between the Liberal support of gay/sodomite marriage/rights, and The Conservative’s core belief of Traditional Family Values?
  5. Where is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat Party’s daily and historic move toward Socialism and Marxism, and The Conservative’s embrace of America’s Founding Principles?
  6. Where is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s support and FUNDING of Abortion, euthanasia, and doctor assisted suicide, and The Conservative’s belief that LIFE is the FIRST right given to us ALL by God, and three times FIRST mentioned in America’s Founding documents, (Declaration of Independence, 5th, and 14th Amendment)?
  7. Where is the COMMON-GROUND between between the Democrat’s gun-grabbing, gun-registration, gun-banning principle(s), and Conservatism’s embrace and defense of 2nd Amendment rights?
  8. What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s belief in Big Government authoritarianism, and the Conservative’s CORE belief that we ARE a Constitutional Republic and that government is defined and RESTRAINED by The Constitution?
  9. What is the COMMON-GROUND between the Liberal’s view that The Constitution is “a living document” to be interpreted and applied HOWEVER is necessary to advance Liberalism, and The Conservative’s belief that America’s Founders said what they meant and meant what they said?
  10. What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s embrace of the Marxist Progressive Income Tax, tax and spending HIKES, and the Conservative’s belief in ONLY Constitutional spending, programs, and as LOW a taxation as feasible?
  11. Lastly, What is the COMMON-GROUND between The Democrat’s view that government, and even Globalism/world government, IS THE Solution to ALL mankind’s ills, and the Conservative’s belief that we are each responsible for our own actions, and that FIRST line of aid is to be family, then church, then LOCAL charity, then, LASTLY, local government?

What is the COMMON-GROUND between Liberals, whether Democrats or RINO/Trumpers, and US Conservatives?

==============

For Those saying they’re pushing “only for moderates…the center” THIS is Mark Warner, a so-called “Champion” of the so-called “Moderate” view:

MARK WARNER’S VIEWS ARE:

SOURCE .

PRO ABORTION:

  • Support Roe v. Wade, but respect differing views. (Oct 2008)
  • Protect responsible Choice. (Nov 2001)
  • Voted NO on restricting UN funding for population control policies. (Mar 2009)
  • Keep federal funding for family planning clinics. (Mar 2017)

PRO BIG GOVERNMENT:

  • Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)
  • Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (May 2009)
  • Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package. (Feb 2009)

PRO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/CIVIL “RIGHTS”:

  • Switched to supporting same-sex marriage in 2013. (Jul 2014)
  • We still need affirmative action, for now. (Oct 2008)
  • Let military leaders advise about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. (Oct 2008)
  • Eliminated Family Rule, so unrelated couples can buy homes. (Mar 2008)
  • Project Genesis: faith-based African-American home program. (Mar 2008)
  • Promote minority-owned business. (Nov 2001)
  • End racial profiling; more minority police. (Nov 2001)
  • Extend hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Nov 2001)
  • Voted YES on reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. (Feb 2013)
  • Enforce against wage discrimination based on gender. (Jul 2013)
  • Let states recognize same sex marriage. (Jan 2015)

ANTI BUSINESS:

  • Financial crisis stems from companies over-borrowing. (Sep 2008)
  • More state contracts for minority & women-owned businesses. (Mar 2008)
  • Rated 83% by UFCW, indicating an anti-management/pro-labor record. (May 2012)
  • Restrict corporate use of consumer mandatory arbitration. (Aug 2016)

PRO EPA:

  • All-of-the-above approach, including pro-coal. (Jul 2014)
  • Opposes drilling ANWR; but OK to drill offshore. (Sep 2008)
  • Offshore drilling is acceptable but not the “silver bullet”. (Jul 2008)
  • Vetoed offshore drilling ban until more laws & facts known. (Jul 2008)
  • Drastically reduced emissions from VA coal power plants. (Mar 2008)
  • Voted NO on barring EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. (Apr 2011)
  • Voted NO on protecting middle-income taxpayers from a national energy tax. (Apr 2009)
  • Voted YES on requiring full Senate debate and vote on cap-and-trade. (Apr 2009)

PRO OBAMA-CARE

  • Ebola: screen passengers on flights from West Africa. (Oct 2014)
  • AdWatch: Targeted by RNC robocalls for support of ObamaCare. (Nov 2013)
  • Proposed 50-governor 7-principle Medicaid reform. (Nov 2008)
  • Cannot allow 47 million Americans to go without access. (Oct 2008)
  • As governor, 138,000 more children covered by insurance. (Mar 2008)
  • Get every eligible child health care. (Nov 2001)
  • Answer seniors’ questions with “Senior Navigator”. (Jan 2001)
  • Supports Virginia Health Care Foundation for under-served. (Jan 2001)
  • Voted NO on the Ryan Budget: Medicare choice, tax & spending cuts. (May 2011)
  • Voted YES on regulating tobacco as a drug. (Jun 2009)
  • Voted YES on expanding the Children’s Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)
  • Merge Alzheimers diagnosis and care benefit. (Jul 2013)
  • Religious exemption from ObamaCare individual mandate. (Mar 2015)

PRO GOV. MEDDLING IN FREE MARKET/PRIVATE BUSINESS SECTOR:

  • Bring high-tech, well-paying jobs to small towns. (Aug 2008)
  • Gilmore opposed helping Tultex, despite Assembly’s support. (Jul 2008)
  • No employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. (Mar 2008)
  • Increase minimum wage; support homeless job training. (Jul 1996)
  • Ban discriminatory compensation; allow 2 years to sue. (Jan 2009)

PRO “MODERATE” STANCE IS “SOLUTION”:

  • End partisan gridlock; embrace common ground. (Sep 2008)
  • It’s “the future v. the past” not “liberal v. conservative”. (Aug 2008)
  • Replace name-calling with bipartisan management. (Jul 2008)
  • Term-limited as governor in 2008. (Jun 2006)
  • We can’t win presidency in only 16 blue states. (Jun 2006)
  • Voted YES on confirming of Sonia Sotomayor to Supreme Court. (Aug 2009)

=============

As I read Mark Warner’s “Moderate” record and stances I see a Liberal feigning to be “reasonable” and then voting with the Liberals.

He says a couple of things that sound/seem good to a Conservative, BUT they are all couched in mountains of Liberalism, and a Liberal voting record.

So, how is a “Moderate” in reality any different than a Liberal? A Liberal is more honest about their Liberalism is about the only difference there is.

============

Each read, think, pray and decide for yourself.

What The Heritage Foundation has to say about this:

SOURCE .

Liberals always seem to be suggesting ways for conservatives to get back on the right track. E.J. Dionne, for example, suggests in a new book that conservatives would be more successful if they “moderated,” abandoned many of their core ideals, and came to terms with big government.

This is nonsense, Heritage scholar Lee Edwards writes in The Daily Signal:

Contrary to Dionne’s advice, conservatives understand that the way to win the electoral debate is to take a strong forward position and stick with it just as Reagan did with his 1981 tax cuts that triggered 90 months of economic growth and his Strategic Defense Initiative which forced the Soviets to abandon the arms race and agree to end the cold war at the bargaining table and not on the battlefield.

Dionne is correct that President Eisenhower presided over a period of comparative peace and prosperity in the 1950s, but his “modern” Republicanism was rejected as “a dime store New Deal” by Barry Goldwater, a prime maker of the conservative movement. What Reagan said in his first inaugural address still applies: “In this crisis, government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem.”

Contrary to Dionne’s counsel, American conservatism does not need warmed-over Republicanism from the Fifties to get back on track but principled leadership committed to real health care solutions, meaningful spending cuts, tax reform that spurs economic growth and creates jobs, a strong national defense, energy independence, commonsense immigration reform, protection of human life from conception to natural death, and preservation of the traditional family.

I’ll close by quoting one of America’s Founding Fathers, “The Atlas of The Constitution”, John Adams:

“In politics the MIDDLE WAY is NO way at all.”

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Consider THE RESULTS. Proceed With Caution.

Image result for Conservapedia

[NOTE: All definitions unless otherwise note are from the Conservative online Dictionary and Encyclopedia “Conservapedia”.]

PART 1 .

PART 3 .

PART 4 .

This 2nd part of “The Middle Way” article will lay the ground-work to look at and address several real world questions:

  1. WHAT is the common-ground that Liberals and Conservatives can via compromise agree on and then vote into policy/law?
  2. Does compromising with Liberals actually mean in real world application and results that Conservatives cave, i.e. surrender Conservative Principles?
  3. ARE Principles negotiable? Something to be compromised, bartered, bantied, and abandoned when “things get really bad”?
  4. IS there actual right and wrong? Liberals say everything is relative, negotiable, and, hence, open for compromise. Conservatives say right is right- period; wrong is wrong- period. That to get good RESULTS we must needs make decisions based on and rooted in what IS good and right. HOW can Conservatives compromise with someone who thinks that WHATEVER is just as right/good as anything else…as long as the Liberal goal is achieved/
  5. Liberalism is a world-view of Big-Government tyranny. Conservatism is a world-view of “Life, LIBERTY, and The Pursuit of Happiness”. WHERE, and WHY, do Conservatives then abandon Conservative Principles to compromise with someone that is wholly, and entirely opposed to their Conservative Principles?

These and other questions will be looked at as we proceed.

FIRST, WHAT IS LIBERALISM?

As catalogued and listed by Conservapedia Liberalism is defined thusly:

liberal (alternately called a left-winger or leftist) is someone who advocates an increase in government spending, power, and control, such as ObamaCare. Liberals often support the censorship and denial of biblical Christianity.[1] Liberals who are a part of the secular left prefer atheism/agnosticism over the Christian faith, as atheism has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans.[2]

Increasingly, liberals side with the homosexual agenda, including homosexual “marriage”. Liberals favor a welfare state where people receive endless entitlements without working.[3] The liberal ideology has degenerated into economically unsound views and intolerant ideology. All liberals support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of conservative principles, while lacking an actual ideology or values of their own.[4] Many of them cannot understand Christian language.[5]

Polling data has consistently shown that an increasingly large percentage of Americans identify as conservative, rather than as liberal, currently by 38% to 21%.[6] However, liberals and “progressives” oftentimes falsely say the exact opposite.

LIBERAL VIEWS ARE:

Liberals support the following political positions and practices:[7]

  • Wasting money on ineffective government programs (the significant economic problems in the Eurozone due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)
  • Many liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.[8][9]
  • In the United States, the Democrat Party and liberals have moved so far left that there are now political figures involved in Democrat politics who are sympathetic to Communism. For example, Anita Dunn, an American political strategist who served as White House Communications Director from April through November 2009 in Obama Administration, said that Mao Zedong was her favorite political philosopher.[10] Bernie Sanders, a leading candidate in the Democrat Party’s 2016 presidential nomination, although he is an adherent of social democracy, he also has a history of involvement with Marxist organizations.[11][12][13] Sanders shocked his fellow liberals by putting up a Soviet Union flag in his Senate office.[14] In 1998, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was founded by Sanders, had the song Red Revolution (a song advocating communist revolution) featured on a website that they shared with the Democratic Socialists of America.[12]
  • In 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of Hillary Clinton, made the statement about the Democrat Party, which is a party strongly supported by liberals, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”[15] In 1988, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), after decades of running their own presidential candidates, stopped running presidential candidates because the gap between Democrats and American communists had grown smaller.[16] In 2016, the CPUSA urged people not to vote for Donald Trump even if they disliked Hillary Clinton (an indirect endorsement of Clinton).[16] Although there are still some very substantial differences between Communists and Democrats/liberals, the line between Communists/Democrats/liberals continues to blur in the United States.[15] Ironically, the leading Communist country in the world, Communist China, has moved farther away from Communism and now has a mixed economy of capitalism and state owned enterprises.[17]
  • Denial of science[18] (especially creation science)
  • Government’s ability to solve economic problems[19]
  • Hypocrisy[20]
  • The belief that Islamic terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Islamic extremists’ hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy [19]
  • Brainwashing voters with propaganda
  • Hedonism
  • Taxpayer-funded and state-encouraged abortion
  • Rejection of Biblical standards
  • Naive acceptance of the Idea of Progress
  • Hatred[21]
  • Murder (through abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia)
  • Censorship[22]
  • Socialism[23]
  • Unsuccessful Keynesian economics as opposed to sound free-market economics
  • Crying instead of accepting reality[24]
  • Cessation of teacher-led prayer in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events.
  • Ending Western morality[25]
  • Gun control
  • Pseudo-intellectualism[26]
  • Affirmative action[19]
  • Opposition to government regulation or restriction of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a First Amendment right[27]
  • Authoritarian government[28]
  • Government-funded medical care, such as Obamacare
  • Fascist tendencies (see also: Homo-fascism)
  • Belief in evolution
  • Destroying the Christian foundations on which America was built.
  • Destroying conservative family values and replacing them with immoral Hollywood values, such as abortion
  • Brainwashing through government-censored public education
  • Limiting personal freedom.[29] Liberal support for gun control is an example of this.
  • High progressive taxes[30] as a form of class warfare against wealthy business owners.[31]
  • Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the military
  • Slowly eroding the U.S. through Progressivism.[32]
  • Legalized same-sex “marriage” and homosexual adoption
  • Failed tax and spend economics
  • Smearing[33]
  • Libertine sexual morality. See: Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality and Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity
  • Economic sector regulations[19]
  • Denial of conservative roles in history. For example, liberals frequently claim[34] that George Washington was a deist when he was actually a devout Episcopalian.
  • Spreading of political correctness
  • Government mass-surveillance
  • Non-syndicalist labor unions
  • Many liberals engage in racism[35]
  • Bigotry
  • Advocating incorrect policies[36]
  • Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching abstinence from premarital sex[37]
  • A “living Constitution” that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended.

  • Government programs to rehabilitate criminals
  • Slander[38]
  • Gender “Equality”
  • Anti-Americanism
  • Abolition of the death penalty
  • Environmentalism[39]
  • Globalismone-world government, and opposition to national sovereignty
  • Support for open borders with no border controls or border walls
  • Unconstitutionally mandated separation of church and state.
  • Opposition to full private property rights.[40]
  • Reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine
  • Welfare
  • Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the Patriot Act
  • Oppression of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy
  • American liberals often have opposition to the U.S. Constitution and/or are often ignorant of what the U.S. Constitution states. Liberals seek to expand federal power at the expense of local government and silence the conservatives who hold them back, violating the 10th and 1st Amendments respectively.
  • Denial of traditional gender roles
  • Support of financially irresponsible policies
  • Encouragement of “global warming” alarmism
  • Rejection of logical[41] standards

Some liberals support:

 SOURCE .

SEE ALSO .

==================

Ok, THAT is Liberalism. Let’s look at Conservatism and see IF there is ANY common-ground…

CONSERVATISM DEFINED, IT’S ROOTS:

conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all. A conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of economics and the logic of the Bible for the benefit of everyone else. A conservative favors conserving value by not giving handouts to anyone who does not really need them.

A conservative typically adheres to principles of personal responsibility, moral values, and limited government, agreeing with George Washington‘s Farewell Address that “religion and morality are indispensable supports” to political prosperity.[1][2]

Religious conservatism is a big driver of social conservatism. Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: Religious conservatism and politics).

Phil Crane, the leading conservative congressman in the House from 1969 to 2005, urged people to make the world a better place than where they found it, and quoted frequently from the Bible in pursuit of that goal.[3]

Former President Ronald Reagan said, “The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.”[4]

CONSERVATIVE VIEWS ARE:

Specifically, conservatives seek or support:

SOURCE 1 .

SOURCE 2 .

==================

In Part 3 we will look at whether there can truly be any compromise between the two…but a cursory glance says: “No”.

LINK TO PART 1 .

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

“The Middle Way Is NO Way At All’

 

Related image

PART 2 .

PART 3 .

PART 4 .

 

We ARE in the midst of the worst storm involving the confluence of politics, culture, principles, morals, and religion(s) in human history. This storm is as Global as The Noahic Flood, BUT with FAR WORSE results…this storm could well mean the END OF OF THE WORLD AS WE CURRENTLY KNOW IT, and the ushering of what secular-humanists call the “New World Order”, and what The Bible calls the Seven Year Great Tribulation Reign of THE Anti-Christ and one world government, one world financing, and one world (mandatory/compulsory) religion.

The debate among GOOD, Solid Conservatives, and Christians is how to BEST prepare for it, maybe delay it, or, perhaps thwart it for now.

Some have suggested wholesale compromise, appeasement, and even VOTING FOR AND PROMOTING The Enemy of ALL that is good and right to rid ourselves of ONE, lone man: Trump.

I 100% with passionate reason and reasoned passion DISAGREE…what follows is my response, my view as posted on twitter over the last few weeks…BUT…these are views embedded, espoused, and embraced by America’s Founders, taught and found IN The Bible, The Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, The Constitution/Bill of Rights (including the 11th Amendment)…views, Principles, that I’ve held, embraced and proclaimed since 1976…the discourse from my pov is as follows:

Image result for a storm is coming meme

AFTER YEARS OF DEBATE AMONG CONSERVATIVES, CONSTITUTIONALISTS, AND CHRISTIANS, THAT SINCE 2015 HAS BEEN INTENSIFIED DUE TO TRUMP…IN RECENT WEEKS HAS COME TO A HEAD… “HOW DO WE PROCEED FROM HERE?”, “HOW DO WE SOLVE THE CRISIS WE’RE IN?”, “HOW DO WE SAVE AMERICA?”…

Some have suggested wholesale compromise, appeasement, and even VOTING FOR AND PROMOTING The Enemy of ALL that is good and right to rid ourselves of ONE, lone man: Trump…

HERE IS MY proposed “remedy”:

I will do ANYTHING to restore Biblical-Christian & Constitutional-Conservative Principles. Supporting, voting for, and by other means selling out to Liberals/Liberalism is NOT remotely the way to restore/save America. 1/

Let’s say we elect a Senate & House FILLED with Democrats/Liberals. And DT is removed. What have we “won”? We rid us of 1 Liberal, and get HUNDREDS of Liberals in Congress & as reaction against the GOP another LIBERAL President??? 2/

Only this Liberal will be a Democrat. That’s “winning”? That’s “saving America”? It certainly is NOT Conservative NOR Conservatism. 3/

It may just be that we, I mean REAL Conservatives, need to DO what should have ALWAYS done: BE Conservative. Study the issues. Study the candidates. ALWAYS VOTE. AND ALWAYS VOTE CONSERVATIVE. We’ve abandoned Principle, sold out, compromised…and what has it got us?? 4/

It’s got us Nixon, Ford, Carter, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush jr. (to a lesser extent), Obama, and now DT. And now our compromising and voting as many LIBERALS ON PURPOSE is our grand scheme to “save America”?? 5/

Compromise helps, aids, and furthers ONLY LIBERALISM. Where are OUR Patrick Henry’s with conviction & Principle crying “Give me Liberty or give me death!”?? 6/

If a bill or issue IS Conservative at the start then any and all compromise ONLY MAKES IT MORE LIBERAL. BE CONSERVATIVE. AND Conservatives do NOT vote for, support, and fund Liberals/Liberalism. 7/

The above 7-Point Twitter Storm was/is my response to the very suggestion of compromise and/or wholesale capitulation to Liberals and Liberalism.

Below is my “fleshing out” my reasoning.

1. I agree. 2. Clean house. 3. Get rid of ALL LIBERALS- DNC & RINO/TRUMPERS. 4. START OVER. 5. WITH CONSERVATIVES- NOT BY VOTING IN LIBERALS. How is flooding all levels of governance with LIBERALS “solving” anything? It’s not- ONLY MAKES IT WORSE.

Every candidate that feigns “moderate”- Dem or GOP- when in office moves/VOTES left, i.e. McCain, McConnell, Warner, Snowe, and Graham. Moserates are Libs either afraid to be outed, or lying/stealth. John Adams: In Politics the MIDDLE way is NO WAY AT ALL.

I want a REAL Conservative like: Jefferson, Madison, Henry, Washington, Coolidge, Reagan, Walter E Williams, Thomas Sowell…

Selling out to Liberals/Liberalism to gain a short term “victory” solves nothing. There are Conservatives- Mike Lee, Ben Sasse, Jim DeMint. Selling out will only make America more Liberal, ie WORSE. Stand for and by Conservatism and win…like Reagan.

You want to save America? You want to turn America around?

You will NOT get it by going Liberal/Dem. When both Houses of Congress & WH are all Dem/Lib it will only be WORSE.

MAGA IS THE LEFT. Nothing Conservative about them. Nothing honest about them either. MAGA is either weak-willed, spineless “Conservatives” who have caved, compromised, sold out, or been bullied or blackmailed, or they (MAGA) are flat-out Liberals-in-sheep’s-clothing FEIGNING Conservatism to destroy it as a voice. Either way MAGA IS Leftist.

To save America, IF still possible, will require…what?

The pain of being honorable, determined, principled, uncompromising Conservatives.

Stand on, with, by Conservative Principles- Period. BE Conservative. Vote Conservative. Live, act, portray and proclaim Conservative Principles. They not only win- they are RIGHT.

BUT FILLING BOTH Houses & the WH with Dems/Libs only makes it WORSE. How do you think the Libs/Dems will be “better”? How will they govern/vote to make things better? We MUST think of the RESULTS.

A winning strategy MUST see the results of it’s implementation.

You will NOT get it by going Liberal/Dem. When both Houses of Congress & WH are all Dem/Lib it will only be WORSE.

This is NOT winning.

Again:

Every candidate that feigns “moderate”- Dem or GOP- when in office moves/VOTES left, i.e. McCain, McConnell, Warner, Snowe, and Graham. Moserates are Libs either afraid to be outed, or lying/stealth. John Adams: In Politics the MIDDLE way is NO WAY AT ALL.

The true source of our sufferings has been our timidity.

…In politics the middle way is no way at all.

John Adams

VOTE ALL LIBERALS OUT, DNC & RINO/TRUMPERS. BUT do NOT then VOTE IN MORE LIBERALS. What problem was “solved” by doing that? None. It ONLY GETS WORSE WITH MORE LIBERALS. A “moderate” is a Liberal lying to you. John Adams: In politics the Middle way is NO WAY AT ALL.

Trumper’s/MAGA’s version of Conservatism?

Trump is FOR, voted FOR, supported, AND FUNDED:

VOTED FOR JIMMY CARTER- TWICE

VOTED FOR WALTER MONDALE

VOTED FOR BILL CLINTON- TWICE

VOTED FOR AL GORE

VOTED FOR JOHN KERRY

VOTED FOR CHUCK SCHUMER

VOTED FOR BILL DE BLASIO

VOTED FOR HITLARY CLINTON

VOTED/FUNDED FOR PELOSI

VOTED FOR ANTHONY WEINER

VOTED FOR CHARLIE RANGEL

VOTED/FUNDED FOR MAXINE WATTERS

VOTED/FUNDED FOR BARBARA BOXER

VOTED/FUNDED FOR DIANE FEINSTEIN

VOTED/FUNDED FOR HARRY REID

VOTED FOR/FUNDED OBAMARXIST- TWICE

IS FOR A $15.00 AN HOUR MINIMUM WAGE

IS FOR TRANSGENDERS USING “WHATEVER” BATHROOM/SHOWER THEY WANT

FOR A BAN ON “ASSAULT WEAPONS”

FOR RAISING TAXES ON “THE RICH” (JUST LIKE SANDERS, CLINTON AND OBAMA)

FOR GAY/SAME-SEX “MARRIAGE” (SAID THE COURT HAD RULED AND IT WAS “THE LAW OF THE LAND”…UM, COURTS DO NOT MAKE NOR PASS LAW, CONGRESS DOES)

FOR MASSIVE TARIFFS THAT WILL FURTHER DAMAGE AMERICA’S ECONOMY AND JOBS

IS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS, GOLDMAN-SACHS, AND OTHER BANKERS THAT HE PRETENDS TO HATE

HAS SOROS, GOLDMAN-SACHS AND EVEN CLINTON PEOPLE ON HIS STAFF

FUNDS/SUPPORTS PLANNED PARENTHOOD

FUNDS/SUPPORTS CODE PINK

AND IS ENDORSED BY THE KKK AND STORMNFRONT!!!
ALL OF THE ABOVE IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE…

I ISSUE THE CHALLENGE, SHOW ME HOW:

1) any of that IS Conservative,

2) how YOU can be truly Conservative and support THAT.

1. Their, MAGA’s, “version of Conservatism” IS Liberalism. 2. Voting LIBERAL does NOT advance Conservatism. 3. Getting rid of 1 Lib as WE VOTE IN HUNDREDS MORE, AND A NEW ONE IN THE WH SOLVES WHAT? 4. I can only follow the example of Conservatives before me- vote Principles.

MAGA abandoned principles to embrace Trump. We will abandon principles to get rid of Trump?? How is THAT Conservative? HOW does that “save” America?

As for me…THIS is MY sentiment, my stance on principles, morals, politics, and saving America:

“Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death”

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not [Jer. 5:21], the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry  for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss [Matt. 26:48]. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be
reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If
we wish to be free– if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending–if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained–we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house?  Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?  Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us [2 Chron. 32:8]. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone [Eccl. 9:11]; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace [Jer. 6:14].  The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field!  Why stand we here idle [Matt. 20:6]? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Viral News Dump: Part 3.

Image result for casemiro totgs fifa 17

Image result for Viral News Dump

Richard LeBlanc

Always remember. Everything with these folks is about distraction from something even worse. Everyone is focusing on crazy Rudy and that means there is something even more insane about to come out.

=========

It’s been a while since my last “Viral News Dump”, but the news is soooo plenteous, and there is no easy way to say which should be whittled out and which should remain (though, believe it or not, some actually DID hit the editing room floor), so what I did was renew the 2 part series “Viral News Dump”. My threads are NEVER short walks, nor short sprints, they are usually at least the equivalent of running the mile…THIS, like my other “Viral News Dumps” is a “Marathon”.

This is not a “bullet point” presentation. Nor is it even a “dictionary”. No, this is more akin to the “Encyclopedia Britannia” of the news.

Read, peruse, study a little now. Digest it. Use it. Come back later for more…unless you’re ready for a Marathon.

LET’S COMMENCE, SHALL WE?

FIRST LET ME LINK TO THE FIRST TWO PREVIOUS INSTALLMENTS ON “VIRAL NEWS DUMP”:

VIRAL NEWS DUMP: PART 1 . 

VIRAL NEWS DUMP: PART 2 .

THE ABOVE ARE FROM MAY AND JUNE OF 2017…A YEAR AGO…NOTICE WHAT WE KNEW THEN!

Once again, another compilation of News, headlines, videos, and links followed with a summation of “Just what have we learned?” 

 

Certain so-called Conservatives, Alt-Right, and other assorted Fascists, Socialists, Liberals and Marxists in an unusual cabal of political inanity are still saying there is “no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion in the last election”.

These R.I.N.O.s, Alt-Right, and assorted Leftists are tripping and stumbling over mountains of evidence from ALL sources- Conservative, MSM, Liberal, Independent, and even EYE-WITNESSES- to carry the swamp water for a man who is nothing but a New York Liberal, Liar, Con-Man, Fraud, Egomaniac, and Arrogant Blow-Hard, Donnie El Trampo.

Why?

Why do they do it?

Some are bought off, the R.I.N.O.s/Faux Conservatives, Populists, talk-show hosts…

Some have been bullied,  senators, reps, pundits…

Others are deluded, many from the aforementioned groups, along with Bernie Sanders and HRC followers who see NO difference on many issues…

And some are willful, in-the-know followers who share DT’s “vision” for America, David Duke, The KKK, White-Nationalists and the Russian Mob…

We KNEW THAT THEN.

We KNOW MUCH MORE NOW.

HOW MUCH MORE?

A LOT! HERE IT GOES…

LET’S BEGIN WITH “TASTY TIDBITS”…LIKE THIS…

This jumped out for me: Vekselberg was “detained and questioned by federal agents related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe earlier this year.” Mueller has known at least about aspects of this for quite a while. In general: Mueller knows a lot.

 

How money flowed through Michael Cohen’s multi-purpose shell company

 May 8 at 9:47 PM

SOURCE .

Replies to Bill Kristol on Twitter:

It’s my understanding that Nunes also knew about Vekselberg. In general: Nunes obstructs a lot.

===

IMHO Nunes is an obstruction all by himself

===

One Twitter Patriot replied:

He’s six months out in front of the rest of us

===============

Trump today: “When I make promises, I keep them.” Like how he’d make sure ObamaCare was repealed, the deficit slashed, funding for Planned Parenthood & sanctuary cities ended, all illegals deported, China declared a money manipulator and the wall, paid for by Mexico, built?

Since Trump’s election, corporations paid millions of dollars to a shell company created by Michael Cohen, a man who doesn’t appear to practice law and is known as a “fixer” for Trump. Why? Isn’t this the “swamp” Trump promised to drain?

===

In reply to Reanto, Richard LeBlanc asked this, rhetorically I presumed, and with a dose of sarcasm and humor to boot:

I have never drained a swamp or promised to drain one but let me ask this of the professional swamp drainers out there. Is it common the triple the size of a swamp you promised to drain?

===========

===

Michael Cohen’s attorney, Steve Ryan, won’t discuss the $500,000 Michael Avenatti says Cohen received from Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg in 2017. “I understand the shorthand you’re using, but it wasn’t a payment,” Ryan says before hanging up.

When is a payment not a payment? When it’s illegal?

So he’s not denying Cohen got the money, just denying what it was for. That, at least, seems to confirm 50 percent of what claimed, right?

has been NOT wrong yet and this is huge. Now we need the proof Trump knew n were free. Remember Cohen taped everything and kept everything.

If it wasn’t a payment to Cohen… then what? Was Cohen a go-between who relayed the $500,000 to someone else?

Didn’t Giuliani say as much in one of his interviews about him handing it off to the person it was intended for. I could have sworn he said that.

[ME: YES. Giuliani said it was used to pay off Stormy Daniels, but “NOT as hush money for a Presidential candidate” but rather to “protect Trump’s family”. Yeah…right…]

Ummmm when you give someone money…and they do sometjing for money….what is it if not a payment? Being corrupt is so confusing….the language is so oppositional.

[ME: Yep. With Liberals, and Trump and his syncophant followers ARE Liberals, language and mean “whatever”, even nothing, “truth” is what they (currently) say it is even if it contradicts what they said previously, or is diametrically opposed to reality.]

It was a gift. You know, the kind where favors are expected .

Ohhhhhh a gift….with benefits.

Better than a friend with. Cant have those kind of titles in mob world. No friends..its I know a guy who knows a guy,lol.

BREAK DOWN OF THE PAYMENT…SO FAR:

$500,000 to Cohen from oligarch

+$775,000 from home equity line

-$1.6m “Broidy” abortion

-$130k Stormy Daniels

———————————–

$455,000 payments we don’t know about yet

Russian oligarchs don’t just accidentally make 500K “donations” to Americans. Miracles do happen but somehow think that’s not what this was …

What a coincidence. Russia is involved. Trump’s “fixer” is involved. Looks shady. Smells shady. And Cohen’s primary client is Trump. Draw your own conclusions. Whatever they are; remember, Mueller is at least 5 steps ahead of you.

AND, LASTLY FROM NATASHA’S THREAD:

Wait so they’re not denying the money transfer?????

[ME: NO, they are NOT denying what is now clearly obvious.]

===

Can u imagine how Republicans in Congress would react if a Russian oligarch sectioned by the US Govt had paid Hillary Clinton’s personal fixer $500k, after she was elected President? They’d be setting their hair on fire, rightly so. Instead, all we’re getting is crickets… 🦗 🦗

CONSERVATISM-IN-EXILE responded:

If you believe, as I do, the Broidy $1.6m Playboy playmate payment which involved an abortion, was actually Trump’s…. And the RNC is paying Trump’s legal bills….. Did poor unknowing evangelicals PAY FOR DONALD TRUMP’S ABORTION?

Isn’t it convenient that Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal broke this “false story”?? (It’s Trump’s affair, Trump’s baby, Trump’s abortion)

Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Negotiated $1.6 Million Settlement for Top Republican Fundraiser

The 2017 deal was on behalf of Elliott Broidy, a businessman who faced allegations he impregnated a former Playboy model, and resembles one Mr. Cohen arranged with Stormy Daniels

SOURCE .

President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer negotiated a deal in late 2017 to pay $1.6 million to a former Playboy model who said she was impregnated by a top Republican fundraiser, according to people familiar with the matter.

===

IN OTHER NEWS…

Another Trump lawyer was just exposed for troubling link to Russia

SOURCE .

The day after it was revealed Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen received $500,000 in payments from a financial firm linked to a Russian oligarch aligned with Vladimir Putin, Pro Publica reports another longtime Trump personal attorney, Marc Kasowitz, also represented the very same Russian firm as recently as last year.

Kasowitz says he has represented the private equity firm Columbus Nova since 2010; Columbus Nova operates as the U.S. investment vehicle for Renova Group, a financial company run by Putin ally, Viktor Vekselberg. Columbus Nova also happens to be founded and run by Vekselberg’s cousin, Andrew Intrater. Vekselberg and Renova Group were both targeted by U.S. sanctions in April; Vekselberg and Intrater have been questioned by Robert Mueller.

SEE ALSO .

BIG QUESTION:

IS THERE ANYONE CONNECTED TO AND WITH TRUMP WHO IS NOT SOMEHOW ALSO CONNECTED TO AND WITH PUTIN-RUSSIA??!!!!

Bombshell report reveals Russian Oligarch gave $500K to Michael Cohen to pay off Stormy Daniels

In an explosive development that could prove collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow, The New York Times is reporting that a Russian oligarch paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to the same shell company that Michael Cohen used to pay off Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign.
According to the report, “A shell company that Michael D. Cohen used to pay hush money to a pornographic film actress received payments totaling more than $1 million from an American company linked to a Russian oligarch and several corporations with business before the Trump administration, according to documents and interviews.”

More from bombshell

Financial records reviewed by The New York Times show that Mr. Cohen, President Trump’s personal lawyer and longtime fixer, used the shell company, Essential Consultants L.L.C., for an array of business activities that went far beyond what was publicly known. Transactions totaling at least $4.4 million flowed through Essential Consultants starting shortly before Mr. Trump was elected president and continuing to this January, the records show.

Among the previously unreported transactions were payments last year totaling about $500,000 from Columbus Nova, an investment firm in New York whose biggest client is a company controlled by Viktor Vekselberg, the Russian oligarch.

======

NOW FOR “FAIR AND BALANCED”… **snicker**

Just In: Donald Trump’s eldest son Trump Jr. has a new girlfriend

SOURCE .

To say that the Trump Administration and Fox News have been engaged in an incestuous relationship isn’t exactly breaking news. The cable news giant has functioned as the unofficial propaganda outlet for the president since the campaign.

They’ve run favorable, often coordinated coverage around the clock, and they constantly stack their opinion shows and panel “debates” with Trump loyalists and sycophants.

But they’ve also served as a staffing agency for the White House. New National Security Advisor John Bolton worked at Fox News before joining the administration, as did State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert, communications adviser Mercedes Schlapp, and Treasury spokesman Tony Sayegh. Others, like Trump-Russia lawyer Jay Sekulow, were frequent guests on shows hosted by Trump loyalists like Sean Hannity and the now departed Bill O’Reilly before Trump hired them

While it is more than a little awkward to see one news agency so intertwined with the executive branch of our government, at least it hasn’t been inappropriate or disgusting.

Until now. Page Six reported late Wednesday that the relationship between Team Trump and Fox News has moved beyond the friend zone. President Trump’s newly divorced eldest son, Don Jr., is reportedly dating Kimberly Guilfoyle, one of the co-hosts of Fox News’ afternoon opinion show, The Five.

“Multiple sources exclusively tell Page Six that Don Jr. and Guilfoyle have been dating for a few weeks,” writes Emily Smith…

====

Rudy Giuliani delivers shocking announcement about Mueller and Trump interview (Details)

SOURCE .

Rudy Giuliani has barely been on Trump’s legal team, and he’s already thrown his boss under the proverbial bus multiple times. And when any other administration would pull him away from the cameras, these bumbling idiots keep shoving this old moron in front of the spotlight any chance they can. And it’s only proving to have backfired on them – time and time again.

After incriminating his boss during numerous interviews, Rudy deemed it appropriate to appear “strong” in the media, and announced that he’s giving Mueller a “deadline” of May 17th to figure out all the details pertaining to his interview with Trump.

Specifically, Rudy said,

“You need a sort of action-forcing event. I think that’s a good one for us, is the special counsel.” He elaborated that this sort of message is pointless, and doesn’t even necessarily mean anything has to happen by then. Adding, “I can’t walk into it and say ‘absolutely.’ I don’t speak for them. I don’t know if it can get complicated by another, you know, another situation where they – we find that they’ve engaged in misconduct.”

What? Bumble a little more, you doofus.

This is a showcasing of feigned bravado. And it’s blatant. Anyone with 20/20 vision can see their guilt from a mile away. It’s truly only a matter of time before this whole administration feels the sweet, sweet sting of justice.

===

Robert Mueller just requested for 70 blank subpoenas in the Paul Manafort Case

Mueller is making the request for the subpoenas in the Alexandria, Virginia, court where Manafort is facing trial on several charges, including bank fraud. Just last week, a judge rejected a lawsuit filed by Manafort that had challenged Mueller’s authority.

A spokesman for the special counsel confirmed to The Hill that the filing is an additional set of requests, after prosecutors previously requested 35 sets of blank subpoenas for the trial.

===

Cohen Cashed in as a ‘Trump Whisperer’

Novartis ended up paying $1.2M for one meeting

SOURCE .

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff
Posted May 10, 2018 5:44 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – Michael Cohen made millions of dollars after the election as a “Trump whisperer,” charging corporate clients large sums for insights into the thinking of the new administration—but it’s still unclear whether his behavior was illegal or merely “swampy.” Sources tell the Washington Post that after President Trump took office, Cohen boasted to potential clients that he spoke to Trump often and was still the president’s personal attorney and “fixer.” One associate says that in the summer of 2017 Cohen told him: “I’m crushing it.” Analysts say Cohen, whose clients included a company linked to a Russian oligarch, could be in deep trouble if he promised government actions in return for cash. In other coverage:

  • A $1.2 million meeting. Drug company Novartis says it hired Cohen for $100,000 a month to advise it on the administration’s approach to ObamaCare repeal and other issues—but it decided after a single meeting that he “would be unable provide the services” needed. The company still paid Cohen a total of $1.2 million because it had signed a one-year contract, the Hill reports. The company says it cooperated with Robert Mueller’s investigation in November when it was asked about the Cohen payments.

====

LASTLY, IN CLOSING TWO INFO LADEN TWEETS ABOUT LITTLE, LYIN’, LIBERAL DONNIE EL TRUMPO:

Evil Heidi Cruz was 1 of 12k VPs at Goldman Sachs & wrote ANTI-NAU paper for Council on For. Rel. as a temp worker.

THANK GOD she didn’t become Whew!

AND ANYONE WHO COMPARES TRUMP TO REAGAN (REAGAN DID NOT LIKE NOR TRUST TRUMP. TRUMP HATED REAGAN) needs to know THIS:

To compare Reagan w/ is not only offensive but repulsive

Would Reagan EVER put a Democrat Obama/Killary donor like Mnuchin as Sec. Treasury? Would RR EVER sign a $1.3T budget w/$ to PP? Does it look like THIS👇🏽Adm of Soros puppets, CFRs, Bushies & GS is 🇺🇸1st?

 

=============================

There.

There’s the 3rd installment of “VIRAL NEWS DUMP”…put on a pot of coffee…sit back…read…

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.