TrumPutin: Headlines and Memes

MUTT AND MUTTIER

“Trump isn’t known to have gone on any trips with Epstein, which would have been out of character. “I don’t think Trump would go to someone else’s property or someone else’s island or villa,” Nunberg said. “He doesn’t even play golf at anyone else’s clubs.” But Trump did host Epstein as a guest at Mar-a-Lago, where he appears in photos in 1997 and 2000. Epstein’s personal little black book, which was leaked by an employee in 2009, contained 14 phone numbers for Trump, his wife, Melania, and several people who worked for him.”

FROM:

“HE SAID NOT TO TELL ANYONE”: HOW TRUMP KEPT TABS ON JEFFREY EPSTEIN

SOURCE .

==================

JUST “HIM AND EPSTEIN” AND “28 GIRLS”: FLORIDA MAN DROPS A DIME ON TRUMP

Florida businessman George Houraney told the New York Times that the president’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein involved at least one “calendar girl” party at Mar-a-Lago.

 

Donald Trump now says he’s “not a fan” of Jeffrey Epstein, a convenient way to feel about the disgraced financier in the aftermath of his 2008 conviction on soliciting underage girls for prostitution and his indictment Monday on charges of sex trafficking minors. (Epstein has pleaded not guilty.) But that wasn’t always the case. There was a time when Trump could be counted among Epstein’s rich, well-connected friends. And, according to a report in the New York Times on Tuesday, the relationship may have been a good deal closer than the president has let on.

Per the Times, Trump in 1992 directed Florida businessman George Houraney—who would later accuse Trump of sexually harassing his former girlfriend and business partner, Jill Harth—to organize a members’ only “calendar girl” competition at Mar-a-Lago. After Houraney “arranged to have some contestants fly in,” he told the Times in an interview Monday, he discovered that there would be only two attendees. “At the very first party, I said, ‘Who’s coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming.’ It was him and Epstein,” Houraney recalled. “I said, ‘Donald, this is supposed to be a party with V.I.P.s. You’re telling me it’s you and Epstein?’” The anecdote underscores the friendship between the pair, and suggests that their relationship proceeded in spite of warnings about Epstein’s behavior. Houraney “pretty much had to ban Jeff from my events,” he said. “Trump didn’t care about that.”

[NOTE: It wasn’t Trump banning Epstein, it was HOURNANEY!!]

 

 

NOTICE THE YEAR TRAMP SAID THIS!!!

Quote from Christopher B. Monday:
I keep seeing posts about impeachment of the President which I find sort of ridiculous and here’s why. The Democrats secretly like him because he is a liberal and Republicans admire him because he does whatever he wants and because they too are liberal, they are covert about it.

TRUMP SUPPORTERS:

THE “GOSPEL” ACCORDING TO TRUMP & CO. :

BELOW IS WHY TO JOIN THE CONSTITUTION PARTY:

 

GLADLY PAY^^^

YO, TRUMPERS, YA LISTENING??

 

There you have it.

“I don’t know if I agree with all of this.”

GOOGLE IS OUR FRIEND. CHECK IT OUT. READ. BE INFORMED. QUIT BEING DELIBERATELY BLIND, DEAF, AND DUMB.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

Advertisements

CELEBRATING ALL THAT IS (THE REAL) TRUMPUTIN.

IN TRUMP-LAND, FORMERLY KNOW AS AMERICA, TRUMPUTIN SEEMS TO FEEL THAT INDEPENDENCE DAY/THE 4TH OF JULY IS ALL ABOUT HIM…UGH.

So, if we are to truly celebrate all that TrumPutin truly is then, well, let’s present THE TRUTH… let us start shall we.

THE REAL TRUMPUTIN

All False statements involving Donald Trump

 

AND

REPORT: TRUMP HAS TOLD MORE THAN 10,000 LIES SINCE BEING INAUGURATED

The noise from wind turbines causes cancer. The wall is already being built. Mothers, in consultation with their doctors, execute their children. These are some of the boldest, most deranged lies Donald Trump has told since becoming the 45th president of the United States. But, as anyone with access to the Internet or TV knows, he’s also told hundreds of smaller lies about everything from not calling Tim Cook“Tim Apple” to the number of people at a Beto O’Rourke rally. And when we say the leader of the free world has told “hundreds” of lies, we actually mean closer to 10,000.

In a truly superhuman feat, The Washington Post has tallied all the “falsehoods” that have spewed from Trump’s mouth and fingers since January 20, 2017, to April 27, 2019. Per the Post, that’s a whopping 10,111 in 828 days. And the situation vis-à-vis the president being a pathological liar is getting markedly worse. After telling a mere 5,000 false and misleading statements during his first 601 days in office, the pace and frequency of the lies has accelerated such that he doubled his bullsh*t in just a third of the time, telling almost 23 lies a day in the seven-month period beginning in late October, during midterm elections.

AND,

Trump is a known liar. Cover-ups are exactly what he does

After storming out of a meeting with members of Congress on Wednesday, President Trump held a press conference where he began with the phrase “I don’t do cover-ups.” The truth is Trump’s campaign and presidency have been filled with lies and cover-ups. Two of the most egregious examples are:

► Just days before the election in 2016, it was Trump who instructed his fixer Michael Cohen to funnel $130,000 in hush money to adult film star actress Stormy Daniels — money he reimbursed after taking office — in violation of campaign finance laws.

► When the news media first reported that senior members of the Trump’s team — including Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner — secretly met with Russian operatives promising dirt on Hillary Clinton in Trump Tower during the campaign, also in violation of campaign finance laws, Trump reportedly dictated the misleading statement by Trump Jr. claiming the meeting was about adoption policy.

The president’s strained relationship with the truth is well-documented. The Washington Post has identified more than 10,000 false or misleading statements that Trump made since assuming office.

The lies did not begin with his swearing in. For years, Trump built a personal brand of being a successful businessman, but he has since refused to release his taxes or any financial information during his campaign and presidency. The financial information the public has seen shows that he and his business have lost millions of dollars each year due to bad deals and investments.

===========================

BUT TRUMPUTIN ALSO IS…

SEXUAL PREDATOR.

Two women say E Jean Carroll told them about Trump alleged sexual assault

AND,

The 24 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

AND,

The one weird court case linking Trump, Clinton, and a billionaire pedophile

A woman suing in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s underage sex ring claims she was first approached while working as a towel girl at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort.

The woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her at age 13 has droppedher civil suit against the GOP presidential nominee. The suit alleged that the victim, known only as Jane Doe, was raped at a party thrown by sex offender billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. The suit also alleged that Epstein raped her. Earlier this week, Trump’s accuser was scheduled to give a press conference alongside attorney Lisa Bloom, but canceled the event at the last minute. Bloom says the woman was fearful for her life.

In a statement to The Daily Beast’s Brandy Zadrozny, Trump attorney Alan Garten responded to the news saying, “We are disturbed by the behavior of the attorneys involved and are evaluating our options.”

AND,

A Timeline of Donald Trump’s Inappropriate History With Women

Donald Trump’s infamous “grab her by the pussy” comment is just the tip of the iceberg: The president has a long history of sexual assault accusations and predatory remarks about women.

 

On October 7, 2016, the direction of Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign took a major turn when a 2005 video surfaced of the businessman turned presidential candidate boasting about how his celebrity privilege has allowed him to grope women and kiss them whether they want it or not. “I just start kissing them,” he told former Access Hollywood host Billy Bush. “It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy.”…

1992: A 10-year-old girl
Another damaging Trump video that emerged during the 2016 election cycle is a 1992 segment for Entertainment Tonight in which Trump made sexually suggestive remarks about a 10-year-old girl. Yes, really. While spotting the girl in front of an escalator, Trump quipped, “I’m going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?” To add even more disturbing perspective to this event, his daughter Ivanka Trump was also 10 years old at the time. He’s since joked that he would be dating her too, if she weren’t his daughter…

1992: Two 14-year-old girls
The same year, Trump made similar remarks to two 14-year-old girls, as the Chicago Tribune reported, linking to an archived story in its entertainment and gossip column. The wire report stated the incident occurred when Trump visited a youth choir outside of the Plaza Hotel. “He asked two of the girls how old they were,” it reads. “After they replied they were 14, Trump said, ‘Wow! Just think—in a couple of years I’ll be dating you.'”

1994: A 13-year-old girl
Trump has been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl in the apartment of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The case, which was recently filed for the third time in New York City, where the alleged rape occurred, consists of two affidavits filed by “Joan Doe” and “Tiffany Doe” which corroborate the victim’s story, as BuzzFeed reported. “Joan” says she was told about the assault after it happened, while “Tiffany,” who was apparently hired as a “recruiter” to bring young girls to Epstein’s apartment, alleges Trump and Epstein raped the victim more than once. Trump’s attorney has denied these accusations.

Late 1990s: Cathy Heller
Heller says she was at a Mother’s Day brunch at Mar-a-Lago with her family when her mother-in-law introduced her to Donald Trump. When she went to shake his hand, she says he pulled her toward him, and she tried to pull away. “He said, ‘Oh, come on,’ and he was angry,” she said. “He really grabbed me, and he was holding me very tight to kiss me on the mouth. He was strong.” She says she turned her head slightly so he couldn’t kiss her fully on the mouth, but she was still shaken and upset that he’d had the nerve to grab her in such a public manner—and in front of her family. Heller came forward with her story after Trump denied that he ever kissed women without their permission. “It drove me crazy,” she said. “It’s not just locker room talk. That’s who he is. He is a guy who grabs women.” A relative who says she was behind Heller when it happened supports her allegation, as does Heller’s husband, who was also present. The Trump campaign refuted the account.

SOURCE .

======

LASTLY, TO GET THE FULL SENSE OF WHO TRUMPUTIN REALLY IS…

TRUMP’S LOVE FOR TYRANNY

Nine Notorious Dictators, Nine Shout-Outs From Donald Trump

 

 

The Chinese Communist Party’s attempt to allow President Xi Jinping to rule indefinitely set off harsh criticism in China, as well as international opprobrium. But the power grab appears to have at least one fan: Donald Trump.

“He’s now president for life. President for life. No, he’s great,” Trump said of Xi at a lunch and fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago estate, according to CNN, which obtained a recording of the remarks. “And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot some day.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin

What Trump said about him: “If he says great things about me, I’m going to say great things about him. I’ve already said, he is really very much of a leader. I mean, you can say, ‘Oh, isn’t that a terrible thing’—the man has very strong control over a country. Now, it’s a very different system, and I don’t happen to like the system. But certainly, in that system, he’s been a leader, far more than our president has been a leader.”

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte

What Trump said about him: “I just wanted to congratulate you because I am hearing of the unbelievable job on the drug problem.”

When: April 2017

Context: The Philippines president has boasted about killing suspected drug dealers when he was a local mayor. Extrajudicial killings of drugs suspects have risen since Duterte became president in June 2016. Trump reportedly favors the death penalty for drug dealers—presumably ones who have been convicted.  The U.S. State Department noted last year that “police and unknown vigilantes have killed more than 6,000 suspected drug dealers and users as the government pursued a policy aimed at eliminating illegal drug activity in the country by the end of the year.” Human Rights Watch said“Duterte has plunged the Philippines into its worst human rights crisis since the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos in the 1970s and 1980s.” It added that Duterte’s most prominent critic was detained on “politically motivated drug charges.”

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

What Trump said about him: “Frankly, he’s getting very high marks. He’s also been working with the United States. We have a great friendship and the countries—I think we’re right now as close as we’ve ever been … a lot of that has to do with a personal relationship.”

When: September 2017

Context: The president’s remarks came shortly after Erdogan cracked down on Turkish civil society, the media, and his opponents. Erdogan accused members of democratic institutions of being part of a failed coup attempt against him the previous year. Trump even congratulated Erdogan after last year’s referendum that gave him—and subsequent presidents—more power.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi

What Trump said about him: “We agree on so many things. I just want to let everybody know in case there was any doubt that we are very much behind President el-Sisi. He’s done a fantastic job in a very difficult situation. We are very much behind Egypt and the people of Egypt. The United States has, believe me, backing, and we have strong backing.”

When: April 2017

Context: Sisi, who seized power in a coup, has cracked down in Egypt, where a brief flirtation with democracy during the Arab Spring resulted in a Muslim Brotherhood-dominated government (which Sisi ousted). The U.S. State Department says the most serious human-rights problems there involve “excessive use of force by security forces, deficiencies in due process, and the suppression of civil liberties.” Human Rights Watch says Sisi’s government “maintained its zero-tolerance policy towards dissent… and [continued] near-absolute impunity for abuses by security forces under the pretext of fighting ‘terrorism.’”

Trump’s fondness for authoritarians may have more to do with how power is wielded than those who exercise it. It just so happens that Western governments have, for the past seven decades, mostly adhered to a system of the rule of law, which empowers institutions rather than individuals. Trump’s apparent preference is for a system in which one individual, presumably him, wields that power.

Just how much does Trump love dictators? He can tell you in his own words.

SOURCE .

TWITTER PATRIOT, GLENN KIRSCHNER-

Who would have thought we see the day when we could take the word of Russian television over the word of our president and his Republican enablers in Congress.

QUOTES JULIA DAVIS-

‘s state TV host Evgeny Popov says that at the , “Putin completely captivated Trump, we can now say with complete certainty that Trump is ours.” Co-host Olga Skabeeva adds: “He wants the U.S. to be just like Russia… and himself to be just like Putin.” ©️

 

LET ME CLOSE AS I BEGAN:

 

 

SO, AS YOU GRILL, GATHER FAMILY AND FRIENDS, AND SET OFF FIRE-WORKS…REMEMBER TO GIVE TRUMPUTIN HIS DUE.

 

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

HOW TO DEFEAT LIBERAL “REASONING” EVERY TIME, ALL THE TIME, EASILY.

If after reading the article’s title you said, “This I gotta see.” Then, buddy, this is the place for you.

99.99% of this article will be simply using three things:

  1. COMMON-SENSE
  2. LOGIC.
  3. REALITY.

There WILL be links to facts. evidence, and science….but for the most part all that is needed to defeat Liberalism and Liberals is a functioning mind and sticking to the facts.

So, are you ready…

FIRST AT BAT:

TAXATION, SPENDING, THE ECONOMY, AND THE NATIONAL DEBT.

Liderals: we need to RAISE taxes on everyone, especially “tHe eViL rIcH”.

Conservative response:

Let’s use McDonalds as an example.

McDonalds in 1987 made 5.8125 BILLION DOLLARS.

So, according to Liberals, McDonalds quit opening stores, quit hiring people, quit giving raises, quit giving bonuses…that’s what happened, right? Because, in Liberal “reasoning” there is NO trickle down benefits, NO investing, NO growth, NO profit SHARING….

EXCEPT in The real World NONE of that happened. NOT. ONE. BIT.

McDonalds KEPT OPENING STORES.

McDonalds KEPT HIRING PEOPLE.

McDonalds KEPT GIVING RAISES.

McDonalds KEPT GIVING BONUSES.

McDonalds grew. And with it the economy FOR EVERYONE. Jobs were CREATED.

JOBS, LIKE, surveyors, architects, construction companies, construction workers, managers, assistant managers, supervisors, EMPLOYEES….

By “tHe eViL rIcH” being able to MAKE money, lots of money, they then INVESTED IT IN JOBS, HIRING, BUILDING, AND GROWING.

To which we Conservatives say:

“DUH!”

Of course that’s what happened! It’s HOW businesses actually operate in the REAL world.

Liberal Counter: “Yeah, but the managers, presidents and CEOs make a LOT more money than the fry cook!”

To which we Conservatives say:

Yes. You do NOT start at the TOP. You start at the bottom and work your way up.

Liberal Counter: “Work?!! As in EARN it?!!”

To which we Conservatives say:

Yes.

REALITY MATH:

20% of $100,000 IS LESS THAN 10% of $1,000,000.

 

GLOBAL COOLING, GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE CHANGE.

FIRST OF ALL:

CLIMATE IS: the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period; a region with particular prevailing weather conditions.

-Source: Google Online Dictionary.

OK.

Climate is DIRECTLY TIED TO AND DEFINED BY…WEATHER.

Having established THE OBVIOUS let us proceed.

In the late ’60’s and early ’70’s the Liberals were warning of “Global Cooling! The Next Ice-Age! All caused by man!” The ACTUAL data never supported that, but, nonetheless Time, Newsweek, The NYT’s et al ran with it. Hence it most assuredly was “truth”. **CUE EYE ROLL**

NO. I t was NOT true.

I was alive then. We had hot, sticky, humid summers in the midwest.

We had hot, arid, blistering summers in the southwest.

NO WHERE did weather conditions ever exist to support the “GLOBAL Cooling” hoax.

NO WHERE.

THENNNNN….

In the ’80’s through the early 2000’s the Left/Liberals warned us of “Global Warming”.

Except….there was NO “Global Warming”.

IT WAS ALL A COLOSSAL HOAX.

Soooo, when that rewording of “Global Crisis” didn’t work the Left/Liberals went to this, using “expert” John Kerry to help carry the water: 

“GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE”

The first two Leftist/Liberal alarms were flat out lies, hoaxes, so they went for something so ambiguous that ANY “data” could appear ro support it: “Global Climate-Change”. ANY change in the weather anywhere was “evidence” of the “Boogie-Man” of the eViL GlObAl cLiMaTe ChANgE. 

It’s raining in SPRING TIME? “Global Climate-Change”.

Hot during Summer? “Global Climate-Change”.

Tornadoes in Kansas, Texas, Missouri, and Oklahoma? “Global Climate-Change”.

Water is wet? Fire is hot? “Global Climate-Change”.

Ugh.

You’re asking by now, “Why are the Libs so bent on warning and scaring people with obvious lies?”

It has NEVER been about HELP.

IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT: CONTROL.

Leftists/Liberals are always and ONLY about: CONTROL.

They think we are too stupid or lazy to take care of ourselves.

We “NEED” their CONTROL.

In short: The Climate Alarmists are the Commie RED wrapped in thinly veiled Enviro-Wacko GREEN.

 

Speaking of Control, our next topic is…

GUN CONTROL.

Liberal “Logic”: ban guns crime will go down.

REALITY:

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

Before becoming a Christian IN 1976 I was a criminal. I committed:

  1. THEFT
  2. BREAKING AND ENTERING
  3. VANDALISM
  4. BOOTLEGGING ILLEGAL FIREWORKS
  5. ARSON

AFTER becoming a Christian, and studying The Bible at 3 Bible colleges, I was an Assistant Supervisor of Security (Guard) for 6 years.

I also worked a Street Ministry for 12 years.

MY experience, my training, shows that:

  1. IF AND WHEN I KNOW a house, apt., car, office, store, or church is protected by alarms, cameras, and/OR ESPECIALLY A PERSON WITH A GUN– choose a “safer/easier” target,
  2. NEVER go against a gun without a gun. Knife? lose. Club? lose. (Unless you have the element of surprise and first strike…even then, NO guarantee of a win).
  3. DEAD PEOPLE do NOT commit crimes.
  4. ALWAYS meet a threat with OVERWHELMING FORCE ON YOUR SIDE.

This is simple COMMON-SENSE.

NO crook PLANS to commit a crime with the end result being they get shot and killed!

AND LASTLY,

LIBERALISM IS LIBERALISM REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT’S FOUND, WHICH PARTY’S NAME THE PERSON TOUTS, OR WHO IT IS. PERIOD.

I am soooo beyond fed up with folks TELLING me:
“IF you don’t support R.I.N.O. ‘X’ then you must be a Liberal/Democrat!”

LET ME JUST SAY THIS:

BULL CRAP!

I HAVE ALWAYS SUPPORTED AND VOTED FOR THE MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE POSSIBLE…ALWAYS…CONSERVATIVE.

1980- REAGAN.

1984- REAGAN [BOTH TIMES NO REGRETS.]

1988- G.H.W. BUSH [BETTER THAN DUKAKIS; STILL HAD REGRETS.]

1992- G.H.W. BUSH [WAAAAAY BETTER THAN CLINTON]

1996- BOB DOLE [HAD A 100% RATING WITH THE CONSERVATIVE UNION.]

2000-G.W. BUSH [WAAAY BETTER THAN ALGORE; STILL HAD REGRETS.]

2004- G.W. BUSH [WAAAY BETTER THAN JOHN KERRY; HAD EVEN MORE REGRETS.]

2008- McCain [BEFORE WE FOUND OUT WHAT A FLAKE PALIN WAS SHE SEEMED TO MAKE THIS OK.]

2012- ROMNEY [MUCH BETTER THAN MADE TO SEEM BY MEDIA, DEMS, AND TRAITORS ON THE CONSERVATIVE SIDE; NOT THE PERFECT CONSERVATIVE, BUT TRULY WAS A CONSERVATIVE.]

2016- McMullin [A TRUE AND SOUND CONSERVATIVE; BETTER THAN BOTH HILLARY, AND HILLARY’S BIGGEST DONOR AND BFF, TRUMP.]

2020- WILL LIKELY VOTE 3RD PARTY AGAIN, MOST LIKELY JUSTIN AMASH. WILL NEVER VOTE FOR TRUMP OR ANY DEMOCRAT- EVER!!! NO LIBERALS MEANS NO LIBERALS.

 

FOR ALL WHO STILL THINK TRUMP’S A CONSERVATIVE, THIS.

HAVE NEVER HAD ANYONE IN 4 YEARS EVEN REPLY TO, LET ALONE REFUTE THIS.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

WHY Have “WE The People” Allowed THIS To Happen In And To America?!!

PREFACE.

To be brutally honest, YES, Obama and Michelle were Marxist too. So were Bill and Hillary, Al Gore, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon, LBJ, FDR…in short, ALL Democrats and EVERY R.I.N.O. is Marxist to some degree or another.

They were all in their own way corrupt and subversive of Our Constitution. So the IDIOTIC “What-Aboutism” crap can STOP NOW.

The stark difference between ALL of them and the flaming, NY Liberal, Big Government, Marxist NUT-JOB we have now is that THEY were at least, as people, much more polite, civil, normal, sane, and many actually thought that they were doing what is Right and Good.

Trump is a flat-out lying, conniving, backstabbing, egotistical, maniacal, fraud and con man. Trump commits OPEN treason, conspires with Putin-Russia, N. Korea, China, Saudi Arabia…Trump commits OPEN obstruction of justice with every breath he takes, he is rude, vile. Trump insults and wages trade wars with our allies, mocks and ridicules our allies, threatens to pull out of NATO, ALL WHILE appeasing and placating Russia, N. Korea, China, Saudi Arabia.

Trump OPENLY BRAGS about sexually assaulting MANY women, mocks the handicapped, scorns OUR military and IC, and takes the sole word of dictators like Putin and Kim Jung Un as Gospel Truth over the word of accumulated evidence from 17 of OUR Military and Intel agencies! 

And Trump lies. Trump lies about EVERYTHING EVERYDAY! Trump then lies about his lies. He then tells more lies to “explain” his previous lies, while telling more lies.

And UNLIKE every other corrupt politician named or unnamed Trump does care ONE BIT about if it’s Right or Good. Trump doesn’t care if it’s Constitutional. Trump does NOT care one bit if it WEAKENS America…or even RUINS America!

THE ONLY THING TRUMP CARES ABOUT IS:

TRUMP

====

Well, I saw this coming way back in the ’80’s when Trump attacked, smeared, and mocked Reagan. I saw it again in the ’90’s when Trump said Billy-Bob Clinton was the best President we’ve ever had (was sating that as recent as 2012!).

Through the early 2000’s saw it again when Trump mocked George W. Bush. And then thought Obama was great, even voted FOR Obama both times.

Trump has ALWAYS been a BIG Government, what’s-in-it-for-me Liberal. ALWAYS.

The grossly irritating part is that Trump is such a rude, vile, vulgar, festering, jackass that other Liberals hate him. And is so blatantly dishonest, corrupt, and Liberal that (TRUE) Conservatives can’t stand him!

The ONLY ones that like Trump are from the following groups:

THE STUPID

THOSE IGNORANT OF REAL AMERICAN HISTORY

THOSE IGNORANT OF THE CONSTITUTION

THOSE WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND WHERE LIBERTY COMES FROM AND HOW TO KEEP IT

THOSE WHO ARE IGNORANT OF CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVE ECONOMICS

THOSE IGNORANT OF CAPITALISM, FREE-MARKETS, PRIVATE BUSINESS/PROPERTY

THE GREEDY

THE CORRUPT

THE BLACKMAILED

THE BULLIED

THE BRIBED.

=========

Did you catch that?

Only those in one way or another are stupid/ignorant OR corrupt/bought off support Trump.

 

Don’t believe me? Then name ONE person who KNOWS America’s true History, origins, heritage, Laws, Constitution/Bill Of Rights, Liberty, and Freedom AND who is moral and uncompromised that supports Trump.

I’ll wait right here…

 

Let me save you some time. There are NONE. NO ONE who KNOWS American history, heritage, law, Constitution/Bill Of Rights, Liberty and Freedom, AND IS moral and uncompromised supports Trump.

 

NOT ONE.

BUT….you want evidence? proof?

HERE IT IS:

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

===

CAN THE CHATTER. DO SOMETHING ALREADY!

===

Either Trump Goes Or America IS OVER

===

Once Again…Just WHOSE Side Is Trump On??

===

“Only The BEST…EXTREME Vetting…” Part 3.

AND LASTLY,

Trump: The Politics of Distraction

===================

I know many of you Trumpers are mad. You are thinking, “Rev. Larry supports Obama, Hillary, Pelosi…Rev. Larry is a Liberal. Rev. Larry is a NUT…Rev. Larry hates Trump…”

  1. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY LIBERAL.
  2. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY LIBERALISM.
  3. I HAVE ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE EVER. PERIOD.
  4. I DO NOT HATE TRUMP OR ANYONE. I PRAY FOR HIS SOUL TO FIND (REAL) FORGIVENESS AND FOR TRUMP TO (TRULY) REPENT. BUT…….
  5. I LOVE JESUS, TRUTH, LIBERTY, AMERICA, OUR CONSTITUTION AND WHAT IS RIGHT MUCH MORE.

And BECAUSE I AM a Biblical-Christian and a Constitutional-Conservative I am bound by God’s Word to warn against ALL evil…and Trump IS evil.

 

 

 

You who continue to support Trump may be angry with me, you may even hate me…but I’ve given you facts, evidence, Scripture, Truth…AND the bottom line is:

YOUR OPINION WONT CHANGE THE FACTS.

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

GETTING BY WITH HELP FROM MY FRIENDS: TWITTER PATRIOTS, ASSEMBLE!

Related image

TO BEGIN LET ME LINK TO HE CALL FOR TRUMPUTIN’S IMPEACHMENT…FROM TRUMPUTIN HIMSELF:

Trump just invited Congress to begin impeachment proceedings

SOURCE .

[EXCERPTS.]

June 12 at 5:01 PM

George T. Conway III is a lawyer in New York. Neal Katyal, a law professor at Georgetown University, previously served as the acting solicitor general of the United States.

Much ink has been spilled about whether President Trump committed a criminal and impeachable offense by obstructing justice. That question deserves extensive debate, but another critical question — the ultimate question, really — is not whether he committed a crime, but whether he is even fit for office in the first place. And that question — the heart of an impeachment inquiry — turns upon whether the president abuses his power and demonstrates an unfitness to serve under the defining principles of our Constitution.

On Tuesday, Trump gave us direct evidence of his contempt toward the most foundational precept of our democracy — that no person, not even the president, is above the law. He filed a brief in the nation’s second-most-important court that takes the position that Congress cannot investigate the president, except possibly in impeachment proceedings. It’s a spectacularly anti-constitutional brief, and anyone who harbors such attitudes toward our Constitution’s architecture is not fit for office. Trump’s brief is nothing if not an invitation to commencing impeachment proceedings that, for reasons set out in the Mueller report, should have already commenced.

=============

THAT IS TODAY (JUNE 12, 2019). BUT LEADING UP TO THIS HAS BEEN THE GROUND WORK OF A PARTICULAR TRIO OF PATRIOTS I FOLLOW CLOSELY ON TWITTER. WE SHALL LOOK AT THEM PRESENTLY, BEFORE WE DO LET ME LINK TO OTHER ARTICLES WITH MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE, QUOTES, EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNTS, AND EXPERT TESTIMONY THAT WILL HELP BUILD AND HOLD THE FOUNDATION TOGETHER.

REMARKABLE TREASON

THE DARK SECRETS OF THE TRUMP-PUTIN TIES

“Where-the-Rubber-Meets-the-Road” Truth About DT’s ties to Putin and Russian Mob

K.S.N./V.N.D. :More Fun And Treason With Trump And Putin

AND ONE MORE,

NUNESBURGER: The Tale of Nothing to See Here

 

NOW MY THREE FAVORITE PATRIOTS FROM TWITTER, FIRST UP JENNIFER TAUB REPORTING ON THE MUELLER REPORT HEARING:

SOURCE .

Here we go. The Mueller Report hearing begins. Chairman Nadler gaveling in a bit late. 2:12 p.m. 1/

Nadler begins with opening statement. Said we now know the Russian government was engaging activities including hacking and influence campaign to benefit the Trump campaign and harm the Clinton campaign. Direct attack on our democratic process 2/

Although not enough evidence to charge Trump or campaign with conspiracy, did find meetings and links. Wants to call Robert Mueller to testify. Ten separate incidents Mueller identified where the president attempted to interfere with the investigation. 3/

We must follow the fact where they lead. Now identifying the four panelists who will testify today. Mentions House Rules that prevent making “inappropriate personal” comments about the president. But shouldn’t prevent discussing “serious misconduct.” 4/

Said former White House counsel Don McGahn will testify before the committee before long. We were attacked. Trump’s campaign took full advantage of the attack. The obstruction go to the heart of our legal system. 5/

Ranking member Collins. “If we were attacked. Then the priority should be to go to the battlefield of the attack.” What’s to know “how can we firm up our elections?” Complaining that this is really about the election of Trump. 6/

Collins said he doesn’t think he should hear from people who appear on television who are not part of the Mueller investigation. Also complaining about John Dean. “The 70s star of obstruction.” 7/

Collins now calls Dean “the Godfather.” Suggests Comey et al are like Dean was when he worked for Nixon 8/

Collins claims that the committee does not want to hear from Mueller. “I believe the priorities are wrong.” 9/

John Dean begins: Last time he was there was July 1974. Not here as a fact witness, but providing some perspectives. Likens Mueller Report to the Watergate Roadmap. 10/

Dean will focus on one parallel. Laid out six examples in his written statement which he called illustrative, not exhaustive. He will speak to the 6th. 11/

Dean is discussing whether the president dangled pardons before witnesses including Manafort, Cohen, and Stone. Was he seeking to keep their silence. 12/

Dean said Richard Nixon who used the pardon power in a similar way recognized that it was improper to do so. 13/

Dean recanted convos with Nixon concerning granting pardons. Nixon knew it was wrong. Nixon told him “in a very peculiar manner” in a “stage whisper.” Said “I made a mistake talking to Colson about clemency for Hunt, didn’t I?” And Dean replied, yes that was obstruction 14/

Joyce Vance is speaking now. Said she will cut to the chase. Prosecutors will only recommend indictment on obstruction if the can prove three elements: (1) obstructive act; (2) nexus with an official proceeding; (3) corrupt intent. 15/

THIS : “The facts contained in that report would be sufficient to . . .charge multiple counts of obstruction.” Not a close call. “I would have confidence that the evidence would be sufficient to obtain a guilty verdict” and stand up on appeal. 16/

Now Vance is presenting the details. EVERYONE should go back and watch her statement. It is clear and powerful. 17/

“If anyone other than the president of the United States had committed this conduct he would be under indictment for obstruction of justice.” 18/

Vance: It doesn’t take a law degree to know that in this country, no one is above the law. If you or I had committed this same conduct we would be indicted. 19/

John Malcolm is speaking. Like his written testimony, he criticizes Mueller and also claims Trump was cooperative. 20/

Malcolm says Trump was not acting corruptly because either “naked self-interest” and to protect office of the presidency. Here Malcolm suggests obstruction prohibition does not apply to President 21/

Note that Mueller wrote that law did apply to President but that the DOJ policy and Constitution prevents prosecution while in office 22/

Now is testifying. Multiple crimes of obstruction of justice.” It threatened our national security. 23/

McQuade lists specific examples. Then she focuses on Trump’s repeated pressure to get Sessions to unrecuse and to focus the interference investigation on future elections 24/

McQuade reminds us that evidence was destroyed. Also says if he’d been successful in curtailing investigation to future elections the indictments would not have been issued and our national security at risk 25/

Now questions begin. Starting with Nadler asking McQuade. Do you agree Congress has independent duty. McQuade said she would not call it a “do-over” but a separate inquiry 26/

Nadler read to language from the first page of Volume II (the obstruction part). She explains that Mueller recognized he was restricted by DOJ policy but contemplated future prosecutors etc could use this report. 27/

President is required to faithfully execute the law said McQuade 28/

Collins asked McQuade whether she and Rachel Maddow has evidence of collusion. She tried to politely remind him that Mueller (on page 1 of Volume I) said explicitly that he looked at crime of conspiracy not the broader non-legal term collusion 29/

Congresswoman from California is focused on McGahn. He told President to speak to his personal lawyer and not him about his complaints about supposed Mueller conflicts 30/

McQuade said Trump felt threatened by Mueller early in investigation because didn’t know Mueller would ultimately conclude insufficient evidence to charge conspiracy 31/

Congresswoman Lee recounts that Mueller report describes the President twice called WH counsel McGahn at home to get Rosenstein to fire Mueller 32/

When asked Vance said these facts show obstruction of justice. Further McQuade said McGahn wanted to resign 33/

THE ENTIRE REPORT IS 110 TWEETS LONG, AGAIN, HERE IS THE LINK TO THE WHOLE REPORT.

===

LINKS TO 2 MORE REPORTS BY JENNIFER TAUB:

HERE .

[RESPONDING TO TRUMP]
Sir, let’s be honest.

The Mueller investigation exposed crimes and the cover up.

Crimes: Russian hacking and disinformation campaign.

Coverup: Your obstruction of justice, including telling staff to fire Mueller. The hearings will further explore the crimes and the cover up

HERE .

===

NOW, LET’S LINK TO SEVERAL OF BILL PALMER’S REPORTS:

SOURCE .

[SAME DAY AS DAY 1 OF THE MUELLER REPORT HEARING.]

Donald Trump’s day so far:

House Republicans humiliate themselves as John Dean Slam Dunks Trump

John Dean testifying that #TrumpsWorseThanNixon

William Barr caves to Jerry Nadler

Jared Kushner foreign money scandal

– Elaine Chao financial scandal

Trump CNBC meltdown

Impeachment is coming

Trump is going to prison

TRUMP GIVES INSANE INTERVIEW ON ABC AND VOWS TO COMMIT MORE TREASON

AND

AND

AND

– It’s still only 1pm

SOURCE .

AND TODAY:

Donald Trump’s day so far:

– Hope Hicks is testifying against him

– His poll numbers nosedive

– Trump vows to accept foreign help in 2020 election

– Attacks the FBI Director

– Trump is a traitor

– Impeach the **CENSORED** now! –

Trump is going to prison

– It’s still only 8pm

SOURCE .

===

and, lastly,

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

SOURCE .

[BECAUSE THERE IS SO MUCH DETAIL THAT IS PERTINENT I AM REPORTING THIS AGAIN.]

NEXT, JUSTIN AMASH OFFERS A 4-PRONGED RATIONALE FOR IMPEACHING TRUMP:

[FOR WHOLE THING GO HERE.]

1. They say there were no underlying crimes.
In fact, there were many crimes revealed by the investigation, some of which were charged, and some of which were not but are nonetheless described in Mueller’s report.
2. They say obstruction of justice requires an underlying crime.
In fact, obstruction of justice does not require the prosecution of an underlying crime, and there is a logical reason for that. Prosecutors might not charge a crime precisely *because* obstruction of justice denied them timely access to evidence that could lead to a prosecution.
If an underlying crime were required, then prosecutors could charge obstruction of justice only if it were unsuccessful in completely obstructing the investigation. This would make no sense.
3. They imply the president should be permitted to use any means to end what he claims to be a frivolous investigation, no matter how unreasonable his claim.
In fact, the president could not have known whether every single person Mueller investigated did or did not commit any crimes.
4. They imply “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” requires charges of a statutory crime or misdemeanor.
In fact, “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined in the Constitution and does not require corresponding statutory charges. The context implies conduct that violates the public trust—and that view is echoed by the Framers of the Constitution and early American scholars.
===

Here are my principal conclusions:

1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.

2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.

3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.

4. Few members of Congress have read the report.

I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.

In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.

Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.

Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.

Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.

In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.

Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.

While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.

Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.

We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degreeson the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.

Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.

America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.

 

 

 

 

IN CLOSING:

 

CONGRESS MUST REMOVE TRUMP AND HIS ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION!
RUSSIA, WITH TRUMP KNOWING AND HELPING, COMMITTED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A. !!
TRUMP HAS THEN COMMITTED MULTIPLE CRIMES OF OBSTRUCTION, PERJURY, FRAUD, BRIBERY, AND BLACKMAILING!!

enough is ENOUGH!!!

#PRINCIPLESMATTER.

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

A LOOK AT TRUMP THROUGH THE YEARS IN PICTURES

THIS WILL BE A SIMPLE SHOWING OF JUST WHO TRUMPUTIN IS VIA PICTURES/MEMES, AND A SMATTERING OF COMMENTARY. THERE WILL ALSO BE TIME TO TIME SOME SANITY INCLUDED SO WE ALL DON’T GO MAD…LET’S ROLL…

 

THE DEBT HAS GONE UP 2-3 TRILLION $$$$ UNDER “I’LL GET RID OF THE DEBT” TRUMPUTIN

SAID JESUS- NEVER.

TRUMP HAS ALREADY BANNED BUMP STOCKS AND IS LOOKING AT MORE ANTI-2ND AMENDMENT “LAWS”!!!!

Trump says take guns first and worry about ‘due process second’ in White House gun meeting

Franklin Graham is pathetic. He threatens a civil war if Donnie is impeached!

U.S. economy slips from first to third place in global competitiveness ranking amid Trump’s tariffs

Crime After Crime

=======================

 

AS FOR ME AND THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVES AKA #NEVERTRUMPERS…

 

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

First a look at Mueller’s press conference today (Wednesday, May 29, 2019), FULL Transcript of speech, highlighted, at end will be pertinent comments.

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

Full transcript: Robert Mueller’s statement on the Russia investigation

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for being here. Two years ago, the acting attorney general asked me to serve as special counsel and he created the special counsel’s office. The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign.

Now, I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking out today because our investigation is complete. The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. And we are formally closing the special counsel’s office and as well, I’m resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life.

I’ll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office’s written work speak for itself.

Let me begin where the appointment order begins, and that is interference in the 2016 presidential election. As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who are part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system.

The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cyber-techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate. And at the same time as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election.

These indictments contain allegations and we are not commenting on the guilt or the innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The indictments allege and the other activities in our report describe efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood. And that is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office.

That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation. The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned. When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of their government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

Let me say a word about the report. The report has two parts, addressing the two main issues we were asked to investigate.

The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

And in the second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the president. The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work.

And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.

The introduction to the Volume 2 of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited.

A special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider. The department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report and I will describe two of them for you.

First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.

And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.

And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president.

We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations. The attorney general then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and to the American people. At one point in time, I requested that certain portions of the report be released and the attorney general preferred to make — preferred to make the entire report public all at once and we appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. And I certainly do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision.

Now, I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak to you in this manner. I am making that decision myself. No one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter.

There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress. Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.

In addition, access to our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office.

So, beyond what I’ve said here today and what is contained in our written work, I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress. And it’s for that reason I will not be taking questions today, as well.

Now, before I step away, I want to thank the attorneys, the FBI agents, the analysts, the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner.

These individuals who spent nearly two years with the special counsel’s office were of the highest integrity. And I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple systemic efforts to interfere in our election.

And that allegation deserves the attention of every American. Thank you. Thank you for being here today.

========================

THE MAIN TAKE-AWAYS FROM THIS:

  1. NOTICE HOW MANY TIMES AND WITH WHAT EMPHASIS MUELLER REFERRED TO HIS WRITTEN REPORT.
  2. NOTICE THAT MUELLER IS “BY THE BOOK”. BY DOJ POLICY HE WAS PROHIBITED FROM CHARGING TRUMP WITH CRIMES. PERSONALLY HE SAW EVIDENCE OF CRIMES. HE SAW IT FOOLISH TO CHARGE THE PRESIDENT IF THERE COULD/WOULD BE NO COURT RESOLUTION
  3. LASTLY, THE “MONEY LINE” IS THIS: if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.

P.S., ALSO WORTH NOTING: MUELLER IS RETIRING AND GOING BACK TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR WHICH MEANS THE DOJ/TRUMP CABAL CAN NO LONGER TELL HIM NOT TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS.

 

Memes, Russia, and Trump: Dear Republicans,  Robert Mueller is a registered Republican,  appointed as Special Counsel by a Republican  Deputy Attorney General who was nominated  by a Republican president.  Remember this when Trump says the Russia  investigation is a "witch-hunt by Democrats."

NEXT, JUSTIN AMASH OFFERS A 4-PRONGED RATIONALE FOR IMPEACHING TRUMP:

People who say there were no underlying crimes and therefore the president could not have intended to illegally obstruct the investigation—and therefore cannot be impeached—are resting their argument on several falsehoods:

1. They say there were no underlying crimes.
In fact, there were many crimes revealed by the investigation, some of which were charged, and some of which were not but are nonetheless described in Mueller’s report.
2. They say obstruction of justice requires an underlying crime.
In fact, obstruction of justice does not require the prosecution of an underlying crime, and there is a logical reason for that. Prosecutors might not charge a crime precisely *because* obstruction of justice denied them timely access to evidence that could lead to a prosecution.
If an underlying crime were required, then prosecutors could charge obstruction of justice only if it were unsuccessful in completely obstructing the investigation. This would make no sense.
3. They imply the president should be permitted to use any means to end what he claims to be a frivolous investigation, no matter how unreasonable his claim.
In fact, the president could not have known whether every single person Mueller investigated did or did not commit any crimes.
4. They imply “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” requires charges of a statutory crime or misdemeanor.
In fact, “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined in the Constitution and does not require corresponding statutory charges. The context implies conduct that violates the public trust—and that view is echoed by the Framers of the Constitution and early American scholars.
===
COURTESY PHOTO

Justin said THAT after he said THIS:

Here are my principal conclusions:

1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.

2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.

3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.

4. Few members of Congress have read the report.

I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.

In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.

Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.

Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.

Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.

In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.

Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.

While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.

Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.

We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degreeson the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justicedepending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.

Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.

America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.

===

AFTER ALL THAT JUSTIN THEN SAID THIS AS WELL:

Mueller’s report describes a consistent effort by the president to use his office to obstruct or otherwise corruptly impede the Russian election interference investigation because it put his interests at risk.

The president has an obligation not to violate the public trust, including using official powers for corrupt purposes. For instance, presidents have the authority to nominate judges, but a president couldn’t select someone to nominate because they’d promised the president money.

This principle extends to all the president’s powers, including the authority over federal investigations, federal officials, and pardons.

President Trump had an incentive to undermine the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, which included investigating contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign.

The investigation threatened to uncover information, including criminal activity, that could put Trump’s interests at risk. Ultimately, the investigation did uncover very unflattering information about the president, his family, his associates, his campaign, and his business.

It also revealed criminal activities, some of which were committed by people in Trump’s orbit and, in the case of Michael Cohen’s campaign finance violation, on Trump’s behalf.

The investigation began before the president was elected and inaugurated. After Trump assumed the powers of the presidency, Mueller’s report shows that he used those powers to try to obstruct and impede the investigation.

Some excuse Trump’s conduct based on allegations of issues with the investigation, but no one disputes the appropriateness of investigating election interference, which included investigating contacts between the Trump campaign and people connected to the Russian government.

Some examples in Mueller’s report of the president’s obstructing and impeding the investigation include:

1. Trump asked the FBI director to stop investigating Michael Flynn, who had been his campaign adviser and national security adviser, and who had already committed a crime by lying to the FBI.

2. After AG Sessions recused himself from the Russian investigation on the advice of DoJ ethics lawyers, Trump directly asked Sessions to reverse his recusal so that he could retain control over the investigation and help the president.

3. Trump directed the White House counsel, Don McGahn, to have Special Counsel Mueller removed on the basis of pretextual conflicts of interest that Trump’s advisers had already told him were “ridiculous” and could not justify removing the special counsel.

4. When that event was publicly reported, Trump asked that McGahn make a public statement and create a false internal record stating that Trump had not asked him to fire the special counsel, and suggested that McGahn would be fired if he did not comply.

5. Trump asked Corey Lewandowski, his former campaign manager, to tell AG Sessions to limit the special counsel’s investigation only to future election interference. Trump said Lewandowski should tell Sessions he was fired if he would not meet with him.

6. Trump used his pardon power to influence his associates, including Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen, not to fully cooperate with the investigation.

Trump, through his own statements—such as complaining about people who “flip” and talk to investigatorsand through communications between his personal counsel and Manafort/Cohen, gave the impression that they would be pardoned if they did not fully cooperate with investigators.

Manafort ultimately breached an agreement to cooperate with investigators, and Cohen offered false testimony to Congress, including denying that the Trump Tower Moscow project had extended to June 2016 and that he and Trump had discussed traveling to Russia during the campaign.

Both men have been convicted for offering false information, and Manafort’s lack of cooperation left open some significant questions, such as why exactly he provided an associate in Ukraine with campaign polling data, which he expected to be shared with a Russian oligarch.

Some of the president’s actions were inherently corrupt. Other actions were corrupt—and therefore impeachable—because the president took them to serve his own interests.

The president has authority to fire federal officials, direct his subordinates, and grant pardons, but he cannot do so for corrupt purposes; otherwise, he would always be allowed to shut down any investigation into himself or his associates, which would put him above the law.

===

LASTLY, FROM JUSTIN AMASH, REPUBLICAN CONGRESMAN, THIS:

Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented key aspects of Mueller’s report and decisions in the investigation, which has helped further the president’s false narrative about the investigation.

After receiving Mueller’s report, Barr wrote and released a letter on March 24 describing Barr’s own decision not to indict the president for obstruction of justice. That letter selectively quotes and summarizes points in Mueller’s report in misleading ways.

Mueller’s report says he chose not to decide whether Trump broke the law because there’s an official DoJ opinion that indicting a sitting president is unconstitutional, and because of concerns about impacting the president’s ability to govern and pre-empting possible impeachment.

Barr’s letter doesn’t mention those issues when explaining why Mueller chose not to make a prosecutorial decision. He instead selectively quotes Mueller in a way that makes it sound—falsely—as if Mueller’s decision stemmed from legal/factual issues specific to Trump’s actions.

But, in fact, Mueller finds considerable evidence that several of Trump’s actions detailed in the report meet the elements of obstruction, and Mueller’s constitutional and prudential issues with indicting a sitting president would preclude indictment regardless of what he found.

In noting why Barr thought the president’s intent in impeding the investigation was insufficient to establish obstruction, Barr selectively quotes Mueller to make it sound as if his analysis was much closer to Barr’s analysis than it actually was:

Barr quotes Mueller saying the evidence didn’t establish that Trump was personally involved in crimes related to Russian election interference, and Barr then claims that Mueller found that fact relevant to whether the president had the intent to obstruct justice.

But Mueller’s quote is taken from a section in which he describes other improper motives Trump could have had and notes: “The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong.” None of that is in Barr’s letter.

As a result of Barr’s March 24 letter, the public and Congress were misled. Mueller himself notes this in a March 27 letter to Barr, saying that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions.”

Mueller: “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

To “alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen,” Mueller urged the release of the report’s introductions and executive summaries, which he had told Barr “accurately summarize [Mueller’s] Office’s work and conclusions.”

Barr declined; he allowed the confusion to fester and only released the materials three weeks later with the full redacted report. In the interim, Barr testified before a House committee and was misleading about his knowledge of Mueller’s concerns:

Barr was asked about reports “that members of [Mueller’s] team are frustrated…with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately necessarily portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?”

Barr absurdly replied: “No, I don’t…I suspect that they probably wanted more put out.” Yet Mueller had directly raised those concerns to Barr, and Barr says he “suspect[s]” they “probably” wanted more materials put out, as if Mueller hadn’t directly told him that.

In subsequent statements and testimony, Barr used further misrepresentations to help build the president’s false narrative that the investigation was unjustified.

Barr notes that Mueller did not “find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.” He then declares that Mueller found “no collusion” and implies falsely that the investigation was baseless.

But whether there’s enough evidence for a conviction of a specific crime which Mueller thought was appropriate to charge is a different and much higher standard than whether the people whom Mueller investigated had done anything worthy of investigation.

In truth, Mueller’s report describes concerning contacts between members of Trump’s campaign and people in or connected to the Russian government.

For instance, Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner took a meeting with a Russian lawyer whom Trump Jr. had been told worked for the Russian government and would provide documents to “incriminate Hillary,” as part of the Russian government’s “support for Mr. Trump.”

It’s wrong to suggest that the fact that Mueller did not choose to indict anyone for this means there wasn’t a basis to investigate whether it amounted to a crime or “collusion,” or whether it was in fact part of Russia’s efforts to help Trump’s candidacy.

Barr says the White House “fully cooperated” with the investigation and that Mueller “never sought” or “pushed” to get more from the president, but the report says Mueller unsuccessfully sought an interview with the president for over a year.

The report says the president’s counsel was told that interviewing him was “vital” to Mueller’s investigation and that it would be in the interest of the public and the presidency. Still Trump refused.

The president instead gave written answers to questions submitted by the special counsel. Those answers are often incomplete or unresponsive. Mueller found them “inadequate” and again sought to interview the president.

Ultimately, the special counsel “recogniz[ed] that the President would not be interviewed voluntarily” and chose not to subpoena him because of concerns that the resulting “potentially lengthy constitutional litigation” would delay completion of the investigation.

Barr has so far successfully used his position to sell the president’s false narrative to the American people. This will continue if those who have read the report do not start pushing back on his misrepresentations and share the truth.

==============

Thank The Lord Jesus Christ for Justin Amash who act on courage, honesty, and integrity.

====================

Here Are the Other Investigations President Trump Still Faces

SOURCE .

Ongoing Investigations

Roger Stone criminal trial

Roger Stone throws up peace signs outside court on Jan. 25, 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

 

The hush money investigation

Trump’s inauguration funding

President Trump gives his Inaugural Address during the 58th U.S. Presidential Inauguration where he was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States of America in Washington, USA on Jan. 20, 2017.

 

Pro-Trump super PAC

Trump Organization insurance policies

Trump Organization real estate deals

The Trump Foundation

Trump’s taxes

Trump’s golf club employing undocumented immigrants

Lawsuits

The emoluments lawsuit

Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. is seen on Nov. 12, 2018.

Michael Cohen’s legal fees

Summer Zervos defamation suit

Congress

House Intelligence Committee

House Intelligence ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., participates in the House Democrats' news conference on President Trump and Russia ties on Wednesday, May 17, 2017.

 

House Judiciary Committee

House Oversight Committee

House Financial Services

House Ways and Means Committee

House Foreign Affairs Committee

Senate Intelligence

The Senate Intelligence Committee started investigating Russia’s election interference in 2017. Unlike its House counterpart, it issued a report in the summer of 2018 concluding that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election to try to help Trump.

THERE ARE MANY LINKS AND MUCH DETAIL TO THE ABOVE REPORT HERE .

=======================

All told there are a total of 19 different investigations into TrumPutin & Co. .

19!

Does THAT sound like an innocent, honest man to you??

  -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

DICHOTOMY DISCOURSES: PART 2.

HOLINESS V. LOVE?

Image result for Jesus: If you love me keep my commandments

In the world AND church today exist these “Toxic Tenets”:

  1. Love never judges.
  2. Love accepts everybody just as they are.
  3. Holiness is legalism and “judg-a-mental”.
  4. All views/any faith is as good as another; “just believe”.
  5. There are NO absolutes.
  6. To say someone or something is wrong is hate-speech and divisive.
  7. We all need to unite together and lay aside any and all differences.
  8. The only thing that matters is if you believe.

Let’s first look at these HONESTLY from The Word of God, The Holy Bible, and using good, old-fashioned commonsense examine these.

[Note: when reading, quoting, and using God’s Word in ANY manner the MOST IMPORTANT thing right along with prayer IS Context. Keep the verse in the CONTEXT of the chapter. Keep the chapter in CONTEXT with the Book. Keep the book in CONTEXT with THE ENTIRE WORD OF GOD.

  1. “Love never judges”?? Really? Let’s first look at this just using basic commonsense. You love your ONLY child. Your ONLY child wants to put their puppy in the oven with mom’s meat loaf. You LOVE your child. Do you let YOUR child cook the little puppy? If yes, then we’re done right here. If NO, why? Why wont you let YOUR ONLY child put their puppy in the oven? Because commonsense says IT’S WRONG. That was a HUMAN example, let’s look at a Divine example: God loves ALL humanity, even those who of their own free will choose to hate HIM, mock HIM, scorn HIM, and rebel and disobey HIM. God’s loves ALL of humanity so much much that even if they CHOOSE to get IN “the oven”/go to Hell God will honor their choice. God will NOT force even ONE person to go to Heaven. The relationship MUST BE of 100%, pure, and true LOVE from us to HIM or God in HIS love WILL let us get what WE choose. God warns us. Our choices, actions have consequences and results. We may NOT like the consequences or results of OUR CHOICES, BUT God let’s us choose. God instructs us REPEATEDLY to chose wisely. To seek and follow HIM. God daily warns of the evil that WILL befall OUR bad choices…and when one’s bad choices then lead to The Great White Throne judgement, God will then give each who freely chose to reject HIM, or come to HIM some “other way”,  The God who IS LOVE will let them have the eternal results, consequences of their choice: Hell/The Lake of Fire. God IS Love. And Love will be the very thing in God’s broken and weeping heart when HE gives you the sentence of judgment YOU CHOSE.
  2. “Love accepts everybody as they are”?? Really? That is love?  Using the human commonsense approach: A student who is nice, sweet, kind, loving, gentle, BUT their grades all through school were BARELY passing: should THAT student be ACCEPTED into Medical school to become a doctor when their entire life shows they are NOT qualified to do so? Commonsense screams NO. And that IS the CORRECT response. Now the Divine view. God does love us enough to accept each and all of as we are. BUT that is ONLY part of it. What kind of love would leave a person with a broken-heart, wounded spirit, twisted mind IN THAT condition? No. While God accepts us as we are God does NOT leave us as we are, God works to change us, to make us more like HIS only begotten Son, The Lord Jesus Christ. Only a Monster of hate would accept someone who needs help and then NOT ever help them.
  3. “Holiness is legalism and “judg-a-mental”.” Really? So, NO rules, ANYTHING goes? The Commonsense approach: FIRST, NO Rules, NO Right and Wrong. Let’s see how that works in accounting. You have $28,000 in checking. You spend $10. You NOW have -$33,000. Is THAT ok with you? Let’s look at construction. You spend 47 million $$$ on a mansion. The Foreman and crew use the cheapest building supplies, don’t measure anything correctly, slop YOUR mansion together, lather paint all over it to make it “look good”. Is THAT ok with you? After x-rays, MRI, and CAT-scans the Surgeon sees a lot of cancer, all treatable, even removable with surgery. BUT he says you have IBS and gives Zantac. Is THAT ok with you? A college Calculus Professor allows students to use whatever means to arrive at whatever answer…regardless of how bizarre and wrong it is, and gives them a passing grade. Is THAT ok with you? No. No it isn’t. And it shouldn’t be ok with anyone. Regardless of intentions and opinions REALITY will not and does not bend to whim and fancy. 2+2 can NOT both equal 4, and 7, and 21. 2+2=4. PERIOD. Regardless of opinion, intentions, or fads. 2+2=4. The Divine approach: God IS Love. AND God IS HOLY. God HATES ALL sin, wickedness, evil, iniquity, unrighteousness…HATES ALL SIN. God LOVES the sinner. HATES the sin. God set the standard. God and His Word ARE The Standard. And NOT ONE PERSON has ever met God’s Standard. THAT is very BAD news. The Good news? God provided THE Way.
  4. “All views/any faith is as good as another; “just believe”.”? The Commonsense approach: you can NOT hop in your car, leave KC, and head WEST to go to Cleveland. You will NOT make it there. NEVER. The Divine approach: NOT all paths lead to Heaven. NOT all views/faiths are “just as good” as Christianity. And “just believing” is NOT enough. I can believe I can fly… So I jump of the ledge of The Grand Canyon. Will I fly? No. There IS gravity. And two opposing views can NOT both be equally true. 
  5. “There are NO absolutes”? Already answered above…BUT… think of this: The statement itself “There are NO absolutes” IS itself an ABSOLUTE statement! Regardless of what opinion may be: fire IS hot; water IS wet. Bad IS wrong. Good IS right. PERIOD.
  6. “To say someone or something is wrong is hate-speech and divisive”? What? Really? Commonsense approach: A teacher drenches his classroom with kerosene. Gets a road flare. Tells the class that as he ignites the road flare they will all be safe. NO fire to be concerned about. Is THAT ok with you?? NO. that is WRONG. The “Professor” IS WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. DEADLY WRONG. Truth IS Truth. Regardless of whose feelings it hurts, regardless of what fad or opinion it shatters…TRUTH IS TRUTH. The Divine approach: To say sin is still sin, aka wrong, is NOT hate-speech. To say adultery, fornication, incest, sodomy (homosexuality, lesbianism), bestiality, rape, murder, theft, lying, gossip…is wrong is NOT “hate”. It IS TRUTH.   
  7. “We all need to unite together and lay aside any and all differences.”?? Sounds good. The “COEXIST” folks are big on this…but does it work? Has it ever? The Commonsense approach: A leader says a group of people are inferior humans, a sub-race. He convinces the nation to this view. They begin to persecute, harass, arrest, and to kill all of said group. Another group says “Well, it doesn’t affect me, so I’m staying out of it.” BUT later the leader and his cult following turn their attentions to you. You cry out for help. But the nearest group to you says it isn’t their business, and stays out of it. Another group thinks ALL these groups are “infidels” and must be either enslaved or exterminated…HOW does one get THESE diverse groups to unite? Now, let’s look at a less violent approach via The Divine approach: One group says the ONLY way to escape Hell and get to Heaven is via doing lots of good works, lots of giving to the church/charity, and abiding by all the rituals and dogma. Another group says the ONLY way to avoid Hell and go to Heaven is take oaths of celibacy and poverty and do charitable work. Another group says the ONLY way to avoid Hell and go to Heaven is to Master esoteric and mystical knowledge. And Christians say the ONLY way to escape Hell and go to Heaven is to accept the free offer of God’s grace, and put your faith/trust completely in Jesus Christ, and follow HIM. HOW does one get these diverse groups to unify? Remember: Two opposing views can NOT BOTH be equally right. The ONLY way to get ALL groups this diverse to unite is to get them ALL to forsake any and all views that are DIFFERENT from another group and ALL believe “the same thing”…BUT WHO decides what “the same thing” IS? HOW will this person/group calling for unity ensure, and when need be, enforce this desired unity?? Is a world of cookie-cutter people with homogenized views a world worth living in?? OR…are some things still Right because they simply ARE right, and some things wrong because they simply ARE wrong??
  8. “The only thing that matters is if you believe.”? Wow…is this really true? Marx BELIEVED all property owners, manufacturers, and business owners were evil. Hitler BELIEVED the Jews were a sub-race of inferior people. Stalin BELIEVED ONLY The State was right. Charles Manson BELIEVED that killing certain people and causing a race war would usher in the Apocalypse, and that he and his “family” would rule the world. Jeffery Dahmer BELIEVED that sodomy, rape, murder, and cannibalism were good. Is “belief” really enough? Is merely placing trust in “something/someone” all that’s necessary? OR do we have to BELIEVE The Truth, aka what is Right? Yes. The bottom line to all 8 points is: THE TRUTH. Seek The Truth. Find The Truth. Believe The Truth. Accept The Truth. LIVE THE TRUTH. 

SO…WHAT IS THE TRUTH???

  1. JESUS IS THE TRUTH.
  2. GOD’S WORD/THE BIBLE IS THE TRUTH.
  3. JESUS IS THE WORD OF GOD MADE FLESH.

Lies are complicated. Since the are deviations, or substitutes for the truth they need to “sound/seem right” while being completely wrong. When a lie is exposed then more lies are used to cover for or divert attention away from the exposed lie. Lies are complicated and become complex because they are twisted, distorted, and corrupted takes on the actual Truth. Lies are “What If”.

Truth is simple. Truth IS What IS. God IS Love. God IS Holy. Fire IS hot. Water IS wet.

Bank tellers and  bankers to tell the DIFFERENCE betwixt The REAL and The Counterfeit do NOT study The Counterfeit. No. They study THE REAL. They study THE REAL inside and out, frontwards and back, up and down…until THEY KNOW THE REAL 100%! So when ANYTHING comes along that is NOT THE REAL they know. 

Christians, Soldiers of The Cross, WE NEED to KNOW THE TRUTH so well, so thoroughly, so completely, that ANYTHING THAT IS NOT THE TRUTH..WE RECOGNISE AS THE LIE IT IS. 

And…just a heads up:

Rat poison is 98% GOOD FOOD.

ONLY 2% poison.

Only a little error, a little lie, a little false doctrine can kill.

Truth is NOT hate.

Holiness is NOT hate.

Love is NOT licentious.

Love is NOT lewd NOR lust.

Love IS Holy. Holiness acts in, on, out of Love.

John 14:15 King James Version (KJV)

The Lord Jesus Christ said:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

DISTRACTION.

THE MAIN THING

Trump. Putin. Russia. Oligarchs. Exxon/Oil. Tillerson. Bannon. Manafort. Cohen. Flynn. N. Korea. China. Iran. Saudi Arabia. Iraq. Mueller. Barr. Sessions. McConnell. Lindasy Graham. Fox “News”. The Rise of Nationalism. White Nationalism. New (FAUX) “Conservatism”. Liberalism. Democrat(s). Progressivism…

The news comes hard and fast. It’s a blur. A LOT of busy-ness, noise…DISTRATION(S). BUT….distractions from…WHAT?

Just The Facts…

Back at America’s founding 98% were Protestant Christian, 1% was Catholic, the other 1% was Jewish or “other”. Of the 55 delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, 49 were Protestant/Christian, 2 were Catholics, 28 of the 55 delegates were Seminary trained and educated ministers, though not all went on into the ministry. 75-80% were active in their local church.

Even today 80% believe in God (not all based on a Biblical understanding). Of that 80% that do believe in God 70-78% still claim to be Christian, but only 37-44% are active on a regular basis in their local church, with only 25% of homes claiming to be “Spiritually Vibrant Christian Homes”.

Where The Rubber Hits The Road…

The more we were focused/united as a Nation upon our (once shared) Christian faith the more we were able to fight through distractions, and focus on defeating our enemy(ies) or achieving a goal. The more fractured we have become, the more we depart from The Lord God and The Christian faith, the more we succumb to our worst impulses, are incapable of defeating our enemy(ies), and see wide spread increase in crime, corruption, and depravity.

Psalm 12:8 King James Version (KJV)

The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

and

Proverbs 14:34 King James Version (KJV)

34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

This can, has been, and will be argued against because of it’s clear and overt Christian and Biblical view. BUT…facts are stubborn things…

Image result for facts are stubborn things

The MAIN Fact.

God is NOT to be trifled with, nor mocked.

IF America now thinks “we don’t need God” then we will, and are in the very process of learning the same “lesson” that Israel had to learn.

A CLOSER LOOK AT TWO THINGS.

“THING ONE”: Distractions.

America has had a Boom in Distractions since 1913. America foolishly elected her first Globalist and Socialist President, who was also a raging racist, Woodrow Wilson. America had her share of ups and downs. Twice fighting THE world power, and winning (England), fighting to end slavery, the settling of a vast continent, and the keeping foreign powers out of our affairs and off our land…then distractions. Wilson embroiled us in WWI. What was the threat to America? to American interests? Yes, we had treaties. We had allies. BUT America’s Founders to a man warned AGAINST entangling treaties that would ensnare us into endless and needless wars. Wilson’s embroiling us in WWI was a distraction from HIS instituting the Federal Reserve Bank, The IRS, and The Income Tax…ALL which utterly violate and trample our Constitution/Bill of Rights, particularly Article 1, Sections 8 & 9, and the Amendments 9, 10, & 11.

From 1913 onward we have moved FROM a Constitutional Republic that honored God and Christianity, TOWARD ever encroaching Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism, Tyranny, Chaos, and utter collapse. Distractions that took place that turned our national focus away from our national decline were:

THE KOREAN WAR

THE COLD WAR

THE VIETNAM WAR

THE FIRST GULF WAR

THE RISE OF ENTERTAINMENT TO MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR A MOVIE EVENT (FROM SUPER BOWL, TO THE ROAD TO THE FINAL FOUR, TO THE WORLD SERIES, TO THE MCU…)

WATERGATE

CLINTON/LEWINSKI/BOSNIA

NOW, TRUMP-PUTINGATE

N. KOREA

IRAN

CHINA

RUSSIA

SAUDI ARABIA

GLOBAL UNREST AND ECONOMIC TURMOIL

IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN…

For each of the above there are scores more distractions taking place. Each nation having their own issues/distractions. Each one is important, big, even calamitous…BUT there ARE are things going on that these distract us from, that so embroil our attention that we are not seeing what IS “The Main Thing” anymore.

Before moving on to WHAT it is that we are being distracted from let me post some links that highlight the rapid fire pace of these distractions.

 

One of the most infuriating Trump rationalization cycles is…

1) “We don’t know that this allegation is really true because it hasn’t been fully proven and he denies it.”

2) It gets proven.

3) “This is irrelevant because it’s old news that everyone already knew about.”

Donald Trump lost more money than any American.

Jerry Falwell Jr. has dick picks floating out there.

Jacob Wohl created a protest against Jacob Wohl.

The Attorney General, Treasury Secretary and former White House counsel openly breaking the law.

America is so f*cking stupid.

=========================

Donald Trump’s day so far –

New York Times has a decade of Trump’s tax returns –

There goes the neighborhood –

Michael Cohen sells out Jerry Falwell Jr –

Chris Wray sells out William Barr –

Impeachment is coming –

Trump is going to prison –

It’s still only 7:15pm

=============

“THING TWO”: The MAIN Thing

 

BUT WHAT ARE THEY DISTRACTING FROM???

FIRST-

Psalm 24:1 King James Version (KJV)

24 The earth is the Lord‘s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein.

 The Lord God created ALL.

Mankind was created for fellowship, relationship with Elohim, The Lord God.

Since Eden The closer we are TO God the better things go. In short, draw closer TO God and He WILL draw closer to you.

The reverse is also true, the further FROM The Lord God the worse things will get.

Simply put: WE GET WHAT WE CHOOSE.

And mankind has choose…poorly.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAN THE CHATTER. DO SOMETHING ALREADY!

Image result for less talk more doing quotes

THE TIME FOR TALKING ABOUT DOING SOMETHING IS OVER.

TALKING IS NOT DOING.

PLANNING IS NOT DOING.

WISHING, FRETTING, COMPLAINING, HAND WRINGING IS NOT DOING.

ONLY DOING IS DOING!

TIME TO START DOING- NOW!

For the bribed, bullied, blackmailed, or brain dead people who still think Trump & Co. are innocent…let me SHRED THAT TO PIECES…as I offer reasons to 

IMPEACH AND IMPRISON TRUMP & CO. NOW…

Let me start…first up a fellow Patriot on twitter:

Profile picture

 

SOURCE .

All right. I just finished the Mueller Report. I’m going to combine the most shocking and important revelations in one thread. Long and short: there was collusion, there was obstruction, Donald Trump needs to be removed from office. Immediately. 1/
Mueller found that Russia was actively interested in electing Trump president, as early as his announcement, if not earlier. Operations began just as Trump Campaign took off. Obvious the two are parallel organizations that occasionally worked together, had the same goals.
 2/
Multiple members of the Trump Campaign were approached by Russia. They were receptive sometimes, other times they just proceeded with knowledge that Russia was interfering on their behalf. They were not ignorant of the fact that Russia was interfering, not at all.
3/
Trump and Cohen continued work on Trump Tower Moscow deal while actively misleading the public as to whether he had business in Russia. He knowingly lied to the American public while Cohen worked with people who seemingly thought the hotel and the election were intertwined.
4/
Perhaps the most critical piece of information is that the Trump Campaign knew that the DNC emails were going to be released before they were. They had an active, multi-pronged plan in place to capitalize off the communications stolen by the Russian government. 
5/
Mueller found that Donald Trump, himself, knew that Wikileaks had the DNC emails before they were released and was in contact with campaign members and people outside of campaign and planned how to capitalize off their release. 
6/
Trump’s call for Russia to find Clinton’s emails was fruitful. Within hours they followed his call and worked to find them. Despite saying it was just a TV stunt, he repeated the call off-camera. It was collusion in real time and in the light of public. No other way to say it 
7/
As for the Trump Tower meeting, Mueller believed that Donald Trump Jr and Jared Kushner committed crimes, but worried that courts would lose the thread on legal definition of the crime and wasn’t sure what the $ value of Clinton dirt was and if it was enough.
8/
Paul Manafort was especially lousy in the collusion front. He obviously had financial incentive and discussed battleground states with Russian individual, including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, leading to suspicion that there were targeted efforts or interference.
9/
Manafort discussing battleground states with Russia is really, really unsettling. There’s a ton of new ground here to cover and who knows what it led to and what can be proven. You could make an argument that this is possible what turned the election.
10/
In terms of obstruction, it is quite obvious that Mueller was communicating that there were SEVERAL instances of obstruction, SEVERAL instances of attempted obstruction, and that Congress should address the issue. 
11/
Trump actively wanted Mueller out of the investigation, said as much repeatedly. He wanted to fire him and worried that his appointment would be “the end” of his presidency.
12/
Trump repeatedly told his subordinates to obstruct justice. He had them contact the principals, including Comey and Flynn, in order to take their temperature and communicate what Trump thought. It was a giant game of illegal telephone. 
13/
Trump repeatedly would call Comey, take his temperature, and try and get him to take it easy on Flynn. He had Reince Priebus contact Flynn, take his temperature, seemingly try and work him in order to keep his loyalty.
14/
Multiple people in Trump’s orbit declined to perform actions they thought were obstruction, including Chris Christie, who counseled Trump on how to not obstruct justice and watched him do it anyway. 
15/
After it was revealed that Mike Flynn had illicit contact with Russia, Trump shook his hand and told him he’d be taken care of. It seems as if the exchange was a promise that Trump would help him with the fallout.
16/
Trump continually and actively addressed those in his orbit to either lie or coverup what they’d done wrong. He was constantly worried people would roll on him and constantly sought to get their stories straight in case of investigation. 
17/
In a bizarre situation, Trump said outloud that he wanted an Attorney General who would protect him. He said he believed the AG position wasn’t independent. He wanted an individual who would “protect him” and wouldn’t mind keeping him illegal informed of investigations [MY NOTE: So he installed Barr to do just that.]
18/
Trump knew that false testimony had been provided, particularly in Cohen’s case. He was aware of a crime being committed and allowed it.
19/
Trump wanted to obstruct even more than he did, but the only thing keeping him from doing so was that those around him didn’t want to be accessories to a crime. Don McGahn said he wanted him to do “crazy sh*t” and refused. 
20/
Now, the big, big, big takeaways. Mueller wrote this report in such a way as to send a message that the investigation was not the end all be all of this matter. It’s obvious he was keenly aware that there was still much work to do in regards to both collusion and obstruction
21/
In collusion, Mueller repeatedly mentions that he was hindered by the Trump team either lying or else not providing information. He said they destroyed evidence and stonewalled him. That’s why he couldn’t establish the charge in totality. 
22/
In terms of obstruction, Mueller was clearly putting the matter in the hands of Congress. This is a full and explicit layout of impeachable, high crimes. He was not intending Barr to steamroll over this thing. Not at all. 
23/
What’s more, Barr not only lied, it appears he actively obstructed justice by misrepresenting the report in his summary. This wasn’t just a partisan structuring, it was an attempt to try and save Donald Trump and the administration. 
24/
What William Barr did here is beyond disgusting and beyond shameful. He should be removed from office and there should be ramifications. This is, to put it bluntly, a massive and indefensible act of cover-up a systematic and overwhelming crime. 
25/
The Trump Campaign and the Trump Organization are criminal enterprises. The only difference between them and the infamous “mob” is that their crimes are explicitly white collar and international in nature. They acted with an intention to commit crimes, over and over. 
26/
It’s impossible to read this report and not notice how careful they were to skirt the line of collusion and obstruction. They were obviously aware of what they were doing and that this is even a matter of discussion is an indictment of our political and judicial system. 
27/
This last thing, I want to preface by saying I don’t say this lightly. It makes me unbelievably sad and depressed that this has happened. But we have a criminal president and he must be removed. It has to happen. 
28/
From the moment Donald Trump announced his campaign he engaged in one unethical and criminal act after another. It’s in black and white that he and the people around him are happy traitors who put their wealth and power above the country’s wellbeing. 
29/
Trump and his cronies made a decision to put power and wealth above the country. They actively sought help in undermining our democratic process. They didn’t report constant Russian contacts or offers to help. They’re traitors. That’s it. They’re traitors. 
30/
We can sit here and parse out legal definitions, but I don’t know how you get to anything else. We can talk about the word collusion or obstruction, but they actively sought help from a foreign adversary to interfere in the election of the Presidency of the United States. 
31/
The House of Representatives must vote to impeach Donald Trump. I don’t care if it won’t carry out in the Senate. It’s what impeachment exists to do. It’s their constitutional obligation to impeach him for high crimes. 
32/
Republicans have a duty to remove Donald Trump from office. They can hide behind partisanship all they want, but it’s right here in the open that he’s betrayed the company and broken the laws. They need to realize that duty is higher than party. And it needs to happen now. 
33/
We are in a crisis. We have to recognize that. Right now, we have a criminally compromised president. If he’s allowed to get through this unscathed, we’re never, ever going back. This is a four-alarm fire and we have to treat it as such. 
Right. Now. 
34/
There’s no defending this. There’s no spinning it. There’s no rebuttal that can put this away. This is a massive and unbelievable crime on a scale before unseen. We need to get rid of the Trump Presidency before it destroys us, before it rots us from the inside out. 
35/

I take literally no pleasure from this. I’m extremely, extremely disheartened that a crime like this could take place on a scale this large. I really, really wish this would’ve been a hoax or a witch hunt, but it’s massive in scope and consequence. Trump has to go. 36/36

 

 

 

ANOTHER SOURCE OF TROUBLING FACTS AND EVIDENCE:

TWITTER PATRIOT TIM DICKINSON:

SOURCE .

Mueller Report: This is the final word on Trump/Russia Butina Sentencing Memo: Hold my beer… SOURCE .

Government Memo: Maria Butina Claimed Influence Over Trump Cabinet Pick

Feds seek 18-month prison term for Russian “access agent” who infiltrated the NRA

On, Maria Butina, leader of a pro-gun organization in Russia, speaks to a crowd during a rally in support of legalizing the possession of handguns in Moscow, Russia. Butina, a 29-year-old gun-rights activist, served as a covert Russian agent while living in Washington, gathering intelligence on American officials and political organizations and working to establish back-channel lines of communications for the Kremlin, federal prosecutors charged Monday, July 16, 2018Trump Russia Probe, Moscow, Russian Federation - 21 Apr 2013MARIIA

[EXCERPT.]

In the case of Maria Butina — the Russian national who pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges for attempting to create a backchannel between Moscow and the Trump administration using the NRA as a conduit — the U.S. government is asking for a prison sentence of 18 months, followed by Butina’s immediate deportation.

The government’s sentencing memo, filed Friday in federal court, offers striking details to support the claim that Butina was not just a naive and ambitious student looking to build up a professional network in Washington, D.C.

=======

 

Image result for less talk more doing quotes

TIM DICKINSON CONTINUED…

Butina “provided the Russian Official with the name of an individual she claimed was being considered for secretary of state” on November 11th, 2016.

“She asked the Russian Official to seek the input of the Russian government on the name she provided and told him, ‘our opinion will be taken into consideration’ in the United States.’”

Former FBI Counterintelligence Officer: “Butina provided the Russian Federation with information that skilled intelligence officers can exploit for years, and that may cause significant damage to the United States.”

For anyone interested in modern spycraft, the declaration by the former FBI counterintel official offers fascinating insight. “A spot-and-assess operation does not require secret encryption, dead drops or any other trappings of a Hollywood spy story.”

 

Image result for less talk more doing quotes

 

ONE MORE TWITTER PATRIOT, BILL PALMER, AND THEN CLOSE WITH LINKS TO ARTICLES THAT DETAIL THIS CRIME FAMILY OPERATING GOING BACK TO THE 1980’S!

 

The impeachment of Donald Trump by the numbers

[EXCERPTS.]

The three most prominent House committee chairs are now talking openly about the possibility of impeaching Donald Trump, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi is doing nothing to publicly push back against the sentiment. This means we’re facing a very realistic scenario in which House Democrats go ahead and impeach him. But what would that look like? It’s all about the numbers.

We all know that as of this moment there are enough votes in the House to impeach Donald Trump, but not enough votes in the Senate to remove him – but those aren’t the numbers I’m interested in. Instead I’m focused on the numbers that dictate everything in any given presidency: approval ratings. As of today, Trump’s approval rating is at around forty percent when you average the polls together. That’s not even close to being high enough to get reelected. If his approval rating holds steady heading into 2020, he’ll get blown out.

So what does this have to do with impeachment? Everything. Let’s say the Democrats impeach Trump, and in the process of exposing his crimes during nationally televised impeachment hearings, they manage to drive his approval rating even lower than it is now. There is a point at which a chunk of Senate Republicans would selfishly vote to oust Trump, if he became so unpopular, they began to worry about their own prospects for reelection. So if impeachment went exactly the way Democrats might hope, they could actually get rid of Trump before 2020, leaving the GOP in a total panic trying to pick a candidate…

==================

NOW, IN CLOSING, LINKS THAT FOLLOW THE TRAIL:

K.S.N. :VIRAL NEWS DUMP

The Dark Secrets Of The Trump-Putin Ties

 

“Where-the-Rubber-Meets-the-Road” Truth About DT’s ties to Putin and Russian Mob

 

REMARKABLE TREASON

 

More Fun And Treason With Trump And Putin

EACH OF THOSE LINKS IN THEMSELVES HAS A PLETHORA, TREASURE TROVE OF MORE LINKS TO MORE EVIDENCE AND FACTS.

I WILL BE CLEAR:

TRUMP & CO. ARE GUILTY. PUNISH THEM TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW…NOW!

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.