If You Haven’t Seen the REAL Trump Yet It’s Because You DON’T WANT To

The shrinking number of Trump supporters* need to STOP. Just STOP. And take the time to REALLY THINK. Slow down to a crawl…AND THINK.

  1. What about THE DIRECT RESULTS of Trump’s actions do you support?
  2. What exactly about THE DIRECT RESULTS of Trump’s Supreme Court picks ACTUALLY panned out to be the Conservatives and Constitutionalist he/they said they were?
  3. What about Trump’s HAND-PICKED Cabinet and Administrative picks says to you that they are ACTUALLY honest, Conservative, Constitutional, Patriotic, Rule of Law, moral picks?
  4. What about Trump’s VERY OWN words, deeds, Tweets, behaviour, and life lead you to HONESTLY believe that Trump is REALLY a Christian, moral man, Honest, a man of Integrity, a Constitutionalist, and a REAL Patriot?

*Trump has 70% of GOP support…BUT those claiming to BE GOP are much fewer.

Forget all the spin from the WH. Ignore the spin from Fox, Breitbart, The Daily Caller, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham et al…what in REALITY is there about Trump that is truly/really: good, moral, honest, Conservative, Constitutional, Patriotic, and normal? Be honest. IGNORE all the spin from ALL your favorite spinsters. What about Trump THE PERSON- who he REALLY is- do you like?

While you’re thinking let me go over the above 4 “bullet points” again. This time with Real World answer.

  1. What about THE DIRECT RESULTS of Trump’s actions do you support? Tariffs? They have raised TAXES ON US! Farmers, the auto industry, and every retailer is getting hit HARD, many declaring and/or close to declaring bankruptcy because of Trump’s Foolish, aka Marxist, Tariff wars. His “tax cut” was so worded, and targeted as to ONLY “help” a miniscule  minority, namely they benefited Trump and a few, select supporters. Trump’s rash, brazen, illegal, and unconstitutional Tweets and exchanges with the media (whom Trump calls “The Enemy of The State”!!) all enrage and endanger our Allies, and aid and abet our enemies. BE HONEST…ask yourself: If this was Obama, Hillary, or any Democrat would you STILL give them a pass??
  2.  What exactly about THE DIRECT RESULTS of Trump’s Supreme Court picks ACTUALLY panned out to be the Conservatives and Constitutionalist he/they said they were? Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have ALREADY several times voted WITH the LIBERAL Justices. And the WORST thing is this: they and Trump’s AG pick think the President should have more power and be more immune to scrutiny and from consequences.
  3. What about Trump’s HAND-PICKED Cabinet and Administrative picks says to you that they are ACTUALLY honest, Conservative, Constitutional, Patriotic, Rule of Law, moral picks? MANAFORT. FLYNN, COHEN. BANNON. TILLERSON. PAGE. BENNETT. STONE. GIULIANI. KUSHNER. DON, JR., ERIC. IVANKA…ALL in some scandal.  Many ALREADY in prison or indicted.
  4. What about Trump’s VERY OWN words, deeds, Tweets, behaviour, and life lead you to HONESTLY believe that Trump is REALLY a Christian, moral man, Honest, a man of Integrity, a Constitutionalist, and a REAL Patriot? For a detailed look at Trump’s profanity, perversion, corruption, fraud, lying, and treason see HERE , HERE , HERE, HERE , HEREHERE .

There are a boat-load links to scads of articles chock-full of facts, evidence, eye-witness accounts, and corroboration in the above links. They have ALL been abundant and easy to find…for those who looked.

 

Let me close with a smattering of memes and facts, enjoy…

ACTUAL COURT DOCUMENT NAMING TRUMP IN CHILD RAPE CASE WITH JEFFERY EPSTEIN.

=========================

TRUMP. ADMITS. IT.

SADLY TRUE.

CAN’T HAPPEN SOON ENOUGH.

TRUTH. PERIOD.

R-RATED TRUTH.

TRUMP KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION.

TRUMP AND FEINSTEIN.

AS WITH TRUMP SO WITH ANTI-CHRIST

NOTHING QUITE SO FUNNY AS TREASON.

LET ME CLOSE AS I BEGAN…

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

CALLING OUT ALL “CHRISTIANS” AND “CONSERVATIVES” WHO SUPPORT TRUMP

Image result for Proverbs 21:6"

THAT is but ONE wicked aspect of who and what Trump is.

There are some who have followed me and read my posts who are about to be surprised, maybe even shocked by the following statement:

I’ve held back.

Using restraint I always spoke The Truth, always backed it with facts, evidence, and witnesses…BUT due to discretion I softened what and HOW I said it a LOT.

NO MORE.

[NOTE: This is quite a long read. You may want to put on a pot of coffee and cut out an hour for reading this. BUT IF you criticise this WITHOUT reading it ALL I will NOT talk to you about ONE point. I have spent years studying The Bible, studying history, praying, researching, and observing…do NOT offer one iota of disagreement IF you have NOT read the entirety of this article.] 

The above Scripture IS an spot-on depiction of who and what Trump is, as are the following Scriptures:

Let’s read that again:

Proverbs 6:12-19

12 A naughty person, a wicked man, walketh with a froward mouth.

13 He winketh with his eyes, he speaketh with his feet, he teacheth with his fingers;

14 Frowardness is in his heart, he deviseth mischief continually; he soweth discord.

15 Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy.

16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,

19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

THAT IS TRUMP.

FIRST, LET ME SPEAK TO THOSE WHO CLAIM CHRISTIAN AND SUPPORT TRUMP…

IF you claim to be a Christian QUIT EXCUSING SIN!

ONLY those who claim to be “Christian” but are either weak, cold, backslid or hypocrites/liars excuse sin.

The Sins of Trump that YOU HAVE EXCUSED:

The Profanity President: Trump’s Four-Letter Vocabulary

SOURCE .

***WARNING! TRUMP’S GRAPHIC PROFANITY IS REPORTED BELOW!! I CLEAN UP AS MUCH AS I CAN WITHOUT RUINING THE LINKS TO THE SOURCES.***

In modern times, presidents have rarely been church mice afraid of a little salty language. But President Trump has grown increasingly willing in recent months to say in public what most of his predecessors tried to keep behind closed doors.

His is the profanity presidency, full of four-letter denunciations of his enemies and earthy dismissals of allegations lodged against him. At rallies and in interviews, on Twitter and in formal speeches, he relishes the bad-boy language of a shock jock, just one more way of gleefully provoking the political establishment bothered by his norm-shattering ways.

In a single speech on Friday alone, he managed to throw out a “hell,” an “ass” and a couple of “bullsh*ts” for good measure. In the course of just one rally in Panama City Beach, Fla., earlier this month, he tossed out 10 “hells,” three “damns” and a “crap.” The audiences did not seem to mind. They cheered and whooped and applauded…

…Martha Joynt Kumar, a longtime scholar of presidential communication, said gritty language was part of the show put on by Mr. Trump, the onetime reality television entertainer, for his fans.

“He knows they like him to use words that lie over the edge of the traditional boundary of presidential decorum,” she said. “His controversial word choices are an aspect of his role as the disrupter he promised his constituents he would be.”

But critics say the vulgarity comes at a cost.No one has debased the civil discourse in this country more than President Trump, and the president really does set the tone in the country,” said Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California. “We see it reflected in our offices by the hateful, belligerent, obscene and violent calls that we get now that we didn’t used to get.”

Mr. Schiff has experienced it personally when Mr. Trump turned his name into a profanity last fall by nicknaming him “little Adam Schitt.” …

…if anything, Mr. Trump is growing more comfortable with crudeness. He used the word “bullsh*t” in public just once in his first two years in office, according to the Factba.se database that tracks his speeches, but on four occasions in the last three months.

Never has any president pushed the boundaries of language as far as Mr. Trump. He had a foul mouth long before politics, of course, but he seemed to try, however fitfully, to clean it up for a while when he set his sights on the White House. Still, he could not resist at times. At one rally during his 2016 campaign, he quoted a supporter calling a Republican rival, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a “pussy.”

Once taking office, he tried, at least, to keep it private, but he was uninhibited when the cameras were not on. After the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, was appointed, he told aides, I’m fucked.” Speaking with lawmakers, he called African nations “shithole countries.”…

…Any restraint Mr. Trump may have sought to exhibit early in his term seems to have eroded in recent months. In a January interview with The Times, he boasted that he had “beat the shit out of Republican rivals in 2016. A month later, he told the Conservative Political Action Conference that his enemies were trying to take him out “with bullshit,” a word he then took up with vigor.

A few weeks later, he told a rally in Grand Rapids, Mich., that Democrats were peddling it (BS). In April, he used it (BS) to describe some statements in the special counsel report.

By the time the president took the stage before the National Association of Realtors in Washington on Friday, he was in a feisty mood.

He recalled that a consultant tried to make work for himself by identifying environmental concerns on a property Mr. Trump wanted to develop. “I fired his ass so fast,” the president recalled…

…[Trump] went after one of his favorite targets — journalists — claiming that recent reports of infighting within his national security team were made up. “There is no source,” he said. “The person doesn’t exist. The person’s not alive. It’s bullsh*t, O.K.? It’s bullsh*t.”

OTHER SOURCES.

Trump described his attempt to seduce a married woman and indicated he might start kissing a woman that he and Bush were about to meet. He added, “I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”

In the video, Trump tells Billy Bush about a failed attempt to seduce Nancy O’Dell, who was Bush’s co-host at the time (circa 2005) of the recording:[9]

I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.

I did try and f*ck her. She was married.

And I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture—I moved on her like a b*tch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.[3]

Later, referring to Arianne Zucker (whom they were waiting to meet), Trump says:

I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the p*ssy. You can do anything.[3]

Trump called out by some Christians for using ‘Lord’s name in vain’ at fiery NC rally

SOURCE .

The controversial “send her back” crowd chant at President Donald Trump’s North Carolina rally may have gotten all the headlines, but some Christians are grumbling over something most of the media completely ignored.

Trump cursed, and it was not just a few vulgarities. He took the Lord’s name in vain.

Twice…

…Among the two instances Trump used the term, according to RawStory, was an anecdote the president told of a meeting with a disliked business competitor who Trump says admitted to prospering under the Trump administration.

“If you don’t support me, you are going to be so Godd*mn poor, you are not going to believe it’,” Trump quoted himself telling the man.

The president used “godd*mn” a second time in a reference to how hard the nation’s armed forces might strike Iran, should it come to a military conflict.

NOTE: ONLY some “Christians” were offended by Trump’s taking the name of The Lord in vain!!

ALL REAL Christians were, and ARE offended by Trump’s taking OUR Lord and Saviour’s name in vain! ONLY phony hypocrites are ok with it! And secondly, apparently even the ones who took issue with Trump’s taking The Lord’s Name in vain were NOT bothered in the least by ALL the other documented instances of profanity and perversion from this vile creature!

THAT IS TRUMP! THAT IS WHO AND WHAT TRUMP IS!

And the corruption is seen elsewhere in Trump:

The 25 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

SOURCE .

Rachel Crooks, left, Jessica Leeds, center, and Samantha Holvey attend a news conference, Monday, Dec. 11, 2017, in New York to discuss their accusations of sexual misconduct against Donald Trump.

 

  • At least 25 women have accused President Donald Trump of sexual misconduct since the 1970s.
  • Renewed attention has been brought to the allegations amid the #MeToo movement and a national conversation concerning sexual misconduct.
  • Trump has repeatedly denied the accusations, denouncing his accusers as “liars.”
  • In June 2019, columnist E. Jean Carroll accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room the mid-1990s.

MORE SOURCING .

==============

President Trump has made 12,019 false or misleading claims over 928 days

SOURCE .

President Trump’s proclivity for spouting exaggerated numbers, unwarranted boasts and outright falsehoods has continued at a remarkable pace. As of Aug. 5, his 928th day in office, he had made 12,019 false or misleading claims, according to the Fact Checker’s database that analyzes, categorizes and tracks every suspect statement the president has uttered.

 

Trump crossed the 10,000 mark on April 26, and he has been averaging about 20 fishy claims a day since then. From the start of his presidency, he has averaged about 13 such claims a day.

============

NOTE: “Misleading”, “false”, “inccorrect”, “made-up” are soft-soap ways of saying Trump IS a Sociopathic, psychopathic LIAR.

==============

I guarantee that if Trump had ran as the Democrat, NY Liberal he REALLY IS, instead of PRETENDING to be a Christian and a Conservative all these phony-baloney, so-called Christians would have FROM THE START been denouncing him! 

The reason they don’t do so is HYPOCRISY! They are bribed, blackmailed, or bullied into supporting a raving, profane, perverted ANTI-CHRIST! Or worse, THEY WILLINGLY AGREE WITH TRUMP. 

=========

But wasn’t Trump led to The Lord Jesus Christ early in his run for office?
NO.

The person that (so-called) led Trump to Christian faith is a prosperity “gospel”, heretic named Paula White.

WHO IS PAULA WHITE?

1. Part of the controversy surrounding White, and perhaps why she appealed to Trump, is because she teaches “prosperity gospel”, which holds that faith and donations to religious causes will boost adherents’ financial wellbeing as well as their spiritual health. As recently as last year, White encouraged members of her congregation to send their first month’s salary to her ministry to enjoy God’s blessings. (!!!WHAT?!!!) White is now married [3rd marriage; not counting her affairs.] to Jonathan Cain, the keyboardist from the rock band Journey, and the two often travel together, including to DC to see the president. 

2. While living in Maryland in 1984, she converted to Christianity at the Damascus Church of God. She later claimed to have received a vision from God shortly after her conversion: “When I was just eighteen years old, the Lord gave me a vision that every time I opened my mouth and declared the Word of the Lord, there was a manifestation of His Spirit where people were either healed, delivered, or saved. When I shut my mouth, they fell off into utter darkness and God spoke to me and said ‘I called you to preach the gospel.'”[10]

3. Southern Baptist theologian and ethicist Russell D. Moore said that “Paula White is a charlatan and recognized as a heretic by every orthodox Christian, of whatever tribe.”[53] Michael Horton, a professor of theology at Westminster Seminary California, wrote in early January 2017 that White represented a heretical movement and that her then-upcoming address at President Trump’s inauguration was helping to introduce heresy into mainstream public life. Horton addressed White’s alleged denial of the Trinity and the prosperity gospel’s position that Christ died on the cross not for the forgiveness of humankind but to rescue people from financial hardship.[53]

4. Connor Gaffey has drawn attention to a 2007 televised event at which White stated, “Anyone who tells you to deny yourself is from Satan.” Gaffey contrasts that with Jesus’ words in the Gospel of Matthew: “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.”[38]

5. Adulterous relationship with (married) Benny Hinn; In 2010 White’s relationship with married televangelist Benny Hinn gave rise to controversy after being photographed leaving a hotel in Rome holding hands. Hinn said “A friendship did develop” though “the relationship is over.” Both denied an affair.[62][63][64]  

IF it was “innocent” WHY were they sharing a hotel room when he was MARRIED? WHY leave the hotel room HOLDING HANDS? WHY say “it’s overIF it was truly innocent? They were caught- but refused to confess and repent.

=======================

But doesn’t Trump have a personal, evangelical Christian minister pray with him daily? Um, not really…unless you count another blasphemous heretic as “an evangelical Christian minister”…

Rodney Howard Browne, The Heretic Who Laid hands On Trump…

I was heartened the other day when I read that the President of the United States took time out of his busy schedule to allow an “Evangelical Minister” to lay hands on Him and pray. He needs prayer, and the support of the evangelical church, as much as possible.

But then my joy turned to angst when I read further, that the “evangelical minister” who prayed for Trump, was in fact a spiritually dangerous counterfeit, a purveyor of false doctrine and gnostic, experience based spirituality named Rodney Howard Browne.

I shouldn’t have been surprised because one of the President’s closest Spiritual advisor, is  a televangelist and Word of Faith heresy  proponent Paula White who is of the same heretical ilk as Rodney Howard Browne.

In short Rodney Howard Browne is the Father of the so called “Laughing Revival” of mysticism and Spiritual Drunkenness which led directly to the disastrously destructive “Toronto Blessing” which spread through Pentecostal, Charismatic and Even evangelical churches in the late 1990’s spreading heresy, false doctrine, mystical experience, deception and delusion throughout the world.

Howard Browne is famous for calling himself the “Holy Ghost Bartender” and inducing people into states of Spiritual Drunkenness, and has destroyed much of what was left of the sense of the true Fear of God in many, many Pentecostal, Charismatic churches. I consider him a minister of Judgment and part of the Strong, God sent Delusion.

In the interest of discernment and for the sake of real prayer by real Christians, I am excerpting a chapter of my 1995 book, WEIGHED AND FOUND WANTING;PUTTING THE TORNOTO BLESSING IN CONTEXT, to let you know just who this man is.

 

Who Is Rodney Howard Browne?

He was born into a Pentecostal home, an atmosphere that was bathed in prayer. By his own testimony, he was saved at the age of five and baptized in the Holy Spirit at age eight. Both at home and in the Pentecostal church he attended, he testifies of

“continually [seeing] supernatural manifestations.”2
His own “baptism of fire” occurred in 1979, while he was still a teenager. Here is how he tells it.

I knew that there was more, much more…In July of 1979, I cried out to God in sheer desperation. I wanted Him to manifest Himself to me and in me. I was hungry…As I prayed that day, I told the Lord, “Either you come down here and touch me, or I am going to come up there and touch you.” I was desperate. I must have called out to God for about 20 minutes that day. Suddenly, the fire of God fell on me. It started on my head and went right down to my feet. His power burned in my body and stayed like that for three whole days…I was really praying, “Lord, I am too young to die.” In the fourth day, I am not praying, “O Lord send your glory,” I am praying, “Please lift it off me so that I can bear it.” I was plugged into heaven’s electric light supply…my desire has been to go and plug other people in. My whole body was on fire…Out of my belly began to flow a river of living water. I began to laugh uncontrollably and then I began to weep and then speak with tongues. I was so intoxicated on the wine of the Holy Ghost that I was beside myself…Because of that encounter with the Lord, my life was radically changed from that day on.3

Rodney Howard Browne proceeds in the book to relate changes in his ministry after that anointing with fire, while preaching in a Methodist church. I’ll let him tell it in his own humorous way.

We were preaching in a Methodist church. I was back in the vestibule—which is a holy name for a plain old office—preparing for service. One of the young ladies came into the office and asked me to pray for her because she was in terrible pain…I got my hand halfway to her head, almost like a gunslinger would draw a gun out of a holster, and point it at his opponent. Suddenly, unexpectedly, it felt like my finger tips came off. I felt a full volume of anointing flow out of my hand. The only way I can explain it is to liken it to a fireman holding a fire hose with a full volume of water flowing out of it. The anointing went right into her. It looked like someone had hit her in the head with an invisible baseball bat and she fell to the floor…4

On and on it goes.

Notice the sensuality of the testimony, though. The fire of God courses through his body, it shoots out of his fingers, like a gun, she gets hit by an invisible bat! The concept behind the word sensual is not always referring to “sexual.” Sensual refers to the things pertaining to the five physical senses. Rodney Howard Browne has a very sensual ministry. The promise is held out that you are going to be touched by God, you’re going to feel God, you’ll even get drunk on the new wine! You’ll laugh, stagger, get stuck to the floor, and generally have an all out good time! It’s “fun” going to these meetings!

Back to Who is Rodney Howard Browne?

In 1987, Rodney Howard Browne left his native South Africa to come to the

United States, on a “word from God.” By that time, he had already pioneered a church, pastored for a time and been on the pastoral staff of Ray McCauley’s Rhema Bible Church in Johannesburg. Upon arriving in America, he commenced an itinerant ministry.

It was at a series of meetings in Albany, New York in 1989 that the unusual manifestations had begun to take place. It began to occur at a time when both he and his wife were hungry for God to move. As he was preaching at a morning meeting, he said a cloud filled the room, visible to others, but not to him. He could feel it, though. People began falling out of their seats as he preached.

While I was preaching, the power of God began to fall. Many people began to fall out of their seats. It looked like someone was shooting them and in some places whole rows at a time would go down. They were laughing and crying and falling all over the place and looked like drunken people.5

Rodney Howard Browne became an internationally prominent revivalist after a Spring, 1993 meeting at an Assembly of God church in Lakeland, Florida, the Carpenter’s Home Church. He was scheduled for one week, but the meeting lasted four! People who heard about it flew in from as far away as Africa, Great Britain and Argentina. What made the difference in this revival meeting? According to Charisma Magazine,

The difference was the laughter. No matter what Howard Browne did or said, hundreds who attended the daily sessions always ended up on the sanctuary floor in helpless laughter. When the services were broadcast on radio, more curious seekers showed up to join the fun.6

In Conclusion

I suppose I could go on and on, “building a case,” about my reservations of the ministry of Rodney Howard Browne, but why? After all of the above, if you don’t have serious problems, you are also a victim of the continuous conditioning that has taken place. Keep in mind that it was a transference of his “anointing” into Randy Clark who brought “it” to Toronto, that “birthed” the Toronto Blessing. I hope that I have brought some clarity to the issue. This is not about personality, it’s about truth. Can you see Jesus or the apostles even remotely promoting anything like this? I think not.

 

Is Rodney Howard Browne correct when he dismisses his critics by saying things like,

RHB-Now some would say, “I don’t believe it,” that’s fine, those people that don’t want to believe it, they probably wouldn’t believe anything. They probably wouldn’t believe the Bible…16

On the contrary, I don’t buy this, and I believe in the Bible! I also believe in the present activity of the Holy Spirit. I consider myself to be spirit filled and have seen many “signs, wonders, and gifts of the Holy Ghost” over the years in my ministry as well as in many other fellow ministers. We have witnessed the casting out of devils, healing of the sick, and powerful life transformations, all to confirm the preaching of the gospel! So don’t dismiss me as an unbelieving, religious dead head!

I want to close this chapter by encouraging you to hold fast to that which is good. We know that certain men have crept in unawares, but that doesn’t mean that we have to throw out the validity of supernatural workings of God. The Pentecostal experience is needed now more than ever, God’s people do need a fresh baptism in the Holy Ghost, to witness afresh to this sin-sick generation.

====================================

According to another hypocritical sell-out, Ralph Reed-

Christians ‘have a moral obligation to enthusiastically back’ Trump in 2020, according to prominent evangelical

SOURCE .

ADD JERRY FALWELL, JR., ROBERT JEFFRESS, FRANKLIN GRAHAM, JAMES DOBSON…

 

Isn’t judging wrong?

  

 

 

2. Matthew 7:1 “Judge not, that you be not judged.” This passage is abused among the haters of Christianity. It’s not used to teach us to guard against being hypocritical, as Jesus intended it to be used, but used to silence anyone who would espouse any godly standard above that of being a dog. Jesus isn’t giving a blanket statement for not judging, but given a lesson on how to judge rightly.

I like what Paul Washer said concerning this verse: “People always tell me, ‘Judge not, lest ye be judged.’ I reply, ‘Twist not Scripture, lest ye be like Satan.’”

ALSO SEE HERE , HERE , AND HERE .

A text taken out of context, becomes a pretext

Many Christians today just take one verse out of the Bible without even poring over its whole context – and at times not going through the whole story. This practice is tantamount to isolating the taken text from its co-text. It’s imperative for readers to read the whole chapter and the succeeding verses – not just one verse – for us to get what the Bible really wants to convey to us.

Matthew 7: 1-5 says;

(1) Judge not, that you be not judged. (2) For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again. (3) And why behold you the mote that is in your brother’s eye, but consider not the beam that is in your own eye? (4) or how will you say to your brother, Let me pull out the mote out of your eye; and, behold, a beam is in your own eye? (5)You hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of your own eye; and then shall you see clearly to cast out the mote out of your brother’s eye.

In verse 5, we can clearly see that the Bible is actually teaching us not ‘not to judge’ – but ‘how to judge righteously’. It says that, for us not to be called hypocrites, we must cast out first the beam that is in our own eye before we cast the mote out of our brother’s eye. So you see, it’s fairly easy for Christians to take this out of context – most especially if their intentions were to be in a safe side by not pointing at a brother’s smudge. To stay silent about a brother or a sister engaging in fornication or adultery because you too are ‘not sin-less’ is ignorance of the Word – but staying silent about the same because you yourself are a fugitive murderer is another thing. The Bible actually encourages believers to judge – but rather in a righteous manner – it’s just that we should be very careful when judging others. It tells us that we should not judge them if we ourselves are of the same league as them – and that is sheer hypocrisy.

 

 READ THE ABOVE SCRIPTURE AGAIN:

John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

THAT IS THE LORD JESUS CHRIST SPEAKING…AND HE SAYS THAT WE ARE TO JUDGE RIGHTEOUS JUDGMENT.

SEE HERE , HERE .

==========================

But NOT every Christian (or, at least, religious) leader has sold out like Judas for their 30 pieces of silver-

Christians in Support of the Impeachment Inquiry

SOURCE .

As Christians in the United States of America, we join together as people of faith to express our conviction that an impeachment inquiry is necessary to reveal the truth, hold President Donald J. Trump and other public officials accountable, and bolster democracy in the United States. We welcome the light of truth, honesty, and transparency that this moment affords our country, whatever may be revealed. We call for an open inquiry that shines light on this administration’s dealings behind closed doors and petition people of faith and integrity to join us in calling forth this light. 

“I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life,” Jesus said (John 8:12). Jesus’ words and ministry highlight the connection between truth and the well-being of the poor, the sick, the immigrant, the imprisoned, and the earth. Likewise, we who follow Jesus must make visible that any President’s violation of his oath of office would harm the most vulnerable among us.

The current impeachment inquiry is focused specifically on whether President Trump solicited help from a foreign government in his 2020 re-election campaign, buried evidence of that solicitation, and then attacked the whistleblowers and Congressional representatives who brought evidence to light. The constitutional process that gives the U.S. Congress power to investigate and try a sitting President is needed in this moment, because none of us can know the full truth apart from this process. But we have already seen enough to know that the accusations are both serious and credible.

While President Trump claims there is an evangelical revival supporting him, we know there is also a revival of people of faith whose commitment to truth remains strong and vigilant. We are Christians who resolutely affirm Jesus’ teachings of justice, love, and equality — echoed in the basic values at the heart of our democracy. This is not a matter of partisanship, but of deepest principle. 

For the sake of our nation’s integrity and the most vulnerable in our society, we call on fellow Christians to support the current impeachment inquiry. Now is the time to shine the light of truth. Please join us in praying that the truth will be revealed and set us all free.

Dr. Efrain Agosto, New York Theological Seminary
Dr. Neomi De Anda, University of Dayton
Rev. Amanda Hambrick Ashcraft, Middle Collegiate Church
Dr. Brian Bantum, Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. William Barber, II, Repairers of the Breach
Rev. Jennifer Barrows, Retired, Episcopal Diocese of Albany
Dr. Nancy E. Bedford, Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Moses Biney, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Traci D. Blackmon, United Church of Christ
Rev. Dr. Chloe Breyer, St. Philip’s Episcopal Church
Daryle E. Brown, Trinity United Church of Christ
Rev. Micah Bucey, Judson Memorial Church
Rev. Jennifer Butler, Faith in Public Life
Sister Simone Campbell (SSS)
, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice
Rev. Dr. Tony Campolo, Eastern University
Rosemary P. Carbine, Whittier College
Dr. Amy Carr, Western Illinois University
Rev. Dr. J. Kameron Carter, University of Indiana
Rev. Dr. Noel Castellanos, Camino Alliance
Shane Claiborne, Red Letter Christians
Rev. Dan Clark, Faith in Public Life Ohio
Rev. Peggy Clarke, Community Church of New York
Rev. Sharon Codner-Walker, Stuyvesant Heights Christian Church
Dr. Stephen Cooper, Franklin & Marshall College
Rev. Dr. Benjamin L. Corey, Public Theologian
Rev. Angie Cox, Broad Street United Methodist Church
Rev. Dr. Chuck Currie, Pacific University
Amy Dalton, Center and Library for the Bible and Social Justice
Rev. Fred Davie, Union Theological Seminary
Dr. Teresa Delgado, Iona College
Rev. Kaji S. Dousa, Park Avenue Christian Church
Rev. Dr. Gary Dorrien, Union Theological Seminary
Rev. Gordon Duggins, Retired, Episcopal Diocese of New York
Rev. Dr. Stacey Edwards-Dunn, Trinity United Church of Christ
Rev. Nathan Empsall, Faithful America
Dr. Wendy Farley, San Francisco Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Nancy Fields, New York Theological Seminary
Rev Dr. Yvette A. Flunder, The Fellowship of Affirming Ministry
Rev. Susan Fortunato, Christ Episcopal Church
Rev. Dr. Mary Foulke, St. Mary’s Episcopal Church
Rev. Dr. Mary Fulkerson, Duke Divinity School
Rev. Dr. Oscar Garcia-Johnson, Fuller Theological Seminary
Rev. Joel A. Gibson, The Micah Institute
Rev. Dr. Jeff Golliher, St. John’s Episcopal Church
Rev. Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons, The Resistance Prays
Rev. Dr. Gwendolyn Hadley, Hall Christ Temple United Baptist Church
Lisa Sharon Harper, FreedomRoad.us
Prof. Dr. Christine Helmer, Northwestern University
Rev. Dr. Peter Goodwin Heltzel, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Katharine Henderson, Auburn Seminary
Rev. Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza, Activist Theology Project
Rev. Susan E. Hill, Church of the Holy Apostles
Rev. Stephen C. Holton, St. Phillips Episcopal Church
Rev. Dr. Chaz Howard, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. David H. Jensen, Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary
Dr. Russell Jeung, San Francisco State University
Bishop J. Alfred Johnson, United Methodist Church
Rev. Stephanie Kendell, Park Avenue Christian Church
Kathy Khang, Author
Rev. Dr. Earl Kooperkamp, Church of the Good Shepherd
Rev. Posey Krakowsky, Church of the Ascension
Rev. Melissa Lamkin, Trinity School
Rev. Dr. Insook Lee, New York Theological Seminary
Britney Winn Lee, Red Letter Christians
Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis
, Middle Collegiate Church
Rev. Dr. Pamela R. Lightsey, Meadville Lombard Theological School
Rev. John Liotti, Able Works
Rev. Dr. Wanda Lundy, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. C. Vernon Mason, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Elizabeth G. Maxwell, Church of the Ascension
Dr. Joy Ann McDougall, Emory University
Rev. Richard McKeon, The Episcopal Church of the Messiah
Brian McLaren, Author
Rev. Rochelle Michael, Trinity United Church of Christ
Rev. Brian Moll, Rescue Alliance
Rev. Dr. Otis Moss, III, Trinity United Church of Christ
Rev. Weldon D. Nisly, Retired, Christian Peacemaker Teams – Iraqi & Kurdistan Team
Rev. Sam Owen, Haitian Congregation of the Good Samaritan Episcopal Church
Doug Pagitt, Vote Common Good
John Pavlovitz, Pastor and Author
Dr. James W. Perkinson, Ecumenical Theological Seminary
Rev. Benjamin Perry, Union Theological Seminary
Rev. Sue Phillips, Sacred Design Lab
Rev. Dr. Nancy Claire Pittman, Phillips Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Soong-Chan Rah, North Park Theological Seminary
Elaina Ramsey, Red Letter Christians
Rev. Dr. Rafael Reyes, III, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Rosalie Richards, Stetson University
Rev. Dr. Joerg Rieger, Vanderbilt University
Rev. Dr. Raymond J. Rivera, Latino Pastoral Action Center and Sanctuary Church
Rev. Betsy Johns Roadman, Retired, Episcopal Church
Rev. Brandan J. Robertson, Missiongathering Christian Church
The Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson, IX Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire
Bishop Dr. Raymond H. Rufen-Blanchette, The Clergy Campaign for Social & Economic Justice
Dr. Michele Saracino, Manhattan College
Rev. Dr. Jill Schaeffer, New York Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Donna Schaper, Judson Memorial Church
Rev. Frederick W. Schraplau, St. Paul’s Church
Rev. Bryan Sirchio, McFarland United Church of Christ
Rev. Dr. Susan K. Smith, Crazy Faith Ministries
Rev. Dr. Stephany Rose Spaulding
, University of Colorado
Margot Starbuck, Author
Rev. Dr. Marti Steussy, Christian Theological Seminary
Rev. Cynthia Stravers, Church of the Heavenly Rest
Rev. Margaret H. Sullivan, St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church
Rev. Adam Russell Taylor, Sojourners
Rev. Jasmin TaylorTrinity United Church of Christ
Dr. John J. Thatamanil, Union Theological Seminary
Rev. Liz Theoharis, Kairos Center, Union Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Linda E. Thomas, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
Rev. Dr. Al Tizon, North Park Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Emilie M. Townes, Vanderbilt Divinity School
Rev. Laura Sumner Truax, Senior Pastor LaSalle Street Church
Rev. Michael Vanacore, Fort Washington Collegiate Church
Rev. Kevin VanHook, The Riverside Church
Rev. Dr. Mark I. Wallace, Swarthmore College
Rev. Jim Wallis, Sojourners
Rev. Dr. LaKeesha Walrond, New York Theological Seminary
Michelle Ferrigno Warren, Christian Community Development Association
Dr. Sharon Welch, Meadville Lombard Theological School
Rev. Dr. Damaris Whittaker, Fort Washington Collegiate Church
Rev. Dr. D. Newell Williams, Brite Divinity School
Rev. Dr. Reggie L. Williams, McCormick Theological Seminary
Rev. Dr. Rodney E. Williams, Swope Parkway United Christian Church
Rev. Terry D. Williams, Orchard Hill United Church of Christ
Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, School for Conversion

========================

Now, To Turn My Sights on so-called Conservatives…

THIS was said by a REPUBLICAN:

“The country has never before now elected somebody who is so manifestly unfit intellectually, morally, temperamentally, for the office of President of the United States”.. – Steve Schmidt, Republican.

A quick look at the very unConservative issues and people Trump supports WITH HIS MONEY AND VOTES!!

THE CHALLENGE.

HERE is The Challenge-

Donald Trump votes/voted for, supports, funds THIS

VOTED FOR JIMMY CARTER- TWICE

VOTED FOR WALTER MONDALE

VOTED FOR BILL CLINTON- TWICE

VOTED FOR AL GORE

VOTED FOR JOHN KERRY

VOTED FOR CHUCK SCHUMER

VOTED FOR BILL DE BLASIO

VOTED FOR HILLARY CLINTON

VOTED/FUNDED FOR PELOSI

VOTED FOR ANTHONY WEINER

VOTED FOR CHARLIE RANGEL

VOTED/FUNDED FOR MAXINE WATTERS

VOTED/FUNDED FOR BARBARA BOXER

VOTED/FUNDED FOR DIANE FEINSTEIN

VOTED/FUNDED FOR HARRY REID

VOTED FOR/FUNDED OBAMA- TWICE

IS FOR A $15.00 AN HOUR MINIMUM WAGE

IS FOR TRANSGENDERS USING “WHATEVER” BATHROOM/SHOWER THEY WANT

FOR A BAN ON “ASSAULT WEAPONS”

FOR RAISING TAXES ON “THE RICH” (JUST LIKE SANDERS, CLINTON AND OBAMA)

FOR GAY/SAME-SEX “MARRIAGE” (SAID THE COURT HAD RULED AND IT WAS “THE LAW OF THE LAND”…UM, COURTS DO NOT MAKE NOR PASS LAW, CONGRESS DOES)

FOR MASSIVE TARIFFS THAT WILL FURTHER DAMAGE AMERICA’S ECONOMY AND JOBS…Pssst! TARIFFS ARE TAXES ON US!!!

IS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS, GOLDMAN-SACHS, AND OTHER BANKERS THAT HE PRETENDS TO HATE

HAS SOROS, GOLDMAN-SACHS AND EVEN CLINTON PEOPLE ON HIS STAFF

FUNDS/SUPPORTS PLANNED PARENTHOOD

FUNDS/SUPPORTS CODE PINK

AND IS ENDORSED BY THE KKK AND STORMNFRONT!!!


ALL OF THE ABOVE IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE…

 

I ISSUE THE CHALLENGE TO EVERY TRUMP SUPPORTER TO SHOW ME HOW:

1) any of that IS Conservative,

2) how YOU can be truly Conservative and support THAT.

THAT is it.

Can anyone rise to the challenge?

I’LL CLOSE OUT THIS PART BY POSTING HEADLINES AND LINKS THAT FURTHER SHOW THAT NO REAL CHRISTIAN AND NO REAL CONSERVATIVE SHOULD SUPPORT TRUMP.

Trump’s other new scandal takes an even more serious turn

Image: US Secretary of State Tillerson rebukes resignation reports

 

Report: Mulvaney’s Ukraine Remarks Shocked White House

He tried to walk it back Thursday night

When asked during the press conference if there had been a quid pro quo, Mulvaney said: “We do that all the time with foreign policy. … Get over it.” Sources tell the Washington Post that Mulvaney’s remarks took other White House officials by surprise and there was a rush to put out a new statement.

Trump Uses Controversial New Word on Impeachment

This is a ‘lynching,’ he says, and black lawmakers are not pleased

SOURCE .

President Trump doesn’t think the impeachment investigation is merely a “witch hunt.” In a tweet Tuesday, he called it a “lynching,” …”So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights,” wrote Trump. “All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here—a lynching. But we will WIN!”

NOTE: The INVESTIGATION, Impeachment Inquiry, are NOT:

  • a witch hunt
  • a lynching
  • a coup

IT IS The Constitutional remedy for such vile, putrefying corruption as Trump.

NYT Says Ukraine Timeline Isn’t What We Thought

Paper says documents, sources show Ukraine knew about aid freeze in early August

SOURCE .

Diplomat William Taylor’s Tuesday testimony to House impeachment investigators drew “sighs and gasps”—and a “pfft!” from President Trump, who dismissively tweeted on Wednesday morning, “Neither he (Taylor) or any other witness has provided testimony that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld.” Not so, reports the New York Times, which claims sources and documents indicate “high-level Ukrainian officials” knew the aid was on ice by the first week of August. That runs counter to a major line of defense presented by Trump and his supporters: That there was no quid pro quo because the Ukrainians were unaware the nearly $400 million military aid package had been frozen until weeks later, in late August.

Before Key Testimony, Trump Lashes Out

He dismisses NSC’s Vindman as a ‘Never Trumper’

It could be a troubling day for President Trump in terms of impeachment testimony, and he unleashed a series of tweets Tuesday morning to undermine the credibility of a key witness. “Why are people that I never even heard of testifying about the call,” Trump tweeted. “Just READ THE CALL TRANSCRIPT AND THE IMPEACHMENT HOAX IS OVER! Ukrain said NO PRESSURE.” The tweet came hours before the testimony of a White House official who listened in on Trump’s July call with Ukraine’s leader, notes Politico. In an opening statement released in advance, Lt. Col Alexander Vindman of the National Security Council said he worried that Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to launch an investigation into the Bidens would undermine US national security, per the Hill.

Trump criticized Vindman Tuesday without mentioning him by name. “Supposedly, according to the Corrupt Media, the Ukraine call ‘concerned’ today’s Never Trumper witness,” Trump tweeted. “Was he on the same call that I was? Can’t be possible! Please ask him to read the Transcript of the call. Witch Hunt!” 

MORE ON VINDMAN .

Leigh Ann Caldwell
@LACaldwellDC

NEW: Vindman told House investigators that a WH meeting AND nearly $400 million in security and military aid was “contingent” on Ukrainian officials carrying out multiple investigations, including into Burisma, the Bidens, the 2016 election and Crowd Strike. w/

============

“This [THE BELOW] is a bribe. Any other American who offered cash to the jury before a trial would go to prison for felony bribery. But he can get away with it?”

TRUMP IS COMMITTING ‘FELONY BRIBERY’ BY GIVING FUNDRAISING CASH TO GOP SENATORS AHEAD OF IMPEACHMENT TRIAL: EX-BUSH ETHICS LAWYER

SOURCE .

This is a bribe. Any other American who offered cash to the jury before a trial would go to prison for felony bribery. But he can get away with it?” Painter, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, wrote on Twitter. “Criminal.

==========================

Lastly, due to the fact that many Christians say they are Conservative and vice versa, let me close with this:

Fellowship of the Pharisees preach fealty to Trump, call it faith in God

In the summer of 2016, so-called evangelicals along with a bunch of prosperity gospel con-artistsa group I refer to as the Fellowship of the Pharisees — held a private get-together with Donald Trump to allegedly discuss issues important to Christians and America. In reality, it was an occasion for the Fellowship to reject G-O-D and replace him with the G-O-P where Trump — the twice-divorced, thrice-married, unrepentant, pro-Planned Parenthood, adulterous, strip-club owner — was praised for his incredible “family values.”

With their seats at Herod Trump’s table firmly secured, and with Trump’s 2020 re-election less-than-certain, the Fellowship has been busy lately building a “hedge of protection” around their orange messiah as they defend and praise him for his god-like character.

In an appearance on Tony Perkins’ Washington Watch program last week, former congresswomen Michele Bachmann, who used to be chairwoman of Perkins’ Family Research Council, defended Trump against his coming impeachment and declared that he “understands the difference between good and evil.” Additionally, she said that “We have not seen a president with greater moral clarity than this president.”

Based on past statements, Bachmann’s declaration of Trump’s morality was actually a little subdued. Earlier this year, she said in an appearance on Understanding the Times that Trump is “highly biblical” and that we’ll “never see a more godly, biblical president again in our lifetime.”

One of the prosperity gospel con-artists in Trump’s inner circle of “spiritual advisors” is twice-divorced, thrice-married — hey, just like Trump — Paula White, who was recently hired to work as an advisor for his Faith and Opportunity Initiative. White has a long history with Trump; she’s known him since 2002, prayed at his inauguration, and visits the White House often as his personal pastor.

When Trump officially announced his re-election in June, White prayed against the “demonic network” opposed to Trump. When asked a few weeks prior to her new gig at the White House about her political relationship with Trump, White said she could never say “no” to Trump because it would be like “saying no to God.”

Right Wing Watch

@RightWingWatch

Pastor Paula White claims that she was ordered by God to serve as an adviser to Trump: “To say ‘no’ to President Trump would be saying ‘no’ to God, and I won’t do that.”

First Baptist Church of Dallas pastor Robert Jeffress, who predicted a “civil war” if Trump is impeached and once called “Never Trump” evangelicals “spineless morons” for not supporting him, appeared on Fox Business to defend Trump for “the values [he] embraces.”

Jeffress also trumpeted that “99 percent of evangelicals oppose impeachment” because “never in the history of America have we had a president who was a stronger warrior for the Judeo-Christian principles upon which this nation was founded than in President Donald J. Trump.” The Southern Baptist Pharisee also said that “the effort to impeach President Trump is really an effort to impeach our own deeply held faith values.”

If by “our own deeply held faith values” he means the values held by the Fellowship of the Pharisees — like when Tony Perkins gave Trump a “mulligan” for paying hush money to a porn star to hide his affair with her — I can see where Jeffress is coming from.

When Ralph Reed recently argued that evangelicals “have a moral obligation to enthusiastically” back Trump in 2020, I noted how if it was Jesus instead of Trump, America would be in the midst of revival. Instead, the Fellowship of the Pharisees has rejected God’s Son to worship God’s Man…who is in actuality an Anti-Christ.

=====================
IF you made this far, and read it ALL, and still are not convinced that Trump should be in prison instead of having YOUR support then there is NO hope for you, and NO hope for America.

As for me…I’ll ALWAYS and ONLY trust in The Lord Jesus Christ, for HE IS my Blessed Hope.

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

“If This Isn’t Treason Then Nothing Is!” and “All Things Trump”

 

Rick Wilson
@TheRickWilson

This is the entire current crisis, perfectly encapsultated.

Christian Vanderbrouk
@UrbanAchievr
·
Let’s keep it simple:
The president’s personal lawyer was paid by crooked businessmen from a foreign country, and then the president gave him authority over American policy toward that country.
This is precisely what the founders meant by “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Trump Told Erdogan That Barr and Mnuchin Would Handle Halkbank Case: Report

President Trump referred Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s repeated requests for the U.S. to avoid pressing charges on one of the country’s largest banks to Attorney General William Barr and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Bloomberg reports. Trump reportedly told Erdogan in an April call that Barr and Mnuchin would handle the issue, and no charges were pressed against Turkish bank Halkbank until recently. The federal charges only came after Trump announced sanctions against Turkey in retaliation for its incursion into Syria. It is not clear if Trump asked Barr and Mnuchin to comply with Turkey’s demands, or if he simply passed the matter on to them because he was tired of hearing the requests.

About two months after the call, Barr reportedly told Turkish Minister of Justice Abdulhamit Gul that he would need to reach a deal with the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan for the case or have it go through a trial. The attorney general reportedly advised Turkey on its best option: a deferred prosecution agreement that would require Halkbank to pay a fine and other actions to prevent further wrongdoing. The country ended up not making a deal, and Halkbank was charged earlier this week with “fraud, money laundering, and sanctions offense.” Mnuchin was also reportedly involved due to the Treasury Department’s role in determining the regulatory penalties against Halkbank for a separate criminal case involving one of their executives.

========

Barr And Pence Now Implicated As Suspects In House Impeachment Investigation

SOURCE .

Even though the impeachment inquiry announced Tuesday by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has as its main subject President Donald Trump, on Wednesday that investigation began to expand to other members of the administration, including Attorney General William Barr and Vice President Mike Pence, both of whom are now in serious jeopardy and may also wind up being impeached for their role in the unfolding Ukraine scandal.

You’re probably wondering, “What is the worst that could come of this?”

In your calculations include THIS:

Turkey holding 50 US nuclear bombs ‘hostage’ at air base, report says

SOURCE .

Officials are reviewing plans to evacuate up to 50 U.S. nuclear bombs that have long been stored at Incirlik Air Base in Turkey in the wake of Ankara’s military offensive in northern Syria, according to a report.

The weapons are now essentially being held “hostage” by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a senior official told The New York Times on Monday.

The Cold War-era B61 nuclear bombs are said to be located 100-250 miles from the Syrian border, according to The Guardian. A former U.S. official told the outlet that Turkish diplomats responded to suggestions about moving the bombs by saying Turkey would start to develop its own.

“The potential problems have been discussed for over a decade,” the former official said. “And now we’ve finally gotten to a point where this is a problem that we can’t ignore anymore.”

[MY NOTE: THESE ARE IDIOTS WREAKING IDIOCY ACROSS THE GLOBE!!!]

====================

You may be tempted to echo what trump said, “But Turkey and Syria are 7,000 miles away”…

Heath Mayo
@HeathMayo

“We are 7,000 miles away.”

So was bin Laden. Our President is an idiot.

After defeating 100% of the ISIS Caliphate, I largely moved our troops out of Syria. Let Syria and Assad protect the Kurds and fight Turkey for their own land. I said to my Generals, why should we be fighting for Syria…

….and Assad to protect the land of our enemy? Anyone who wants to assist Syria in protecting the Kurds is good with me, whether it is Russia, China, or Napoleon Bonaparte. I hope they all do great, we are 7,000 miles away!

-Dopey Donnie Trump via his moronic Tweets.

Image

 

Trump’s vow to sanction Turkey for the genocide he allowed to happen is like trying to put out a forest fire with a spray bottle.

=============

Trump’s Sunday Nightmare: 64% of Americans Believe He Shook Down Ukraine For Biden Dirt

SOURCE .

A new ABC News/Ipsos poll found that 64% of Americans believe that Trump tried to pressure Ukraine for dirt on Biden and the vast majority aren’t surprised.

=================

A FACEBOOK PATRIOT AND CONSTITUTIONAL-CONSERVATIVE WROTE:

The Deep State conspiracy nonsense is just that, nonsense. But there is something to the fact that the government consists of tens if not hundreds of thousands of people, and at the upper levels, the professionals involved are more committed to the institution of government than they are to any one man.

That’s how it should be. That’s why there are civil service laws, and why the whole government isn’t replaced election by election. This way, there’s institutional integrity in the State Department, and in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and in the Department of Agriculture for that matter.

And it’s these same people, testifying with their expertise, to Congress, are going to be extremely damning to any pretense Trump’s lawyers want to put up. This is the real deal, and I think both houses will see that.

This is what taking down an administration looks like.

==============

THIS WILL BE THE LAST ENTRY IN THIS ARTICLE CALLING FOR TRUMP TO BE CHARGED WITH TREASON: 

Miss Carrie
@CLinJones13

Hi Gentleman. I have gathered you together because I believe that

has met the definition of Treason based on a few things and I will outline them for you.

First a reminder.

Treason Clause

Next is this article by Newsweek.

EXCLUSIVE: U.S. CEDES SYRIAN CITY TO RUSSIA IN BATTLEFIELD ‘HANDOVER’ AS TURKEY TRIES TO TAKE IT

SOURCE, INCLUDES VIDEO OF TRUMP .

 

The U.S. military has begun a hasty exit from Syria’s northern city of Manbij, and is set to help Russia establish itself there amid a Turkish attempt to defeat Kurdish-led, Pentagon-backed fighters at the strategic location, Newsweek has learned.

The U.S. was scheduled as of Monday to officially withdraw from Manbij within 24-hours, leaving the mostly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces behind as two rival factions—the Syrian government, backed by Russia and Iran, and the Turkey-backed Syrian insurgents opposed to it—sought to seize control of the strategic location. A senior Pentagon official told Newsweek that U.S. personnel, “having been in the area for longer, has been assisting the Russian forces to navigate through previously unsafe areas quickly.”

“It is essentially a handover,” the official said. “However, it’s a quick out, not something that will include walk-throughs, etc., everything is about making out with as much as possible of our things while destroying any sensitive equipment that cannot be moved.”

[MY NOTE: MOVE OR DESTROY EVERYTHING…EXCEPT FOR 50 NUKES WE LET TURKEY HAVE!!]

Here is a Video where Secretary of State Pompeo outlines the Trump Administrations Plan to put Military Bases all over the world at the expense of the countries that host them staffed to over 100 K of US Soldiers.

SOURCE .

This is also to include armaments, military secrets, etc. This is at about 9 minutes in. In articles and you can look them up. It states that Trump revealed Military Secrets to Erdogan just before the assault. Who do we know according to articles that have paid Trump?

It was a line. Russia, of course, was first. Then Saudia Arabia, we actually are staffing a base that they built for us. Then Erdogan. I am guessing that the Kurds did not. I do not know the reason.

Then there are Donald’s tweets this morning.

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
After defeating 100% of the ISIS Caliphate, I largely moved our troops out of Syria. Let Syria and Assad protect the Kurds and fight Turkey for their own land. I said to my Generals why should we be fighting for Syria.
….and Assad to protect the land of our enemy? Anyone who wants to assist Syria in protecting the Kurds is good with me, whether it is Russia, China, or Napoleon Bonaparte. I hope they all do great, we are 7,000 miles away!
Some people want the United States to protect the 7,000 mile away Border of Syria, presided over by Bashar al-Assad, our enemy. At the same time, Syria and whoever they chose to help, wants naturally to protect the Kurds….
….I would much rather focus on our Southern Border which abuts and is part of the United States of America. And by the way, numbers are way down and the WALL is being built!
Russia paid, Saudia
Arabia Paid, Erdogan Paid.
Kurds did not.
Pompeo is the Pitchman. He is guilty too.
Next, follow the $$$$ because I would guess not all went into the Treasury.
I would guess that Trump, Mnuchin, Pompeo, Barr, McConnell and a few others profited. Act Fast.

====================

The above details Trump’s Treason.

Now for Part 2, “All Things Trump”.

 

ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND THIS IT ALL MAKES SENSE…

 

 

 

EVEN WITHOUT TRUMP’S EXTORTION AGAINST THE UKRAINE, EVEN WITHOUT TRUMP’S FAILED “DEAL(S)” WITH CHINA, EVEN WITHOUT TRUMP’S CAVING TO TURKEY, AND BETRAYAL OF THE KURDS, AND THE RESULTANT GENOCIDE, EVEN WITHOUT TRUMP LETTING 50 U.S. NUKES FALL INTO THE HANDS OF EDROGAN/TURKEY…THE MUELLER FINDINGS ARE ENOUGH TO IMPEACH, REMOVE, AND ARREST TRUMP!

AMERICA WAS GIVEN THE FALSE “CHOICE” BETWEEN HILLARY AND HILLARY’S DONOR…BOTH LIBERALS.

 

HINT: TRUMP “ROSE” BECAUSE OF RUSSIA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAKE NO MISTAKE, PUTIN OWNS TRUMP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

BECAUSE IT NEEDS TO REPEATED…OFTEN!

SO, let’s can the platitudes, aka crap, and remove Trump and ALL his associates and enablers NOW!!!

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

The Slow, But Steady Drum Beat Of Justice

Due to the amount of accumulated and incoming news we will post mainly headlines, pics, and links. IF you think or say, “Well, there is not real ‘meat’ to this article, the charges against Trump & Co. are bogus.” Then you: 1) did NOT follow the links to the articles where evidence and witnesses ARE presented, OR 2) you are TrumPutin troll or bot who is willfully blind and deaf to facts. OR 3) Both. You didn’t follow the links BECAUSE you are a TrumPutin troll or bot.  

For those with ears to hear…

Here’s What Trump Said to Ukraine’s President

White House has released a 5-page memo summarizing the call

SOURCE .

The White House on Wednesday released a five-page memo summarizing the July 25 call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The AP shies away from using the word “transcript,” and the Washington Post explains that what was released “is a memorandum of a telephone conversation and is not a verbatim account of the conversation” in keeping with White House practice; it pulls from the notes and recollections of those who were in the Situation Room. You can read the document in full here, which reflects what CNBC reports was a 30-minute call. It begins with Trump congratulating the newly elected Zelensky on his “great victory” and “terrific job.” Trump then goes on to bring up Rudy Giuliani, Attorney General Barr, and Joe Biden. Here’s his explicit mention of Biden:

  • “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it. … It sounds horrible to me.”
  • Background here: After taking the lead for the US in the country during the Obama administration, Joe Biden in 2016 called for Ukraine’s general prosecutor to be booted in favor of someone more aggressive. Trump and Giuliani have claimed he was trying to stop an investigation into Burisma Group, which Hunter Biden was on the board of.
  • Zelensky replies to Trump by saying the new prosecutor he appoints “will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue.”

  • Trump then said, “I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I’m sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict. You have a lot of assets. It’s a great country. I have many Ukrainian friends, their [sic] incredible people.”
  • CNN reports DOJ rep Kerri Kupec has stated that at no time following the call did Trump talk to Barr “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son.” She continued, “The President has not asked the Attorney General to contact Ukraine—on this or any other matter. The Attorney General has not communicated with Ukraine—on this or any other subject. Nor has the Attorney General discussed this matter, or anything relating to Ukraine, with Rudy Giuliani.”
  • The Wall Street Journal notes that early on in the call Trump emphasized how good the US has been to Ukraine, unlike European countries. “We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time,” he said.
  • But the Journal and Politico report the memo shows Trump made no reference, implied or explicit, to the US aid he had put on hold a week prior.
  • Hillary Clinton responded to the release with a tweet in favor of impeachment: “The president of the United States has betrayed our country. That’s not a political statement—it’s a harsh reality, and we must act. He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”
  • And from Trump himself on Twitter: “Will the Democrats apologize after seeing what was said on the call with the Ukrainian President? They should, a perfect call – got them by surprise!”

(Read more President Trump stories.)

=================================================

Trump vs. The Whistleblower

Guest Contributor: David Thornton, Writer for The Resurgent

================

Intel Chief Backs Whistleblower’s Actions

Joseph Maguire testifies before Congress

SOURCE .

Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday.

I think the whistleblower did the right thing,” Joseph Maguire said Thursday during testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, per Reuters. “I think he followed the law every step of the way.”

====================

WH Concealed Calls With Putin, Crown Prince: Report

As well as reported convo in which Trump told Russians election interference didn’t concern him
By Jenn Gidman,  Newser Staff
Posted Sep 28, 2019 6:30 AM CDT
========================

Trump’s Envoy to Ukraine Quits Amid Whistleblower Hubbub

Kurt Volker steps down after Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani says they were in frequent contact

In this Sept. 15, 2018, file photo, US special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker is seen in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to NATO caught in the middle of a whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine, resigned Friday from his post as special envoy to the Eastern European nation, according to a US official. The official said Volker told Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday of his decision to leave the job, following disclosures that he’d connected Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani with Ukrainian officials to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his family over allegedly corrupt business dealings, per the AP. Giuliani has said he was in frequent contact with Volker about his efforts…

Volker was brought into the Trump administration by former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to serve as envoy for Ukraine. He worked in a volunteer capacity and had retained his job as head of the John McCain Institute for International Leadership at Arizona State University. Arizona State’s student newspaper was the first to report his resignation. (Read more envoy stories.)

======

In the Hot Seat: William Barr

Barr was ‘surprised and angry’ that President Trump had dragged him into this

[MY NOTE: Look at the expression on both faces, and their body language. Something BAD is a’foot!]

SOURCE .

===========

House Democrats: We’re Subpoenaing the White House

Will request 13 separate batches of documents related to Trump’s Ukraine phone call

SOURCE .

  • House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff appeared at a presser with Nancy Pelosi where he provided an update on the impeachment inquiry. He expressed “[deep] concern” about Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s “effort to potentially interfere with witnesses” who are set to appear before House committees, per the Guardian
  • Schiff said he wanted to make it “abundantly clear” that any effort by Pompeo, President Trump, or anyone else to interfere “will be considered as evidence of obstruction” and that any effort to block witnesses from coming forward to testify “will create an adverse inference that those allegations are correct.” Schiff added, “We are proceeding deliberately, but at the same time we feel a real sense of urgency.”
  • As for the new subpoena, it’s directed toward acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney. It requests 13 separate batches of documents related to a July phone call that Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and related matters. The Oversight panel will issue the subpoena in coordination with the House intelligence and Foreign Affairs committees, Cummings said.
  • The action came as House and Senate staff prepared to meet with the State Department’s inspector general on Wednesday. A State Department invitation to the meeting, which was reviewed by the AP, requested an “urgent” meeting with staff from eight House and Senate panels.
  • The invitation said only that the inspector general, Steve Linick, “would like to discuss and provide staff with copies of documents related to the State Department and Ukraine.” The documents were obtained from the State Department’s acting legal adviser, according to the email.

(Read more President Trump stories.)

===========

House Wants Files on Pence’s Ukraine Meeting

Panels cite reports an aide listened to Trump call

 

===================

Texts Show Pressure Put on Ukraine to Launch Probe

House Democrats released a series of text messages provided by Kurt Volker

SOURCE .

Kurt Volker, a former special envoy to Ukraine, leaves after a closed-door interview with House investigators at the Capitol in Washington on Thursday. 

================

Attorneys for CIA Officer Behind Trump Complaint Say They Now Represent ‘Multiple Whistleblowers’

One attorney said a second whistleblower has come foward with firsthand knowledge of some of the allegations

SOURCE .

WASHINGTON—At least one additional whistleblower with firsthand knowledge of the circumstances around President Trump’s July call with his Ukrainian counterpart has come forward, according to lawyers representing both the individual and the CIA officer whose initial complaint helped spark an impeachment inquiry.

The existence of a second whistleblower comes as Mr. Trump repeatedly has sought to attack the credibility and motive of the first individual, whose whistleblower complaint in August details efforts by the president to pressure Ukraine to investigate a political rival.

“I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers,” Andrew Bakaj, the lead attorney for the first whistleblower, wrote in a tweet. “No further comment at this time.”

=========

Trump tries to claim Chuck Todd was the one who failed in Ron Johnson’s catastrophic interview

Published

on

After a full day of mockery on Twitter, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has become destroyed for being unprepared to answer questions about President Donald Trump’s Ukraine call. Nearly 12 hours after “Meet the Press” aired Sunday, Trump seems to have finally heard or seen the show and struck out against the criticism.

“Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd of “Meet the Press” had a total meltdown in his interview with highly reaspected (sic) Senator @RonJohnsonWI. Seems that a not very bright Chuck just wasn’t getting the answers he was looking for in order to make me look as bad as possible. I did NOTHING wrong!” Trump exclaimed in a misspelled tweet.

===========

Scoop: Trump’s private concerns of an impeachment legacy

Trump

SOURCE .

President Trump has told friends and allies he worries about the stain impeachment will leave on his legacy.

Driving the news: In a phone call with House Republicans on Friday, Trump articulated why he really doesn’t want this. Impeachment, Trump said, is a “bad thing to have on your resume,” according to a source on the call. Two other sources on the call confirmed the substance of the comment, but one said they recalled Trump phrasing it as “you don’t want it [impeachment] on your resume.”

==================

Former Trump Organization executive says she expects President Trump will resign

SOURCE .

A former Trump Organization executive says she thinks President Donald Trump may resign rather than face possible removal from office by impeachment.

 

“He does a lot of things to save face,” Barbara Res, a former Trump Organization vice president, told CNN’s Brian Stelter on Reliable Sources Sunday.
“It would be very, very, very bad for him to be impeached,” Res said. “I don’t know that he’ll be found guilty but I don’t know that he wants to be impeached. I think that’s what this panic is about. And my gut [instinct] is that he’ll leave office, he’ll resign. Or make some kind of a deal, even, depending on what comes out.”
Res said she was hesitant to share her opinion, because “I could very well be wrong.”

=======

Greg Olear
@gregolear

EVOLUTION OF A TREASON DEFENSE

The whistleblower lied.
The whistleblower is a spy.
The whistleblower is a Democract.
We did it, sure, but to fight corruption.
We do this w/ALL hostile foreign powers.
Mike Pence was more involved than I was.
Rick Perry made me do it.
============

Just like his Treasonous “President”

Eric Walters
@EricTWalters
Chuck Todd: “You dont trust the FBI or CIA?”
Ron Johnson (R-WI): “No, I don’t! I didn’t then and I never have.” That is a real quote from a United States Senator!
==========

One day this madness will end and only a handful of leading conservatives — people like

,

, and

— will be able to hold their heads up high. The rest showed themselves to be unprincipled, craven sycophants.

The ‘Never Trump’ Coalition That Decided Eh, Never Mind, He’s Fine

They signed open letters, dedicated a special magazine issue to criticism him and swore he’d tear at the fabric of this nation…NOW they’ve become the Presideent’s strongest defenders.

SOURCE .

[MY NOTE: NOT ALL Never Trump Conservatives caved. Many stood with and for Constitutional PRINCIPLES.]

===========

He’s either an active Russian Agent or he’s what people in the Company refer to as a ‘Useful Idiot’. Someone who thinks he’s getting what he wants, while actually giving them everything they want. Trump is a useful idiot. But that doesn’t make him any less of a traitor. That he would solicit the Ukraine (a former Soviet puppet) to interfere in the 2020 election at the same time he’s under investigation for Russian interference with the 2016 election really drives home the extreme arrogance underlying his idiocy…Trump knows he’s going to be impeached but it makes a difference to him whether he is impeached for, say, being a Russian agent, or whether it’s for these bogus international Biden investigations.

And I think it matters to a lot of people in Washington as well. If he goes as a Russian agent, there it is for the history books, and it’s a Russian victory for them as well.

Working that out, that’s what I suspect is going on behind the scenes.

 -FB Patriot and Conservative, Eliza Mazur.

========

John Aravosis 

@aravosis
Even Tucker Carlson said Trump’s conversation with the Ukrainian president was indefensible.
Image

=======

Rick Wilson
@TheRickWilson

I’m starting to think The Greatest Negotiator In History(tm) isn’t actually a very good negotiator.

Image

US, North Korea break off nuclear talks: report

SOURCE .

======================

Aaaannnndd…with ALL this going on the world is…well…doing this:

Iran and North Korea's Nuclear Threat Increasing is leading us to believe there might be cooperation.

Iran and North Korea’s Nuclear Threat Increasing. Coincidence or Cooperation?

Iran. If their “Death To America” chants and latest missile launches weren’t enough, we now have North Korea’s nuclear threat increasing. As a result of their recent nuclear test, our Dear Leader has “condemned” Pyongyang, however, he did not do the same with Tehran. Both of these isolationist countries are advancing their nuclear tech at an alarming rate. What I find more alarming, though, is that most major news outlets don’t even beg to question that the two nations are working together.

Let’s start with the year 2007. An article from The Daily Mail nodded at the 2002 State Of The Union speech where George Bush had said Iran and North Korea formed an “axis of evil” along with Iraq. They had, at that point in time, been seeking plans for over a decade to be a state sponsor for terrorism. Now, fast forward almost fifteen years later. Iran has been planning and making deals with North Korea for over two decades…

=======================

FOR MORE SOURCING SEE HERE , HERE , HERE , and HERE .

  1. IF the president was innocent we would have said so in our report,
  2. The reason we didn’t indict Trump was because of OLC memo that prohibits from indicting a sitting president,
  3.  IF Trump were not President we would charge him.

And that is all from just the Mueller investigation!!!

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

The End In Sight???

Laurence Lewis
@TurkanaDK

It’s almost as if he’s a pathological narcissist and gets all his intel from Putin.

Said about “President” Trump.

Why? Besides the obvious…here’s why:

Angry Staffer
@AngrierWHStaff
If you want to know exactly how bonkers Trump’s calls with foreign leaders are, here you go:
Image
AND…
Image
AND…
Image
AND…
Image

Now back to this:

Laurence Lewis
@TurkanaDK

It’s almost as if he’s a pathological narcissist and gets all his intel from Putin.

But this isn’t the first time Trump has sided with Putin/Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Peru…over the Intel from his own U.S. agencies.

 

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

SOURCE . Oct. 21, 2016 

Donald Trump’s claim that the United States has “no idea” who is behind recent email hacks is just not true.

The fact-checking website Politifact says Hillary Clinton is correct when she says 17 federal intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia is behind the hacking.

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday’s presidential debate in Las Vegas.

Trump pushed back, saying that Clinton and the United States had “no idea whether it is Russia, China or anybody else.” [MY NOTE: What?!! 17 of the best Intel agencies in the world ALL AGREE that the hacking WAS DONE BY RUSSIA and you/Trump say the “U.S. had NO idea”?!!! THAT is a LIE, and your always siding with Putin/Russia IS TREASON!]

=============

Intelligence Director Says Agencies Agree on Russian Meddling

SOURCE .

…The “three or four” agencies referred to by Trump are the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all of which were named in a January public report assessing with “high confidence” that Russia interfered in the election.

Other intelligence agencies, such as the U.S. Coast Guard’s, were not involved, Coats said. But, he added, there was no disagreement inside the intelligence community.

============

AND LET’S NOT FORGET JUST HOW PUBLIC TRUMP’S SIDING WITH PUTIN AND RUSSIA HAVE BEEN:

Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit

16 July 2018

SOURCE .

US President Donald Trump has defended Russia over claims of interference in the 2016 presidential election.

After face-to-face talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Trump contradicted US intelligence agencies and said there had been no reason for Russia to meddle in the vote.

Mr Putin reiterated that Russia had never interfered in US affairs.

The two men held nearly two hours of closed-door talks in the Finnish capital Helsinki on Monday.

=================

Before we get to the NEW News, let’s look at the recent whistleblower #1…

A true Texas Conservative, not the Trump butt kissin’ kind like Ted Cruz, Heath Mayo of “Principles First/Principles Matter” conducted indepth analysis of what has been revealed, so far, by the FIRST Whistleblower:

Heath Mayo
@HeathMayo

Reviewed the materials released by the House Committees’ from Amb. Volker testimony and, on a close read, they are more devastating for the White House than even the reporting suggests. Let’s walk through both Volker’s testimony & then the corroborating texts…

Image

First: who is Volker? He’s the former US Rep for Ukraine Negotiations & he resigned a week ago after news of the July 25 call btw Trump & Zelenskyy broke. These are his words—and he immediately rebukes the whole Deep State nonsense right out of the gate. No “spies” or “treason”.

Image

He then frames the entire affair as his dogged effort to “fix a problem as best he could.” He also goes out of his way to highlight that *he* was focused on US national security interests. It’s almost like he thinks the evidence might lead us to question that fact.

Image

So what problem was Volker fixing? “A negative narrative about Ukraine, fueled by assertions made by” Lutsenko, that reached the President and “impeded our ability to support” Ukraine. This is an admission that Trump’s belief in conspiracies & Biden charges influenced US policy.

Image

Then, Volker moves into CYA mode. He disavows knowledge of anything related to Biden—but the revealed text messages suggest otherwise. Indeed, “Burisma” which was clearly code for “Biden” appears routinely throughout, as we’ll see. Read this! Volker clearly knows this smelled.

Image

Finally—Volker goes to great pains to make it clear that he actively opposed withholding aid to Ukraine, along with the rest of practically the entire US national security and foreign policy apparatus. Trump injured American interests to pressure Ukraine into doing his bidding.

Image

The entire Giuliani section makes it clear that he & Trump were undermining the judgment of State officials on Ukraine. And Biden was all over this thing. Burisma clearly equaled investigating Biden throughout. Oh, also—Volker says claims against Biden are bogus.

Image

Listen to Volker’s own assessment of Trump’s inability to even grasp the impact of changing circumstances in Ukraine after the election. This is scary, folks. The President is just dense. He doesn’t understand things and thinks other countries are “trying to take him down.”

Image

Then, in the section of testimony about the Rudy/Yermak tango, Volker discusses negotiations over an official statement that Trump/Rudy wanted Zelenskyy to deliver re: investigating “Burisma & 2016,” presumably to create bad press for Biden. Rudy made repeated demands. Shameful.

Image

Now — let’s move to the smoking guns: the text messages between various players in this shakedown. These are really the nail in the coffin—Volker’s testimony just reinforces how bad this thing was for US interests in Ukraine & his damning feelings & guilt over what occurred.

Image

Thankfully—some of these are so bad, we can cut right to the chase: Here’s Volker advising Yermak about the quid pro quo. Zelenskyy had to convince Trump he would investigate in order to secure a meeting with Trump. This was BEFORE the call.

Quid. Quo. It’s all there.

Image

Need more evidence? Try this from Ambassador Bill Taylor who made clear that’s exactly what he was gathering from the situation. Sondland — who plays the role of yes-man in all this—won’t put things in text. He knows he can’t memorialize the truth.

Image

Bill Taylor doesn’t give in. He’s pissed. Why? Because withholding the aid is playing right into the Russian’s hands. The move was un-American—and they knew it.

Image

Finally—this kicker closes things out. Bill Taylor is furious that aid was withheld and progress in Ukraine stalled “for help with a political campaign.” Sondland unmoved. Notice, after Taylor speaks truth, Sondland takes 5 hrs to compile a legal treatise denying the suggestion.

Image

This was just the *first* witness. This new evidence, combined w/ the July 25 call summary & the WB complaint, makes it abundantly clear that it was common knowledge for officials that a quid pro quo existed whereby Z would agree to investigate Biden for US aid & access. Period.

==================

Now to the NEW News… The 2nd Whistleblower…

Rick Wilson
@TheRickWilson

Just a reminder: it never gets better.

The New York Times
@nytimes
·

Breaking News: A second official with more direct information about President Trump and Ukraine is said be considering whether to file a whistle-blower complaint…

SOURCE .

A second whistleblower on Trump and Ukraine might be coming forward

The New York Times reported that another official is considering making a whistleblower complaint against the president.

The second whistleblower is one of the officials that intelligence community inspector general Michael Atkinson interviewed to corroborate claims made in the initial complaint, according to the Times. Federal law would protect the whistleblower from retaliation, since he’s cooperating with the inspector general.

A second whistleblower with a more intimate familiarity with the events could bolster the allegations against Trump amid pushback from the president and his allies. But it’s important to remember that key allegations from the first whistleblower have already been confirmed by the White House itself and text messages released by the State Department.

We know that the first whistleblower was right about a lot…

=======================

So, let me wrap this up with a quote from a Patriot on Twitter:

THIS is where we are. THIS is who and what America is now.

Yes. We were ONCE a great, good, Godly, Christian nation.

Yes. We still have many REAL praying and discerning Christians in America who weep and pray over what has been growing IN America at least since 1962.

BUT how much longer will The Thrice Holy God put up with America’s wickedness, murder/abortion, lies, fraud, corruption, and depravity can NOT be much longer…or God would must needs apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.

To all real and true Christians who have a broken and discerning heart…pray, pray, pray.

REPENTANCE AND TURNING 100% TO JESUS IS, ALWAYS HAS BEEN, ALWAYS WILL BE…THE ONLY ANSWER.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

FORMULA FOR DEFEAT: THE “WHY?” EDITION

Here we go again…Conservatives, many ONLY so-called/faux Conservatives waving, the white flag of surrender…yeah…again.

HISTORIC PRELUDE.

Waaay back in 1980 there was a real Conservative who actually ran on un-watered down Conservatism…and WON A LANDSLIDE VICTORY for The Presidency. He governed, talk, acted, and behaved as a Conservative, and four years later…won by a larger landslide. This “mythological creature’s” name? RONALD WILSON REAGAN.

He walked, talked, acted, behaved, joked, governed, and WON as a Conservative.

AND WON.

But since then…

[NOTE: some of these were good men, meant well, but were NOT Conservative, NOR did they run, act, or talk like a Conservative, with the possible exception of ONE.]

GEORGE H. W. BUSH- MODERATE, AT BEST; SERVED AS VP UNDER REAGAN; TRIED TO TALK AS A CONSERVATIVE, BUT GOVERNED AS A MODERATE-TO-LIBERAL.

BOB DOLE- MOSTLY CONSERVATIVE; BUT WOULD/COULD NOT PRESENT CONSERVATISM IN AN A WAY THAT APPEALED TO THE MASS OF VOTERS; WOULD NOT GO ON THE OFFENSE DURING CAMPAIGN; NEGOTIATOR, BUT NOT A LEADER.

GEORGE W. BUSH- MODERATE AT BEST; TARP AND BAILOUTS, VERY LIBERAL; NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, VERY LIBERAL. MAY HAVE MEANT WELL, BUT NOT CONSERVATIVE.

JOHN  McCAIN- MODERATE AT BEST; OFTEN ATTACKED CONSERVATIVES AND CONSERVATISM; WOULD TALK/CAMPAIGN AS A “CONSERVATIVE”, GOVERN AS A LEFT-OF-CENTER “MODERATE”; WAS UNORGANISED, AND UNWILLING TO GO ON OFFENSE DURING CAMPAIGN; WOULD/COULD NOT DEFEND OR PRESENT CONSERVATISM IN A MANNER THAT WAS APPEALING.

MITT ROMNEY- MODERATE-TO-CONSERVATIVE; HONORABLE MAN, MOSTLY CONSERVATIVE; SMART, LEVEL HEADED, GREAT ORGANISER; MOSTLY PRESENTED AND RAN ON CONSERVATISM; WAY TOO MANY “CONSERVATIVE” VOTERS GOT HUNG UP ON MITT’S RELIGION, RATHER THAN ON THE FACT(S) HE WAS AN HONEST, HONORABLE, SMART, AND, MOSTLY CONSERVATIVE MAN; WOULD NOT GO ON OFFENCE DURING CAMPAIGN.

TRUMP- HARD-LEFT/HARD CORE NY LIBERAL THAT’S CLOUDED, SHROUDED, AND FOGGED OVER BY LIES, CONS, FRAUD, PERJURY, DECEIT, EGO, PROMISES/DEAL MAKING, AND GENERAL TWO-FACED CORRUPTION; HAS SIDED WITH AMERICA’S ENEMIES AGAINST AMERICA, AGAINST AMERICAN INTEL, AGAINST AMERICAN INTERESTS, AND AGAINST AMERICAN ALLIES; ALL WHILE ATTACKING AMERICAN MEDIA, CONSERVATIVE DISSENT, LIBERAL DISSENT, THE CONSTITUTION, THE ECONOMY, AND OUR ALLIES; HAS A HISTORY GOING BACK TO THE ’70’S OF “MAKING DEALS’ WITH; THE MAFIA, PUTIN-RUSSIA, N. KOREA-UN, CHINA-HU, SAUDI ARABIA-SAUD, UKRAINE-ZELENSKY; THESE “DEALS” INVOLVE EVERYTHING FROM DOING LITERALLY WHATEVER IT TAKES TO MAKE TRUMP $$$ OR GET PRESTIGE, TO OUTRIGHT SELLING OUT AMERICAN, AND TREASON.

Which brings us to NOW…

Just yesterday (9-24-19) I had a lengthy discussion with several ( I believe) Conservatives.

The topic?

THEM: “We need to mobilise and vote Democrat to get rid of Trump. And then in the next 2 to 4 years vote in Conservatives.”

ME:
The way to defeat Liberalism is NOT with more or “other” Liberalism.

You do NOT put out a fire pouring gasoline on it and adding more fuel.

IF those who claim Conservatism would spend as much time, energy, money, thought, and effort into presenting, proclaiming, and mobilising FOR CONSERVATISM AND CONSERVATIVES WE WOULD HAVE CONSERVATIVES AND CONSERVATISM.

WHY are (so-called) Conservatives ONLY energised, motivated, and mobilised to appeal to, campaign for, and elect LIBERALS?!!

What is WRONG with them?!!

They say they are Conservative.

They say they want Conservatism.

Aaannndd then push to elect LIBERALS!!!

THAT is a level of asinine-ery that there is NO measurement for!

IF YOU ARE A REAL CONSTITUTION-BASED, LIBERTY LOVING, SMALL AS POSSIBLE GOVERNMENT, GUT TAXES AND SPENDING CONSERVATIVE THEN…

Then act like a Conservative.

Talk like a Conservative. 

Behave like a Conservative.

Vote like a Conservative, meaning VOTE FOR CONSERVATIVES.

Organise, mobilise, present, proclaim, and appeal TO Conservatives and Conservatism.

ALL ELSE IS LIBERALISM AND BEING A LIBERAL. PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION. CRAP!

This IS basic common-sense. It (once) didn’t NEED to be spelled out this clearly. And shouldn’t have to be broke down like this TODAY!

But we have far too many who are pretend, faux, so-called “Conservatives”. These are traitors, turncoats, backstabbers, and two-faced cons and liars who spend their time, energy, $$$, and efforts presenting and defending Liberals and Liberalism; all while BOTH 1. clouding over/muddying the issue(s), and 2) Performing Defend-N-Deflect, Smoke-N-Mirrors, Bait-N-Switch attacks on REAL Conservatives.

Add to that toxic, treasonous mix the clueless, spineless, weak (possibly) real Conservatives and you have THE REASON Commie, Jackass, Traitors like Trump can get elected…maybe even re-elected!!

THE CONCLUSION.

This is ONLY to/for those who ARE REAL Conservatives:

  1. BE CONSERVATIVE.
  2. STAY CONSERVATIVE.
  3. STAY ON MESSAGE WITH PRESENTING CONSERVATISM.
  4. STAY ON MESSAGE WITH APPEALING TO CONSERVATISM & CONSERVATIVES.
  5. STAY ON MESSAGE WITH DEFENDING, DEFINING, AND EXPLAINING CONSERVATISM.
  6. STAY ON MESSAGE WITH POINTING OUT THE STARK DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONSERVATISM AND LIBERALISM.
  7. MOBILISE CONSERVATIVES.
  8. MOBILISE FOR CONSERVATISM.
  9. VOTE CONSERVATIVE.
  10. TALK CONSERVATIVE.
  11. BE CONSERVATIVE.

Conservatism and Liberalism have already long been defined. 

This is Conservatism , and HERE .

This is Liberalism , and HERE .

ONLY 2 groups of people can not/will not see the VAST DIFFERENCE between the two:

  1. THE STUPID.
  2. THE LIAR.

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

What Is It Going To Take?

JUST WHAT WILL IT TAKE FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON A LAWLESS PRESIDENT TO HAVE HAD ENOUGH AND DO SOMETHING ALREADY?!!

I am far from the only one who wishes, wants, begs, even DEMANDS that Congress, The Courts, somebody with The Constitutional authority to DO something would just get off their butt or soap-box and, then, DO WHAT IT TAKES TO STOP THIS MADDENING, TREASONOUS DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA!!

Here is but one of the tens of millions of Patriots who express their frustration at Trump’s treason, fraud, corruption, lies, perjury, obstruction of justice, and the general selling out of America…listen to them as they describe an all too familiar pattern:

Wendy Wood
@WWoodUK

Here we go again…

Major evidence of Trump’s treasonous acts.

Pelosi, & other Dems express their outrage, (do nothing. My edit.)

Slight pause by Trump minions and GOP

-until…

Narrative is owned by Trump, Minions, GOP, FoxNews.

Rinse, Repeat.

I Am Sick Of This!!

#ImpeachTrumpNow

=========

Logical reasons why Trump should NOT ever be President:

  1. TRUMPS NOT FIT FOR ANY OFFICE. NOT DOG CATCHER OF HOOTERVILLE, KENTUCKY, LET ALONE PRESIDENT. Lies. Perjury. Fraud. Lack of civility. Lack of being SERIOUS about The Constitutional Duties and Responsibilities of being President. Total lack of education, intelligence, wisdom, discretion, and the discernment to BE President. He is rash, brash, crass, volatile, vile, vulgar, crude, rude, impudent, ill tempered, prone to snap judgments based on his instincts and gut feelings, and a depraved loudmouth jerk. Simply: Trump is NOT fit emotionally, mentally, NOR morally to be President.
  2. TRUMP SHOULD NEVER BE PRESIDENT BASED ON HIS DO WHATEVER IT TAKES (for him) TO WIN- AMERICAN AND EVERYONE ELSE BE SCREWED. Trump didn’t need to be blackmailed into conspiring with Putin. Trump is so vile, so moralless, and so completely about HIMSELF that he’d throw America, friends, even family under the bus to get what HE wants. Trump’s utter depravity made him the PERFECT mark and puppet for Putin, Kim Jung Un, Hu, and the Saudi Royal family. America’s worst enemies simply flatter, and offer him a token gift…and “BOOM!” they have whatever they want in return: elections, control of our economy, control of our Intel Community, and control over our military. THEY call the shots. NOT Congress, and certainly NOT “We The People”, NOR The Constitution. Simply: Trump is NOT honest, NOR has the integrity, and character to be President.
  3. TRUMP, BY HIS VERY NATURE, IS A FRAUD, A LIAR, AND A CON MAN. HE IS WILLING TO SELL OUT AMERICA, FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO GET WHAT HE WANTS. From Comey to Sessions to Mueller to Michael Cohen…to…who’s next?!! Trump doesn’t give a flying rat’s backside who or what he tramples to get what he wants, and to save his hide…it’s ALL about Trump with Trump.

So, in these three categories we can then place mountains of abuses and crimes by Trump Inc. …and the “Fake News” HAS filled each quite well…so far to NO avail.

Here is my own personal research and evidence:

What We KNOW, And What SHOULD be Done About It

===

Trump: Our National Dumpster Fire

===

Poppa Trump Loves Jr.

===

Can America Survive Trump’s Vitriolic Brand Of Liberalism?

===

MUELLER NOT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION.

===

CELEBRATING ALL THAT IS (THE REAL) TRUMPUTIN.

===

Remarkable Treason

===

This is NOT all the research and evidence I have, to see it all go HERE .

What are others saying about this? Oh, let’s take a looksee:

Walter Shaub
@waltshaub

 

What are you doing right now? Remember it. For the rest of your life that will be the answer when you’re asked what you did when the President of the United States solicited an attack on America.

I’m the Senator who blocked efforts to hold him accountable.

I’m the congressional representative who attacked the whistleblower.

I’m the craven politician who hid under my desk.

I’m the reporter who uncritically amplified the discredited claim about Trump’s rival.

I normalized his conduct.

I criticized those sounding the alarm for being hyperbolic.

I’m the frog who feel asleep as the water temperature rose.”

I went after some other shining thing he dangled.”

I told everyone there’s nothing we can do.

“I watched the republic die.”

Folks, you’re fine. Unless you’re in Congress or the media, the only item in that list for you was not telling others there’s nothing they can do. But here’s a thing you can do: Make sure reporters and Congress know that this is the red line. Flood both with messages and tweets!

IN REPLY WAS THIS:

Jennifer Taub
@jentaub

Replying to

Here’s what I’m doing . . .please join

Our voices matter now more than ever. We will flood the phones. Today, and Monday, and Tuesday, we must call the Congressional Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

Things could move quickly now. Why? Friday’s news that Trump asked the president of Ukraine eight times during a phone call to investigate his political rival, clearly in exchange for military funding for protection from Russia. This is criminal. It’s impeachable.

===

Another Patriot asked:

Jennifer Rubin
@JRubinBlogger

 

Seriously is there ever a point at which Cruz, Cotton, Sasse etc say: “I’m defending a traitor here. This has to stop.”?

===

If This Isn’t Impeachable, Nothing Is

 

Money is seen in the back pocket of U.S. President Donald Trump as he boards Air Force One.

The president of the United States reportedly sought the help of a foreign government against an American citizen who might challenge him for his office. This is the single most important revelation in a scoop by The Wall Street Journal, and if it is true, then President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office immediately.

Until now, there was room for reasonable disagreement over impeachment as both a matter of politics and a matter of tactics. The Mueller report revealed despicably unpatriotic behavior by Trump and his minions, but it did not trigger a political judgment with a majority of Americans that it warranted impeachment. The Democrats, for their part, remained unwilling to risk their new majority in Congress on a move destined to fail in a Republican-controlled Senate.

Now, however, we face an entirely new situation. In a call to the new president of Ukraine, Trump reportedly attempted to pressure the leader of a sovereign state into conducting an investigation—a witch hunt, one might call it—of a U.S. citizen, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden.

As the Ukrainian Interior Ministry official Anton Gerashchenko told the Daily Beast when asked about the president’s apparent requests, “Clearly, Trump is now looking for kompromat to discredit his opponent Biden, to take revenge for his friend Paul Manafort, who is serving seven years in prison.”

===

Crikey! What Trump asked for on live tv in a national debate with Hillary Clinton, he NOW is repeating against Biden in a private phone call!!!!! 

Will ANYONE step forward and STOP this TREASON??!!!

===============================

So, let me close as I opened by asking:

What’s it going to take to DO something to remove Trump and Co. from their offices and positions?!!

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

COLON KRAPERNICK

PICTURE ABOVE OF A LIBERAL JACKASS, I KNOW, REDUNDANT.

 

PROLOGUE.

Due to moving A LOT, BEING A PREACHER’S KID, growing up tall fast, having a long/funny last name, having crew cuts in the late ’60’s-’70’s when my friends were going hippie…here is my personal experience at “oppression and bigotry” :

  1. was “the new kid”, an outsider, much of my life,
  2. was called names due my long, German/”funny” last name,
  3. was mocked for being a PK,
  4. because I was tall, but scrawny, bullies targeted me,
  5. because I was growing tall fast (was 6 ft. tall in 6th grade) I was constantly out-growing my jeans/pants, hence was mocked for wearing “high waters”, and getting ready for the flood,
  6. was daily called stupid, dummy, idiot, dork, nerd, jerk, loser…and those are the non-profanity laced names I was called,
  7. got beat up almost daily,
  8. had my belongings, bike, and possessions vandalised,
  9. had as many as 8-10 sports jocks meet me at my locker to take turns insulting and hitting me,
  10. was NEVER included in any parties, events, anything,
  11. was always blamed for whatever went wrong, even if it was not possible for me to be the blame…

So, there you have it. I was “oppressed”.

Now a closer look at Colon Krapernick, aka Colin Kaepernick.

Kaepernick was born in 1987 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to Heidi Russo, who was white.[6][7] His birth father, who was African-American, separated from Russo before Kaepernick was born.[8][9][10] Russo placed Kaepernick for adoption with a white couple named Rick and Teresa Kaepernick. The couple who had two older children, son Kyle and daughter Devon. The Kaepernicks decided to adopt a boy after losing two other sons to heart defects.[8][11][12]

Kaepernick lived in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin until age four when his family moved to California.[13][14] When he was eight years old, Kaepernick began playing youth football as a defensive end and punter. At age nine, he was the starting quarterback on his youth team, and he completed his first pass for a long touchdown.[13] A 4.0 GPA student[15] at John H. Pitman High School in Turlock, California, Kaepernick played football, basketball and baseball and was nominated for All-State selection in all three sports his senior year. He was the Most Valuable Player (MVP) of the Central California Conference in football, leading his school to its first-ever playoff victory. In basketball, he was a first-team all CCC selection at forward and led his 16th-ranked team to a near upset of #1 ranked Oak Ridge High School in the opening round of playoffs. In that game, Kaepernick scored 34 points but future NBA player Ryan Anderson of Oak Ridge scored 50 points to lead his team to a victory.[16]

Kaepernick started his college career at Nevada playing in 11 of the team’s 13 games. He finished the season with nineteen passing touchdowns, three interceptions, and 2,175 passing yards with a 53.8% completion percentage.[17] Kaepernick also added 593 rushing yards and six rushing touchdowns as the Nevada Wolf Pack finished 6-7.[18]

Kaepernick played college football for the University of Nevada where he was named the Western Athletic Conference (WAC) Offensive Player of the Year twice and became the only player in NCAA Division I FBS history to amass 10,000 passing yards and 4,000 rushing yards in a career. After graduating, he was selected by the San Francisco 49ers in the second round of the 2011 NFL Draft. Kaepernick began his professional football career as a backup quarterback to Alex Smith, and became the 49ers’ starter in the middle of the 2012 season after Smith suffered a concussion. He then remained the team’s starting quarterback for the rest of the season, leading the team to their first Super Bowl appearance since 1994. During the 2013 season, his first full season as a starter, Kaepernick helped the 49ers reach the NFC Championship Game. Over the next three seasons, Kaepernick lost and won back his starting job, with the 49ers missing the playoffs for three years consecutively.

Kaepernick was baptized Methodistconfirmed Lutheran, and attended a Baptist church during his college years.[104] Kaepernick spoke about his faith saying, “I think God guides me through every day and helps me take the right steps and has helped me to get to where I’m at.”[105] Kaepernick has multiple tattoos about his faith. His right arm features a scroll with the Bible verse Psalm 18:39 written on it. Tattooed under the scroll are praying hands with the phrase “To God The Glory” written on them. To the left of both the scroll and praying hands is the word “Faith” written vertically. His left arm features a Christian cross with the words “Heaven Sent” on it referring to Jesus Christ. Written above and below the cross is the phrase “God Will Guide Me”. Written to the left and right of the cross is the Bible verse Psalm 27:3.[106][107][108]

Kaepernick reportedly started dating radio personality and television host Nessa Diab in July 2015,[109] and officially went public about their relationship in February 2016.[110]

[NOTE: Nessa Diad is a Black Muslim, and leader in the Liberal, Militant “Black Lives Matter” group that implements socialism, America-hatred, racism, and violence as part of the S.O.P. Shortly after Colon began dating Muslim woman, Nessa Diad, he began his Anti-American bullying tactics and spreading the Liberal LIES of “oppression”…AND became a vegan, see below.]

Kaepernick began following a vegan diet in late 2015.[111]

ALSO, IMMEDIATELY AFTER hooking up with the Muslim, Black Lives Matter, Socialist Activist, Colon began his idiotic jihad:
In the 49ers third preseason game of the 2016 season, Kaepernick was noticed sitting down during the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” as opposed to the tradition of standing. During a post-game interview, he explained his position stating, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder”, referencing a series of African-American deaths caused by law enforcement that led to the Black Lives Matter movement and adding that he would continue to protest until he feels like “[the American flag] represents what it’s supposed to represent”.[72][73][74]

In July 2019, Nike, Inc. released a shoe featuring the Betsy Ross flag called the Air Max 1 Quick Strike Fourth of July trainers. The trainers were designed to celebrate Independence Day. The model was subsequently withdrawn after Colin Kaepernick told the brand he and others found the flag offensive because they associated it with slavery.[86][87][88] J

TIME FOR FACTS AND REAL HISTORY.

  1. THERE HAS BEEN NO SLAVERY IN THE U.S. SINCE 1865, WHITE PEOPLE FOUGHT A WAR TO FREE THE SLAVES.
  2. THE BETSY ROSS FLAG WAS, AND IS, RIGHTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, A WAR FOR LIBERTY.
  3. COLON WAS NEVER OPPRESSED IN HIS LIFETIME ANYMORE THAN I WAS, SEE PROLOGUE.
  4. COLON WAS, AND  IS, RATHER RICH AND PRIVILEGED…AND WRONG AND STUPID.
  5. COLON WAS NEVER A SLAVE. NO BLACKS, NO “PEOPLE OF COLOR”, HAVE BEEN SLAVES IN AMERICA SINCE 1865.
  6. THERE ARE NO SLAVE OWNERS ALIVE…ANYWHERE IN AMERICA.
  7. THIS IS NOTHING OTHER THAN MARXISM, DELUSION, LIES, AND FRAUD…AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND I’M BEING REDUNDANT.

SO there it is.
Colon Krapernick’s entire life as he  knows and lives it is a LIE. Yes, I called him names throughout…but that is NOT “oppression”, that is TRUTH IN LABELING.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

Eh, How bad Can It get?

No photo description available.

BUGS BUNNY, A VAST IMPROVEMENT OVER THE JACKASS-N-CHIEF WE HAVE NOW…JUST SAYIN’…

SERIOUSLY though, this article is 99.99% the work of Twitter Patriot, Legal expert, Thorough researcher, and Genuine investigative reporter, SETH ABRAMS…let’s commence, shall we?

GOING TO POST THE ENTIRE THREAD FROM TWITTER PATRIOT EXTRAORDINAIRE, SETH ABRAMS.

SOURCE .

(THREAD) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS (CNN): Convicted Kremlin agent Maria Butina’s longtime boyfriend confirms that Don Jr. met secretly with Kremlin agents for an hour during the 2015 NRA Conference in Knoxville; Don Jr. therefore lied to Congress about collusion. Please RT and read on.

Image

1/ This story is still developing—and confusing enough that only those who’ve researched the Trump-Russia case for years understood its import when it first broke; many others are currently misreporting it, [MY NOTES: LIKE FOX]. I’m going to do my best to get this 100% right for you—as it’s huge news.

2/ SUMMARY: All agree Butina was a Kremlin agent working for a Kremlin official—Torshin; all agree she used sex to access targets; all agree she infiltrated the NRA and aimed to infiltrate Team Trump; all agree her job was to end sanctions. We *didn’t* know Jr. met with her team.

3/ BACKGROUND (all taken from PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, the Mueller Report, and major-media sources): in early 2015, the future top Trump adviser on Russia, Dmitri Simes, met with Putin; thereafter, he helped Alexander Torshin and Butina gain access to top federal banking officials.

 

4/ Torshin and Butina wanted access to banking officials as part of what is now confirmed as a Russian intelligence operation aimed at—among other things—gaining confidential data about the Ziff Brothers, whose Clinton donations the Kremlin thought could be used against Hillary.

5/ During the period Simes—the former top Trump adviser on Russia who now makes $500,000/year working for the Kremlin’s TV network, RT—was aiding Torshin/Butina, he was trying to Torshin’s aid for the top funder of his pro-Kremlin think tank, the Center for the National Interest.

6/ Filings in the Butina case confirm that—in early 2015—Butina/Torshin aimed to infiltrate the NRA and, if possible, Trump’s campaign. Butina’s ex-boyfriend, Patrick Byrne, has now confirmed Butina *spoke* of infiltrating four campaigns, but in fact only focused on one: Trump’s.

7/ We don’t know exactly who puts the FBI onto Russia’s activities—though to be clear both the hacking and propaganda operations run by the Kremlin in 2016 had *already begun* by Spring 2015. We also know the FBI was investigating George Papadopoulos as a possible Israeli agent.

8/ Given that it later prosecuted Butina, made Torshin an unindicted co-conspirator, got warrants on Papadopoulos, and turned Simes into the shocking “star” of Volume 1 of the Mueller Report, there’s a reasonable chance—but we don’t know—that the FBI was long tracking all four.

 

9/ The upshot to this part of the story is this: FBI agent Peter Strzok was running an FBI probe in early 2015 that believed—it turns out, 100% correctly—that Kremlin agents under Putin’s control sought to infiltrate Trump’s 2016 campaign. Tonight we got *major* new news on this.

10/ Butina’s ex-boyfriend—businessman Patrick Byrne—tonight *confirmed* to CNN that Butina said she had “close ties” to “four of the top seven oligarchs in Russia” and that she was in a position to orchestrate him (Byrne) meeting *one-on-one with Putin himself*. This is 100% new.

11/ Byrne further *confirms* to CNN that Butina said she was working for Torshin, a Kremlin official, and that she’d been tasked with infiltrating Trump’s campaign. She said the purpose was “peace”—which is the term the Kremlin uses (systematically) to refer to sanctions relief.

12/ We’ve long known that at the spring 2015 NRA Conference in Knoxville, Donald Trump Jr. made contact with Torshin; both men claimed that they randomly found themselves near one another and spoke only briefly of inconsequential things—and that’s what Don Jr. told Congress, too.

13/ We don’t know Torshin’s full story—as he fled to Russia. Likewise, we don’t know Simes’s full story—as he took a job for the Kremlin in Moscow. But in my 2018 book PROOF OF COLLUSION, I wrote of a major-media story that hinted Don Jr. *might* have been lying about Knoxville.

14/ CORRECTION: I mean Nashville, Tennessee, not Knoxville, Tennessee. My sister went to University of Tennessee in Knoxville, so it’s more on my brain than it is with most people. Wherever I wrote Knoxville above, I’m speaking of Nashville. OK, to continue with this major story:

15/ PROOF OF COLLUSION offered major-media reporting that a) Torshin’s meeting with Don Jr. wasn’t accidental; b) they discussed more than pleasantries; c) Torshin had been tasked to get Don Jr. to come with him to a second location for a secret meeting. That’s what I had *then*.

16/ According to Byrne, Butina told him that—at a time when she was connected to “four of the top seven oligarchs in Russia” and could orchestrate *face-to-face meetings with Putin*—she and Torshin successfully got Don Jr. to go to a second location for a one-hour secret meeting.

17/ This secret meeting in Nashville took place in April 2015, per Butina, just 60 days before Trump announced his presidential run. At *any* meeting between Torshin, Butina, Trump Jr., and other Kremlin agents, the topic Torshin and Butina were assigned to discuss was sanctions.

18/ By 30 days after Trump announced his run in June 2015, he *still* had not made a major official declaration of his policy on Russia sanctions. Then he went to FreedomFest in Las Vegas in July 2015. Butina was there and Byrne was there. Butina was posing as a young journalist.

19/ The event was televised, so any statement by Trump was certain to be seen by Putin and other leaders. Butina, posing as a journalist, asked Trump to state his position on sanctions. Trump—whose son had apparently secretly met with Butina and her boss—said he wanted them gone.

20/ It was at the 2015 Las Vegas event that Butina first approached Byrne; at the time she was in a relationship with GOP operative Paul Erickson, who’s since been indicted on multiple charges. Butina, the Kremlin agent, seduced Byrne, and they soon began a romantic relationship.

21/ Byrne is unclear on whether he contacted the FBI about Butina before or after their romantic relationship began. In any case, Byrne is clear he *wasn’t* acting as an FBI CI in Las Vegas; he was there as a *speaker*, but had worked with the FBI previously on unrelated matters.

22/ In any case, Butina’s conduct in trying to recruit Byrne is so suspicious that he alerts the FBI because he has prior—unrelated—contacts in the organization. The FBI, which has already—it turns out, 100% correctly—begun investigating Butina, asks Byrne to continue to see her.

23/ Byrne now says federal officials have told him that the order for him to keep seeing Butina came from Peter Strzok, James Comey and one other person—which would make sense, given that these are the men who were heading up the Russian election-interference probe at that point.

24/ In the months after Butina—following a meeting with Trump Jr.gets Trump to oppose sanctions on TV, Butina so infiltrates the NRA that she’s able to arrange a trip by the NRA’s top brass to Moscow to meet Putin at the same time Trump adviser Flynn is in Moscow to meet Putin.

 

25/ Just over a year after meeting with Putin—who has called Simes a “friend”—and during a period he’s still in contact with Torshin and Butina, Simes manages to insinuate himself into the Trump Camp during a March ’16 Center for the National Interest event that Jared Kushner attends.

6/ Thereafter, Simes becomes the “Russia whisperer” of the Trump campaign—involving himself in every major Russia-related foreign policy event and policy paper Trump’s campaign constructs between March and November 2016. Shortly after Butina is arrested, Simes *flees to Moscow*.

27/ Don Jr. testifies to Congress that he had no significant contacts with Torshin. But media reports suggest that not only—if Butina’s claims are true—did Don Jr. meet with Torshin, but *so did Trump himself*. Torshin ultimately tweets out that he met Trump at an NRA conference.

28/ Live television, folks. Going to correct one or two things that don’t change the story but more properly align events and dates.

29/ In late 2015, Alexander Torshin claimed on Twitter that he knew Trump from the NRA and could speak to his character. Torshin and Trump both attended the April 2015 NRA Conference in Nashville, so the assumption has been that they met at that time.

Russian politician claims he knows Trump through NRA connections: report

SOURCE .

30/ The secret Torshin/Trump Jr. meeting occurred, per Butina’s statements to Byrne, at *either* the Nashville NRA Conference in spring 2015 *or* the Louisville NRA Conference in spring 2016 *or* both. Byrne, in speaking to CNN, was not clear on this. But Byrne has corroboration.

31/ We already know that prosecutors investigating Torshin abroad have intimated that Trump Jr. is lying about his contacts with Torshin, which (as I wrote in PROOF OF COLLUSION) is further suggested by Trump Jr.’s lies about the meeting and Torshin’s plans for an off-site event.

2/ Here’s the 2018 YAHOO NEWS article (from Michael Isikoff, the author—with David Corn—of the New York Times bestseller RUSSIAN ROULETTE) about wiretaps that apparently incriminate Trump Jr. with respect to him lying to Congress about Alexander Torshin:

‘Trump’s Son Should Be Concerned’: FBI Obtained Wiretaps Of Putin Ally Who Met With Trump Jr.

The wiretaps feature conversations between Alexander Torshin and Alexander Romanov, a convicted Russian money launderer.

SOURCE .

33/ Earlier in the thread, I indicated that we *knew* Patrick Byrne was saying the Trump Jr.-Butina-Torshin meeting happened in 2015; reviewing his interview, it’s more accurate to say that he indicates the meeting could have occurred in 2015 in Nashville *or* 2016 in Louisville.

34/ By the way, between those two events Torshin tweeted this:

Image

35/ It’s *marginally* more likely the secret Trump Jr.-Butina-Torshin meeting happened in 2016 in Louisville, as we *know* the two men interacted at that event. But that said, it seems Torshin and Trump Sr. interacted in 2015 in Nashville—and *we know Trump Jr. was in Nashville*.

36/ We know Trump Jr. was in Nashville in 2015 because his father said so during his speech:

 

The Making of Donald Trump and the NRA’s Marriage of Convenience

How a potent odd couple came together, in 14 steps.

SOURCE .

37/ NOTE: I’m going to say something now that I can’t believe I’m going to say… but the next tweet is really one that *everyone* needs to read *carefully* and understand because it could point toward the most important revelation in the entire Trump-Russia investigation so far.

8/ 1) Trump and Don Jr. were both in Nashville and both in Louisville.

2) Torshin—by 7 months after Nashville—says he knows Trump via the NRA.

3) Butina says Don Jr. attended a secret meeting with Torshin in either Nashville or Louisville.

4) Why wouldn’t *Trump* have gone too?

39/ 5) SCENARIO #1: If Kremlin agent Torshin met Trump in Nashville in 2015 as he implies—and if the secret meeting was in Nashville—why would Don Jr. have gone in his father’s place, and how would Torshin be able to say he met *Trump* if *Trump* didn’t also attend that meeting?

40/ 6) SCENARIO #2: If Butina is saying the secret Torshin-Don Jr. meeting was in *Louisville*, that’s months *after* Torshin says he already knows Trump—and media reports say Torshin wanted to see Trump in Louisville. So why wouldn’t Trump have attended *that* secret meeting?

41/ In any case, what we have now is Don Jr. meeting secretly with Kremlin agent Torshin in—most likely—Louisville in spring ’16, and later lying about it to Congress. Torshin is—at the time—apparently connected to an op looking to get dirt on Clinton involving the Ziff Brothers.

 

42/ When Jr. gets contacted a few weeks later—in early June—and learns the Kremlin has dirt on Clinton it wants to give him, guess what the dirt is about? As confirmed by US media’s publication of the Kremlin talking points for that meeting, the info involves…the Ziff Brothers.

43/ Trump and Don Jr. thereafter lie about the meeting in which Jr. learned of the HRC “dirt” Torshin had been connecting to uncovering. And they *also* lie about the *other* topic of that June 2016 meeting: the “peace” Butina was working for, that is to say… sanctions relief.

 

44/ SUMMARY: So there’s now a clear throughline establishing a Kremlin operation involving Putin, his top four oligarchs, Butina, Torshin and Simes—one that involves infiltrating the Trump campaign through the NRA and specifically Don Jr. Both Don and his dad then lied about it.

45/ To me, the craziest part of all this is that when it hit media this evening, those who picked it up didn’t know enough about the Trump-Russia timeline to know what they were hearing. So they fell into a trap laid by the far-right “journalist” who spoke to Byrne—Sara Carter.

46/ Carter falsely claims the *real* story here is… the FBI asking Byrne to keep seeing Butina. I’ve no idea why that’d be a story, or why it’d be a story if—as Byrne says—Strzok and Comey issued that order. They were…*investigating Russia*. Of *course* they issued the order.

47/ The three Russian election-interference campaigns—hacking, propaganda, and infiltration—began in 2014 and 2015. It was always my assumption—it should’ve been everyone’s—that the best intelligence agencies in the world (ours) were on to the Russians’ activities not long after.

48/ That’s why, when the story came out that Mueller was looking into Papadopoulos’ overseas activities *before* he approached the Trump campaign the first time—in summer *2015*—it made sense: because the multinational collusion(s) PROOF OF CONSPIRACY details had started by then.

49/ I won’t rehash the whole Red Sea Conspiracy here—as that’s what PROOF OF CONSPIRACY will do when it’s published September 3. Suffice to say that activities in Israel, Russia, and the UAE in *2014* communicated to U.S. intelligence that a strange new alliance was being formed.

50/ The FBI, when it’s investigating a major national security issue—an attack by a hostile foreign power on our infrastructure, which was being investigated beginning in summer ’15 at the *latest*—*absolutely* is going to use a new resource like Byrne if he drops into their lap.
51/ Byrne maintains that the FBI agents he spoke to were honorable, were apologetic about asking him to falsely keep up a Butina relationship, and represented that they were pursuing key law enforcement duties. It’s the *last* portion of Byrne’s interview that’s sowing confusion.
52/ Byrne—citing no evidence at all—now says that he feels he was used to conduct “political espionage.” And even odder, he says that espionage was being conducted against *both* the Trump *and* Clinton campaigns. But his view on this seems to all stem from a single name: Strzok.
53/ That is, people like Sara Carter have convinced a certain brand of conspiracy theorist that just because Strzok didn’t like Trumpjust like *150 million Americans don’t*—it *automatically* means he was willing to throw away his FBI career to try to frame him and stage a coup.
54/ Mind you, Mueller did a thorough review of Strzok’s work and found *no* fault with it. Strzok got in trouble due to private texts—not his professional responsibilities. But because Byrne has become convinced—without evidence—that Strzok framed Trump, he feels Strzok used him.

55/ The result of all this is media is reporting the biggest breakthrough in the Trump-Russia investigation so far as though it confirms some sort of “deep-state” conspiracy—rather than just that Byrne isn’t happy about what he was asked to do now that he knows Strzok ordered it.

56/ As we’ve seen, Byrne’s revelations in fact have nothing to do with Strzok; rather, they’re about: (1) Donald Trump Jr.’s secret meetings and lies to Congress, (2) Maria Butina’s much-higher-than-known level of access to Putin and his oligarchs, and (3) the Trump-Torshin link.

57/ Here’s what absolutely has to happen now:

(1) Byrne has to be called before Congress.

(2) Donald Trump Jr. has to be called back before Congress.

(3) Trump has to be asked about every meeting he ever had with Alex Torshin, Maria Butina, or any agents of either Kremlin agent.

 

58/ And: (4) Media must clean up its reporting from tonight. Byrne is offering *no evidence* he was used for “political espionage”; he’s merely angry at Strzok—and therefore upset that Strzok apparently urged him to keep seeing Butina. His story is important for *other* reasons.

59/ But I also want underscore that Patrick Byrne’s story isn’t *legible* to anyone who hasn’t been researching the Trump-Russia case for years. I’ve been doing that—and have written two books on the subject—and even *I* had to listen hard to understand what Byrne was revealing.

60/ I don’t say that to be self-aggrandizing; I believe that *anyone* who fully understands the timeline and players in the Trump-Russia case would see and can confirm all I’ve said—so I’m not special for having “figured something out.” I’m just explaining why US media missed it.

61/ As for Carter, I don’t know why she misrepresented this. There’s an obvious potential reason—a political agenda—and a less-obvious reason: that some on the right are trying to “launder” bad information for Trump by reframing it falsely. But I don’t know if that happened here.

62/ It must be underscored that Byrne is a problematic witness—just not in a way that would necessarily undercut *this* story [i.e., in the way it’s important]. He clearly still has feelings for Butina; he deeply admires her; he even thinks that she should be President of Russia.

63/ Byrne’s story is significant exclusively because of statements his girlfriend made to him at a time those statements were either (1) against her interest, or (2) corroborated subsequently by other means. Let me explain what I mean by that, as it’s important.

64/ Federal filings confirm that Torshin and Butina were running an intelligence op to infiltrate the NRA and Trump’s campaign.

65/ It would have been *entirely detrimental to that intelligence op* for either of the two Kremlin agents to falsely claim to have had contact with anyone in the Trump family.

 

66/ Doing so would risk arousing the ire of their marks and diminishing their credibility and therefore potentially compromising their entire operation. So there are indicia of reliability in what Butina said to Byrne about Trump Jr. It’s also consistent with major media reports.

67/ Those news reports place the relevant parties at the relevant locations and with the stated intent to establish communications. We even had prior reporting that Torshin wanted an off-site meeting with Trump Jr. and that wiretaps would prove Trump Jr. lied about what happened.

68/ It’s clear Byrne believed his story was helping Butina *and moreover* it is clear from Carter’s reporting and Byrne’s CNN interview that Butina’s *U.S. lawyers* also thought so. So there’s no sense *anyone* here realized this would actually sink Butina, or wanted that result.

69/ One would have to be an idiot to hear or see the interview Patrick Byrne gave with CNN and *not* wonder about his reliability. The problem is that media reports also say that the FBI believed his story and, again, the relevant parts aren’t really touched by Byrne’s weirdness.

70/ And of course I’m leaving out entire swaths of corroboration for the sake of brevity. For instance, we already know that Donald Trump Jr. has lied under oath about these *very matters* (and others), and that Torshin and Simes both fled the country *when Butina was arrested*.

71/ The boasts Butina made about her extraordinarily well-placed Kremlin contacts were *confirmed* when she invited to Moscow, and then hosted in Moscow, top NRA brass, who were then ushered into meetings with top Kremlin officials. So she wasn’t lying to Byrne about any of that.

72/ I could go on (for instance regarding the telling synchronicity of Flynn being in Moscow while Butina was hosting the NRA brass, as we know what Flynn was in Moscow to do and who he was there to meet with) but the broader point is that weird people *aren’t* necessarily liars.

73/ I can readily understand, given the foregoing, why DOJ (presumably attorneys with the IG) believed Byrne. The question is whether they *only* looked at the Strzok angle, because that’s the only thing *they* are tasked with looking at right now. Mueller is [prematurely] gone.

74/ When Bob Mueller, to the shock of everyone except (oddly) the husband of Trump’s communications director, closed up shop almost immediately after Trump’s handpicked AG, Bill Barr, was confirmed, I was one of those saying, “What happens if new info comes out? Who handles it?”

75/ The one thing Carter may have gotten *right*, albeit inadvertently, is that at present the entirely silly and unimportant Strzok angle *is* the only one being looked at, because Byrne chose to go to DOJ, and therefore the IG looking at *just* that narrow (GOP-invented) issue.

 

76/ That Peter Strzok’s work was reviewed and found professional doesn’t matter to the conspiracy theorists obsessed with him. And when he *chose* to sue the FBI, thereby *opening himself up to questioning under oath*, even *then* they didn’t say, “Huh! Maybe this guy is clean?”

77/ But none of that solves the current problem: with Mueller having prematurely wrapped up his work (for whatever reason), there’s no one to publicly interview and publicly report on an interview with Byrne unless Congress does it or we see the FBI’s counterintelligence reports.

78/ As to the question asked—see below in the feed—by Maya Wiley about how Byrne could’ve had counterintelligence information about Butina that didn’t make it into Mueller’s report, that’s precisely the evidence Mueller said he left out (leaving out Butina/Torshin particularly).

79/ Just so, the probe Mueller did isn’t synonymous with the probe *Strzok* did—as Strzok and Comey were investigating Russian election interference well over a *year* before Mueller was appointed and chose to employ the former of the two (with good reason, given his prior role).

80/ Ever since the Mueller Report dropped and we learned—on p. 10 of Volume 1—that *all counterintelligence evidence* had been removed from the report with few if any exceptions, I’ve been saying that (as it turns out) on *collusion* we still haven’t seen the report that matters.

81/ You’ll never hear me say that about Vol. 2 of the Report; that’s as comprehensive as we’re going to get—accepting that (a) Mueller said he didn’t relay *every* relevant instance of potential obstruction but just 10 selected ones, and (b) more obstruction happened post-Report.

 

82/ But on “collusion”—meaning, every federal crime that has as a constituent part what a layperson would call collusive activity—Mueller only considered if Trump was part of a before-the-fact conspiracy with two entities: the GRU or IRA. That’s not what we’re talking about here.

83/ Indeed while much of the evidence—proof pointing toward a single conclusion, whether or not sufficient for conviction—I compiled in PROOF OF COLLUSION overlapped with what appeared in the Mueller Report 5 months later, even PROOF OF COLLUSION didn’t look at *that* conspiracy.

84/ Nor does my upcoming book—PROOF OF CONSPIRACY—consider any before-the-fact GRU or IRA conspiracy. Indeed, it doesn’t even focus on a quid pro quo, but rather “aiding and abetting” an existing conspiracy that was entered into overseas by the leaders of several foreign nations.

85/ So Byrne’s evidence a) is actually new, b) has indicia of reliability, (c) implicates Trump’s family in collusion, (d) must now be the subject of new House hearings, and e) isn’t evidence we would’ve expected to hear earlier—as it’s in an intelligence report we’ve never seen.

 

CONCLUSION/ I wrote such a long thread because this is *confusing* stuffnot because it’s fictional, but for the opposite reason: real crimes (at this level and implicating these particular statutes) are messy, confusing, and have many moving parts. It’s hard to summarize things.

NOTE/ I’ll stay on top of all this; I’m not pretending it’s fully unfolded. We must hear more from Byrne—though we’ve already heard enough for Congress to hold hearings at which Don Jr. and Byrne are asked about a secret 1-hour meeting with Kremlin agents in Nashville/Louisville.

NOTE2/ But I’ll also return to the most harrowing part of this thread: the possibility—as there’s evidence pointing this way—*Trump himself* attended, knew about in advance, or knew of after the fact a meeting between his son and Kremlin agents at an NRA conference in 2015/2016.

NOTE3/ Apologies again for the Knoxville/Nashville typo—addressed in Tweet 14—plaguing tweets 0, 12, and 13 due to my affinity for/ties to Knoxville (see Tweet 14). Note also the clarification that the NRA conference could’ve been either 2015’s or 2016’s. It’s damning either way.

NOTE4/ PROOF OF COLLUSION (Nov. ’18) and PROOF OF CONSPIRACY (Sept. ’19) both have literally thousands of citations, so please understand that this thread doesn’t even graze the surface of the news items we have on these topics. They even get this obscure:

Nashville lawyer who introduced Russian operative to the NRA has ties to Blackburn

SOURCE .

NOTE5/ I think most reading this know this, but in the event you don’t, the CNN report referred to in the first tweet in this thread is the interview that

conducted with Patrick Byrne on the former’s hour-long CNN program tonight. Byrne also (previously) spoke to FNC.

VIDEO/ Feel free to watch Byrne’s odd interview with FNC, in which he reveals the third person his orders came from—per his undisclosed sources—was McCabe. You’ll also see that he’s framing his story in a way that has nothing to do with why it’s important.

VIDEO .

VIDEO2/ Here’s the CNN interview referenced in my first tweet. It’s odd—again—but remember everyone agrees he had a relationship with Butina, the DOJ does believe he did work with the FBI involving Butina, and there’s significant other media corroboration.

VIDEO3/ The FNC video is *must-watch TV* for reasons no one at FNC seems to realize: Byrne says—quite clearly—that the moment the intel he was feeding the FBI indicated Butina was going to infiltrate *Trump’s* campaign rather than *Clinton’s*, “their interest went to zero.” WTF?

VIDEO4/ If Byrne’s FNC story is accurate—and his CNN interview echoes it on this point—he’s saying Strzok, McCabe, and Comey were investigating *Hillary’s emails* when he first came to them, and only *later* agreed to work with him because by then they were investigating Russia.

VIDEO5/ In other words, Byrne’s saying the FBI was *so focused on Clinton* and so focused on *doing their jobs* they almost let his shocking intel about the Trump family slip through their fingers. It was only *new* intel they got that made them want to work with Byrne on Russia.

 

SUMMARY/ Byrne is hard to follow, but put his FNC/CNN interviews together and what he’s saying is…
he’s the reason the Russia probe began. The FBI was working the Clinton case; he told them a Kremlin agent aimed to infiltrate Trump’s team; they began using him to follow up.
SUMMARY 2/ I don’t know what to say: Byrne’s FNC interview is the most incredible interview I’ve seen in three years. In *that* interview he says it was *Trump*—not his son—Butina’s team was going to “take out the back door” to a secret conference off-site from the NRA conference.
SUMMARY 3/ He seems to be describing the very beginning of the very first Russia probe, and doing so in a way that dramatically exculpates—frees from responsibility for wrongdoing—Strzok, McCabe and Comey, as they won’t listen to him about Trump because they’re focused on Clinton.
SUMMARY 4/ When—per Byrne—he’s able to convince Strzok, McCabe, and Comey to finally pay attention to what he’s telling them about the NRA and the Trump campaign being infiltrated, the three men do absolutely nothing wrong: per Byrne, all they do is tell him to keep seeing Butina.
SUMMARY 5/ I guess what I’m saying is—and I can’t believe I’m writing such words—that *if his story is accurate*, Patrick Byrne, future federal witness, represents the END of the conspiracy theory about anti-Trump sentiment at the FBI and the KEY to proving Trump-Russia collusion.
MORE/ There’s no way for me to summarize on Twitter the innumerable ways these facts dovetail with the intelligence evidence everyone will be seeing in PROOF OF CONSPIRACY on September 3, so at this point I’ll bring this to close and just point you there:

ADDITIONAL PATRICK BYRNE INTERVIEW/ Below I’ve done a brief thread (just 10 tweets!) on the interview Seth Hettena (

) did with Patrick Byrne on August 18. There’s still much to process from that interview, but I’ve at least made a start, here:

In this interview with Seth Hettena, who acknowledges Byrne’s oddness as I do, Byrne confirms that he told the FBI about Butina in July of 2015; they ignored him because they were working on the Clinton case; and in July *2016* they began paying attention.

 

The CEO of Overstock Has More to Say about Maria Butina, the FBI … and Don Jr

1/ Strzok, Comey and McCabe greenlighting having agents ask Byrne to re-engage with Butina in July ’16 is consistent with them receiving in spring 2016—from at least 7 allied intel agencies—reports of unusual Trump-Russia activity. Byrne had previously volunteered to assist them.
2/ It’s striking that Byrne says he was trying to feed the FBI intel a long time—but they were ignoring it. Given the Louisville NRA conference was in May 2016, and Butina told Byrne of Torshin meeting Trump/Don Jr. there, Byrne is saying even *that* intel was ignored until July.
3/ If true, this conclusively establishes that the FBI had no interest in *any* information suggesting foreign infiltration of Trump’s campaign until July 2016—by which time they’d received so much intel from trusted intel agencies that they went back and reviewed prior call-ins.
4/ It *also* means that when they reviewed that prior intelligence from Byrne, they found it credible enough to want to use him as an asset (as they had, with success, twice before on wholly unrelated matters). That intelligence would *include* a secret Kremlin-Trump Jr. meeting.
5/ It also means that this information—about Trump Jr. (or possibly Trump) meeting off-site with Torshin at an NRA conference in 2015 or 2016 and then lying about it to Congress (Jr.) or allowing Jr. to lie to Congress (Trump)—was among the intel passed off by Mueller to the FBI.
6/ Mueller clearly put Butina/Torshin in a separate intelligence-evidence bin, hence their absence from his Report. That’d also explain him farming out Butina’s case and giving no indication to anyone outside the FBI Counterintelligence Division that he had intel on Byrne-Butina.
7/ Do I think Buffet convinced Byrne to come forward? I don’t know. It’s bizarre that Byrne went to far-right activist Carter first; it makes me wonder if a Trump ally steered him there. But I don’t pretend to know. It’s just troubling, *especially* as his story was first framed.
8/ Byrne told FNC that Attorney General William Barr has all the evidence he (Byrne) has, which is odd—why wouldn’t Byrne’s evidence go to IG Horowitz? Why would Barr have access to it? Why would FNC be Byrne’s first TV interview? I think someone misread Byrne’s evidence *badly*.
9/ I think what we have here is someone on the right, who knows who—whether tied to Trump or not—wrongly thinking Byrne’s story inculpated Strzok, Comey and McCabe, when in fact it *exculpates* them. But this backfire is even worse—as Byrne’s story *incriminates* Donald Trump Jr.
10/ Just wait until tomorrow or the next day—you’ll see. As has happened each time the far-right tries to push its Strzok conspiracy theory, it’s backfired—with the “new” evidence *exculpating* the FBI and *inculpating* Trump pals. And this is the worst example of that ever. /end
PS/ Another mystery—from his FNC interview now—that Byrne is going to have to unravel is, who was the “bigtime Republican attorney” who he told his tale to in 2018, who in response told him to “go home and shut up”? My money is on Joe DiGenova, but to be clear, we don’t know yet.
PS2/ As an attorney, I feel compelled to add that Byrne tells Hettena he deliberately lied to federal agents he knew were in the midst of a criminal investigation—and that’s a crime. So Byrne—by all rights—should face federal charges here. If Barr does nothing, it tells us a lot.
Image

ADDITIONAL THREAD/ I’ve now done a sort of “after-action report” following up on the events of yesterday (Thursday, August 22), specifically by trying to separate fact from fiction in the fallout to Byrne’s explosive claims. You can find that thread below:

(THREAD) It’s time to separate fact from fiction in the case of Patrick Byrne, Maria Butina, Trump Jr. and a cadre of FBI agents and leaders. This is a still-developing story—but problematic reporting and Byrne’s bad framing are muddling events. I hope you’ll read on and retweet.

Image

 

CLAIM1/ Byrne was “directed” to sleep with Butina by the FBI (CNN).

False. The FBI not only had no authority to “direct” Byrne, but Byrne himself says that he was clearly told that he didn’t have to do anything. The FBI asked if he was willing to do something and he said he was.

CLAIM2/ Byrne’s activities were coordinated by Strzok, McCabe, and Comey (Byrne). Unclear. Byrne keeps changing his story—at one point saying “federal authorities” told him this was so, at another point saying he figured it out from TV, at another point implying he/Strzok spoke.

CLAIM3/ Byrne isn’t credible (many folks).

Unclear. We know he/Butina had a relationship; we know he’d worked with the FBI before; we know—if true—FBI records will confirm his story; we know DOJ found some of his story credible. It’s his odd demeanor convincing people otherwise.

 

CLAIM4/ There was no “second meeting” between Don Jr. and Kremlin agents Butina/Torshin; Don and Torshin had only a chance May 2016 encounter in Louisville. False—apparently. In other words, it *does* appear there was such a meeting. This one will take a few tweets to unwrap.

CLAIM 4-2/ According to Don Jr. and Torshin, all that happened is that they—by chance—were sitting near each other at an NRA dinner and they briefly exchanged inconsequential pleasantries. This bears no relationship/similarity to any meeting Butina has ever told any person about.

CLAIM 4-3/ What Butina told Byrne is that at 2PM on one of the days of the May 2016 Louisville NRA Conference, Butina and her team planned to take Trump Jr. out the back door of his hotel and bring him to her—Butina’s—hotel for a 1-hour meeting. The meeting was to be clandestine.

CLAIM 4-4/ Moreover, unlike the story Torshin and Trump Jr. later told—Torshin, who subsequently fled the country; Trump Jr., who subsequently lied to Congress on this and other mattersButina was, per Butina, slated to be *present* at the meeting between Torshin and Trump’s son.

CLAIM 4-5/ Byrne is *unwavering* in saying Butina told him this was her plan, and *unwavering* in saying it was his understanding the meeting *did* happen (leading to his *anger* that the FBI had “let it happen”). When Butina *told* him the meeting had occurred is still in doubt.

 

CLAIM 4-6/ Byrne says he stopped seeing Butina in April 2016, so they weren’t together (or in communication) at the time the planned May 2016 meeting would’ve occurred. But he reconnected with her after July 2016, and now says the meeting occurred, so she must have told him then.

CLAIM 4-7/ Butina’s attorneys are now saying there was no second meeting; as ever, statements made by paid advocates for a Kremlin agent who knows it would be an international scandal if it was revealed that she and others secretly met with Trump Jr. can be and must be *ignored*.

CLAIM 4-8/ Much more reliable are statements made against her own interest—because she was revealing sensitive operational details of a Kremlin operation—Butina made to Byrne in the context of a) a romantic relationship, b) trying to establish a trusting relationship with a mark.

CLAIM 4-9/ Of course, far more reliable than *that* is corroborating evidence: Don Jr., Butina, and Torshin were in the place Butina says they were on the date in question; Don Jr. and Torshin admit to contact; we know from other reporting that Torshin wanted a “second meeting.”

CLAIM 4-10/ We know Torshin is under criminal investigation in multiple jurisdictions and was Butina’s handler in a course of conduct in which Butina was a covert agent of influence; we know he’s fled; we know he took numerous actions to secretly liaison with Trump team members.

 

CLAIM 5/ Byrne’s story is “crazy” (Jim Comey).

First, we *have* to note that the *whole Trump-Russia story* as we now know it—while 100% true, per Mueller—sounds crazy when you first hear it. But Comey isn’t actually, making a *blanket* denial of Byrne’s highly unusual claims.

CLAIM 5-1/ It appears what Comey is denying is that *he* oversaw FBI agents’ contacts with Byrne—or that *he* in any way directed Byrne to have a relationship with Butina. It’s entirely possible for both Comey and Byrne to be right—as Byrne seems to be guessing about some things.

CLAIM 5-2/ Not only did Byrne *only* have contact with field agents—it *doesn’t* appear he had contact with FBI leadership—when you actually listen to the facts of his story, rather than his own misguided framing, it’s not clear… well… what the field agents *asked* him to do.

CLAIM 5-3/ From July ’15 to July ’16, Byrne was voluntarily in a relationship with Butina that he voluntarily reported on to FBI field agents. He says when he asked the agents to greenlight the relationship they did—but they were just declining to force him to end a relationship.

CLAIM 5-4/ It *would’ve* been a scandal if agents *had* told Byrne to end the relationship in late 2015—as it would suggest they saw Butina as dangerous *but* weren’t willing to investigate her further. *And* they’d be interceding in Byrne’s situation in a way they’d have to own.

CLAIM 5-5/ So the supposed “greenlight” appears to be FBI agents saying, yeah, you can keep us informed if you like, in the event anything untoward happens, but we’re not going to stand in the way of your romantic relationship. That appears to be all that happened at that point.

CLAIM 5-6/ What Byrne is *angry* about is that he then kept feeding the FBI agents information—which presumably they memorializedbut that they didn’t take any action, which frankly is *exactly* the same reaction Christopher Steele encountered, and actually looks bad for *Trump*.

CLAIM 5-7/ Trump and his allies’ conspiracy theory is that there was a massive FBI conspiracy to destroy him—but only if he won the presidency, which they took no action to prevent; follow *that* logic—but Byrne/Steele both suggest the FBI *ignored* evidence of Trump-Russia ties.

CLAIM 5-8/ Coupled with the FBI *lying to the New York Times* in the days before the election about what they knew of Trump-Russia ties, what we’re seeing is a *consistent* pattern of the FBI *hiding* what it knows about Trump and Russia rather than weaponizing it in any fashion.

 

CLAIM 5-9/ Even so, nothing in Byrne’s story is even arguably “crazy”—to go back to Comey’s claim—until July 2016, when the FBI, inspired by other evidence of Trump-Russia ties, asks Byrne if he’s *willing* to not just continue his relationship but continue having it be romantic.

CLAIM 5-10/ But here’s the thing: Byrne was already in the relationshipwhich is confirmed. It’d previously been romantic—which is confirmed. So in what way was the FBI even asking Byrne to do something he wasn’t already doing? It’s unclear. I think there’s an easier explanation:

CLAIM 5-11/ The easier explanation is that in July 2016 the agents communicating with Byrne told him that—in fact—Butina *was* potentially a danger to the US, at which point—presumably—Byrne would’ve wanted to break things off. The FBI simply asked him to consider not doing that.

CLAIM 5-12/ And that is, I think, the sum total of the far-less-interesting “Strzok-McCabe-Comey” part of the story—Byrne is offended that the FBI even *asked* him to continue seeing Maria Butina after the FBI informed him it was, in fact, worried that she was a foreign agent.

CLAIM 5-13/ But the fact is, the FBI request for Byrne to consider continuing to see Butina came in *July 2016* if it came at all: at a time when—as Byrne says the FBI told him—they were dealing with an extraordinary national security situation. It was *not* some concocted plot.

CLAIM 5-14/ I think, therefore, that Comey can be *correct* that Byrne’s framing of events is “crazy” even as his response doesn’t do anything to contradict the core facts: the Byrne-Butina relationship; Byrne-FBI contact; Butina’s claims—to Byrne—that she and Torshin met Don Jr.

 

CLAIM 6/ AG Barr intercepted Byrne’s evidence, even though it should have gone to the DOJ’s IG—Horowitz—and Barr should’ve had nothing to do with it.

Unclear. Byrne says that Barr knows the entirety of his (Byrne’s) story, but it’s not clear if he’s presuming that or knows that.

CLAIM 7/ Byrne “set up” persons “X, Y, and Z”—who he appears to now identify, respectively, as McCabe, Strzok, and Comey—for federal “felony charges.”
False. There’s zero evidence any of these men did anything wrong or were even involved in the field agents’ contacts with Byrne.
CLAIM 8/ Byrne himself committed federal felonies.
True—apparently. Byrne confessed, to journalist Seth Hettena, that he deliberately and repeatedly lied to federal investigators on the subject of a federal criminal investigation that he knew was ongoing. That’s a federal crime.
CLAIM 9/ Byrne was somehow coaxed into telling this story by Trump allies.
Unclear. Byrne says Warren Buffet—a mentor—is the person who finally convinced him to talk, though he also spoke to a “bigtime Republican attorney” who told him *not* to. But that’s where things get odd.
CLAIM 9-1/ Byrne also is cagey about who told him (almost certainly falsely) Strzok, McCabe, and Comey were overseeing his situation. These three men happen to be Trump’s three biggest enemies—in Trump’s view. Byrne also implies that *watching Trump allies on TV* got him to talk.
CLAIM 9-2/ It’s also unclear why Barr—who’s been acting as Trump’s lawyer, not the Attorney General—had access to info that should’ve been immediately referred to the IG. And it’s not clear why, if Byrne confessed to federal felonies in April, he hasn’t—it’s August—been arrested.
CLAIM 9-3/ It’s also unclear why Byrne’s first interview was with far-right “journalist” Sara Carterwho’s pushed the “Spygate” hoax Trump allies are desperately hoping will eclipse his crimesand why his second and third interviews went to Trump-allied Fox News and Fox Business.
CLAIM 9-4/ It’s also unclear why Byrne has had so much contact with the lawyers for a Kremlin agent (Butina) that his story now seems aimed at advancing a false narrative—aided by Byrne’s own bad framingthat would be exculpatory for Butina and, more importantly, for the Kremlin.
CLAIM 9-5/ Byrne also talks like someone who was seduced byand is still dazzled by—Butina. He offers glowing praise of her character and abilities, even saying she should be Russia’s president. So all this feels off—like the broader agenda that pushed Byrne forward is political.
SUMMARY1/ It’s possible that, due to Byrne’s bad framing—which seems wrapped up in others’ political agenda(s)—Byrne is telling the truth about the core facts of his story, many of which dovetail with other evidence, but simply drawing bad conclusions about what those facts mean.
SUMMARY2/ The facts Byrne offers about Butina’s Kremlin connections and carried-out plans to secretly collude with the Trump family are what’s earth-shattering here; the rest is just noise, confusion, and bad framing. Congress now needs to follow up on *only* the facts here. /end

IF ALL THIS WAS NOT ENOUGH TO CONVINCE YOU OF:

  1. THE DANGER AMERICA IS IN
  2. THE DANGER THE WORLD IS IN
  3. THAT THERE IS NO POLITICAL ANSWER…

THEN MAYBE THIS WILL HELP:

THERE ARE OTHER INVESTIGATIONS GOING ON.

AND ANOTHER POLITICIAN/PERSON IS NOT THE ANSWER.

THE ANSWER????

TURN TO

TRUST IN

FOLLOW COMPLETELY

THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. PERIOD.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.

 

The Answer?

Though the above is meant to be funny (Author’s note: If it weren’t so scary it would be funny), it does not signal the true start of America’s descent into Liberalism, which goes back to the Liberalization of America’s universities, colleges, and so-called elite academia in the 1870’s. For brevity we will concern ourselves with what marked America’s first shift(s) as a nation toward Liberalism in 1913 and bring it forward to today via a timeline.

1913- President Woodrow Wilson (a racist, globalist, and Socialist) is the “father” of the IRS, INCOME TAX, The Federal Reserve bank, and The League of Nations, which would then give way to The United Nations. Wilson’s tax and economic policies led in part to The Great Depression.

1923-1929- CALVIN COOLIDGE. A small, Constitutionally restricted government, and tax CUTTER. Truly a Constitutional-Conservative and a silent version of the later Ronald Reagan. Greatly slowed the march toward Marxism/Liberalism.

1929- Herbert Hoover, another Liberal, Big Government President, exacerbated Wilson’s taxing with his Big Government spending. Hoover began the “alphabet soup” government bureaus that plague us to. This spending REQUIRED MORE $$$, hence taxes went UP…the logical application of Liberalism is ruin.

1933- FDR. What Wilson and Hoover began FDR put on steroids and applied even more vehemently. More bureaus, more government spending, to “Liberal Logic” necessitated MORE taxation. Truman continued this during his term.

1953- Eisenhower slowed the march down, BUT his “Super Highway” program, AND his continuing of ALL “New Deal” programs, AND expanding them did keep America’s march into Liberal ruin going. Eisenhower described himself as a “Progressive Moderate”.

1961-1969- JFK and LBJ sped the Marxist march back up…A LOT. Especially Johnson with his “Great Society”, which was a warmed over FDR “New Deal”. In short: Liberal answer is ALWAYS MORE GOVERNMENT…ALWAYS.

1969-1976- NIXON FORD…Minimum Wage, The 3 Phases of Wage and Price FREEZES, established the EPA…more and more BIG GOVERNMENT MEDDLING.

1977-1981- CARTER. A BIG pusher of Affirmative Action, aka Race & Gender based quotas; Carter also instituted the Cabinet level positions of the Depts. of Energy and Education, more reasons to spend $$$, hence to RAISE taxes. Carter’s energy policy included government price control a’la Nixon’s wage and price freezes…all of which are, of course, Liberal, and FAILED.

1981-1989- REAGAN. Even more than Eisenhower greatly slowed the march towards more Marxism, more akin to Coolidge. Reagan’s tax CUTS help bolster the economy, create jobs, and bring in an economic boom. Reagan had to fight with a wholly Liberal/Democrat Congress, but was still able to slow the march down.

1989-2000- GEORGE H.W. BUSH AND CLINTON. Bush sr. broke a major campaign promise of “No New Taxes” and raised taxes a LOT. Clinton raised taxes, weakened our National Security, and tried to push through Nationalised Health Care, aka Marxism. Oh, and Lewinski.

2001-2008 GEORGE W. BUSH. I believe a sincere man, meant well, BUT was economically worse than his dad with bail outs/T.A.R.P, NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND; the Democrat created Dot.com collapse and housing collapse made things economically worse. And when Liberal ideas fail, as they can ONLY do, the answer? MORE LIBERALISM. Ugh!

2008-2016- OBAMA. Obama-Care. The SINGLE BIGGEST Marxist, BIG Government grab EVER. And Obama’s CONSTANTLY apologizing to America’s enemies, and cold-shouldering our Allies. Obama though more polite, civil, educated, and refined than Trump was actually the predecessor of what was to come.

2016-present- TRUMP. Wow! Take ALL the racism of Wilson and LBJ, ALL the Big Government “solutions” of FDR, LBJ, and BHO, add ALL the lying and corruption of Nixon and Clinton, throw in a short attention span, heinously bad temper,and the IQ of a clump of dirt, and you have Trump. For more detail on Trump that is deeply and thoroughly documented see HERE .

FOR MORE ON HOW BAD IT IS NOW SEE:

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE

HERE and

HERE . This last one I wrote originally in 2015…NOT ONE PERSON HAS EVEN TRIED TO REFUTE IT, ANSWER IT, OR DENY IT. NOT. ONE.

All this has been well and deeply documented.
WHY ISN’T ANYTHING BEING DONE???

 

And….

MY QUESTION:

WHY, AND HOW, DOES ANYONE STILL DEFEND AND SUPPORT TRUMP???

Donald Trump Has Made More Than 12,000 False or Misleading Claims Since Becoming President

=======

These are the Trump associates who’ve pleaded guilty in the Mueller probe

The report is complete, but it’s possible more guilty pleas could come after further investigations.

========

A list of the alleged and admitted crimes undertaken by people associated with the Trump campaign

=======

TRUMP’S WORLD STILL FACES 16 KNOWN CRIMINAL PROBES

=======

It’s no coincidence that Trump is surrounded by criminals

========

Trump and Republicans and their pals who are Pedophiles and Sexual Abusers

PREDATORS TRUMP DEFENDED

• Rob Porter
• Steve Wynn
• Roy Moore
• Steve Bannon
• Bill O’Reilly
• Corey Lewandowski
• Roger Ailes
• Andrew Puzder
• Mike Tyson
• Donald Trump

“Trust me I will only hire the best people. BELIEVE ME! They will be great.”

=======

HOW can any sane person, Conservative or Liberal, ESPECIALLY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE A CHRISTIAN, defend and support THIS??!!!!

I’m going to speak to Conservatives now, primarily those who claim to be Christian.
HOW do YOU defend THIS?!!

Trump: ‘I Am the Chosen One’

Trump has snubbed an ally over some whacked-out fantasy to buy Greenland, told Jews who vote for Democrats that they’re disloyal, and referred to himself as the Chosen One. I eagerly await GOP loyalists saying with a straight face they think this is a stable, normal person.

-Tom Nichols, Twitter Patriot.

Skeptical? Don’t believe me?

Here, this is from Trump’s own Twitter account:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

“Thank you to Wayne Allyn Root for the very nice words. “President Trump is the greatest President for Jews and for Israel in the history of the world, not just America, he is the best President for Israel in the history of the world...and the Jewish people in Israel love him…. ….like he’s the King of Israel. They love him like he is the second coming of God…But American Jews don’t know him or like him. They don’t even know what they’re doing or saying anymore. It makes no sense! But that’s OK, if he keeps doing what he’s doing, he’s good for….. ..all Jews, Blacks, Gays, everyone. And importantly, he’s good for everyone in America who wants a job.” Wow!

================

The bizarre-even-by-Trump-standards past 72 hours, explained

From an ill-fated attempt to purchase Greenland to God comparisons, the past three days have been a lot.

By 

President Donald Trump speaking with his hand held up in the sign for “okay.”

President Donald Trump repeatedly threatened to release ISIS fighters in Europe as a form of punishment for countries like Germany and France; said he’s strongly considering trying to change the Constitution by executive order (it doesn’t work that way); indicated he hasn’t ruled out trying to illegally serve more than two terms; rewrote history during comments about Russia’s expulsion from the G8 that framed the situation in the most pro-Kremlin manner possible; and, despite five draft deferments, joked about giving himself the Medal of Honor.

That was Wednesday. And that’s an incomplete list of all the outlandish stuff Trump said on that day alone.

 

Any of the aforementioned statements would’ve generated major scandals coming from the mouth of any other president. But given the week Trump has been having, they arguably didn’t even make the cut of the five most WTF things he’s said since his New Jersey vacation ended on Monday.

Even in the context of a presidency that has regularly veered into surreal territory, the 72-hour period from Monday through Wednesday stood out. From a silly, ill-fated attempt to purchase Greenland that turned into a diplomatic row to amplifying a conspiracy theorist who compared him with God, Trump seems to be out there more than ever before.

Here’s a chronological rundown of just some of the lowlights.

Trump gets mad when the Danish PM accurately describes his effort to buy Greenland as “absurd”

The president’s desire to purchase Greenland from Denmark — even though it isn’t for sale — started off humorously enough. Trump even managed to poke some fun at himself over the whole thing on Twitter on Monday.

View image on Twitter

 

But shortly after Trump posted that tweet, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen dismissed the idea of selling the resource-rich island to America as “absurd.” That seemed to wound Trump’s robust sense of pride, causing him to lash out.

Out of nowhere, Trump on Tuesday escalated things by announcing that in light of Frederiksen’s comments, he decided to cancel his planned state visit to Denmark — one he reportedly invited himself to in the first place

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) noted that the chain of events was worthy of a Simpsons episode.

Little known fact: the current CNN breaking news headline “President Trump Postpones Denmark Trip After Prime Minster Refuses to Sell Greenland to United States”, was, word for word, in a 1995 episode of The Simpsons.

And yet there was more to come. Trump took things to another level on Wednesday, calling Frederiksen’s comments “nasty.”

“She shouldn’t treat the United States that way, by saying, ‘absurd.’ That’s not the right word to use, ‘absurd,’” Trump said, adding that he thinks he knows Denmark “well” because “I have many people from Denmark who live in the United States.”

[NOTE: Trump said “I have many…” I?? The U.S. is NOT Trump’s property!!!!]

Before Wednesday was over, Trump was attacking NATO in general and Denmark in particular for not spending as much as he wants them to on defense. What started as farce had turned into a diplomatic debacle.

Trump says he’s “the chosen one” and compares himself to the king of Israel. No, really.

In recent weeks, Trump has tried to score political points off Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib’s (D-MI) criticisms of Israel in an extremely misleading manner by saying things like they “hate Israel and all Jewish people.”

Trump seems to think that in light of Omar and Tlaib, no American Jew should vote for a Democrat. And on Tuesday, he said so in a way that invoked the very “dual loyalties” trope Republicans spent so much time criticizing Omar over earlier this year.

“I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat — I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty,” he said.

The president’s accusation that the majority of American Jews are either dumb or traitorous did not go over well. But on Wednesday morning, he made it even worse by quoting commentary from far-right conspiracy theorist Wayne Allyn Root in which Root asserted that Jews in Israel regard Trump as something akin to “the King of Israel” or “the second coming of God.” (Jews do not in fact believe in the second coming of God. [NOTE: Jews await the coming of Messiah, to them it is the first coming])

During his Wednesday afternoon media availability, Trump indicated that he’s taking Root’s comparison of him to divine figures more seriously than you might think. At one point he paused, looked toward the heavens, and said, “I am the chosen one.”

SOURCE .

======

LET ME ASK THIS AGAIN IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:

HOW can any sane person, Conservative or Liberal, ESPECIALLY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE A CHRISTIAN, defend and support THIS??!!!!

IF ALL THIS WAS NOT ENOUGH TO CONVINCE YOU OF:

  1. THE DANGER AMERICA IS IN
  2. THE DANGER THE WORLD IS IN
  3. THAT THERE IS NO POLITICAL ANSWER…

THEN MAYBE THIS WILL HELP:

THERE ARE OTHER INVESTIGATIONS GOING ON.

AND ANOTHER POLITICIAN/PERSON IS NOT THE ANSWER.

THE ANSWER????

TURN TO

TRUST IN

FOLLOW COMPLETELY

THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. PERIOD.

 -Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer.